Difference between revisions of "ISFDB:Community Portal"

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Alison Scott disambiguation: explain my thinking)
(→‎Gary Allen: new section)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{isfdb-comm-portal-header}}
 
{{isfdb-comm-portal-header}}
  
== David St. Clair ==
+
== Post-submission pages for Edit Publication submissions updated ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?4619; He wrote a lot of dopey non-fiction books in the 70s and 80s about psychic powers and exorcisms and whatnot, but the etsy.com page I just found for his 1989 book Bloodline says he's turning his hand to fiction. Mine to Kill's Corgi ed., https://www.ebay.co.uk/p/91790613, says "true account" on the cover and the cover of The Devil Rocked Her Cradle on ISFDB also says "account". They're non-fiction (although the Bart ed. of Mine To Kill on ISFDB has different copy on the cover that tries to make it look like a novel) and so probably should be deleted; he's certainly not above-the-threshold. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:55, 1 July 2022 (EDT)
+
All "Modified Content" tables displayed on EditPub post-submission pages have been updated. Table cells which used to say "Current" now display a link to the Title ID about to be modified. Multiple yellow warnings are now displayed correctly and include the names of new/alternate name/disambiguated authors.
  
== Reviews by Dave Langford (alternate name) ==
+
This pretty much completes the cleanup of post-submission pages. As always, if you come across errors or anything unexpected, please let me know. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:30, 30 March 2023 (EDT)
  
The summary bibliography for alternate name {{a|Dave Langford}} lists more than 100 Reviews.
+
: The software has been tweaked to display a yellow warning if a non-existing series, publication series or publisher matches a disambiguated record of the same type. For example, this yellow warning will be displayed if a submission uses "The Rules" in the "Series" field because we already have [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?62626 The Rules (F. T. Lukens)] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?55408 The Rules (Aaron Oster)] on file. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:26, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
  
And it does not display the note "Alternate Name. See: David Langford (or view all titles published using this alternate name)" that I expect to see.
+
== Several Problems ==
  
Meanwhile, for David Langford, I see no way to "toggle" from the default view to one that lists only works we know to be published under that canonical name. Is that a feature we have lost? or (more likely, yes, of course) a phantom memory of some years-ago wishful thought? --[[User:Pwendt|Pwendt]]|[[User talk:Pwendt|talk]] 13:18, 1 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5590099; I was going to cancel this since nobody came to an agreement about what the publisher should be but when I looked at it I realized the note makes no sense because it describes a 1977 date for this 1983 book, also edit history's 2014 entry is offset from the rest so there seems to be a problem there, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:36, 1 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:When all titles under a pseudonym are already varianted to the canonical name, the page remains empty of titles and the software will display "Alternate Name. See: David Langford (or view all titles published using this alternate name)". If there are still titles not yet varianted, as with all these White Dwarf reviews, it will display only "Used As Alternate Name By: David Langford", so all these reviews will need to be varianted to David Langford. AFAICR I think it has always been this way. ;) [[User:PeteYoung|PeteYoung]] 09:23, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Resurrected Holmes ==
  
:: That's right. Spot checking some of the "Dave Langford" reviews, I see that they come from recently entered "White Dwarf" issues, e.g. [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?897890 White Dwarf, December 1984], which was entered on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pub_history.cgi?897890 2022-05-08]. They just need to be varianted. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:04, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?33870; I made some edits, still pending, adding March to the title date, correcting the title to "The Resurrected Holmes" since whoever entered info here went by the cover title and not the title page plus I imported the "Giant Rat" story in the HC into the TP. The contents are on OL and there's an Archive.org copy of the TP; if anyone knows which of the contents are genre or were written by authors above-the-threshold they may want to flesh the records out, but be aware that 1 story, R. Lupoff's "The Adventure of the Boulevard Assassin", was reprinted in his collection Claremont Tales II as "The Adventures of the Boulevard Assassin" so a variant will be needed; unlike the few other non-genre stories in that collection nobody entered a note saying where it originally came from even though it says so on the copyright page. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:25, 1 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Science Fiction Encyclopedia Links ==
+
== Introduction Title Question ==
I have been working on this project, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/edit/sfe3_authors.cgi. About half of the original task is done but many of the remaining entries are matches on pseudonyms and  I am not sure what is the best way to process them, if at all. [[User:Swfritter|swfritter]] 16:15, 1 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
: SFE's pseudonym stubs can still be useful as sources of pseudonym attribution, so I would link them on our side. If we have the same pseudonym on file, then I would add its SFE link under the pseudonym record. If we don't have the pseudonym -- which can happen for non-genre pseudonyms -- I would add it to the canonical name. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:19, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
+
An editor submitted [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5626362 this edit] changing the titles of the two introductions in {{P|602865|this publication}}.  For each introduction, there is the word Introduction in a large font over an author credit (e.g. "by China Miéville") in a significantly smaller font.  Each essay is also signed with the author's name at the end of the text.  I had originally considered the byline to be a simple author credit and thus titled each essay simply "Introduction (The Left Hand of Darkness)".  However, the signature at the end gives me pause.  I think I still agree with my original title, but I see how it could be interpreted differently.  Also if we include the byline as part of the title, should we still disambiguate.  What do other folks think?  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 08:00, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: I consider the byline to be just an author credit as well. We already have the author in the author field, adding “by author” to the title feels like an overkill. If we decide to keep it in the title, it still needs disambiguation IMO - it is as generic as Introduction on the author’s page after all. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 12:37, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::If I may explain how I arrived at the proposed titles. Usually there is only one novel introduction and where that is the case, it is simply titled "Introduction" and may or may not be signed. Here, we have two introductions (the Miéville one being added for this Masterworks II edition). To make it clear to readers whose introduction each is, the publishers have extended the title to include the author's name (probably for the first time) and, for our purposes, have created a variant title. In the notes I have tried to make it clear that the title is as it appears above the work (as the titling rules require) and not just a whim on my part. That we also have the author in the author field I consider as just a system function. I added the disambiguation for the purposes of the author's page, as noted above. Hope that helps. Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 15:16, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: I still do not think we should add it as part of the title - we never add the author name to the title unless it is incorporated cleanly and a byline is not an incorporation for me. I understand how you came up with the titles but I just do not think that we should be doing that. Two introductions or an introduction and a foreword are essentially the same thing from our perspective - but you are proposing we handle one of these differently from the other because they happen to both be called introductions. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 13:55, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::I agree with Annie. It's not part of the title. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:38, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::Thanks for those answers, but I'm left unclear as to what you mean by "unless it is incorporated cleanly and a byline is not an incorporation". I think I get the meaning but can you expand on that a little. Does it follow that if the author's name appears above the essay it should always be treated as a byline and therefore ignored? Thanks, Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 22:23, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::: Unless it is part of the title organically, the author name does not get added to the title regardless of where it is on the page - below, above, in between the two lines of a title, led or not led by “by”. Otherwise as most title pages out there have the author name, one can take your argument to the extreme and make a case that we always add the author name to the title of stories, books, essays and so on because it is on the page after all; your case is not different from that really even if you are restricting it to a limited usecase in your mind - there is no reason to mad an exception here. So “Isaac Asimov Presents” keeps the name as part of the title because it cannot be separated. Or “Neil Gaiman Talks About Things”.  Similarly to how we do not keep a series title inside of a title for example. We are not ignoring it - we just have a different place for it in our record so we use that. Just like we do with series names.  [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 00:26, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::::Thanks for taking the time to explain that clearly. As I couldn't find anything in the help pages, it's been nagging at me :) Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 19:46, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
  
::That was my inclination. It is kind of nice to see items disappear from the list after they have been processed.--[[User:Swfritter|swfritter]] 16:15, 3 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== F. Cantor ==
  
::: Keep in mind that, as the report header says, "this report lets moderators ignore SFE author URLs." Once you have a list of SFE author pages which we don't need to link to, please feel free to post it here and a moderator will "ignore" them. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 21:47, 3 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?26927; People here have been working on Silverberg's anthology Mirror of Infinity, cover artist Fred(erick) Cantor only has credits for that and The Exorcist, cover image of which has been used countless times on later editions, but he also has 1 interior credit for a cover of John Farris novel All Heads Turn... but there's no cover credit on any edition on ISFDB. So which cover did he do? Also, there's 1 credit here for Frederik Cantor for a reprint edition of Exorcist that he didn't do the cover for, it being just an image from the film, so that is something to look into, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:04, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
  
Meanwhile, I am taking a little Covid break. Not severe, but I definitely have a little Covid fog.--[[User:Swfritter|swfritter]] 16:15, 1 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Conan ==
  
: Sorry to hear that! Hopefully things will get better soon and it won't have any side effects. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:19, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://archive.org/details/conan00howa; https://archive.org/details/conan0000unse; One very old Archive.org upload, one fairly new, I'm not sure about the Ace edition because there's no updated date on the copyright page, whether it's the '77 or '79 (with illustrations) edition, neither is PV so if anyone wants to do something with them, also that British edition's notes are unclear, long-gone PV says reprinted 1977 but wrote reprint line from copyright page below that so I don't know if they had an edition that actually said 1977 because the Archive.org copy doesn't, I don't know the history of these endless Conan reprints at all but I know others here do so they may want to do something with this, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:38, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:: Just on the subject of that report, could it be extended to look for SFE links associated with records other than authors?  [https://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/star_trek_picard This link] is currently at #1633 in the list, and I'd added it to [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?57687 the relevant series page] ages ago, but it still shows up in the report.  I guess non-author SFE pages are less important to get in the database, but it would seem preferable to add them where relevant, rather than mark them as ignored, I'd have thought?
+
== Brian Williams ==
:: (Although I do note that the SFE link on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?34988 this series page] - which I'd previously moved from an author page to the series, as the author/editor in question now has a proper SFE page - doesn't show on the report, so maybe things are more complicated than I thought? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 13:02, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::: There are a couple of things to consider here.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?8790; I just made an edit adding link to copy of Vampirium, one of those Lone Wolf game books, and the cover artist, Brian Williams, was also the interior artist but that wasn't entered so I did it. Now the problem is he died in 2010 but there are multiple entries on ISFDB after that date; I believe this guy, https://fantlab.ru/autor13980, wrote those series novels while the deceased was the artist, but the problem with that is the last 3 interior art credits are for books written by the novelist, implying that he illustrated some of his own books. Then there's the question of which Williams wrote the 2 70's letters and the 5 short stories spanning early 80's to 2013. Who knows which one did those 3 computer magazine stories but "Tie Your Own Rope" was done for a White Wolf anthology, a well-known gaming company, so maybe the artist wrote a story now and then, but then the last story was written for a disturbing sex anthology that I remember writing about on these boards once before, and I can't picture either one of these Williams writing a story for that, especially since the artist died a few years before it was published, so that's possibly a third Williams. There's also the fact that while the first 4 cover credits are gaming-related as is Vampirium, 2 others are for gay-themed anthologies and the last is for an obscure American horror magazine. Note also another Brian Williams, a comic artist, is on ISFDB being interviewed (possibly the same guy as the above artist except the interview is dated more than 6 months after he died; different guy or long lag time before publication?) and there's another Williams who wrote a dragon fantasy novel in 2018 from a UK self-publisher so not likely to be by the above novelist whose books are from major publishers. So untangling is needed if anyone is interested. EDIT: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5627339; This one was missing both cover artist and interior artist so whenever the artist is separated into his own record I have a feeling there'll be a lot more books than the 2 I edited that are missing his credits here. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:29, 2 April 2023 (EDT)
  
::: First, the ISFDB/SFE reconciliation report is supposed to be rebuilt nightly by scanning the SFE categories listed on [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/category/everyone this SFE page of "people" categories]: artist, author, critic, etc. Their [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/category/all full list of categories] includes awards, comics, fandom-related entries, films, games, etc. Once we catch up with the "people" categories, we can explore other categories. "Award" looks particularly promising. "Game" may also be of interest since we have quite a few fiction series based on game worlds.
+
== Lost story, no title, no author, only rough memories of the plot ==
  
::: Second, SFE's recent (October 2021) migration from HTTP to HTTPS required certain software changes on our side. Some were easy to implement, but others can't be put into effect until we upgrade our server. This means that we are working with an out of date version of SFE's data. (We'll be able to catch up once our server migration is finished.) Since I don't see https://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/star_trek_picard listed as part of a "people category", I assume that it comes from an older version of the SFE data. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:49, 2 July 2022 (EDT)
+
This is set WAY WAY WAY far in the future. The location of Earth has been lost in time. Horses and dogs are coequals with humans in society. A horse approaches a young and wealthy woman and offers her something amazing if she'll help him find and restore old Earth. To cut it short, he lets her have a horseback ride. She falls in love with it, and becomes INSANELY wealthy, sends out scout ships, finds Earth, terraforms it, and hands it over to the non-human members of society. The horse gives her another ride and they all live happily ever after.
 +
Sorry to not be more eloquent. I just finished a 12 hour shift at the ambulance company's dispatch center where I work.
 +
Thank you very very much.
 +
Sak1776 <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Sak1776|Sak1776]] ([[User talk:Sak1776|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sak1776|contribs]]) .</small> 20:39, 2 April 2023‎ (EDT)
 +
:If no one can answer your question here, we have a few other sites that can help listed at [[ISFDB:FAQ#I need help finding a book]]. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:00, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I checked around with a few people and they suggested it was "[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?63400 Dreams Done Green]" by Alan Dean Foster. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:25, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Yes this is definitely "Dream Done Dream" by Foster.[[User:Zybahn|Zybahn]] ([[User talk:Zybahn|talk]]) 23:14, 3 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Red Skel(e)ton ==
+
== Nordon ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?326759; Someone uploaded a copy of this anthology to Archive.org in 2015; the first author's last name was misspelled, and Supernatural Index where contents were entered from by previous editor spells it properly, so I assume it was just a mistake and I fixed it. More importantly, the title page seems to suggest the title should be Red Skeleton (or maybe Red Skel(e)ton), and it is Skeleton in many places on the web; what do you think? Also, there is much (creepy) interior art; does anyone know if it's also by the cover artist? --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:32, 4 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=leisure+b&type=Publisher; Many of the books on ISFDB as by Leisure Books are actually by Leisure Books / Dorchester Publishing so when I come across them I fix them, but for some reason 5 books on ISFDB are under the Nordon name. The problem with that is all the early Leisure books before they hooked up with Dorchester in the mid-80's say published by Nordon on the copyright page (93 of them were found by doing a text search on Archive.org); the Dorchester name is used here to differ the later books from the earlier ones so there's no need to do that for the early books. Would there be any objection to me changing those 5 to just Leisure Books so they merge with all the hundreds of other books by that publisher here? Only 1 of the Nordon books is PV (by MLB). --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:30, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
:I think it should be "Skeleton".  Note that LOC has it that way.  Also, if you look at the scan, both the title page and the running headers spell it Skeleton with the second "e" slightly lighter and dropped a bit, but still clearly "Skeleton".  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 11:52, 4 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Yellow Mark ==
+
== Wasteworld ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5352499; Does anyone know if that URL can be fixed in order not to display that warning? I entered the other Sunset book by Jakes, Brak, with an Amazon cover that's not so good but at least there was one, but this audiobook's cover could only be found by me on Goodreads and it does start with an Amazon URL but mod apparently doesn't agree, although there are countless cover images on ISFDB with the same warning and yet their covers still display properly. I prefer to save uploading covers to Wiki for rare books, or those with badly scanned or damaged covers, neither of which applies in this case. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:53, 4 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?19205; 4th one's a chapbook but 1st one has same page count so shouldn't it be so, too? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:11, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:I suggest you ping Ahasuerus.  It could be the validator needs a little tweaking.  It probably doesn't like the periods in the "compressed.photo.goodreads.com" part -- usually periods separate Amazon's formatting directives -- but that's just a Male Answer Syndrome WAG. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 18:43, 4 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Expired Link ==
  
:: Our software currently recognizes one stable pattern for Amazon-hosted "S" image URLs: *.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amzn-author-media-prod/ followed by 26 letters or digits and ending with ".gif", ".png" or ".jpg".
+
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?34362 This publication] has a note regarding the cover art followed by a link. The flickr page being directed to no longer exists--in such a case can I simply remove the note or is it customary to notify a PVer? I do not know which one had left the note. Thanks.  [[User:Zybahn|Zybahn]] ([[User talk:Zybahn|talk]]) 22:18, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:It's Mavmaramis's link - I've notified him. Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 23:22, 4 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Before deleting a link, see if you can find if archived in the web archive. If not, then all we can do is to delete it. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 11:07, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::https://www.flickr.com/photos/markfullerdillon/52607643318; Is that what you're looking for? Also, if you replace old link can you also correct the 2 misspelled words in the note? I've done so for many of this editor's notes. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:11, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::: Thanks to all. I've made the corrections & submitted. [[User:Zybahn|Zybahn]] ([[User talk:Zybahn|talk]]) 21:55, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:: The "S" URL linked above is "images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1327999593i/9621932.jpg", which is very different from what's expected. Do we know if this pattern is supported by Amazon? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 18:54, 4 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Throat Sprockets ==
  
:::The link does work. I have never seen one like it. I spent a little quality Google time trying to find an alternative Amazon path for it, but I was unsuccessful. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 07:19, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?8169; A copy of the rare American edition was just uploaded so I added a link and a bunch of other stuff, including correcting the month which was off by a couple of months, but the 2 even rarer British editions seem to have disappeared almost entirely, with no eBay copies I can see or any online scans of anything besides the cover. The one review I could find, https://criminolly.com/2021/10/27/throat-sprockets-review/, has a different page count than either edition and a month that neither have. So if anyone owns a copy or can actually do better than me and find online info it would help. Poor Mr. Lucas lost his wife recently so it would be nice to flesh out and correct his info here. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:02, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:::: Oh, I know that it works, I am just wondering if it's officially supported. We've run into stability issues with unsupported Amazon URLs in the past -- "here today, gone tomorrow". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 09:00, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Leviathan Awakes (excerpt) (sic) by James S. A. Correy (sic) ==
  
== "Publications with Invalid Page Numbers" updated ==
+
I stumbled across [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2231009 this] by chance the other day, with both [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1272911 the title] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?155601 author name] incorrect.  It's strikes me that 2 errors is perhaps more likely to be down to data entry here than mistakes by the publisher, but it's from [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?345034 a 2011 pub] transient verified by an editor who has not been active for several years.  Any thoughts on whether the appropriate varianting and note-adding is the best course of action, or instead to correct the title and editor fields?
  
The cleanup report "Publications with Invalid Page Numbers" has been updated to look for invalid values after the pipe character. Once the report is rerun tomorrow morning, it should list 388 publications. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:32, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
+
FWIW, some cursory Googling threw up [https://isulibrary.isunet.edu/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=8781 a library entry] that indicates the correct title and author name was used. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 09:15, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:https://openlibrary.org/books/OL25033756M/Degrees_of_freedom; One of those OL-only non-preview things; search inside says Leviathan Wakes by James S. A. Corey. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:16, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== 2022-07-05 -- server problems ==
+
:: Thanks, I have now updated title and author name, and made a parent title for the real authors Franck and Abraham. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:26, 12 April 2023 (EDT)
  
The ISFDB server is currently experiencing system issues and "leaking" disk space. It appears to be the same problem that we ran into a couple of months ago and that had to be fixed by the hosting company. At the rate things are going, we will run out of space within a couple of hours.
+
== E. Borgese ==
  
I have notified Al and hope that the issue will be resolved later today. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:35, 5 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5623541; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=borgese&type=Name; Will my rejected edit be un-rejected if my fixing of her name in the original Brit edition is made a variant or variant is deleted or whatever it is that needs to be done? I'm confused. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:15, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:That won't fix the issue.  The problem is that the add publication submission was made to add a publication to the title by Elizabeth (with a moderator note that you were adding it with the incorrect name).  Your subsequent submission updated both the existing title and publication records to Elisabeth.  I was not aware of your second submission until after I rejected the first, but it wouldn't have mattered. Changing the source record does not update any pending submissions (e.g. your rejected edit).  Had you done these two submissions in the opposite order, and waiting until the name change was approved before submitting the add publication, you would have been fine.  The other way you could have done it, was to submit your first edit as a new publication.  Then, when both were approved, you could merge the title records.  At this point you can submit a new Add Publication from the updated title record (Elisabeth).  By the way, there is a second step that is still required for your change of the existing title record from Elizabeth to Elisabeth.  Since you changed it to a variant name, you need to make the altered record into a variant of the canonical name.  Hope this helps.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 13:56, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::But her real first name is spelled with an S, so that should be the parent name. There's nothing on ISFDB that was published as by "Elizabeth Mann Borgese". --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:23, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Well, we currently have 11 title records that have been published as by [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?13609 Elizabeth Mann Borgese].  We have no concept of "real name", we only reflect how things have been published.  The canonical name is the name by which the author is best known in the field.  You'll note that her legal name, as Elisabeth, is reflected in the legal name field.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 14:57, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::They weren't really published as by Elizabeth in her collection, whoever entered the original Brit edition here (Chris J? He's first in edit history) incorrectly wrote her name that way and thus she's credited that way. Her American edition also says Elisabeth so it's not like they changed the spelling due to some British/American differences, it's just wrong. So her name needs to be changed to Elisabeth for all those stories and then when everything says Elisabeth my edit adding the American edition can be un-rejected, re-added, whatever. I just saw a full wraparound cover online so that'll be something extra to upload that wasn't in my rejected edit. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:10, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::There are two issues that you are talking about.  First, you submitted an edit to add a new publication, but you submitted incorrectly.  I don't think your edit could be unrejcted even if all instances of "Elizabeth Mann Borgese" were changed to "Elisabeth Mann Borgese" (i.e. the two authors are merged). Even that is impossible because there are publications where the author is credited as "Elizabeth Mann Borgese" (e.g. [https://archive.org/details/Fantasy_Science_Fiction_v017n01_1959-07_PDF/page/n67/mode/2up here]).  Regardless, there is nothing that can be done to change the author's name in your rejected edit that you submitted as Elizabeth.  Even if "Elizabeth Mann Borgese" was deleted from the database, your edit would re-add the name as a new author were it approved.  I've mentioned above the best way to proceed.  I noticed that you did not include the content in your rejected edit.  The content from the other record cannot currently be imported because the title records have the incorrect name.  There are two ways to bring these records into shape.
 +
:::::# You could edit the existing collection and change the author credit for those stories that appear only in that collection.  You would also need to remove any stories that are published elsewhere from the collection, then re-add them with the correct credit.  There is a further step in that variants need to be made, but I'll discuss that below when covering the second overall issue.
 +
:::::# Alternatively, you could manually add all the stories, with the correct credit, when you re-add the George Braziller publication.  You could then remove all the stories from the MacGibbon & Kee publication and import the ones with the correct author credit from the other pub.  Again variants will need to be made to finish the process.
 +
:::::The second issue is what name needs to be canonical for this author.  Absent evidence to the contrary, I would assume that all other publications are correctly credited.  That leaves us with 6 titles in 13 publications credited to Elizabeth.  There are 10 titles appearing in 3 publications as Elisabeth.  I'm not counting translations which are all variants anyway.  You could argue that the canonical name be changed to Elisabeth, but I'd recommend proposing that in a separate thread.  Also, would you be volunteering to do this work (it's many edits)?  You would need to move all the author data from the current canonical record to the new one; Break all of the parent child author name relationships;  Make all new alternate names variants of the new canonical name;  Merge any titles with the new canonical name where the former parent name appeared in no publications, deleting the parent title relationship;  Change the author credit of any titles with the former canonical name that appear in no publications to the new canonical name. Break any remaining parent child story relationships; Make any remaining titles by alternate name variants of the new canonical name.  If you don't want change the canonical name and can't find someone else to do it, or the community decides to keep it as Elizabeth, you'll need to finish the above edits by making the new Elisabeth titles into variants of Elizabeth.  Again, I hope this helps. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 19:09, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::Dude, as I've mentioned somewhere on the message boards before, I was hit in the head a few times when I was a kid, many years ago, so I'm a little slow, and my mind has been rapidly deteriorating recently due to personal and external issues, which shows in the occasional misstep I've made here lately which is highly unusual for me, so I don't have a clue what it is you're asking me to do; you and others here seem to forget that I've said more than once that I'm a total amateur with no background in anything literary who just started doing this a few years ago to pass the time (which makes the fact that I have one of the largest number of non-moderator edits in the history of this site even more remarkable). I'm just about done doing this, anyway, for many reasons, and am mostly doing simple stuff these days, so I have a suggestion; you mentioned recently that you're still in contact with this Chris J, so maybe you can ask him if he's the one who entered the name wrong and, if so, why. If it was him, maybe you can convince him, now that I have brought the American edition to everyone's attention, to do whatever it is you said above. I notice that the Archive.org copy was uploaded in September, 2015 and his first entry in the edit history was November, 2015, so the correct spelling of her name was available at the time. If nobody wants to do any of this, it won't bother me. I've done hundreds of edits since this one and can barely remember it, anyway. I'm sure, though, that the ones here who like to variant every name and title difference would want to see it entered; people who've searched for her on this site over the years may have come away disappointed because her name has been wrong for so many years. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:48, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::::I'm not going to contact another editor on your behalf.  Chris J's talk page is [[User talk:Chris J|here]].  However, there is no point in contacting Chris.  None of the edits in the history added the content to the record.  Even if we could determine who added the records incorrectly, what would be the point of contacting that person?  They could have been working from a secondary source that was incorrect, but in the end, it doesn't matter.  You've discovered an error in a record and you've fixed only part of that error.  That's good, but the job isn't finished.  The bare minimum to fix this record is:
 +
:::::::# Go to the {{T|1931892|title record}} where you changed the name and use the Make This Title a Variant tool to make it a variant of the canonical name.  Use Option 2 and enter the canonical name, "Elizabeth Mann Borgese" and click Create New Parent Title.
 +
:::::::# Go to the {{P|547020|publication record}} and use the Edit This Pub tool to edit the record.  For each story where the edit fields are not disabled, change the author's name to "Elisabeth Mann Borgese". For all other stories, add "delete" to the page number, use the add title button to add a new row and copy the title of each story to the new title field, enter "Elisabeth Mann Borgese" as the author for the new author field.  You can enter this edit at the same time as the one above.
 +
:::::::# After the above edit is approved, go back to the {{P|547020|publication record}} and use the Remove Titles From This Pub tool.  Mark each title with delete in the page number.
 +
:::::::# For each title that does not have a parent title (you can find them all at {{A|Elisabeth Mann Borgese}} after the above edits are approved).  You need to go to each title and use the Make This Title a Variant tool to link the title to the appropriate parent.  At this point, the parent titles should exist.  Find each matching title at {{A|Elizabeth Mann Borgese}}.  Take note of the Title Record # at the top right of the screen.  In the make variant screen, use Option 1 and enter the title number to link the titles.
 +
:::::::Making variants when an alternate name is used is not something that is optional or done only when people like to.  It's a data integrity issue that needs to be resolved. As it stands, this record will show up on several cleanup reports until it is fixed.  Also, there is no problem in searching by an alternate name.  If set up correctly, each alternate name has a link to the canonical name, as does all 4 of Ms. Mann Borgese's alternate names.  By the way, when you being one of these multi-step edits, it is generally a good idea to let the moderator know that you intend the next steps by adding it to the moderator note.  I've tried to give you complete instructions, but if you have any questions when attempting this, please reach out either here or on the [[ISFDB:Help desk|Help desk]].  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:31, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
: The server finally ran out of disk space around 5:30am this morning. The hosting company fixed the issue a few minutes ago. Everything should be back up. Please post here if you come across any problems. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 10:08, 6 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Number Line ==
  
== $5.95 ==
+
https://archive.org/details/nailedbyheart0000clar_p5s1; What printing is this? It's 3rd, isn't it? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:49, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Yes, the 3rd - the lowest number on the list gives you the current printing (with a special note for some number lines that contain a year as well as a printing number). That specific configuration of numbers is a pretty common one. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 19:48, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::OK. I asked because of this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5625372, where either I goofed or there was some hiccup when I entered it, so I made a new edit with the right cover, but the 2002 edition on Archive.org matches the ISFDB note which says "third printing" yet the mod who rejected this said 4th printing, which I had a feeling was wrong. I'll now add a link in that record. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:53, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Username#The_Summer_Meadows; Can someone look at this and approve my edit? I'm tired of arguing. --[[User:Username|Username]] 17:01, 6 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== The Heaven Maker ==
  
: It was approved very soon after I wrote this, but I think that was just in the normal run of things, not as a result of my message. I'm still curious about whether I was imagining things, or does anyone else see what I saw? There's no Delacorte PB and searching Google's copy brings up $5.95, right? --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:58, 7 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1518099; I recently added the 2014 TP and a link to the Archive.org copy which was recently uploaded; why page count is different between all 3 editions is unknown, someone entered them for the HC and they seem accurate, final essay starting on p. 249 and page count being 254, while TP is 20 pages longer but doesn't seem to have any extra material, but more importantly is while importing HC contents into TP and adding page numbers I now notice that the foreword, which is actually titled Forward in the book, is by Janis McKay, who is actually Janis Mackay per signature, an author with several credits on ISFDB, while the intro is actually by Herbertson. So if anyone can get a hold of the original HC edition and verify it's the same then those can be corrected. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:30, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
::I saw the $5.95, but I wouldn't have been able to figure out that the snippet was showing the price from a flap.  FWIW, a Google shows plenty of resellers calling it a hardcover, as well as a Reginald bibliography on [https://books.google.com/books?id=P8zW2AH6150C&lpg=PA382&ots=mn9E5SmOBl&dq=%22the%20summer%20meadows%22%20delacorte&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=%22the%20summer%20meadows%22%20delacorte&f=false Google Books] calling it "cloth".  An entry on [https://www.abebooks.com/signed-first-edition/Summer-Meadows-Robert-Nathan-Delacorte-Press/18772435700/bd AbeBooks] calls it hardcover, talks about the dust jacket condition, and has some pictures, although the pictures do not include anything that definitively show the format.  So, given all of that, it seems likely Google Books' metadata is mistaken. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 10:39, 8 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Magnus Fin ==
  
::: I happen to agree that $5.95 is the price for the hardcover. I agree because of information provided subsequent to the edit. However, the publication note still says only 'Price found in search of Google Books copy. I find that statement incomplete at best. Note, I did not reject it, I released it so another moderator could review it. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 11:14, 8 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?30867; Print editions are all same price, one says TP, one PB, and one "unknown", in case anyone knows which they should all really be. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:33, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: They are all the standard B format in UK (a few mm under 20 cm) - which is a tp in our DB. I've fixed the 2 that were added in error. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 19:51, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:::: https://www.nytimes.com/1973/10/21/archives/new-novel-by-leland-frederick-cooley-607-pp-new-york-avon-paper-175.html; https://www.nytimes.com/1973/10/01/archives/a-listing-of-recently-published-books-fiction-general.html. Yes, $5.95 IS the price of the hardcover. There's 2 mentions of it linked above. I saw those first, didn't want to enter 2 links, and found the price in the Google copy, which is preferable because I'm sure the New York Times was just as capable of wrong info as anyone else, but when you see $5.95 in print on an actual scan of a physical copy when you do a search on Google, you can't dispute that; pics don't lie. If you'd like to add those 2 Times links to the record so it's more complete, you're free to do that. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:30, 8 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Tenth Time (A)round ==
  
== John Farris birthdate ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?74425; I randomly came across that Venture issue on Archive.org, a Brit magazine that apparently reprinted F&SF with added illustrations, if I'm understanding it correctly, and I immediately noticed a problem; McIntosh's story, which ISFDB claims is only "Tenth Time Round" in Venture, is the same in F&SF, too; it's not "Tenth Time Around". There are some active PV so I'm not touching it but this seems like a fairly big change so I thought I'd mention it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:36, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I updated the title in {{P|61294|The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, May 1959}} based on the [https://archive.org/details/Fantasy_Science_Fiction_v016n05_1959-05_PDF/page/n3/mode/2up Internet Archive scan] and notified the active verifiers. I will also expand {{P|351769|Venture Science Fiction, October 1964}} based on its Internet Archive scan. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 19:34, 6 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::https://archive.org/search?query=%22venture+british+ed%22&sort=-addeddate; I think these are all the issues available, in case anything else needs fixing. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:54, 8 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Thank you. Searching for Venture Science Fiction only returned the one hit and Venture too many. I appreciate you finding a good search term. I will add the links to the magazines and make updates as needed. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 11:08, 8 April 2023 (EDT)
  
It was pointed out [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?1492 on Twitter] that ISFDB has [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?1492 today as a birthdate for him], but [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Farris Wikipedia] (and also [https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0268468/ IMDB]) has the 26th.  I looked through the Wikipedia history and talk pages, but couldn't see anything that might explain the discrepancy, other than the possibility of confusion with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Farris_(poet_and_novelist) a different John Farris], but that one doesn't have any DOB info on Wikipedia, so that doesn't seem an especially likely explanation.
+
== Pranks ==
  
Does anyone know any more about this author, or is it something that will just have to be acknowledged in the note, but leaving the DOB field as-is.  Having a month and day-of-month of the same number makes me suspect the data here is more likely to be incorrect (e.g. typo or date format mismatch), but I don't think that's enough to justify changing the value in the field. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 14:23, 7 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?17626; I've been trying to fix publisher Leisure as many of their old books here as by Leisure Books were wrongly entered here with Dorchester in the publisher; with this book I have a vague memory of working on it last year, trying to get all the cover images to match price/ID entered here, and after adding an Archive.org link to the 3rd one I noticed the 1st one, entered by ChrisJ in 2014, is the same as the 3rd one (which I entered last year) except he used the original edition's 1983 date instead of the reprint's 8/89 date which is on the copyright page, so I think the 1st one can be deleted. The 2nd one has a broken image and a Not Found message when it's clicked; I see that I made an edit some time ago for that, too, but obviously if the image was broken back then it would have been noticed. So does anyone have any ideas about that? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:58, 5 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:The [https://prezi.com/8g0n6unlfd2g/john-lee-farris/ Prezi] page says "Born July seventh, 1936".  Judging by the edit history, that page is likely the source for our date.  See [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/dumpxml.cgi?3488752]. The "blackleatherrequired" site only has/had 1936.  Searching on https://www.missouribirthindex.com/ for Farris between 1935 and 1937 give "JOHN LEE FARRIS 07/26/1936".  While that's not an official Missouri government site, it looks fairly authoritative to me.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 10:23, 8 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Plus qu'humains ==
  
:: Thanks for doing way more detective work than I could even have considered!  I've updated the author record, adding a note about the contrary date in the Prezi. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 16:52, 11 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL19267614W/Les_plus_qu%27humains?edition=key%3A/books/OL26778119M; Full cover, which none of the images on ISFDB show, with a date that's earlier than other editions with that cover, so French-fluent editor may want to add it, re-date the cover art, etc. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:45, 6 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Long Dash ==
+
== Robert Wise ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?24550; Not merged like they should be because of that dumb dash being entered 2 different ways. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:21, 7 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?4333; Cover of J. Rovin's UFO Movie Quiz Book says intro by Wise (who was a famous director) so I added that here and put (director) after his name to differ him from the Wise on ISFDB who wrote Christian novels; interview is also by the other Wise, https://www.ebay.com/itm/371173025862, as the seller mentions in his description. Now that it's an interview about films should it be deleted or should (director) be added to that, too? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:52, 7 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:My edit was finally approved; how about that interview? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:48, 20 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Why Don't They Just Use Words? ==
+
== Ad Astra's analysis of our data ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?119003; So it turns out this dude, Brian Ames, wrote a ton of fiction including much that's not on ISFDB because it was published in literary/online zines, and had a weird old site, tendollardog.com, with a huge list (last archived link in 2009) of his works, so I'm going to add it here soon. I added links to 2 stories from mytholog.com, apparently a popular site once that ended in 2007 but is still archived online, but I just couldn't find that reprint of his All Hallows story "Several Appearances of Stuart" in Whispering Spirits, another once-popular online site that published PDF's of each issue, it seems, but changed their bloody URL so many times (Ralan says their old defunct site was whisperingghosts.com, which is weird because that's NOT THE TITLE OF THE MAGAZINE), including a Geocities site and a domain called dragynspice.com (*puke*). If anyone can extract any stories beyond the scant couple I found on Archive.org and can locate Ames' story, that would be great. The issue here, though, is that 1 of his stories was written using the old "write the title using graphics" BS, and in this case his 2002 story with the random symbols for a title was reprinted in his 2004 collection, but whoever entered it here decided to title it "grey blob". Now, I was going to variant, but changed my mind. So would anyone like to decide which title is more suitable and merge or whatever is needed? If you hover over the 2002 title it says "Circle with Vertical Fill". --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:07, 8 July 2022 (EDT)
+
In "James Gunn's Ad Astra" #12 (the current issue), René Walling writes an essay on "Report: Books, Creators and Series, 1800-2018", in which he does a statistical analysis of books published in the genre during the specified period. He analyzes 168,012 genre books, of which 162,140 come from isfdb, and another 5,872 come from "The Locus Index to Science Fiction" and the "SFBooklist". He focuses his attention on (1) Number of books and creators; (2) Number of books published by an author; and (3) Number of series published. And, of course, how these numbers vary over time. If you're interested, the article is online at https://www.adastrasf.com/report-books-creators-and-series-1800-2018/. [[User:Chavey|Chavey]] ([[User talk:Chavey|talk]]) 12:47, 7 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Of course there are lots of question about the data he generated, e.g. Did he count translations as different books? Did he use our non-genre flag? Did he correctly process our "variants" of a title? etc. Nevertheless, it may still be slightly interesting to some. [[User:Chavey|Chavey]] ([[User talk:Chavey|talk]]) 12:55, 7 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Blue Star ==
+
:: Curious. Comparing [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/stats.cgi?8 Percent of Titles in Series by Year] generated by our weekly reports and the "ISFDB" column in [https://www.adastrasf.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Issue-12-Table_6.png Table 6: Percent of books in a series per year, 1891-2018], I see that the numbers are somewhat different. It makes sense since we count  "novels" and "short fiction" separately while René Walling apparently consolidated everything that he considered "books":
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?28465; I added a sweet Amazon cover for the Moorcock book and decided to enter publisher's address since it's in a photo; that 2021 book obviously isn't the same as the 70's books, but all I see in every edition on Amazon is Crystal Star. So if anyone can actually find a title page that says Blue Star it could be changed in some way to differ it from the old publisher; if not, it just needs changing to Crystal Star. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:00, 9 July 2022 (EDT)
+
::* Novels, chapbooks, collections, anthologies and nonfiction books related to the genres of fantasy, horror and science fiction, i.e. found in one of the above mentioned lists, were all included.
  
== Peter (Andrew) Jones ==
+
:: Moreover, our chapbook records do not have "series" information, which will inevitably affect the stats. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:03, 7 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?26793; These are orphaned because editors didn't variant titles and name to Peter Jones, but it's not a guarantee that all are by the same Peter Jones, being a very common name, so if anyone knows for sure about any of them they should be made variants. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:41, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Doubleday and The Crime Club ==
:While Peter Jones is a common name, Peter Andrew Jones is less common. {{A|Peter Jones}} is our canonical name for {{A|Peter Andrew Jones}} so extremely likely anything under Peter Andrew Jones is the same Jones. All the covers are consistent with Jones' style as well. I have varianted them. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 12:23, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== "Publications with Invalid Prices" tweaked ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=crime+club&type=Publisher; I did an edit for the Gores/Pronzini Tricks and Treats anthology and made Doubleday into Crime Club / Doubleday, but ISFDB has a jumble of different ways that people added the publisher, with the Crime Club / Doubleday one also having Doubleday Crime Club as a pub. series with many more books than the publisher has, some of which are from the Doran era which has its own separate entry here, Crime Club / Doubleday Doran, while I think none of the ones as by Doubleday / Crime Club make sense because Doubleday was the publisher. So if anyone wants to take a look at this some merging/standardization would probably help. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:28, 8 April 2023 (EDT)
  
The [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/edit/cleanup_report.cgi?100 cleanup report "Publications with Invalid Prices"] has been tweaked to ignore legal prices like "£0.075" and "$0.125". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:16, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Touchstone Awards for Individual Poems ==
  
== 2022-07-10 -- more server problems ==
+
Hi,
  
The disk space "leak" which we ran into on July 5/6 is back. At the current rate we will run out of disk space in a few hours. I have contacted Al. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:18, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
Joshua Gage's speculative fiction poem, "Penrose process . . ." has been long listed for the 2022 Touchstone Awards for Individual Poems by The Haiku Foundation.
  
: 7:15pm update. We are still leaking disk space, although slower than this morning. At this rate the server may run out of space either overnight or tomorrow morning. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 19:18, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
I would like to have this award added to those supported by the ISFDB software, as the award does recognize poetry in the speculative fiction genre.
  
:: After a couple of rocky hours between 4am and 5:30am, things seem to be back to normal. Fingers crossed. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 05:52, 11 July 2022 (EDT)
+
The Haiku Foundation, as part of its mission to expand possibilities for English-language haiku, created the Touchstone Awards Series in 2010 for individual haiku and senryu (The Touchstone Award for Individual Poems) and books (The Touchstone Distinguished Books Award). In 2022, the Touchstone Award for Individual Haibun was added to recognize individual haibun.
  
== "My Pending/Recently Approved/Rejected/Errored Out" lists tweaked ==
+
All awards seek to reward excellence and innovation each calendar year. Results are determined through a year-long nomination and selection process and are released the following year on April 17, International Haiku Poetry Day. Award recipients are selected by independent panels comprised of authorities in the field.
  
The following Web pages:
+
https://thehaikufoundation.org/touchstone-poem-awards/
  
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+I My Recent Edits]
+
https://thehaikufoundation.org/2022-touchstone-awards-for-individual-poems-long-list/
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+N My Pending Edits]
 
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+R My Rejected Edits]
 
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+P My Errored Out Edits]
 
  
have been limited to the last 3 months for performance reasons. We may be able to lift these restrictions once we upgrade the database engine. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 19:16, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
Thank you. <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:SillyWilly|SillyWilly]] ([[User talk:SillyWilly|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/SillyWilly|contribs]]) .</small>
: For me the report "My Pending Edits" is suddenly empty --a change this hour, or nearly so-- without new listings atop "My Recent Edits".
 
: The current number of pending edits by all editors (not held by a moderator) is 431, up from 426. --[[User:Pwendt|Pwendt]]|[[User talk:Pwendt|talk]] 19:20, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
 
: Address bar displays ~/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+N (Pending) or ~/cgi-bin/myrecent.cgi?0+I (Recent). --[[User:Pwendt|Pwendt]]|[[User talk:Pwendt|talk]] 19:22, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Let me take a look... [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 19:38, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
: Thanks for bringing this award to other editors' attention. It appears to be legitimate and I see no reason not to create an Award Type record for it. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 09:10, 10 April 2023 (EDT)
  
::: Fixed. The 3 month limit should only apply to the "My Recent Edits" page from now on. Thanks for reporting the problem! [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 19:49, 10 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Utopia Awards ==
  
== Russian Warren ==
+
Hi,
  
https://fantlab.ru/art1391; I've been adding edits for various Jim Warren-related things, and that page lists a bunch of Russian books with his art, but many of the covers I recognize from other books, or, in the case of that "pair of eyes with a woman's face on top" cover, from the poster of the G. Romero/D. Argento 1990 anthology film Two Evil Eyes. All the English-language covers are credited on ISFDB, but several edits could probably be made from the Russian ones for people fluent in that language. The 1996 cover is from Stuart Friedman's Maniac, for example, while the first 1997 cover uses the hourglass art from R. Karl Largent's Black Death, but the woman in the background isn't on that cover, so maybe they stole from multiple covers at the same time for some of these books, although she appears on the back cover, too, so maybe she was some kind of Russian horror personality or something (poor late Richard Laymon is also on the back cover, with a photo that couldn't look any less scary for a horror author). A bonus is that some of these Russian entries include American covers that aren't elsewhere on FantLab, with some including the original art used for the covers. I have no idea why the Deathwalker cover keeps appearing under Stephen King's books, though. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:10, 11 July 2022 (EDT)
+
Several ISFDB titles have been nominated (or won) the inaugural 2022 Utopia Awards. Considering their website, it appears to be legitimate.
  
: FantLab editors have done a great deal of work figuring out which artists' art has been "reused without permission" by Russian publishers. For example, consider [https://fantlab.ru/edition4725 this 2003 translation] of {{A|David Zindell}}'s [http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/title.cgi?21415 The Lightstone]. The cover is a fusion of paintings originally produced by Mónica Pasamón, Jerry Vanderstelt and Donald Clavette. It's a headache to sort out... [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:54, 11 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.android-press.com/2022-utopia-award-nominees
  
== Elvis Is Alive! ==
+
Would it be possible to add it to the database?
  
"John Farris' 2004 collection from Babbage Press, [84], is rare, with only 2 copies on Worldcat. I ordered it from interlibrary loan a few years ago so it definitely exists, but I noticed it had no page #'s entered on ISFDB, and couldn't find anywhere online that shows the contents page so I could enter them. However, in searching I stumbled across the fact that it was reprinted under a different title in 2020, https://www.amazon.com/No-Sin-Unpunished-John-Farris-ebook/dp/B08G892JNN. So anyone with an Amazon account who can access the entire e-book may want to enter all the info on ISFDB; there's a few stories in there that are hard to find anywhere else. Also, if anyone owns the Babbage edition (HA!) it would be good to enter the page #'s, too."
+
Thanks. <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Alittlebook|Alittlebook]] ([[User talk:Alittlebook|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alittlebook|contribs]]) .</small> 09:52, 10 April 2023‎ (EDT)
The above was cut-and-pasted from a message I left sometime last year (I knew I had written about this book before but couldn't find it until I searched for the title), and today after seeing John Farris' birth date fixed by others here I decided to do some edits for his books, which surprisingly are still missing many editions/have incorrect or missing info. While doing so I came across a single copy of Elvisland on eBay, with a welcome photo of the contents page, so I've entered the page #'s. However, in typical Babbage fashion their proofreading was crap, and the next-to-last story has a page # lower than the story preceding it. Also, WorldCat had a page count much lower than entered here, and an ancient review on sfsite.com agreed, so I fixed that, too. So now someone needs to verify from an actual copy if all the page #'s and the page count are correct. Anyone? No Sin Unpunished hasn't been entered by anyone yet, either, and I see that 1 story from 2005, "Bloody Mary Morning", was not in Elvisland and the title story seems to be original. EDIT: I saw on IMDB that Farris was involved in a movie 2 or 3 years ago titled No Sin Unpunished which was based on his story "Horrorshow", so if anyone enters the e-book they should check to see if it's mentioned anywhere that the title story is not original but simply a retitling of that old story. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:30, 11 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:I suggest waiting to see if they are awarded a second time. I can't find much about them outside of that one site. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:00, 10 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Bad Voltage ==
+
== Richard Hill ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?6372; I just made some edits moving Potter's credit over to the second entry, replaced the unstable cover image, fixed dates, etc., so there's really no need for the first entry anymore. Not sure why it was entered because other entry was done in 2007, a couple of years earlier. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:50, 12 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=richard+hil&type=Name; This falls under the category of "never assume anything". So I randomly found a copy of Squane's Journal #4 (1997) on eBay, a special Ramsey Campbell issue, and took the time to enter the extensive essays included, 1 of which was by a Richard Hill. Something seemed familiar about that name and, being fairly common, I checked to make sure there weren't others with that name here. It turns out that there's a Richard Hill from the USA who wrote a few SF stories in the early 70's, but he had 1 story that was dated many years after he died in 1999. Turns out that story belonged to Richard Hill (I), who wrote a few recent stories in horror publications. However, under this (I) was a 1980 anthology, Hot Air, which I entered in 2021, although I have very little recollection of doing so and apparently just did it so I could enter the original appearance of Ramsey Campbell's story "Out of Copyright" in this obscure British publication. Thinking I was clever, I added a (II) to the editor of Hot Air and also added it to the poem's author since that was written for an early 90's anthology, Now We Are Sick, edited by 2 Brits and so was almost certainly by the same Hill. However, after these edits were approved, I clicked on the Horror Zine bio under Hill (I) and discovered that, I think, the Hill who's written a few recent horror stories is the SAME GUY as the Brit Hill, since it mentions him being from Liverpool and he's obviously an older guy judging by his photo; there's also another bio I found, http://www.thehorrorzine.com/Fiction/June2012/Hill/RichardHill.html, which describes him as a widely published poet, and I notice that in the first bio there's a poem reproduced from who knows where; the title of it, Slick Jack Brady, is completely unknown to Google. So it seems a guy who edited an ultra-obscure mainstream Liverpool travelogue that's only remembered today because Campbell had a story in it decided after 30 years to suddenly write short stories in mostly American magazines (although his last story on ISFDB was in a Brit anthology). So I think I should change the 3 entries as (II) to (I) unless anyone can tell me that the recent Hill is a totally different guy who just happens to also come from Liverpool. Anyone? Hey, I just noticed something; 2 of the Hills have 1941 entered as their birth date. I assume the USA Hill was verified but I have a feeling the Brit Hill's date may be a mistake, although it's certainly possible that they both just had the same birth date. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:20, 13 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Goldsteins ==
+
== Snow Fury ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=goldstein&type=Name; Steve, Steven L. and Steven Lawrence Goldstein all seem to be the same guy. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:03, 12 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?258899; [https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/BOcAAOSwwIxjMHRN/s-l1600.jpg]; Shouldn't the date be March? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:17, 14 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Yes. The verifier (who is no longer active) added the pub note stating March so I updated the pub date to match. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:36, 15 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Return of the Living Dead ==
+
== Fekete ==
  
https://archive.org/search.php?query=return-of-the-living-dead%20russo&and[]=mediatype%3A%22texts%22; Someone uploaded that Hamlyn edition a few days ago, but in Hamlyn's typical fashion there's no indication of what printing it is; they just liked releasing the same book with different covers. I'm sure Brit PB experts will know. Also, that Undead book revealed the sweet cover art credit on the back cover, so I entered that in the e-book edition (TP was never entered here). More importantly, I saw here, https://vaultofevil.proboards.com/thread/2325/return-living-dead, the suggestion that Russo re-wrote the book after the 1985 film version came out, so that version may be a novelization, but writers at that Vault link seem confused about whether the Hamlyn edition with the cover recently uploaded was the rewritten version or whether it was the Arrow edition, and both the Hamlyn on ISFDB and the Arrow have the same page count, which seems unlikely if he re-wrote the book. So there might be some further investigation needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:12, 12 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=feket&type=Name; First name probably the same guy as Joe with Jr., Joe without Jr. wrote a story in 1965, could be the same guy or his dad. I noticed this when adding story links to stories in Gateway Magazine; most now have links although a few were dead or couldn't be found. Most of them are terrible, but that's besides the point. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:31, 14 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Rewrite of submission review pages underway ==
+
== Russell Miller ==
  
The way the ISFDB software displays submission review pages is a holdover from an earlier era. The code is convoluted and inefficient, which makes it hard to add new features or fix existing problems.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?21117; I added a link to an edition of Bare-Faced Messiah; the short story is by some lawyer, https://www.heroicfantasyquarterly.com/?p=1111, bio at bottom. I don't see anywhere online that mentions Miller stories in those other publications mentioned, 2 of which are genre and 2 of which sound like mainstream magazines. Differing needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:56, 14 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:The two authors have been separated. I also updated the story with the link you provided. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:39, 15 April 2023 (EDT)
  
I am currently in the middle of a rewrite which will require multiple patches to complete. If you see submission review pages behaving in wrong or unusual ways, please post your findings here. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 10:08, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== FK Young ==
  
: I just tried to edit the DAW publisher page (see item below) and on clicking submit on the edit page, I'm linked to [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/mod/submission_review.cgi?5363605 which just says "Moderator privileges are required for this option". (NB: this is just to submit an edit, not to self-approve it.)  Sidebar says I'm logged in as me. (This was around 15:45 BST (GMT+1) if you need to trace any logs) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:49, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?165423; The poem and first 2 stories are by some old pulp writer; the new guy is the subject of a recent post on Wormwoodiana. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:52, 17 April 2023 (EDT)
: EDIT: I see that my 2 attempts to submit this (5363603 & 5363605) do appear in my Pending Edits page, so the edits have been accepted, and (presumably) submission_review.cgi is bombing out after that point.  If I click on one of those edits, I can see the detail (view_submission.cgi), but when I click on the self-approver view link, I go to submission_review.cgi and the same error as previously mentioned. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 11:03, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:They've been separated. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:17, 20 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:: Thanks, investigating... [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:23, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Rare Ligotti Story ==
  
::: I have patched the code. Could you please give it another try and see if it fixed the problem? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:44, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5641814; Ligotti.net, according to an article I read, existed in several incarnations and the early ones are lost, but someone got parts of it from somewhere so, while trying to get a link for "Teeth" by Matt Cardin (his first story), the link to which just defaults to the modern Ligotti site and a "not found" page, I saw there were other stories listed, including a few from the man himself. 2 sounded familiar but "Ghost Stories for the Dead" didn't, and it turns out it's never been collected. It was reprinted in Crypt of Cthulhu in '89 but it turns out it's from '82. The index on philsp.com is wrong; E. M. Cioran is not a pseudonym of Ligotti but a real poet, and this article, https://www.ligotti.net/showthread.php?t=527&page=2, mentions his admiration and that he used a quote to introduce "Ghost Stories", which is probably why the index is confused. I mention all this in case anyone ever enters the missing issues of Grimoire here, only 1 and 4 currently, because as usual online info is not to be trusted. EDIT: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5641848; The feoamante.com site, still online but dead, gave me a link to the old Ligotti site, when they were using a totally different URL, www.longshadows.com, so I've replaced the archived link since this one says 1999 while the previous one said 2019 (although the earliest links are May and October 1999 but when you click on them they refuse to go to those archived pages and instead go to November; spooky). Also, I found Cardin's story "Notes of a Mad Copyist"; it's also on the 2019 archived site but while the old site shows it just fine the new one is completely black and the text needs highlighting to read it; sadly, "Teeth" is missing on the old site, too, and Cardin revised many of his stories for his collections, so it would be good to read the original; if anyone can find it on some other old site I don't know about that would be great. I also discovered that Ligotti's story "Allen and Adelaide" is on ISFDB twice, the 1981 original and the 1989 Crypt of Cthulhu reprint, the difference being & vs. and, so I've made them variants. One I'm not sure about is "Three Scientists", https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2702155, which actually contains the first 3 titles here, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?360640, with their 1985 dates being because, according to online info, they originated in Songs of a Dead Dreamer, problem being the earliest edition on ISFDB is 1986 and no edition contains any of them. I also notice the first title was in a 1986 poetry best-of, so 1985 is likely correct, except it's actually from 1982, so this is a problem. How to variant the 3 titles to the original umbrella title is the question I have. Also, anyone who can further clean up Ligotti's info would be appreciated. Just now I found his poem "Envoi" on some obscure site and added a link. EDIT: I see that Cardin has several stories which are in his record twice, with one being spelled differently (Theater vs. Theater), so variants likely needed there. I also found a link to his recent huge collection To Rouse Leviathan, https://archive.bookfrom.net/build_in_search/?q=matt+cardin, on a site which probably shouldn't be linked to in his record so I'll just leave it here in case anyone just wants to read the stories. EDIT: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2749745; 3 titles mentioned in note are also individual stories on ISFDB. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:33, 21 April 2023 (EDT)
:::: I've just submitted a new version of the edit to the DAW page, and was able to accept it as part of the regular self-approver workflow.
 
:::: Something that I only just noticed, is that there seems/seemed to be some weirdness with the diffing logic on view_submission.cgi.  If you go to https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5363605 , it doesn't show any changes. DON'T CLICK ON THE XML LINK FOR THAT EDIT!!  If you look at my slightly earlier attempt at that edit https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5363603 it was also not showing any changes.  However, I clicked on the XML view to see if that had my edits, which it did, but when I went back to the submission view, those changes were now showing in the diff. I assume there's something behind-the-scenes that explains that, and presumably the lack of anyone else reporting problems means this hasn't had wide impact, but editors, especially self-approvers, might want to double check their edits have been properly processed? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 11:58, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::::: This is odd. Submission review pages and "Raw XML dump" pages are not supposed to affect each other; they load data directly from the database. I have looked at the linked submissions and couldn't see the differences between the view_submission.cgi representation of the data and the dumpxml.cgi representation. I am not sure what could be responsible for the behavior that you described :-( [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:11, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Balefires ==
  
:::::: It looks like my second submission lost my edits (due to somewhat-known back button behaviour on edit pages), which would explain how things look right now.  Hopefully this is all solved - I've done a couple of AddPubs in the mean time, and they were both fine. {{unsigned|ErsatzCulture}}
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?215571; 2009 PB on Archive.org, I added a link in a pending edit, I think 2008 PB is redundant and can be deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:04, 21 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Duplicate deleted. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 19:16, 21 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== DAW ownership ==
+
== Saxton Stories ==
  
DAW has just been bought out by a Chinese publisher - [https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/89841-astra-publishing-house-acquires-daw-books.html paywalled PW story] [https://twitter.com/clarkesworld/status/1547214646574292993/photo/1 PR statement in Twitter thread].  Whilst reading up on the background behind this, I note that [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?43 the publisher note] states "DAW is currently a division of Penguin Group (USA)". Whilst I might have edited that to switch to the past tense, as far as I can tell, that's isn't/wasn't a true statement?
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?124321; The variant for "Woe..." is correct, I checked, but "Heads Africa...", as confirmed from PV of Orbit edition where it first appeared, has no comma after Africa but it does in Saxton's collection; also, is it correct that "Gordon's Women" is dated '76, French date, but "Pollyanna Enzyme" is dated '86, collection date, and not '80, German date? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:04, 24 April 2023 (EDT)
  
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DAW_Books Wikipedia] says "Although it has a distribution relationship with Penguin Group and is headquartered in Penguin USA's offices in New York City, DAW is editorially independent and closely held by its current publishers, Betsy Wollheim (Donald's daughter) and Sheila E. Gilbert."
+
== Razar ==
* The acquisition statement linked above also says they were a private company & were "partnered with and distributed by PRH"
 
  
Anyone care to edit that note accordingly?  (As someone on the other side of the Atlantic from where DAW operates, I don't feel knowledgeable enough about them to change things.) FWIW The bit about them being a division of Penguin seems to have been in since before 2010/the edit history records. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:33, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5644587; Bewildering Stories, which only has recent issues indexed here, has many stories in old issues that are here and while adding some links I saw a story, "Groomed", by Chris Bartholomew that jogged my memory. It's in this weird anthology but the problem is 2 of his stories were jumbled together so it's here as "Ante Up Groomed"; I also noticed some of his other stories don't have exactly the same titles as here. So if anyone can access the full issue a lot of fixes can be done, along with page numbers, etc. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:31, 24 April 2023 (EDT)
  
: I suspect that "partnered with" can cover a variety of arrangements. I also note that the press release [https://www.tor.com/2022/07/13/daw-books-acquired-by-astra-publishing-house/ quoted by Tor] says:
+
== Novelization for Unfilmed Screenplay? ==
:* ...we will be the sole SFF imprint of their company (a first for DAW).
 
: which seems to suggest that they considered themselves a Penguin "imprint" prior to being purchased by Astra Publishing.
 
  
: Given this ambiguous language, I think we'll want to quote the sources of our information about the prior ownership structure explicitly. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:01, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
I'm holding [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5638720 this submission].  The [[Template:TitleFields:Novelization|help template]] specifies that the novelization flag is for "novelization of a movie, TV show, game or other '''non-written work'''" (emphasis mine).  I may be splitting hairs here, but it strikes me that this work is an adaptation of a screenplay (a written work which would be eligible itself were it published), rather than a novelization.  Do we want to include this sort of thing in the novelization flag?  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 10:39, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
  
:: I've now expanded the note in [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?43 the DAW entry] to reword the stuff about the Penguin relationship, and to add that Betsy Wollheim & Sheila Gilbert had been running it after the senior Wollheims, and to note the Astra buyout.  More than happy if someone else wants to take a crack at tweaking it further. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:27, 16 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:If a film using the screenplay had been made, wouldn't this be a typical novelization? To my simple mind, the act of filming the screenplay has no bearing on the nature of novel.  It seems to me novelization should be adaptation-as-a-novel of any work produced for delivery via a non-"reading" medium.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 11:14, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Perhaps a rewording to something like "novelization '''of the screenplay or script''' of a movie, TV show, game, or other non-written work" (emphasis added to show the new wording). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:00, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Don't replace the word '''movie'''. See [https://isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?197778 Luana] for a reason. The fact the movie was not filmed (or distributed or shown) seems irrelevant. I'm more in agreement with MartyD's approach, but why limit it to non-"reading"? A play has a script delivered via a non-"reading" medium - acting - so should novels produced from them should be novelizations? Play scripts have been published, though rarely. But do we allow for novelizations from short stories? or poems (Beowolf?)? ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 16:30, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::I didn't replace the word "movie" in my suggested rewording, so I'm not sure what you mean. Also, I wouldn't call ''Luana'' a novelization since he just made up a story based on the poster and watching a movie in a language he didn't understand. That's not novelizing. That's making it up wholesale, with a little inspiration from visuals. It's a completely different story.
 +
:::As for play novelizations, I'd consider those covered under the "or other non-written work" part. Expanding a short story into a novel is not so much novelization as it is making up entirely new scenarios and plots based on the short content of the original story. Same with a poem. For me, a novelization is an adaptation of a similarly-lengthy (so not short stories or poems) visual medium such as television, movies, games, plays, and the like. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:11, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::If it helps, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novelization Wikipedia] defines it as "a derivative novel that adapts the story of a work created for another medium, such as a film, TV series, stage play, comic book or video game." ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:15, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::: FWIW I tagged [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2885785 the Pat Cadigan adaptation of the William Gibson attempt at Alien 3], which seems to be a similar scenario to the edit in question here, as a novelization, and that edit was approved by Annie back in 2021 when I didn't have self mod privs. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 17:18, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Bill Gates ==
+
(unindent) One of the challenges here is that -- in most cases -- we don't know how much the "novelizer" relied on the written script/plot outline that the media work was based on. Chances are that the author watched/played the media work in question at least once, but it's also likely that the author was familiar the script/plot outline. It's entirely possible that some novels/stories which we list as "novelizations" and which say "Based on [media work]!" on the cover were primarily based on script/plot outlines as opposed to on actual media works. (I say this in part because that's how some novelizations read.)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?150983; I remember adding that appropriate photo a long time ago, but today came across this randomly and the name seems weird. Why is there a period after the III, and shouldn't III be after the other names? --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:02, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
Because of this uncertainty I would be inclined to use the "novelization" flag and then add a note explaining the gory details. Even if we don't use the flag, we'll want to add notes.
  
== Richard Powers Portuguese Cover? ==
+
After reviewing the linked Help template I am also thinking that we could profitably clarify the text in other ways, but that's a separate issue. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 20:25, 25 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: I think the clarification should consider what ISFDB wants to consider 'novelization' to be, as opposed to relying on external definitions. Interestingly we have a Note saying that [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?20417 Peter Pan] is a novelization of a play, but the Novelization flag is not set. ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 08:22, 26 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: The flag is relatively new -- we used to use the contents field with specifically designed strings before and these were not set as often as the flags are now. I often find such obvious omissions... :)
 +
:: I think that if something claims to be a novelization, we put the flag up and add a note with all the details we know - until more evidence is found that makes that incorrect (then we change the note and explain why it is not a novelization). [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 11:25, 26 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/titlecovers.cgi?16229; I imported the Galaxy edition's cover art to the 2 Wildside editions, but that Regresso edition clearly uses some of it while adding a stupid-looking green bird or whatever that is. So I don't know if Powers' credit belongs in that, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] 17:47, 13 July 2022 (EDT)
+
::: This may be more of a Rules and Standards topic, but here are my thoughts:
 +
::::* A novelization must follow the same plot as the "media work" being novelized. If a work of written fiction is set in a media universe but has an original plot, it is not a novelization. This rule excludes original novels and stories set in media universes like Star Wars, Star Trek, Warcraft, etc.
 +
::::* A single work of written fiction which follows the plots of multiple TV episodes can be entered as a novelization if the plot is close enough to the original plots. Borderline cases are left to the editor's discretion provided the specific are explained in Notes.
 +
::::* If a script, a screenplay, a libretto or a plot outline (e.g. for a game) which was used to produce a "media work" is subsequently published in written form without alteration, it is ''not'' considered a novelization.
 +
::::* An expansion or amalgamation of pre-existing works of written fiction into another work of written fiction (e.g. fix-ups) is ''not'' considered a novelization.
 +
:::: [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 16:32, 26 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Psychos Page Count ==
+
== Portuguese Jedi ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?35077; I've been replacing unstable covers for Robert Bloch books and the HC edition of this has just been replaced with a cover that actually looks a lot better, but I think I recall asking about the page count some time ago; is the HC really much lower than the Pocket editions or is HC the same and someone got the wrong info from some website? Someone here may own a copy. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:51, 14 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?852871; I think this should be a variant of an English-language novel, right? Also, it's Kahn who wrote Star Wars novels, not Khan, so that might be wrong (and James Khan has a recent story in his record, so there may actually be a Khan totally unrelated to the Star Wars guy). This, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1394010, seems to have been done correctly. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:36, 26 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Varianted. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:17, 26 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== PLEASE upgrade ISFDB to SSL meaning https: ==
+
== The Fire Worm ==
  
Hi... I don't know where else to post this... I'm John T. Cullen (John Argo, Jean Cullen) and I have been active on the Web since 1996. I have had a number of websites up for more than 20 years. In the past few years, I finally figured out how to apply SSL (Secure Socket Layer) to my websites. That changes the domain names from http: to https: and it is a major, important upgrade. I am shocked that the ISFDB domain name address (https://www.isfdb.org/) has not yet been upgraded. PLEASE! it is so easy to do, and so important. ISFDB is a tremendously important resource to all of us in this business, including authors, editors, and webmasters to name just a few. PLEASE somebody start working on this issue... it will only take a few hours to install & make active. Thank you! JTC anchor site: https://www.johntcullen.com
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?5223; I just added a link in a pending edit to the Grafton edition; it mentions "Jingling Geordie's Hole" on copyright page, a 1986 Interzone story that (I think) is used for one of the chapters and seems to be mentioned elsewhere in the novel. No edition on ISFDB mentions this fact, so should it be noted somewhere or should the story be imported? Also, and I have a vague memory of asking this before, but the e-reads edition says 1988, which is wrong because that company wasn't founded until 1999. It's 1 of 6 with a too-early date on ISFDB, none PV, so fixing shouldn't be a problem if anyone knows what dates they really should have. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:40, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:It might be 1998-12-01, which would work okay. That's around the dawn of ebooks. Also, [https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=31329187634&searchurl=an%3Dwatson%2Bian%26sortby%3D17%26tn%3Dfire%2Bworm&cm_sp=snippet-_-srp1-_-title8 this listing] on Abebooks states the novel is based on the "Jingling Geordie's Hole" short story, so that's what the mention was likely referring to. The short was apparently expanded into the novel. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:10, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I've changed the year based on the assumption 1988 is just a typo. I added a note about it, too. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:13, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::https://openlibrary.org/works/OL3691729W/The_Fire_Worm?edition=key%3A/books/OL8007597M#editions-list; 2002 e-book and 9/2004 PB, so there's probably several releases for each book by the company. Also, I think the complete short story is in the novel, copyright page says the story "first appeared" in Interzone. This, https://archive.org/stream/interzone-26/Interzone26_djvu.txt, says "constructed around" the "originally self-contained" story, so someone more familiar than I with Watson's work would need to see if the story is in the novel complete, spread among the chapters, etc. Likely importing the story would be incorrect but certainly a note could be added mentioning the novel's based around the story. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:41, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
  
: Yes, it is important, because of all the intellectual property theft from China and elsewhere, to make even the most casual site protected, much less a major site like this one. I'm not a mod, but I'm sure someone will heed your advice soon. Also, your author photo was blurry and a hat covered part of your face, so I replaced it (pending approval) with a "John Argo" Amazon photo of you, hatless, wearing a colorful shirt and holding a glass of champagne outdoors. Where was that taken? It looks lovely; I wish I was there now. P.S. Don't forget to sign your messages here by clicking the next-to-last symbol on the row above. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:39, 15 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== New SFWA "Infinity Award" category ==
  
: Glad to hear that you find the ISFDB database to be an important resource! The site administrators are very much aware of the need to upgrade to HTTPS and have been working on it since late 2021. Unfortunately, it's not a straightforward process since our site uses complex software. It took months of work to upgrade everything and we are now testing the results on our public-facing test server, [https://isfdb2.org/ isfdb2.org]. There is no ETA at this time. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:02, 15 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://file770.com/sfwas-inaugural-infinity-award-honoree-is-octavia-e-butler/
  
== Macrae Smith ==
+
Looks to be the same sort of thing as the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category.cgi?412+0 Grand Master Award]. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:37, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Cool. She's a great author. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 22:22, 27 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?577858; I did some edits for Macrae-Smith Company books, and there was one Co. entry, the one linked above, which I added Archive link to and fixed the publisher's name, but there's no dash between the words so I entered it that way. Online photos of title pages of the other books by them online suggest that someone saw dots between the words in publisher's name and thought it was a dash. So if anyone can verify that all half-dozen Macrae-Smith books on ISFDB have no dash then they, plus book linked above, will all be under the same publisher. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:27, 15 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:: The official press release is [https://www.sfwa.org/2023/04/27/the-inaugural-infinity-award-honoree-octavia-e-butler/ here]. As near as I can tell, the first Infinity award will be presented at the 2023 "Annual Nebula Awards® Ceremony", but it will be separate from the Nebula award. Unlike the Bradbury award and the Norton award, the Infinity award is not mentioned on the [http://nebulas.sfwa.org/about-the-nebulas/nebula-rules/ Nebula Rules page]. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 00:48, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: FWIW the Grand Master Award isn't listed on that rules page either.  Looking at [https://nebulas.sfwa.org/award-year/2021/ their page for last year's awards], Grand Master, Solstice and Service to SFWA are all in a "Other Awards" list on the right, separate from the main "Nebula Awards" list.
 +
::: In passing, I note a couple of potential other issues that might need resolving:
 +
::: * Some of the category naming is inconsistent: the YA, dramatic and service awards have a person's name before them, but we don't have '''Damon Knight''' Grand Master Award or '''Kate Wilhelm''' Solstice Award.  Looks like these were renamed after their inception - [SFE says] 2002 for Damon Knight and 2016 for Kate Wilhelm.  I know from the likes of [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?27 Campbell / Astounding] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?43 Tiptree / Otherwise] that the main award records try to capture name changes, I dunno if there are official rules and standards at the category level
 +
::: * [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?31 The Nebula note] says ''"Note that the "Andre Norton Award" and the "Ray Bradbury Award" are awarded at the same time, although they aren't strictly Nebulas"'', but this is contradicted by the SFWA rules page which references "The Andre Norton Nebula Award" and "The Ray Bradbury Nebula Award", and that on the 2021 results page, they are listed alongside the other Nebulas, rather than the "Other Awards" sidebar. I have a vague recollection that they might have become "proper" Nebulas - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebula_Award Wikipedia] says this happened in 2019.
 +
::: Anyone with more insight or opinion on these? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 07:04, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Marie Belloc Lowndes Titles ==
+
:::: I think we discussed the SFWA Grand Master Award at some point after its name was changed to "Damon Knight Memorial Grand Master Award". If memory serves, we considered renaming it to "Grand Master Award / Damon Knight Memorial Grand Master Award", but it felt awkward. Now that we have more experience with changing award names, I think expanding the award name would be a good idea.
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?19896; Her collection is actually titled IN Terror across all editions so I fixed that, but 1 of her novels contains no Out in the original Brit ed. (title page on Google) so changing that would require unmerging and such, in case anyone wants to do that. The Timmy novel seems to have the same title in all editions, because there's a not-on-ISFDB Doran American ed. on Archive.org with the same title. --[[User:Username|Username]] 00:55, 16 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:::: As to whether the Norton and Bradbury awards are technically Nebula categories, I have reviewed [https://daviddlevine.com/2019/04/i-am-now-officially-a-nebula-award-winner/ the 2019 blog post] that the Wikipedia article links to and I am still not sure I understand how it works. It would be best to find an official announcement before we start changing things.
  
== Leisure Trade Paperback?!? ==
+
:::: In the meantime, I have created a new [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?103 Award Type record], a new [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category.cgi?1065+0 Award Category record] and a new [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?78337 Award record] for {{A|Octavia E. Butler}}. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 22:10, 29 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?50607; This book didn't have a cover until I added it and got it approved today, but the mod then made their own edit changing format to TP. Leisure was a low-rent paperback publisher, they didn't do trade paperbacks. I just did an advanced search for Leisure Books and TP format and out of nearly 700 books by the publisher a grand total of 2 books came up, this one that was just changed and a $1.50 Charles Berlitz Atlantis non-fiction book, which is also likely not a TP. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:00, 16 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Clint Smith ==
  
== "Adult" Book Notes ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5648349; SFE says it's not the same guy as the later horror writer; https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/smith_clint. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:02, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I sent a message to the SFE editors asking about that since their bio says to not confuse the Clint Smith they list with the one who did the Gholjaw collection, but they list the Ghouljaw collection in that same bio. In the meantime, I've added a [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?362778 Clint Smith (I)] entry until we know more.  ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 20:08, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pub_history.cgi?651649; So some time ago I added price to this book with a note, then added Wikipedia page, then added at least one of those external ID, and recently I added a note about the face on the cover not being some random art but rather the male star of the film, and then made another edit about there being 2 film photos on the back cover. From past experience ISFDB can't handle entering new info in an edit if the same field had info entered in a previous edit that hasn't been approved yet, as can be inferred from the fact that a mod approved the edit with the face info but then the photo info edit was left hanging for a while, with whoever looked at it probably wondering why this guy wanted to erase the info he previously wrote, which of course I had no intention of doing. I even tried to trick ISFDB this time because when I entered the first edit I did so on a separate line in the note box, but for the second edit I placed the info on the same line as my price info done some time ago. It didn't work. So now I've had to enter another edit adding back the erased info about the face. Is there a way to enter info without it erasing previous info? I sometimes find new info to enter while a previous edit is still in the queue, and don't like to wait for the first edit to be approved because it often takes so long to get to it in my usually very long list of edits that by the time it's approved I forget to enter the next set of info. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:28, 16 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:: The SFE entry has been fixed and I have added notes to the ISFDB record. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 22:12, 29 April 2023 (EDT)
  
: Submissions operate on a "field-by-field" basis. Only ''changed'' field values are recorded when submissions are created. For example, suppose I create two Edit Publication submissions for the same publication record. We'll call them Submission A and Submission B. Submission A changes the price value from "$5.99" to "$7.99". Submission B changes the Catalog ID value from "D-272" to "D-273". Since only these two changed values will be stored in the submission records, the two submissions won't overlap and can be approved in any order.
+
== Carl (J.) Hoffman ==
  
: On the other hand, if Submission A changes the price value from "$5.99" to "$7.99" and Submission B changes it from "$5.99" to "$8.99", the approval order becomes important. Whichever submission is approved ''last'' will trump the other submission.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5648405; Here's a weird one. This rare book was uploaded recently so I made the above edit, checked afterwards for Carl J. Hoffman, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2144766, I think it's a mistake and should be this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?945236. Mistake by editor here or Italian editor in the Horror Story anthology? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:09, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
  
: The same logic applies to Note fields. Whichever submission is approved last is the one that takes effect. If you create a submission which adds a sentence to the Note field of some record and then create another submission affecting the same Note field, the last approved submission will take effect. It would be safer to cancel the first submission, which can be done on "My Pending Edits" page, and create a new one. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 08:13, 17 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Third Alternative #6 ==
  
== Flies on the Wall ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?61651; I fixed a poem title ("Latest Things") and there's a story that's dated March here, there's 2 mentions in the zine of March, I propose all contents and issue itself be dated March. Yes or no? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:59, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
  
This Alex Hamilton collection, which seems not to have been published in America unlike his earlier collection Beam of Malice (although that edition isn't on ISFDB), is rare and I did a lot of edits months ago piecing together the contents from searching the Google Books copy, discovering a contents listing online was missing 1 of the stories, finding a single copy on eBay so I could enter the price, uploading the full cover, etc. Today I randomly saw it on Archive.org (https://archive.org/details/fliesonwall0000hami); turns out someone uploaded it last month. Damn it. Anyway, most of the stories were collected in his bumper collection from Ash-Tree in 2007, but for some reason it seems his 1966 story "End of the Road" wasn't included and the original story "Fall" wasn't, either. So there's a couple of reasons this book is still valuable. Also, it's a good thing the eBay copy was complete because this copy is price-clipped, with an adorable little cut on the bottom of the front flap. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:03, 17 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:I think if you could find a scan of #5 and it had an "In March" section on the TOC page (as this one has "In July"), you could use March and cite that as the source of the date.  Unfortunately, there's no source cited for the March date on "The Bee Keepers", so we can't tell if there was something ascribing a March date to this issue and how authoritative that source might be. Otherwise, the standard treatment for issues with timing specified by season is to use just the year, so we're stuck. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 08:42, 30 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== French Vincent O'Sullivan ==
+
== Dom and Va ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1818259; Anyone know why this story, which is "When I Was Dead" in English, isn't a variant of that story, and why the anthologist is listed as a co-author? --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:47, 17 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5648943; ISBN trouble. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:19, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
:That's what shows on the copyright page as well as the LOC entry, so that's what we go with. I added a couple additional notes based on the Archive.org copy that's linked there. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 19:56, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== See Here ==
+
== Flexi-Disc?!? ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?88940; "See" note may not be needed now that I've added the full cover, but there's so much tag stuff I don't know what to delete. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:41, 18 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5649045; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5649045; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5649045; Related to my mention here somewhere a while ago that magazines uploaded years ago on Archive.org aren't always complete, I took a look at these since there were only a few issues published. The first 2 had a few things fixed/added, but the 3rd is most interesting. According to front cover, contents, and intro something called a "flexi-disc" with music from The Bridge, an old Skipp & Spector horror novel that apparently was made into a film or something, was included in this issue. Now I'm certainly no youngster but I don't have a clue what that is; was it some pre-Internet music format or something? Was it like a CD? Anyway, the uploader, Sketch the Cow, who added a metric ton of old genre zines years ago, likely removed the disc but it seems to have screwed up the pages because there are several missing. Most alarming is the supposed JK Potter art for the Ray Bradbury poem, a little bit of which is on the contents page but nowhere to be seen in the zine itself. So I think the starting page entered here may be off for at least the poem, possibly others, too. Any chance someone owns a mint copy who's willing to unseal it and respond here? Also, there's always the possibility I missed a few other mistakes in these issues; there's also movie reviews and such that someone may think are worth entering, etc. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:38, 28 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Hi, Username!
 +
: Flexi disc is phonograph record made of thin, literally flexible :) piece of vinyl.
 +
: Those discs used as a means to include sound (speech or music) with printed magazines or sometimes books before CDs.
 +
: For an example, look at the popular Soviet literary and musical magazine [https://back-in-ussr.com/2021/02/sovetskiy-muzykalnyy-zhurnal-krugozor.html "Krugozor"] (the article is in Russian, but it should be clear from the photos). --[[User:Zlogorek|Zlogorek]] ([[User talk:Zlogorek|talk]]) 04:50, 29 April 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Thanks. I see that I've never left a message on your page in all the years you've been here, so welcome. This Bridge flexi-disc thing is bugging me because there's literally almost no mention of it online that I can find except on discogs.com and a random comment on Goodreads where a guy named "Tom" says "At least I have a flexi-disc of one song from the soundtrack". Highly unusual when every minute detail of almost everything is mentioned somewhere. Skipp and Spector were once 2 of the most popular horror authors around so you'd think this item would be hot stuff but no, nothing. The important thing, though, is finding a complete issue of Iniquities #3 so we can see exactly how the contents are. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:53, 29 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Thirty Seconds Over New York ==
+
== Nina A. ==
  
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL19266963W/Thirty_Seconds_Over_New_York; Anyone know what edition this is? I don't see this cover on eBay or in Google Images. The Collins edition which has no cover on ISFDB is online and it looks nothing like this. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:38, 18 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?328172; These are both by Nina Allan. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:23, 30 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== Orchids for Doc ==
+
: I have fixed the Strange Horizon review, as that can be clearly seen to be correctly attributed on the SH webpage.
 +
: The story is a bit more of a pain, because it's in a PVed pub, and there are some other related issues.  I'll message the editor in question. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 11:21, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?196373; Supposedly unpublished, but there is a WorldCat page that has a cover unrelated to the title, https://www.worldcat.org/title/orchids-for-doc-the-literary-adventures-and-autobiography-of-robert-aw-doc-lowndes/oclc/27728655, in case any old SF experts can do anything with this info. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:51, 18 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Jewish Fiction Award ==
  
== Birthing Person ==
+
The [https://jewishlibraries.org/jewish-fiction-award/ Jewish Fiction Award] has been given by the Association of Jewish Libraries to works with significant Jewish themes each year since 2018 (first year they were awarded). It looks like these are the types of awards:
 +
*Winner
 +
*Honor Book
  
A British author named Rodney Hyde-Thompson (can't get more British than that) wrote a 1972 HC novel called The Alternative about A MAN WHO GETS PREGNANT, and it was quickly released in America as a cheap Warner PB with sweet cover art and the usual comparison to Rosemary's Baby, followed (preceded?) by a British Sphere PB retitled Black Marriage, with a photo cover showing a man sitting in a rocking chair, wearing makeup and a dress, holding a baby doll in his arms. The Warner PB was on Archive.org so I entered that, the Sphere has an Amazon page and a WorldCat record so I entered as much info as I could from those, but the HC really needs a print copy handy to enter info from; the Warner PB doesn't even mention it was previously published in England. Anyone have a copy? Also, if any mods read this, can you approve those 2 edits before my hundreds of others, because I saw on eBay that the ISBN is on the spine, which of course can't be seen on the Archive.org copy. I'd like to enter that info before I forget. EDIT: Approved, and it only took 3 days. Thanks for the quick response; I really appreciate it. The ISBN has now been added so I can finally delete my bookmark of the eBay photo with the spine. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:29, 19 July 2022 (EDT)
+
This is a general fiction award for novels or collections of short fiction by a single author, with genre works winning or receiving honors on occasion. It doesn't appear to be a poll (I can't find details on exactly how the winner is decided each year), there's no fee to enter, works published only as ebooks are not eligible, reprints of previously-published work are not eligible, and the full guidelines are [https://jewishlibraries.org/fiction-award-submission-guidelines/ here]. Should we add it? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:45, 30 April 2023 (EDT)
  
== The Collected Stories of Philip *D*. Dick ==
+
: The organization behind the award has been [https://jewishlibraries.org/history/ around for generations] and they have given awards to SF works like [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2993594 ''Atomic Anna'']. Looks eligible to me. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:03, 30 April 2023 (EDT)
  
Looking at the edit history, [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?883425 this one] has had 4 different editors/mods eyes on it, including a seemingly-inactive PVer, so I'm a tad wary of unilaterally fixing the apparent typo in the title without getting any second opinions.
+
:: Hearing no objection, I have created a new [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?104 award type], two award categories and two award records. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:36, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Thanks! Those are the only two I could determine are genre. None of the others seemed like genre works. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:03, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Also, the mod note on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5237562 the original edit] which stated ''This edition was on Amazon.com US for a few weeks, where I bought it, before disappearing from their site. There was no publisher listed, and no ISBN.''  It feels like this - with slight wording tweaks - should probably be in the pub note, unless anyone objects?  (That this pub is no longer available makes it harder to verify if the typo is/was genuinely in the pub, of course.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:18, 20 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Lovecraft Studies ==
: Dave is probably going to show up from somewhere soon-ish :) If you want to add the note, go ahead. See also [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Anniemod#The_Collected_Works_of_Philip_K._Dick_-_A_question this] for a conversation on other details on the thing. I am pretty sure the D. is a DB typo based on the long discussion we had on my page about it. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 12:50, 20 July 2022 (EDT)
 
:: You weren't kidding about the length of that thread ;-)  I'll make the tweaks I proposed if there hasn't been any other feedback/dissenting opinion here in the next few days. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 16:38, 20 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Internet Archive ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5650639; A dozen random issues of this magazine were uploaded on Archive.org in 2016 but today, while looking for something else, I stumbled on a single issue that was uploaded by a completely different person in 2021. Surprisingly, there was quite a bit that needed added/fixing; I tried my best, but I'm sure someone can improve on a few things after it's approved. Dirk B. entered it here in 2019 so he might want to look at it. Also, I made a follow-up edit merging "More Chain Lightning" by Lovecraft, keeping 1915 date and essay format. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:23, 30 April 2023 (EDT)
  
https://blog.archive.org/2022/07/08/internet-archive-seeks-summary-judgment-in-federal-lawsuit-filed-by-publishing-companies; I've warned about this a few times before on these boards, but now it seems they're really getting serious. The Archive has always had a questionable practice of allowing any and every book, including hundreds of thousands of non-public domain titles, to be on their site, similar to YouTube and other sites. So it would be a major blow to this site if all those books weren't available anymore to add info from, not to mention to people who just like to read the books. So this is something to keep an eye on. Or is this something they go through regularly and it won't amount to anything? --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:00, 20 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Mr. Murphy ==
  
== Canonical Name Change KC Grifant from K. C. Grifant ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5651017; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5651022; There's a note by someone discussing Jim/James A. Moore's name in the anthology but it turns out Murphy's name was wrong here; however, in their novel he really was credited just as Kevin Murphy. There's also a story, "Awake", published in old British horror zine Peeping Tom, many 90's/early 2000's cover art credits (some for books by Moore and so very possibly by the same Murphy who wrote with him), an interview with a guy from the old MST3K show, and a (II) who wrote a letter to Analog in the late 70's. So when my edits are approved the Murphys need separating if anyone can figure out who's who. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:33, 1 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Any objections to making [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?204307 KC Grifant] the canonical name and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?312721 K. C. Grifant] the alternate? The four titles attributed to K. C. Grifant shouldo have been credited to KC Grifant. I'll take care of the corrections when I make the change. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 16:37, 21 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Tinmey ==
  
: Hearing none, change made. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 10:57, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=tinm&type=Name; Same person, probably. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:49, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Sorcerer's Apprentice ==
+
== Peter Tate ==
  
https://archive.org/details/sa-016; The Wold story is on ISFDB with just a 1983 date and no note about where it came from, so I added a note about that, but philsp.com only mentions that story and the Keith Taylor article. So if anyone thinks the full contents should be entered here someone uploaded it recently. Philsp.com also mentions a #17 with a Karl Edward Wagner story but as far as I can see #16 is the only issue on Archive.org. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:22, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?11147; Note in his first story says it's slightly different version of the second story. Should they be made variants? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:36, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
: I added the publication with a second article and the book reviews [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?907718 here]. I've also been fixing the FictionMags links and adding RPGGeek links. [[User:Taweiss|Tom]] 10:56, 24 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Thanks. I noticed a lot of Sorcerer's Apprentice entries in the edit list; you went above and beyond. One thing I've been noticing is that some of the genre magazines that were uploaded to Archive.org (an uploader named SketchTheCow was responsible for many of them years ago) are incomplete; a very recent upload of an issue of a rare zine, Amazing Experiences, is missing 2 pages, which almost caused me to think that 1 of the stories listed in the contents wasn't in the zine. I was ready to crow about finding that out when I realized that the plot of a certain story didn't match the plot on the previous page ("The Yellow Pagoda"; the plot really shows up on the second page of the story, so I'm guessing not much is missed by the first page being missing; it seems like a sappy wish-fulfillment story about a woman who can't have a baby until she enters a pagoda at a carnival and a mysterious man from the Orient grants her wish and somehow makes her pregnant, but the ending takes a dark turn into pure horror; the author wrote a horror novel around the same time, Mantis, so I guess it's not too surprising). Also, the uploaded-in-2017 first issue of Night Cry from 1984 (which just reprinted stories from early issues of Twilight Zone Magazine) is missing SIX pages. What bothers me is that when I was rabidly printing every horror magazine that was uploaded several years ago I just assumed they were complete. I have at least half-a-dozen gigantic stacks of thousands of articles, essays, short stories, etc. printed at my local library that I haven't had time to read yet, and among them are hundreds and hundreds of stories from these magazines. When I finally get around to starting to read them, I wonder how many will be incomplete. So I suggest that anyone who works on anything having to do with archived zines, check and make sure they have all their pages, and if they don't leave a note in their record so other people will know. EDIT: I just noticed that Issue 16 which started this whole discussion doesn't have the issue number entered in the notes, while all the other issues have the issue # in the title, which I think is wrong; RTrace likes to fix those when he sees them. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:29, 24 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Looking for 90s e-zine Cosmic Visions ==
:::I have run into the issue with incomplete scans in the past.  At least the SA scan had page numbers, so that helps.  I added the issue number to the notes.  Unfortunately, issue 17 also came out some time in '83, so both issues will end up with the same title.  I have some more edits to make to the early issues as well to fix their links. [[User:Taweiss|Tom]] 11:38, 26 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Award Bibliography page - sorting by award type? ==
+
Good afternoon. I am trying to find any information about the late 90s ezine 'Cosmic Visions' that was put out by John Fultz for several years. I spoke to the editor myself, and he said he had no records or copies remaining. Specificaly, I am trying to find the September '97 edition which included a story by Stanley C. Sargent called "Synopticon of Fear". Does anyone have a lead re. any collectors or archivists out there that may be able to point me in the right direction? Thank you! --[[User:MagusManders|MagusManders]] ([[User talk:MagusManders|talk]]) 15:24, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Was it published on a website? If so, do you know what the URL was? Was it published as an ebook? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:46, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::It was an ebook, distributed via PDF from cosmicvisions.com. The website went down in 1998, but there's some archived pages [https://web.archive.org/web/19970414113406/http://www.cosmicvisions.com/ here]. The editor told me that becase the copyrights were donated, each issue had an "expiration" date, but it wasn't clear to me if this meant he would stop distributing it, or if the files actually deleted themselves. And thanks for fixing my posting error. --[[User:MagusManders|MagusManders]] ([[User talk:MagusManders|talk]]) 15:59, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::https://web.archive.org/web/19970416090028/http://www.cosmicvisions.com/html/cvse.pdf; Only PDF in the archived pages as far as I can tell. None of the contents are on ISFDB. Whoopee. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:34, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::https://web.archive.org/web/20111119172143/http://www.stanleycsargent.com/bibliography.html; Looks like he had 5 stories in Cosmic Visions and an interview with Bruce Campbell, star of the Evil Dead movies (evidence of that seemingly nowhere online at present). So I think a lot more than the story you mentioned above are elusive; the only evidence of it I see is your comments on Reddit. EDIT: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/note_search_results.cgi?OPERATOR=contains&NOTE_VALUE=cosmic+visions; famed author Brian A. Hopkins had a bunch of stories in the zine; non-famous author Sean Rodgers had at least one. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 17:30, 2 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Well, I'm working my way through the archived pages and trying to add what I can find. You can see the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/seriesgrid.cgi?69784 issue grid here] for what I've entered so far. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:38, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::It looks like a lot of big names were in this zine and it seemed to run for a long time. I keep finding random mentions in online bibliographies and such (even on LYSATOR, for God's sake), but I'd be happy if I could just find the Campbell interview. At least we now have that PDF linked here. Even the guy who ran the zine didn't seem to mention it; he probably forgot it was there. Websites in the nineties are like fossils now. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:52, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Based on what I can find, it appears the magazine folded shortly after the January 1998 issue. I can't find anything in the archives about any issues beyond that one. So, it appears to have lasted about 1.5 years. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:17, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::It looks like Robert Silverberg, Thomas Ligotti, Lin Carter, and Brian Lumley all contributed based on the entry on [http://www.lysator.liu.se/sf_archive/SF_resource_guide/sfrgc4.htm this page]. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:31, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I'm curious how you know "Synopticon of Fear" was in the September 1997 issue. I can't find that information anywhere, though I may not be searching for the right information. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:23, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Ah, it's on the [https://web.archive.org/web/20111119172143/http://www.stanleycsargent.com/bibliography.html bibliography page archive] linked by Username, above. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:27, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I think I've gotten the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?17678 Stanley C. Sargent] bibliography as far as I can with the current sources I've found. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:28, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Wow, thank you Nihonjoe and Username! You jumped on this faster than I could have imagined and did more than I could have myself! I am going to try to reach Robert M. Price to see if he has anything in his archives he's able to share, and I'll reach out to you if there's anything to be found. --[[User:MagusManders|MagusManders]] ([[User talk:MagusManders|talk]]) 14:22, 8 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::You're welcome. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:01, 8 May 2023 (EDT)
  
The "Award Bibliography" page currently sorts awards and nominations by year. That's fine for authors with relatively few awards, but it's not that great for more popular authors. For example, if you want to know if any of {{A|Paul J. McAuley}}'s works have been nominated for the Hugo award, you have to search [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/eaw.cgi?220 his "Award Bibliography" page] for the word "Hugo", skipping false positives like the 2005 Sidewise nomination for "The 2005 Hugo Award Ceremony Script".
+
== Atwood's Dancing Girls ==
  
I am thinking that it would be helpful to split the "Award Bibliography" page into two separate pages: one by year, which would be identical to the current one, and the other one by award type, which would have separate tables for each award type, sorted by type name. Would that be an improvement? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:13, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5653645; Nobody ever entered original Seal PB so I did from recently uploaded scan but got ISBN trouble. Only site in Google Search with the ISBN without the dashes is Open Library which of course links to Archive.org, but there's also 1 lonely site that has the ISBN with the dashes, https://leavesandpages.com/2012/07/03/review-dancing-girls-by-margaret-atwood/. So somebody out there has a copy with the same ISBN. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:00, 3 May 2023 (EDT)
: I'd love to be able to order that page by any of the 5 pieces of data in now shows - you have a similar issue if you are trying to find all nominations for a certain book for example (and they won't always be clustered if you sort per year because of translations and retrospective awards). So yes, having a second page grouping "per award" will be useful but having one which groups per title will also be a good idea IMO (if you are planning to do reorders anyway... :) ) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 15:20, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:Changing the checksum digit did not result in a valid ISBN. In these cases, we move the ISBN to the catalog field and make a note that it has an invalid ISBN in the pub notes. I have taken care of that. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:34, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
::Perhaps making the table that lists them sortable by some or all of the column headers? Would that be easy to implement? I know they have sortable tables on Wikipedia, though I haven't looked into how they are done. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:39, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
+
::Added another link to a copy and replaced cover. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:25, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/adv_search_results.cgi?USE_1=pub_title&O_1=exact&TERM_1=&C=AND&USE_2=pub_publisher&O_2=contains&TERM_2=seal&USE_3=author_canonical&O_3=contains&TERM_3=atwood&USE_4=pub_note&O_4=contains&TERM_4=isbn&USE_5=pub_title&O_5=exact&TERM_5=&USE_6=pub_title&O_6=exact&TERM_6=&USE_7=pub_title&O_7=exact&TERM_7=&USE_8=pub_title&O_8=exact&TERM_8=&USE_9=pub_title&O_9=exact&TERM_9=&USE_10=pub_title&O_10=exact&TERM_10=&ORDERBY=pub_title&ACTION=query&START=0&TYPE=Publication]; Bluesman moved ISBN to ID like you did for one of his PV and left some notes in both PV about ISBN; apparently spines need to be seen to get the real ISBN. I just added the month to the 3rd printing using eBay and the ISBN on spine doesn't match that on copyright page, so Seal books were a mess, it seems. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:16, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::: Making tables sortable is doable, but it would require some changes. For example, "Year and Award" is currently one column. We would need to split it into "Year" and "Award Type" before we could sort by award type. Also, translations and other variant titles would affect sorting by "Title", which may be better handled by creating a separate table layout.
+
== Constable ==
  
::: One more thing. We have a "Statistics" report for [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/most_popular_table.cgi?0 Titles Ranked by Awards and Nominations]; you can limit the results by title type, decade and year. It would be nice to be able to sort author-specific titles by "award score". It would help answer questions like "What's Author X's most popular works?". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:54, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?532472; While adding a bunch of edits for Jonathan Aycliffe books I discovered a lot of the recent editions had wrong covers with somewhat different text. Constable & Robinson is the publisher for most on ISFDB but I also got a Corsair. Problem is most were actually published by the Constable imprint, with that publisher being on the title page and the copyright page mentioning it's an imprint of Constable & Robinson, but there's only a handful on ISFDB with imprint/publisher being entered correctly (I've fixed the few I've come across in my edits). However, Corsair is also an imprint of theirs and yet there are nearly 200 books on ISFDB by them but none as an imprint. That's a separate issue, but I'm only interested in this particular case where Constable is on the title page but copyright page now says it's an imprint of Little, Brown. There doesn't seem to be any combination of those on ISFDB so how should this imprint/publisher be entered? A text search on Archive.org revealed that the copyright text about Little, Brown for Aycliffe books only finds this one. There's several Little, Brown publishers on ISFDB, ISBN 1-4721 leads to several British ones. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:43, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
:::: "Work with the most awards" is not necessarily the same as "most popular work" though :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 17:56, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::::: True, but in the absence of publishers' sales numbers awards and nominations are probably as close as we can get. We could also create a "Sorted by the number of reviews" page. (Unfortunately, our "votes" system is not as popular as Goodreads', which would make it only marginally useful.) [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 10:02, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
: From the 3 Constable anthologies I have print (*) pubs to hand for, it looks like something changed around 2014/5:
 +
: - [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?423965 Dozois' Best New SF 26] has "First published in the UK by Robinson, / an imprint of Constable & Robinson Ltd., 2013", and no mention of Little, Brown anywhere on the copyright page
 +
: - [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?573707 His Best New SF 29] by contrast has "First published in Great Britain in 2016 by Robinson"; there's no mention of Constable anywhere on the page, but down at the bottom it does have "Robinson / An imprint of Little, Brown Book Group". I note also that the address is the Hachette UK HQ at Carmelite House, whereas the previous 2013 book has Russell Square.
 +
: - [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?550958 The Mammoth Book of Kaiju] is also 2016 and has the same details as Best New SF 29.
 +
: (* I also have a bunch more of their anthologies in ebook that presumably have similar details, but as I'm led to believe that some people don't think there's any value in keeping records of them, I was disinclined to spend time digging them out and investigating further.)
 +
: Re. how these should be entered, I'll let someone more experienced speak to that, but my reading of [[Template:PublicationFields:Publisher]] is that whilst "Foo / Bar" may be preferable to "Foo" or "Bar", neither of the latter are intrinsically "incorrect"? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 15:59, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::OK, thanks. Except for the sarcasm. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:07, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:::::: How about number of pubs?  For example, using that as a ranking metric (*) puts Snow Crash ahead of Neal Stephenson's other work, which matches where it appears in [https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/545.Neal_Stephenson the Goodreads number-of-readers metric], whereas it's only his #5 work in the award table.
+
== Machen Merges ==
:::::: (* at least when just counting the English language pubs, which is all I could be bothered to implement in [https://github.com/JohnSmithDev/ISFDB-Tools/blob/master/bibliography.py my own version].) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:46, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::::::: Sure, we can do that as well. There may be a certain bias when some of the author's works are in public domain and some aren't, but it can still be useful. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:56, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?55418; Person who entered contents, J.D. Cowan (has their own record on ISFDB) didn't merge anything in the 2nd and 3rd volumes and a few things in the first may not be merged, either, from what I can tell. They seem to have generated a lot of messages on their page about not entering things properly but never answered any of them so it's pointless to leave a message there; if anyone wants to merge all of that I'm letting you know. Machen's stories were published under a mess of slightly different title variations so it probably won't be easy. Also, looking at his ISFDB page I see that stories jump from 1937 to 3 1987 Italian titles, a 2019 Italian title, and a 2022 Portuguese title; the 2019 story, Un frammento di vita, capitolo IV, is possibly the same as the last poem on his page, Un frammento di Vita, so that's another issue. Is it a story or a poem? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:57, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Duplicates merged. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 07:50, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:::: Other from that - yes - making these available on the individual authors' awards pages sounds like a good idea.
+
== FIRE ==
:::: For the title sorting - that is why I did not mention making the tables sortable (if we do, we will need to pull "Original title" in its own column and that view will get too crowded and wide I think). I like our usual way of +1,+2 and so on in the address bar that we have in some other pages to switch between views and I think it can work well here as well. But either way works. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 17:56, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
(unindent) Hearing no objection, the following FRs have been created:
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5654147; Judging by edit history the title changed back and forth, with Stonecreek, I believe, entering the full title, but shouldn't all words be capitalized? ISFDB doesn't care how it's entered in the book, words should be capitalized, I seem to remember reading that somewhere? Also, Hand's ISFDB author image is the cover of this book; it would be nice if someone could find a good one to replace it with. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:51, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
* {{FR|1521}} "Allow sorting authors' award pages by different fields"
 
* {{FR|1522}} "Author bibliography sorted by the number of reviews"
 
* {{FR|1523}} "Author bibliography sorted by the number of reprints"
 
[[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:00, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Szélesi Sándor = Sandor Szelesi ==
+
== Dutch Tilly ==
  
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?170731 Szélesi Sándor] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?298265 Sandor Szelesi] both appear on the birthdays section of the homepage today.  The latter only has a single title (from a short story in a German anthology), so it would seem the second author record should be made a variant of the first one, or perhaps have the story changed to use the first author, if it looks like the latter is a data entry issue?
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?542210; I have a few suggestions. There's a copy, https://archive.org/details/tillyroman0000pere, which is 111 pages, not 112, unless that last unnumbered page is in some way a part of the novel, in which case a note should be added about last page being unnumbered. Also, the subtitle Roman is not needed because it just means novel and those kinds of things aren't included in titles per ISFDB rules. Most importantly, this is some later edition judging by copyright page and 13-digit ISBN. By the way, there must be other genre-related books from this publisher, right? Because this is the only one on ISFDB. EDIT: I discovered something interesting while adding a link to the English-language edition; it says "a novel" on the cover but "the novel" on the title page because apparently it was originally an audio drama in 1986. So I don't know how exactly English translates to Dutch but if it's "the novel" then possibly that was meant to delineate between this print edition and the original spoken word. In which case subtitle "The Novel" should be added to the English and "Roman" left as is in the Dutch. If anyone cares about something so minor. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:11, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
  
However, I noticed that both of the author records have "Legal Name: Szélesi, Sándor", which made me wonder if Hungarian uses <family name> <given name ordering> like Japanese.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_names Wikipedia] indicates that's the case, so I'm guessing the author records should be varianted (like we have for Cixin Liu and Liu Cixin), but a second opinion would be preferable before I start on edits about things that I don't have any expertise in.... [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 17:56, 23 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Bill Prosser ==
  
:You' re right. In Hungary, the family name comes first, then the given name.Thanks for the discovery. I will correct this and change Sandor Szelesi into the alternative name. Rudolf [[User:Rudam|Rudam]] 11:59, 24 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://archive.org/details/horrorshorrorsho0000unse/page/181/mode/1up; A rare British edition of one of Helen Hoke's thousand or so anthologies was just uploaded on Archive.org, I added a link and fixed the ISBN (which was incorrectly the same as the American ISBN) somebody entered from WorldCat, I think (I have a feeling a lot of stuff is wrong in these books considering how many different editors here entered them over the years and the insane mess of multiple printings, interior art being re-used between USA and British but often totally different cover art, etc.). However, in this case what I want to know is if there's a way to extract an image from the back flap, because there's actually a clear photo of Bill Prosser, who did interior art and British covers which are pretty awesome (sometimes re-used for USA, sometimes not). Date is 1978 but he looks like a dirty hippie who just crawled out of a commune in Haight-Ashbury or whatever the British equivalent of that was so I'm assuming this was an old photo that probably is in other British Hoke editions if anyone could actually find the damn things. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:47, 4 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:If you could update [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/File:Bill_Prosser.JPG this] page with the appropriate template variables, it should serve. ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 08:08, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::I'm a moron. I have no idea what that means so if you could explain further. Also, should I click on the image link and add it to his record in an edit? I think probably yes. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:22, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::And I'm a maroon. I didn't know where or how to connect it up and this was the best I could do as it was just graphics. ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 22:15, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::I have [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=File%3ABill_Prosser.JPG&type=revision&diff=661373&oldid=661301 filled in] the license template. Each template page has the instructions for completing the template. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 07:37, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Triptych ==
+
== Masterless Swords ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1157274; Someone uploaded some Cemetery Dance issues recently, and since William F. Nolan's work in #4, https://archive.org/details/cemetery-dance-4-spring-1990, was never collected in any of his many story collections I believe it should be made an essay, since he just talks about a few story ideas he's had but there's no actual story. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:04, 23 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5654953; Obscure NZ newspaper article has revealed the contents, the titles of which seem to be nowhere on the web. However, I'm assuming the first 2 should be marked non-genre after this is approved. The article doesn't explicitly state the 3rd story's title but it's implied; there's a copy on eBay which shows title page but not contents page, so if anyone here has a copy that could help with possibly identifying the cover artist, verifying the title, and determining story lengths (I'm guessing it's 3 novellas). EDIT: I thought of searching newspapers.com and got 1 hit in an English paper but sign-up is required so I searched Google, verbatim, and got nothing but searching non-verbatim got 1 hit, https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/digitised/issue/straitstimes19480422-1, which shows a little bit of a review on p. 9 which seems, from the text, like a different review than that above, so if anyone has a subscription or whatever then possibly this review may verify the 3rd story's title, which is the only genre one and the most important. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:18, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:This author is not above the threshold IMO so their non-genre content would not be eligible. While the newspaper review implies the title is the same as the collection title ("third story explains the title"), but it is not explicit. We need a better source for the title. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:21, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== New WorldCat? ==
+
== Jack Red Bear ==
  
Anyone else see a banner at the top of WorldCat which says a new WorldCat is coming? I wonder what "new" means. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:37, 25 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5655023; I think the right thing is making original a variant of the more common name, right? If so, shouldn't the date of Strete title be 1977-10-00, date of his collection it appeared in under that name? Also, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=nocka&type=All+Titles, where Strete supposedly wasn't even co-credited in the original and apparently it was by Strete under an alternate title and then the original title in his collection. I'm passing the baton on that one. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:56, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
: They are redesigning. The details are not fully released yet but they hinted at it earlier in the year: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=962866871258711 . As far as I know, there won't be missing features but as with any redesign, we shall see. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 20:18, 25 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:I varianted both stories to being by Bear and Strete. Due to how ISFDB works, if they were varianted to just Strete, they would disappear from the Bear page & we'd be left with an empty author page. It seems quite possible Bear was an alternate name for Strete so I added that to the {{A|Jack Red Bear}} author page, but without a source, it will have to remain speculation. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:12, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
:: Oh my God, they went and did it, and it's HORRIBLE. I only found out when I clicked an OCLC link on OL and it took me to this page, https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/16107969?tab=details, which doesn't even have the OCLC on the page anymore. Why don't these people ever learn? They totally screwed up IMDb a few years ago with their awful redesign and now this, plus Amazon seems to be changing because many pages now lead to some weird thing where they just show the cover and there's some message about an error at the top of the page. This is ridiculous. Can't any of these sites ever do a redesign that actually improves things? It all seems so pointless now. EDIT: You now have to click the "Show more information" at the top of the page to see the info that used to be on the bottom of the page without clicking anything. Jerks. --[[User:Username|Username]] 23:31, 22 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Love Child ==
+
== Selkie Questions ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1838099; Title is very confused; I discovered that the Secker variant title is actually the original title with the dash, as are Viking and Richards, so I added the dash to those 2 plus the overall title record; however, an eBay copy of Virago shows every photo except the title page but since there's no dash in any of them it's safe to assume title page has none, either, and there's a 2021 British Library edition on Amazon but not on ISFDB which also has no dash; the Bello copy on Google Books, however, has no dash and no "The", either. So when my edits are approved breaking the Secker variant and making later editions variants may be needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:21, 26 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Willem_H.#Signet_Selkie; I tried discussing things with this guy but he's giving me his usual attitude so I'm going to ask further questions on this board. So I see from edit history that back in my early days here I entered the exact HC date using a clear photo of a review copy slip that's on FantLab. Recently I entered a later printing of the Signet PB but things were messy because the map date said March due to somebody messing with the date long ago, although he claims it was in 2010 but I don't see that anywhere, I think he meant 2009. He fixed the map date so now it should obviously be imported into the HC since that's where it comes from. So do others here see, as I do, that the map is also on p. [6] of the HC like it is in the PB? PV of HC doesn't respond except by e-mail which I'm definitely not sending. He PV it in 2007, prehistoric days in terms of this site, so maybe people weren't entering things like maps back then. Also, if anyone thinks the page count really needs [6] added to it like this guy did for his PB PV they can always add it to the HC and my PB entry, you have my permission, although there's still the case of the mysterious 1990 12th printing entered, possibly, by Bluesman who's long-gone and also where printings 2, 4-11, and possibly more are and whether they all included the map. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:29, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Ralph Smith ==
+
:See [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?1351644 this submission] from April 2010, scroll down to Modified Regular Titles and you see the date change of the map to 1982-03-00. That was not messing with the date, but aligning it with the date of the hardcover edition, (1982-03-00 since [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?1241153 this october 2009 edit]. I pointed to the edit that changed the date to 1982-04-16 in May 2021. I also pointed to the helptext that explains why the pagenumber should be [6] for the first paperback printing. Is there anyone else who thinks this has anything to do with "attitude", or is this simply the same editor complaining whenever someone disagrees with anything he does? --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] ([[User talk:Willem H.|talk]]) 15:13, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::You also advised me that you skipped an edit I made for the HC of this book because I didn't leave a note on the PV's page even though it wasn't changing anything but just importing the map credit which either PV didn't think needed entering or maybe entering map info wasn't a thing here back in 2007, and whoever entered the map info in the PB forgot/didn't know or care to import it themselves (I see from edit history that the map was likely entered by Bluesman and APPROVED BY Mhhutchins, the same person who didn't enter it in the original HC that they PV, so why after approving it in the PB he didn't just import it himself to his own PV is a mystery that maybe you can ask him/her). Plus the fact that the PV has pretty much given up and doesn't respond to much of anything these days, requesting people send them an e-mail which I'm not going to do because the last thing I want is anyone on this site knowing my e-mail address. After our initial encounter a long time ago where you threw a fit because I told you I changed a few things in one of your PV and a few later unpleasant discussions we had you actually seemed to be responding professionally for a while to several of my messages without giving me much of a problem but I guess your meds ran out or something because you're back to your old self. You were the only active PV of the PB so I was trying to sort out the mess as I've done for thousands of other books but apparently your personal problems, whatever they are, are more important. Who cares, 50,000 edits done so far, losing 1 here or there doesn't bother me. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:10, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?8649; I see that I added the cover to Captain Vincible some time ago and also a link to an article, but does it really belong here, being comics? Also, OL only lists 2 editions, in 1984 and 1985, not 1998. If it does belong here, the 1800's Smith needs something to separate him from the later Smith. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:14, 27 July 2022 (EDT)
+
::: Please note that "your meds ran out or something" is a personal attack. They are not allowed as per [[ISFDB:Policy#Blocking_Policy]]. A warning has been left on [[User:Username]]'s Talk page as per the Policy. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 16:56, 5 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Where's Samuel L. Jackson When You Need Him? ==
+
== F&SF Sep/Oct 2022 ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Mhhutchins#Snake.28s.29_.26_.28and.29_Ladders; This dude didn't respond to my message (I don't think he does respond here anymore) but I just saw in the edit list that he did something, but I don't think he quite got it, unless he's planning on doing more. So if anyone remembers, just check that the title in TZ (and art with same title) is changed properly and variants are OK. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:32, 27 July 2022 (EDT)
+
I noticed on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?20325 the F&SF series page] that [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3103984 the Sep/Oct 2022 issue] isn't part of [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2971585 the 2022 record]. I only have a vague understanding/recollection of how magazines work, so I'll let someone more familiar with them work out if this should really be like that, and if not, how it should be fixed. (FWIW that standalone issue is PVed, but by an editor who hasn't been around since the start of the year.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 08:54, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I merged the two title records together. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 09:09, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Thanks.  (I'm currently in the middle of adding the remaining 100-odd Locus Award finalists, and didn't want to get sidetracked spending a bunch of time looking into that tangentially related issue.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 10:05, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Futurians ==
+
== A pricing anomaly ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?838968; 1 John Day edition credits Greco while the other doesn't. Which is correct? There's a PV in common between both editions. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:54, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
If we ever get into codifying multiple prices, here's an oddity to keep in mind - a book with two prices that are date dependent.
 +
"£19.99 until 31 December 1998" / "£24.99 from 1 January 1999". ([https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?949447 The Silmarillion]) ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 12:09, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== New award "Ursula K. Le Guin Fiction Prize" ? ==
+
== RVT ==
  
This one had presumably been announced in the past, but hadn't been on my radar until [https://lithub.com/heres-the-shortlist-for-the-first-ursula-k-le-guin-fiction-prize/ the announcement of the first set of nominees] popped up in my Twitter feed just now. Off the top of my head, I know that at least 5 of 9 nominees are works that are in the database, and I suspect the others either already are, or probably should be. Looks like it's a panel judged award with just a single category - although the eligibility period looks a bit off, as there are both 2021 and 2022 works amongst those nominees. ([https://www.ursulakleguin.com/prize The official site] indicates it uses a May-April eligibility period.) The value of the winning prize, and a fairly high profile set of judges (for this year at least) indicate it's a fairly serious prize that should be around for a while. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 11:09, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=ray+van+tilb&type=Name; Very likely the same person, problem is 2 of the publications are scarce zines and the Dragon issue, which I checked on annarchive.com, says Raymond Van Tilburg. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:17, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
: EDIT: I've just checked the titles I wasn't sure about, and all of them are already in the database, except for [https://bookshop.org/books/after-the-dragons/9781777091743 one that definitely looks to be speculative]. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 11:18, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
:[https://efanzines.com/Argentus/Ag13.pdf This] explains (and lets us correct) the Tilberg [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?584053 here]. It's "Ray van Tilburg" on the cover and several mentions, but the artwork credit list below the TOC says "p.20 Ray van Tilberg". The artwork is credited on p. 20, however, with "Ray VanTilburg". The text associated with that begins "Ray Van Tilburg has a niche...".  I am going to change it. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 15:55, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::One follow-up on all of this:  A little Googling reveals "VanTilburg" is correct, not "Van Tilburg".  See the litany of [https://www.pinterest.com/aircool66/ Pinterest], [https://www.facebook.com/RayVanTilburgArt/ Facebook], [https://www.etsy.com/shop/ArtofRayVanTilburg Etsy], and his [https://offworlddesigns.com/ OffWorld Designs Art] site.  Per ISFDB standard, spacing is normalized when recording the credit, so I am going to remove the space from the canonical name and note that an extra space is sometimes included in credits. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 08:36, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: I wouldn't say that an expectation of "being around for a while" is a requirement -- a "real" award should be eligible for inclusion even if it dies after a year or two. What we primarily try to exclude is promotional gimmicks run by publishers and "paid contests". This award is clearly nothing like that.
+
== Brown's Brightest Day ==
  
:: Unless there are objections, I plan to add it to the list in a couple of days. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:17, 28 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=the+brightest+day&type=Fiction+Titles; While adding links to stories that were on the old House of Pain horror site I added a link to Eric S. Brown story "The Brightest Day" but according to ISFDB it was published in a 2002 issue of Black Petals as Eric Brown, which means that is lumped in with the well-known Eric Brown who wrote a lot of SF. So if anyone knows how to get that issue of Black Petals and verify what his name is then either it can be variant or merge. I suspect there are other stories on Eric Brown's page here that belong to Eric S. Brown. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:07, 6 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::: The [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?99 new award type] and a single award category have been created. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:31, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Shumate Story ==
  
:::: Thanks.  By chance, I just added the missing nominated title a few minutes ago, so I'll add the nominees later this evening.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:43, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Biomassbob#Time_To_Scare_Gramma; I suppose titles should be merged since they're the same but the lengths are totally different, so what do you suggest? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:27, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== 2022-07-29 -- server problems again ==
+
== Le James Bond ==
  
We are once again experiencing server problems. At the rate the virtual machine is leaking disk space, we will have to shut down in less than an hour. Al has been notified. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:26, 29 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?260470; French edition, https://archive.org/details/jamesbondchassea0000otfi, if anyone wants to enter it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:07, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: Edit: The loss of disk space is even worse than what I saw a few minutes ago. We probably have 10-15 minutes left. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:27, 29 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Leokum ==
  
:: I am about to shut the server down, right before it runs out of space. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:09, 29 July 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5657866; While doing this I saw an Arkady Leokum on Wikipedia with different birth/death dates but at the bottom of his credits is a book with Posnick (it's on Archive.org). Just thought that was weird. Maybe dad and son? Wiki mentions "pulp fiction" (doesn't list any, though) so maybe they're confusing Leonard with his dad, except that Wiki mentions a son but his name is Peter. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:13, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::: We are back up. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 20:48, 29 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Linton Christmas Story ==
  
:::: I have a suggestion. Typing isfdb.blogspot.com verbatim on Google only brings up these 5 sites, [https://www.google.com/search?q=isfdb.blogspot.com&biw=1366&bih=667&tbs=li%3A1&ei=a1blYvuCKLqfptQP5JeW2AY&ved=0ahUKEwi75LDP_qD5AhW6j4kEHeSLBWsQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=isfdb.blogspot.com&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BQguEJECOgUIABCRAjoLCAAQgAQQsQMQgwE6EQguEIAEELEDEIMBEMcBENEDOg4ILhCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICAAQsQMQgwE6CAguENQCEJECOgQILhBDOgQIABBDOggILhCABBCxAzoLCC4QgAQQxwEQrwE6BQguEIAEOgoIABCxAxCDARBDOggIABCABBCxAzoFCAAQgAQ6BAgAEB46BggAEB4QCEoECEEYAEoECEYYAFAAWPIaYPwcaABwAHgAgAHfAYgBxhCSAQY2LjExLjGYAQCgAQHAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz], which are the actual site, an ancient ISFDB message from 2008 heralding the new site, and a couple of mentions on academickids.com; the last 2 are fake spam sites. Typing "isfdb blog" verbatim brings up these, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22isfdb+blog%22&tbs=li:1&filter=0&biw=1366&bih=667&dpr=1], which are only slightly more numerous. When there are server problems there should be an obvious link to the blog, but there's not, so maybe someone can fix that. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:15, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
http://www.philsp.com/homeville/FMI/n04/n04934.htm#A181; 2 separate titles that don't match the title here, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2851147. EDIT: I made these 2 edits, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5658281, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5658282, but there's a problem with "The Veiled Portrait" because it was given the wrong name and the date doesn't match either of these, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1359048, so I think somebody with a copy of this book needs to correct info somebody entered here; it seems to be Toff, who judging by the few entries on their page also entered some other Valancourt anthologies, so a look at those may be needed, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:16, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::::: There are two different downtime scenarios:
+
== Asimov's Essays: The Hugo Winners ==
:::::* A complete server shutdown when browsers fail to establish a connection to the server. There isn't much we can do about that.
 
:::::* The server is up but the database is not accessible for some reason. You can tell because trying to access any ISFDB page results in a "The ISFDB database is currently undergoing maintenance. Please try again in a few minutes" message. We can modify this message to say "http://isfdb.blogspot.com/ may have more information."
 
::::: [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:40, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:::::: {{FR|1520}} has been created. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:40, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
On Asimov's summary page we have the series [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?68833 Introductions for 'The Hugo Winners']. This excludes his other essays - afterwords, postscripts and appendices - and so I propose enabling their inclusion by renaming the existing series to "Asimov's Essays: The Hugo Winners". What do others think? Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 21:48, 7 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: The existing series has only Asimov's essays, and is missing the introduction by [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?135920 Charles Sheffield]. Not including it  suggests the title is wrong, but including it keeps it from being Asimov as your proposed title suggests. Also, prefixing it with "Asimov's Essays:" suggests that there are, or should be, other collections of his essays. Given how many he has written and how often they are reused, it may be difficult to categorize them. I think the series adds little value and don't care if it's changed, but I do think that a hierarchy of titles (e.g. "The Hugo Winners", "Essays for 'The Hugo Winners'") should be considered. ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] ([[User talk:Holmesd|talk]]) 08:24, 8 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::::::: {{FR|1520}} has been implemented. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:40, 7 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Author DJ Tyrer ==
  
:::::::: Great! One suggested tweak; "if this due" to "if this is due". --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:38, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
I have been working on a number of publications involving DJ Tyrer, as an editor or a contributor. In the actual publications, he is always credited as DJ Tyrer not [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?153003 D. J. Tyrer]. Despite this, the ISFDB only showed separate initials. A quick check of the canonical record's [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/author_history.cgi?153003 edit history] shows three merges. I contacted DJ and he confirms his first name is David-John, one name. He only goes by DJ. Separate initials are wrong. I intend to merge the two author records and all the appropriate title records. David-John Tyrer and David John Tyrer (one title each) will remain alternate names unless I can verify an error. I will add a note to the new canonical record so there will be no question in the future. He was also kind enough to review his summary bibliography and only found 4 errors, which I will correct. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 19:59, 8 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5659503; There are at least a few other thehorrorzine.com Tyrer poetry pages currently online spanning several years where they printed several poems on each page, including "Afraid of the Dark" which has a 2021 date here but it's on a 2018 Horror Zine page. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:15, 8 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Sounds good to me. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 11:26, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::::::::: Good point. Fixed. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:05, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Gruft ==
  
== Pentacle ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?495335; While doing edits for F. Paul Wilson books I saw this; that looks like a Les Edwards cover, doesn't it? If so, someone who can ID it can also variant it to the original. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:00, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?38644; The preview copy on Google has an essay by Ken Abner, who edited Terminal Fright where most of the stories appeared, but there's no 1999 edition on ISFDB, just the 1995 and the much later e-books. Anyone know where it originated? --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:06, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Lincoln Hunters Date ==
  
== Samuel R. Delany / The Einstein Intersection - Cut / Restored Chapter ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?9373; I just added a link to the Rinehart 1st ed. and I think the dates are wrong because they're from the club ed. which usually comes later; anyone know original date? 3 PV of club ed., 2 long-gone and 1 with a very odd name has zip on their discussion page. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:16, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Various editions of The Einstein Intersection have a cut or restored chapter. I will shortly edit and PV five pub records: [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?39061 one] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?308432 two] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?256309 three] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?200281 four] and five which will be a new pub record. I will add a general note about the cut / restored chapter to the title record and a specific note to each of these five pub records. Whilst researching this, I noticed that the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?256325 Ace fourth printing] states "First Ace printing March 1967". The pub record for the Ace first printing currently has a date of 1967-00-00 so I will add the month, add a pub note stating the source and add the month to all the associated records.
+
== Butterfly Revolution Questions ==
There are far too many PVs to notify individually hence this posting on the Community Portal. I will wait a few days in case there are comments before submitting all these edits. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 13:56, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
 
:I have submitted the edits. There are eight in the queue. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 11:42, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Meyrink Cover ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?20540; Some more editions of Butler's books recently uploaded on Archive.org, I've been making some edits, I noticed someone (Don Erikson?) wrote a note about where they got cover artist from for the original American PB but didn't actually enter the artist. So if anyone has the book he got it from they may want to enter it. Also, the most recent American PB on ISFDB is a 20th printing but there's a 1984 19th printing uploaded with the same cover, so if anyone knows which edition was the first to use that cover they can fix the art date. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:16, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?138313; The 1992 Dedalus ISBN links, on OL, to a 2004 Dedalus cover while on Amazon it shows the Ariadne cover. So is Ariadne Dedalus under a different name, and is it correct for the cover to be dated 1936, when it was painted, instead of the book's date? --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:22, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Bloch's Second Coming ==
  
== She's Dead, Jim ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1222802; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?97532; Might be the same thing. This, https://socialistjazz.blogspot.com/2017/04/ffb-eighth-stage-of-fandom-by-robert.html, describes it as articles about Jesus; this, https://cthulhuwho1.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/2256_inventory_4.pdf, says it was in an obscure periodical, Osgledaren, foreign I'm guessing. So some obscure things here, Taboo, Eighth Stage of Fandom, and that periodical are not anywhere I can see, so help if you can. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:03, 9 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Well, Nichelle Nichols, Star Trek's Lt. Uhura, has died at the age of almost 90, and from the info on her Wikipedia page it looks like the last 5+ years of her life were pretty sad. Anyway, I added a better cover and an OL link to the Archive copy of her autobiography Beyond Uhura (the British Boxtree HC, which is the only non-PV edition), but her novel Saturna's Quest is a bit puzzling, being from some obscure publisher, Planet X, unlike the first book in the series which was mainstream. It turns out the publisher's name has been wrong here for years, being Publishing and not Publications, which caused it to be lumped in with a Planet X that published books many years later. I fixed the name and imported a nice cover to the Wiki because Amazon and other ISFDB-friendly sites either have no cover or weirdly show the title page instead. Info is scarce, so if anyone owns a copy they may want to verify page count, etc. Only Takei (85), Koenig (85) and Shatner (91) are left (although Shatner will probably refuse to die when Death comes for him). --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:35, 31 July 2022 (EDT)
+
== Joan D. Vinge's Heaven Chronicles and Vernor Vinge's Zones of Thought - same series? ==
  
== Height Intro ==
+
Per [https://www.tor.com/2023/05/10/five-authors-who-wrote-sequels-to-someone-elses-work/ a James Davis Nicoll piece published today on tor.com], ''"Finally, there is the curious matter of Joan D. Vinge’s 1978 [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1423 Outcasts of Heaven Belt], which shares a setting with Vernor Vinge’s [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?11587 Zones of Thought] stories... Vinge explained the genesis of her novel and the connection to the Zones in a 2008 letter to her readers. Until I read that letter, I had no idea there was a connection"'' and there's a link to [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303224912/http:/www.sff.net/people/jdvinge/letter_20081103.htm an archive.org copy of that letter] (which I've only skimmed over).
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?39382; I recently added a newly-uploaded Archive copy of the Arkham, and just now added page #'s to the Millington because contents were all out of order, but I noticed the introduction is missing from the Star; page count is lower so maybe it's not in there, but maybe it is, so if anyone owns that edition they can say for sure and, if it is, it can be imported. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:21, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
There are a fair number of PVs of both the Joan and Vernor Vinge novels, any thoughts on whether those series could/should be merged, one made a subseries of the other, just have linking series notes, etc?  I don't have any personal opinion or insight on this, as the only one of them I've read was A Fire Upon the Deep, which I have to confess I DNFed a third of the way through... [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 10:53, 10 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Adrian Tchaikovsky's Elder Race ==
+
: The linked article says:
 +
:* ...the "Heaven Belt" stories are linked to the "Zones of Thought" series created and written by my former husband (and still friend), Vernor Vinge.
 +
: I would turn the two series into sub-series of a super-series. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:12, 10 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Thanks - I've created [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?69884 an unimaginatively named superseries] with some brief extracts from that letter, and a link to it. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:13, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
We currently have {{A|Adrian Tchaikovsky}}'s [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2933372 ''Elder Race''] listed as a novella. The Note field reads:
+
== We Are All Legends ==
  
: Per a tweet from the author, this is a novella. Kobo reports a word count of 40k words. A conservative word count of 250 words per page, and 165 pages (blank pages are excluded) give 41,250 words, above the NOVEL threshold.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5661090; My note is in addition to notes that other editors wrote for the other 2 editions on ISFDB. I assume ISFDB rules state that this should be a collection as opposed to a novel even though it's called a novel on the copyright page. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:40, 10 May 2023 (EDT)
  
I have a copy of the ebook and the lowest possible word count -- once you delete the copyright page, the dedication, etc -- is 40,347. As per [[Help:Screen:NewPub]], a novella must be "less than or equal to 40,000 words". Any objections to changing the title type to NOVEL? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 17:00, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Trek: The Lost Years ==
  
:I did an estimated word count from my print copy using the tool (I think it was the one Mhutchins created?) and got 39,384. It's definitely right on the border, and there's a page of smaller text with two columns, so it may well bump over to 40k. There are a lot of blank pages scattered throughout the book. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 18:40, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5661789; James Van Hise is on title page regardless of what cover and Archive.org note writer says, so what's the procedure? Shouldn't it say James Van Hise (in error) and variant to Edward Gross? Assuming, of course, that Van Hise didn't actually write it. EDIT: Cover artist has an extensive record without their middle initial; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?133578. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:40, 10 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: FWIW: [https://twitter.com/aptshadow/status/1375024649373937665 "Editing this novella back and forth over the 40k word limit like I'm God and the Devil fighting over its soul."]  The dating of that tweet would suggest it refers to either Eldar Race or [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2981560 Ogres], the latter of which also has a 40k word count reported by Kobo.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 19:31, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== RWH ==
::: The Hugo admins also consider it a novella. While they can make a mistake, I cannot find anyone online challenging the type - and the SF community is not exactly silent with such things... [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 19:43, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
 
:::: [https://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-faq/ Hugo FAQ] says "Also note that there are similar principles involved with the relocation of works in the four written-fiction categories, which also have a +/- 20% gray zone around their respective category boundary lengths."  I dunno if any other awards have a similar fudge factor; if not, that might explain why getting under 40k is still the target for novellas? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 20:06, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
 
::::: I know they can fudge a bit - but even when they do, someone does complain :) Especially the fans (and occasionally authors) of the novella(s) that did not make the cut... And unless my google-fu is broken, I cannot find anything (and I don't remember anyone complaining). It is possible that this one slipped and went a bit higher. If Ahasuerus is sure in his count, I am fine converting it with notes - it is just way too close for estimates :( [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 20:35, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
 
: Are you sure it is not counting some extras (pages numbers, chapters titles, single words split into two lines and so on)? If you are sure of the count, then we just need to document and change the type I think but I will be very surprised if it did not got edited down to fit a category (because it was never going to get a novel nomination). Not that it cannot happen of course :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 19:43, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Well, it's an e-book, so there are no page numbers or split words.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?175902; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?58684; Someone added link to one of Hedge's poems years ago so I just added link to the other poem even though 1990s Nightscapes issues are somehow still online and not hard to find; however, I think this is a pseudonym for Ron Goulart because that essay (not short fiction as ISFDB calls it) from F&SF is clearly a fake bio. EDIT: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5662212; I found another poem by "Hedge" hiding in that HPL issue. This page, http://www.epberglund.com/RGttCM/nightscapes/NS04/hplindex.htm, lists all the letters and other stuff that The FictionMags Index didn't list in case anyone thinks those need entering. The date is fishy, too, because it was published in October judging by the production dates but it's called "April-October". --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:36, 11 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: I am using TextPad to count words in an ASCII version of the file. TextPad is pretty good at it since it's part of its core functionality. For example, the e-book uses "* * *" as chapter/scene separators, but TextPad doesn't count them as separate words.
+
== Sargent Review ==
  
:: There are no chapter titles per se, but POV changes are marked with the name of the POV character. It could arguably subtract a few dozen words from the "official" count, but it would still be well over the 40,000 word limit. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 21:33, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?395035; Title is wrong, it's Lost Cities, note makes no sense with the dates vs. book date, non-genre series book with many other Lost Cities volumes, only here because of review, delete? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:04, 11 May 2023 (EDT)
::: Sounds like it did not get under the wire then... :) Depending on how they made the ebook, split words can be an issue (surprisingly enough that happens now and again even in new books from major publishers...) - thus the question :) Same for page numbers and the like - although these show up more often in OCR messes than in new books. As I said, if you are sure in the count, I do not object a conversion. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 22:36, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:Book deleted. Review turned into an essay. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 14:06, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::I just fixed a short story in Sargent's record, turning it into an essay; I think it was this one so mistake was made when entering, I guess. I also added a few more story and poem links and think that I've done pretty much all there is to be done with him for now, at least until someone uploads one of his hard-to-find books, which will probably open a can of worms because I see at least one problem with 2 of his stories probably being the same but one having a subtitle in his collection. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:40, 16 May 2023 (EDT)
  
(unindent) Thanks, folks. I have updated the title and publication records, including Notes. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:38, 3 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Hitler Art ==
  
== Russian Interference ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5649674; Someone familiar with the foreign editions, tell us which cover Hoffmann really did. SFE, as so often before, has wrong info, but it was obviously wrong anyway because it's a tinted photo of Adolf H. who didn't come to power until long after Hoffmann died. I tried to explain that in my note but it didn't help. So when someone identifies which cover is his this can be un-rejected. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:53, 11 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I see JLaTondre just updated the book with notes and mentioned the Hoffmann credit that's on the flap; however, this can't possibly be the Hoffmann on ISFDB because he died decades before Hitler came to power and so clearly isn't the artist here, especially since it's just a photo, anyway. So either book has wrong info or there's someone else with the same name who's responsible. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:07, 14 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::(edit conflict) SFE was correct. It is credited on the back flap of the book. The photograph is by Heinrich Hoffmann (1885–1957), Adolf Hitler's official photographer. I have disambiguated this Hoffmann from the other one. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 09:11, 14 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Uh-oh; I mentioned this some time back, but FantLab seems to have gone through some changes recently because today I had to replace Thomas Monteleone's author photo from FantLab because the old one was broken, and now I was looking at Star Book of Horror 1 and that FantLab cover is also broken. I noticed the replacement photo I added was the same URL except there wasn't the word "data" at the beginning, if that helps. I'll be damned if I'm going to replace anything besides that photo, so I assume when mods get everything sorted out there will be a general fix for all broken links, right? Please? --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:19, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Investigations of Avram Davidson ==
  
: Checking their security certificate, I see that it expired earlier today. Let's wait a day or two and see if their administrators renew it. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:35, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5663113; Fixed this up but there's another record, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?35403, which has an award nomination, so I think the award should probably be moved to the record I just edited and the other record deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:01, 12 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Fixed. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 14:02, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: They have updated their security certificate, which should remain valid for the next 90 days. Everything seems to be working again -- see [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?262338 ''Star Book of Horror No. 1'']. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:28, 3 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== John Stewart ==
  
::: Great! I cancelled my Monteleone edit and made another one because even though the author image is now working again, when I added it long ago I forgot to erase the trailing "?r=" thing at the end of the URL, and I also found a rare 1990 interview conducted by fellow horror author Robert McCammon on a TAPE RECORDER (kids, ask your parents), so another edit was necessary. However, in the many edits I've made since I wrote this I may have replaced 1 or 2 FantLab images that were broken while I was adding other info to the record the image was in, so I'm mentioning that to forestall any complaints of "Why did you replace a perfectly good image?!?" when a moderator gets around to approving them. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:43, 3 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?27454; I just had author image approved and noticed that short story is likely not by the artist because he died several years earlier. There's also an alternate name for the story which was also an alternate name for a few interior pieces by the artist. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:32, 12 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: The publisher's website and the title verso of the publication containing the story agree the authors name is Jeff Stewart, not John Stewart. I'm hoping it's this [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?131106 Jeff Stewart]. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 14:52, 12 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Mira ==
+
== C. Armitage Harper ==
  
Famous author James Patterson edited an anthology, Thriller, back in 2006 which included some well-known names; someone entered it here but didn't add any contents (doubtful most of them are genre, anyway) and the page count was off by nearly 200 pages, so I fixed/added stuff from the Archive copy; however, the publisher, Mira, got lumped in, I think, with a Mira that publishes women's fiction, of which there are nearly 600 on ISFDB. So the question is how to differ this book's publisher, and whether among those 600 there may be at least a few that are by this Mira. EDIT: I decided to do an advanced search using publisher and 7783 ISBN and it turns out that this Mira IS the same as the others, which is weird because they published books by women and this anthology's 30+ writers are mostly men. Oh well. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:45, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5663571; Death date very different, mother's name slightly different, verification needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:14, 12 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Hot Blood ==
+
== External ID template additional wording needed ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?8749; I added the Book Club edition of Stranger By Night from Archive.org, which shows the PB cover on OL, and then noticed, as usual with these insane Pocket Books with their Canadian maple leaf editions and several printings and whatnot, that the cover for the original PB of Hot Blood was not the right cover, having no price (possibly the Gallery edition; they used the same Pocket covers but ridiculously jacked up the prices). There's an Archive copy of the Book Club edition which also shows a different cover on OL, also added by me, but after importing the original PB cover, because it doesn't seem to be on any friendly sites (FantLab shows the later printing's cover with the much higher price that's already on ISFDB, but then shows a photo of the back cover of the original edition!), I noticed that the subtitle on the original PB cover is Provocative, not Erotic. There's some confusion about that, with other editors making notes about how later editions say Erotic on the cover but still use Provocative on the title page, so I believe the original cover is the only one with the original title on both cover and title page. So just mentioning this in case anyone owns a lot of editions and can compare and make sure everything's as it should be re: proper titles, prices, covers and such. --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:36, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
+
In the Template:PublicationFields:ExternalIDs [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:PublicationFields:ExternalIDs here], for the Audible-ASIN entry, could something like "If the Audible ASIN is an ISBN-10, convert the ISBN-10 value to ISBN-13 and place the ISBN-13 value in the ISBN field." be added after the sentence that reads "Also note that, unlike regular Amazon ASINs, we record Audible ASINs even when they match the ISBN-10."?  Thanks! [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 08:30, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I think I must have put this in the wrong discussion group so I just copied this to Rules & Standards. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 06:54, 22 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Kheryn Callender / Kacen Callender canonical name change ==
+
== Harry O ==
  
I think it is time to switch the canonical name [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?265373 here]. Except for the few early editions of the first book, all books are published under Kacen Callender. Any objections? [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 18:42, 3 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?273603; I randomly came across a non-fiction book by R. Matheson, Mediums Rare, that was never entered here but after doing so it said Harry O. Morris was a disambiguated name because of that 1 wrongly-entered cover credit; do I have permission to merge with this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1282130, since PV with wacky name never responds to any messages sent to them on their page? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:42, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I merged them. That was an obvious error (entering the cover illustrator & interior designer and labeling them with their roles). --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 13:47, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: Sounds like a plan. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 23:01, 3 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Crispino Cover ==
:: And done while adding their new book. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 13:09, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Smoking Shatner ==
+
https://fantlab.ru/art9850; Says he's Italian but credits on ISFDB are for German books, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?244341; cover on FantLab is the same as this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?603133. Also, the note on FantLab about the artist (RIGHT-CLICK AND CLICK TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH), if I understand it correctly, says he's wrongly credited as D. Crispino in that book. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:33, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
In a follow-up to my Nichelle Nichols post above, I replaced the terrible William Shatner ISFDB photo, too-bright, old, and fat, with a crystal-clear B&W photo of a young and incredibly handsome Shatner smoking a cigarette, so you know it's from a long time ago. Looking next at George Takei, I think his photo is OK as it is, but I noticed that his 90's autobiography has a British price here for the Archway edition; the copy on Archive.org, https://archive.org/search.php?query=takei%20%22to-the-stars%22&and[]=mediatype%3A%22texts%22&and[]=collection%3A%22internetarchivebooks%22, has only American prices. It seems the original editor was the one who entered that price, but they're very long-gone. There's also some odd confusion about the ISBN being re-used from some much older book. So anyone more familiar with this book may know more, like where that British price came from, and whether it should just be changed to the American price and the Archive copy linked here. --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:29, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Martin H. ==
  
== May Dawney Designs ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=martin+hof&type=Name; I think the 2 German artists are the same person. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:04, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:There is an English artist, a German artist, and a German essayist. If you question the credit on any of these, they all have active verifiers whom you can ask to double check. Otherwise, you would need a source that shows any of these are the same person in order to create an alternate name. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 13:56, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Checking... [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=may+dawney&type=Name Three different May Dawney Designs] - I guess we should merge these into just May Dawney Designs, right? [[User:MagicUnk|MagicUnk]] 13:16, 5 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== John Craig ==
:Done. Looking at the Amazon Look Inside for the pubs, the 2021 and 2022 were copyright year credits and not part of the name. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 15:56, 5 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Mysterious Poe Collection ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?19264; None of those are by the guy who died before any of them were written/drawn, and likely none have anything to do with each other, although it's slightly possible the guy who wrote the stories wrote the essays, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:08, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://archive.org/details/illustratededgar0000poee; Found this with no dustjacket, contents don't correspond to the other book with that title on ISFDB (also published in 1976), by Jupiter but there's a reprinted by Bookthrift on bottom of title page, Bookthrift only appears once on ISFDB as the publisher of an F. Paul Wilson book in 1990 with no cover image and ISBN finding nothing, ISBN of this Poe title finds 2 different Amazon covers, both terrible sideways photos, and Goodreads cover is upright but badly framed and damaged. So does anyone own a copy/know more? --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:53, 6 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Tipped-In ==
  
== Molt Brother ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?815229; Book is 1920, preface is 1930, this page, http://wormwoodiana.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-revels-of-orsera-query.html, says it was tipped into leftover copies of the 1920 edition, link someone provided here to Harvard copy doesn't seem to have the preface, this copy does, https://archive.org/details/b29826123, what do you suggest? Add Archive.org link and mention preface in notes? Clone edition? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:06, 13 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I would make a second pub, 1930, for the one on Archive.org, with that dated pre-TOC preface in the contents as the differentiator (note it also has a "By the same author" list not seen in the other copy, and the "v" number on the first TOC page no longer aligns with the physical page count).  The linked Harvard copy has the library's date stamp "Dec 6 1920", which pretty much guarantees it is an edition published before that date and can't possibly have a 1930 preface. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 07:51, 14 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?22570; As I've been working on Playboy books, some were entered as Playboy Press when they were really Playboy Paperbacks, and here's one with several active PV. Photo of title page here, https://www.ebay.com/itm/112360554002. Needs fixing? EDIT: Mind War, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?290886, is on OL and even though there's a (non-active) PV the cover artist wasn't entered from the copyright page so I took care of that, but then the publisher is Playboy Press Paperbacks so I changed it to that, and then the LCCN does show up on the LOC site but as "invalid" and a completely different one is listed as "valid" so I entered that. However, looking further, it seems that a lot of PB from the publisher were entered as Playboy Press, the HC name, but somewhere along the way they switched the PB name from Playboy Press Paperbacks to just Playboy Paperbacks, but editors entering them on ISFDB couldn't decide because there are more than a dozen with the longer name and several dozen with the shorter; far too many of them have active PV, so I'm just fixing Mind War's publisher and leaving the other ones alone. Someone here with a ton of patience could go through every paperback and fix everything. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:31, 6 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== DW and the Genesis of the Daleks ==
  
== Robert Foster Middle-Earth guides ==
+
https://archive.org/search?query=dicks+daleks+pinnacle; According to edit history I added Archive.org link to Day last year although I have absolutely no recollection of doing so. However, the recently-uploaded Genesis is problematic; it says second printing, May 1982 with a $1.95 price but the only ISFDB edition with that price says 1-1981 and the 1982 edition is $2.50. So someone who knows the complex history of these Who books can add the link if they can decide which edition it belongs to. I assume it should be the 1981 because that has the right ISBN in which case the date would need changing, but then the 1982 would need a new date because it's a third printing. There's no note in 1983 that it's a fourth printing, either (and no price), although there is for the fifth and sixth printings. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:08, 14 May 2023 (EDT)
  
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?181137 This author] has 4 different Middle-Earth guide titles published between 1971 and 2001; pubs of the 1971 and 1978 iterations have verifiers.  The copyright page text copied into the notes indicates that these are revisions of the same book e.g. [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?204225 from a 1978 pub]: ''"First Ballantine Books Edition: August 1974" (over) "Revised and enlarged edition: March 1978 (hardbound)"'', so I'm just double checking that the consensus that the later titles are definitely different enough that they shouldn't be varianted from the original 1971 one?
+
== French Dark Channel ==
  
The reason I ask is that there's [https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/the-complete-guide-to-middle-earth-the-definitive-guide-to-the-world-of-jrr-tolkien-robert-foster?variant=39718557450318 another version of this to be published next month].  The blurb doesn't indicate any difference in content from earlier versions, other than the addition of illustrations, so I'm inclined to variant it to the 2001 version, but throwing open to any alternative opinions...? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:41, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://archive.org/search?query=garton+alliance; I've been doing a lot of Ray Garton edits and came across this in case anyone wants to enter a French edition. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:14, 15 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Horne Anthology Art ==
+
== Ronald Fraser Art ==
  
https//www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?33822; I added a link to the Book Club edition; PV is gone now. I also added a link to the PB (at least 1 active PV), but artist was entered as Daniel even though it says Dan in the PB and note even mentions that, so I changed it to Dan. I'm sure someone will say something about this. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:51, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5666000; Unusual last name of artist, he's on ISFDB, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?373087, Desert title page photo online says E. while signature can't be found on Flower Phantoms cover but few online mentions use Eric; I also added a link to Fraser's Landscape With Figures and the artist there is also on ISFDB twice, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=lucchesi&type=Name, with 1 cover clearly signed E. and the other Edmund. So I mention these things in case after approval someone decides which names are parents and wants to variant the other ones. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:59, 15 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== The Man Who Created Tarzan ==
+
== Saga Press Dates ==
  
https://archive.org/search.php?query=porges+tarzan&sin=; I came across these 2 books, 1 uploaded more than 10 years ago and 1 uploaded recently. The HC is a 2nd printing, and PV is not around anymore, while the PB has 1 active PV who I tried to interest in looking at Archive's copy to compare with his own and possibly add or fix anything, especially since it seems the uploader only included the first volume, not the second, but PV wasn't having any of it, apparently being a Luddite who only cares about physical copies, which I can sympathize with, being in my early fifties and remembering when people actually read books on paper. So I mention this here in case anyone who's interested in Burroughs wants to see if this printing of the HC differs in any way from the original entered on ISFDB (people who like entering multiple printings would probably want to enter it, anyway, just for posterity) or if the half-uploaded PB can yield anything useful. EDIT: I noticed that the publisher of the HC, Brigham Young University Press, only has 1 other ISFDB book, a kids' book from nearly 40 years earlier, while Brigham Young University has dozens of ISFDB books starting in the mid-1980's. Just thought that was weird; I can't believe the only 2 genre books they published in nearly 40 years were a little chapbook and a Tarzan bio. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:11, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?576157; I just did an edit adding Archive.org link to this; I don't often deal with such recent books so I'm not familiar with Saga but is it normal for their print books to have one date, in this case 0816, on the flap and another date, in this case November 2016, on the copyright page? One of the bios at the back says a book from one of the authors "will appear in August 2016". --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:45, 15 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Emperor of the If ==
+
== E. Gornall ==
  
Just a heads-up that this rare novel by Guy Dent is on Luminist.org, but since they seem to have converted all of their books to PDF they screwed up because the PDF link goes instead to a French fairy tale book a little further down the list. The archived Google Drive and Dropbox links are, of course, very dead, but I managed to find a PDF on some Canadian digital archive and have made an edit with a link to it. I've been adding many PDF links and author photos from Luminist recently and this is the first mistake I've come across, so if anyone is friends with whoever runs that site they may want to let them know that Dent's PDF goes to the wrong book. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:12, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=gornall&type=Name; While adding some M. John Harrison edits I was going to add a link to Ice Monkey but it was already there via RTrace last year, but I noticed artist Eddie Gornall is also on ISFDB as Eddi; PV of that book, Jlassen (Jeremy Lassen?) is gone and never responded to any messages, copy on eBay shows everything except back flap where I assume cover credit is, and Archive.org copy of Ice Monkey is coverless. I can't get a handle online about what his real name was so if anyone knows they can variant one to the other, assuming they're really spelled differently. Being older fantasy books I assume some people on here have their own copies they can check. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 00:15, 16 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Ten Tomorrows ==
+
== Zombie Apocalypse ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?34741; There's at least 2 permanent PV and 1 transient, so I'll just mention this here. Someone wrote a note about initials on the cover and how they don't appear here, but they do, so I added the cover artist, FMA (along with a PDF link to the book). --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:06, 9 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?36612; I made a bunch of edits to a few of the anthologies; I'll just mention that they don't really say "Mammoth Book of" on US title pages, just on the cover, so there's really no variant titles. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:29, 16 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Margaret (P.) Killjoy ==
+
== Jagendorf ==
  
Does anyone object making [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?349295 Margaret P. Killjoy] (4 credits, all from 2007 in Steampunk Magazine) to [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?138463 Margaret Killjoy] (various credits from 2009 onwards, including [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1604281 the same magazine])?  I've not found anything to definitively tie the 4 earlier credits to the latter person - their personal site seems to be down, which might have had some useful info - but the common publication venues, and very similar but distinctive names, makes me think it highly unlikely they are 2 different people. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:16, 9 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5666413; "Demon and the Rabbi" was the only title I couldn't fix, appearing in one of Helen Hoke's anthologies (one of several by him in her books) as M. A., in his collection as Moritz A., and ISFDB saying it first appeared in 1968 somewhere under some unknown name; anthology says it comes from his collection Ghostly Folktales (not on ISFDB) but gives no date. So take a look at that after approval if you wish. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:36, 16 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?349295 Margaret P. Killjoy] is an alternate name for [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?138463 Margaret Killjoy]. She was an editor of 'Steampunk Magazine'. The masthead of early issues credited 'Margaret P. Killjoy' later issues 'Margaret Killjoy'. Various work is credited to both names as well as just Margaret within a given issue. Of the four titles, only [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3064995 Issue Three: The Sky is Falling] has the correct attribution. Go ahead and make the alternate name & variant the one title (correct the case first, 'Is'). [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 10:50, 10 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Hoke Horrors ==
:: Thanks - I'll make the edits as you propose in the next day or so, assuming no objections are raised.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 13:33, 10 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Gaines ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5654666; I've made another edit simply adding the Archive.org link, but someone more versed than I in technical stuff can help explain what should be done with this. SBN is for Brits, ISBN is for Americans, why SBN gets no hits I have no idea but that's clearly the number on the copyright page. Why did Helen Hoke have to edit so MANY books and why did the American publishers change so much but not change other stuff and confuse everybody? A good assignment for someone with a lot of patience would be to go through her entire ISFDB list and double-check everything; they re-used British covers for American editions sometimes but other times they were completely different, both editions of each anthology would need to be seen side-by-side to verify if the Bill Prosser illustrations are the same between editions, British spelling of certain words in story titles that may or may not have been used for American titles, multiple printings of certain books of which very few have been entered here, etc. Someone keeps uploading ex-library copies on Archive.org but the titles of some of her books are so similar it's hard to keep track of them or remember if I added links or not. On a side note I discovered that at least a few of her books were part of a pub. series called Terrific Triples but that's only mentioned on their copyright pages; I have a couple of pending edits adding the series but hell if I can remember which ones they were; many more out there, it seems, some for her many non-genre books not on ISFDB. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:46, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=gaines&type=Name; I found an uncommon photo of the founder of Mad Magazine, but after adding it I saw that ISFDB has a Bill Gaines/William Gaines as a separate person, which should probably be linked to William M. Gaines. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:32, 9 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Brief server downtime at noon ==
  
== Arthur Hailey Cover Artist ==
+
The server will be down for maintenance between 12pm (noon) and 12:05pm server time (Eastern Daylight Time). [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:10, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Mr. Hailey, writer of many once-popular books, like Airport, that nobody reads anymore, has 1 novel on ISFDB, In High Places, from 1962 (although apparently it was published in 1961 elsewhere and serialized in Canada in Maclean's magazine and a bunch of other confusing stuff that I'm willfully ignoring); it's a possible nuclear war type of book, so popular in the 1960's, and was reprinted roughly a zillion times, many editions being on Archive.org (but none on ISFDB), but the original American edition from Doubleday, for some reason, is very difficult to track down exact info on. Most eBay and other online sites either have no jacket or are a Book Club edition, but I finally managed to track down an auction of the original edition with the jacket flaps visible, https://picclick.com/In-High-Places-by-Arthur-Hailey-1962-1st-Edition-223453505903.html, although the seller started off with a bunch of photos with no jacket and stuck the jacket photo at the end, and the text on the flaps is either defective or was photographed badly, because some of it is tough to make out. I'm 99% sure the price is 4.95, so I included it in my edit, although I can't find a definitive place online where this price is mentioned, which is odd for such a mainstream book, but the real problem is the credit on the back flap. I've seen one other photo of the back flap online somewhere that was photographed bright and sharp, but the photographer cut off the photo after the words JACKET PAINTING, while the artist is visible here but the letters in the name are sketchy. I've tried finding it by searching for Homer in advanced search, but none of the 4 with that name match up, and it's possible it might not even be Homer. So does anyone know who the artist is? It's a very nice cover, and it would be good to credit them. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:41, 9 August 2022 (EDT)
+
: The server is back up. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:01, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::If that was related to the many messages by Alvonruff lately, what is the hoped-for outcome of his behind-the-scenes work? Will it improve anything on our, the editors, end? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:12, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Fortunes of Brak ==
+
::: The downtime was unrelated to the project that Al is currently working on. It was simply to free up some disk space.
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?28665; I added a Luminist PDF of the American Dell edition, but there's an un-entered (Book Club?) hardcover on Archive.org, uploaded last year, and I noticed it said DOUGLAS Beekman on the copyright page; there's no dustjacket. It turns out that it says so on the paperback's copyright page, too, so is it correct to go with the back cover's DOUG, as someone did, or should it be the longer name (which has a couple dozen entries on ISFDB)? --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:26, 10 August 2022 (EDT)
+
::: Al's work will update what's happening behind the scenes and -- eventually -- improve our multilingual support. For example, it will let our searches recognize that the Cyrillic letters "А" and "а" are the same for search purposes.
  
== Holt(-)White ==
+
::: More generally, we need to update the underlying software that we are using. At this point it's so old that it's no longer supported by the vendor. It can cause a variety of security and compatibility issues. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:41, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5387088; This author has the dash in his name for some of his books but clearly not for this one, as seen on the title page in the PDF. However, my edit was rejected, so was that right, or should it be accepted and author's name made a variant of the hyphenated name? --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:42, 10 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Quanta ==
: Mod who rejected has un-rejected. All is well. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:56, 11 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Coronet Kersh ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?54005; Chris J entered all issues on ISFDB but there are several missing; this page, https://web.archive.org/web/19990224223357/http://www.etext.org/Zines/Quanta/issues.html, seems to have all of them, in case Chris is still around and wants to finish them or someone else is interested. I noticed this because the serial by Vassilakos is missing several parts on ISFDB (it also says 17 parts but archived page ends at 16 so that's odd). --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:16, 17 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:He's still around because he just made a ton of edits adding/fixing stuff. Thanks. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:25, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::All done.--[[User:Chris J|Chris J]] ([[User talk:Chris J|talk]]) 17:08, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?488936; While adding info about prices on back cover I noticed the title on the title page is the same as the American edition, so I fixed it and the cover art title, too. I don't know who provided the alternate title, but once my edit's approved some merging or unmerging or whatever needs to happen. Also mildly amusing is they partially rewrote the cheesy blurb on the back cover because, I guess, Brits wouldn't know what premium redemption stamps are. --[[User:Username|Username]] 22:47, 10 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Pertwee's Whodunnit? ==
  
== City of Glass ==
+
https://archive.org/details/whodunnit0000radn; I came across this randomly, seems to be a murder mystery anthology but some of those titles (especially "A Curse on the Pharaoh's Rod", hee hee) sound like they could be genre. Anyway, a Who is on the cover so that may push it over the line. Older Brits here may have read this in their youth and remember details. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:24, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5388100; Rare book, Luminist PDF shows there are 2 numbered ad pages after the novel, PV hasn't responded to anything since last October, so should another edit be made to change the page count? --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:55, 11 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Merge Titles -- more error checking added ==
  
== ''Genre Fiction: The Roaring Years'' by Peter Nicholls is out ==
+
"Merge Titles" has been enhanced to perform additional checks before creating submissions. You can no longer create Merge Title submissions which would result in "circular" variants, i.e. variants whose parent record ID is itself. If you come across any issues, please let me know. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 16:37, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
  
''Genre Fiction: The Roaring Years'', a compendium of 60 articles and reviews by the late {{A|Peter Nicholls}} (the mastermind behind the first version of ''Encyclopedia of Science Fiction'', 1979), is now out in paperback and as an e-book. It's not available from Amazon, but you can order both versions directly [https://ae.ansible.uk/?t=roaring from the publisher], which also makes the [https://ae.ansible.uk/?t=roaring-cont table of contents available online]. There are no page numbers, but Dave Langford has volunteered to provide a scan of the ToC of the paperback edition if anyone wants to enter the book. Anyone feel up to the task? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:20, 12 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Non-Genre Stories ==
:Sure, I would do it. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 21:20, 13 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Thanks! Dave has added [https://ae.ansible.uk/?t=roaring-cont a link to a scan of the first few pages] to the ToC Web page, which should hopefully help. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 22:11, 13 August 2022 (EDT)
+
After recently printing contents not available elsewhere (which is most of them) from the 1935 British anthology My Grimmest Nightmare at a local library I've finally started reading them and discovered that several are non-genre so I've been marking those and giving brief synopses. This is a common issue here with collections/anthologies both old and new; I think it would be helpful if editors who come across non-genre stories mark them and write a synopsis so people will know which are genre and which aren't. I also want to mention that this anthology is nuts. I read the rare A. Blackwood story long before the others and it was pretty creepy, as expected, but besides the several ghost stories there are a philosophical discussion of the afterlife with what seems to be an atheistic ending (probably raised a few eyebrows back then), a slice-of-life about a sad old guy in a top hat who gets hit by a bus, an account of 2 hikers lost in the mountains that seems like it strayed in from National Geographic, a shopkeeper who apparently gets punished because he didn't donate enough money to charity, and my favorite, a jungle tale of an explorer who encounters spiders, were-hyenas, and a giant half-spider/half-were-hyena which ends with what I think was meant to be a nasty joke about his bride-to-be's looks (no #MeToo in 1935). Least favorite so far? Probably the one about the guy who likes SOS messages on the radio and decides to visit some old guy looking for his long-lost son; the old guy's Irish maid is drawn so broadly I'm surprised she wasn't chewing on a potato when she answered the door. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:49, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
:::I have entered both the {{P|910485|tp}} and {{P|910487|ebook}} versions along with the contents. We did not have existing records for quite a few of the contents. The website provides a listing of original appearances so my next step will be to sort that out. Some may be variant titles, but others (like {{T|3068541|Hop Aboard Kids, We’re Going to 1984: Seven Children’s Books}} which first appeared in {{P|293929|Foundation, #10}}) sound like they may have been review columns where we only list the reviews in the original publication. I will need to reach out to the verifiers of the original works so it will take a bit to work through that. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 10:31, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:::: One step at a time :) Thanks! [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:08, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Reginald-3 ==
  
== Make Variant - submission review changes ==
+
I got a sudden urge to know what is entailed when someone makes a Reginald-3 verification, I think it's called. I know RTrace does a ton of them and I see a few others doing it occasionally, but where do you go to check that and what exactly is it? Maybe I'll try some. Are secondary verifications considered something important here or do people just do them because they want to? Does anyone find them useful? Are there any rare ones people have been looking for? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:08, 18 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:When you're viewing a publication page, click on "Reginald-3" in the Secondary Verifications section and it will take you to [[Reference:Reginald3|this page]]. It's a big case-bound book that has tons of author, titles, awards, and such in it. It's a very useful thing to have , but only for works published between 1975-1991. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 00:09, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?4975; Did it for Seth Pfefferle's 2 books since I entered 1 of them early last year. Is this something people have been doing since 2006 when public editing started here or is it recent? Because it seems weird that those books had never been verified before someone like me did them. Are there, like, tens of thousands of books still not verified or have most of them been done already? What's the criteria for not verifying something in that book? Is it known to have lots of mistakes? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 00:32, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::It's generally considered reliable, but unless you have access to the book (Reginald-3) itself, you shouldn't be verifying anything with it. It's got around 1500 pages (if I'm remembering correctly), and it's always possible it's missed some books that were published in that period. However, for the books it does have, it's considered very accurate. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:26, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::It's easy to verify with it because I'm using the Archive.org copy that I added a link to 6 months ago. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:46, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::Awesome! Have fun adding the verifications. I don't think those even require a moderator to approve them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:52, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::Honestly, as soon as I added those 2 verifications I lost all interest. Half the "fun" of editing here, for me, is waiting for a mod to look at my edits and then decide whether to approve them (50,000 and counting, in the top half-dozen all-time for a non-mod/non-self-approver and the only one who still edits regularly except for "Fixer" which is a robot and doesn't really count), especially when they claim something was wrong when it actually wasn't and then think they can argue with me. If I'm lucky sometimes they even apologize when they find out they made a mistake. Doing Reginald seems entirely pointless if there's no approval needed. I only mention my adding the link so that others here who actually want to verify those ID know that the book is readily available. It seems to me that one of the computer geniuses who are on this site should have figured out a way by now to trawl the book and automatically add ID to all books that don't have them yet, but maybe it's not easy/possible to do. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:23, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
  
As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, I have been working on a rewrite of the ISFDB software responsible for displaying submission review pages. As part of that rewrite "Make This Tile a Variant" has been changed. The following changes have been made:
+
== Adventures Of The Adventurers' Club ==
  
* All fields associated with the title record are now displayed in the table; in the past only the fields whose values were explicitly specified in the submission were displayed. This is supposed to help moderators see the entirety of the record and identify potential problems.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5669128; https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/9339400; I think the edition on ISFDB should really be paperback because of the cover and price; Stanford copy linked above is clearly hardcover and notice that it doesn't mention drawing on title page like Archive.org copy does. So what do you think? Change to PB and maybe clone a HC edition with Stanford link? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:44, 19 May 2023 (EDT)
* The order of rows within the table has been changed to match the order of rows in the edit forms which created the submission, e.g. "Authors" is now displayed after "Title" and "Transliterated Titles" as opposed to at the bottom of the table.
 
* The left column and the right column of the displayed table use the same color since they represent separate title records and not changed values in the same record.
 
* For COVERART titles, two separate rows are now displayed. The first one shows the title types and the second one shows the related cover scans (if there are any.)
 
* All fields now display hyphens ("-") in empty table cells.
 
* All fields have been updated to support multiple yellow warnings. In the past some fields supported only one yellow warning per field even if the software identified multiple problems with the submitted data.
 
* If a field generates multiple yellow warnings, they now appear on separate lines, making them easier to parse.
 
* A yellow warning is now displayed when creating a new parent title record with a disambiguated series name, e.g. "Future History".
 
* A yellow warning is now displayed when any non-Notes/Synopsis fields of the proposed parent title record contain recognized HTML tags. (Notes/Synopsis fields will continue to display yellow warnings if an UNrecognized HTML tag is used.)
 
* A yellow warning is now displayed if the languages of the two titles are different. This is experimental and may be removed if it proves to be distracting.
 
* Yellow warnings are now displayed if there is a mismatch between the two titles' non-genre, juvenile, novelization and graphic flags.
 
* Yellow warnings about new, pseudonymous and disambiguated author names now specify which author(s) they apply to. This should help when the proposed parent title has multiple authors.
 
* For omnibus titles, a yellow warning is now displayed if there is a mismatch between the Content values of the two title records.
 
  
Please note that these changes are limited to the way Make Variant submissions are ''displayed''. No changes have been made to the way field values are entered in your Web browser or to the way they are filed into the database.
+
== Phenix ==
  
If you come across any bugs or anything unexpected, please post your findings here. If everything looks OK after a few days, I will start making similar changes to other submission review pages. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 17:00, 13 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5669692; Story seems never to have been reprinted in English but it was in a French gaming magazine for some reason, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?39139, https://www.amazon.com/Phenix-n45-magic-jeux-role/dp/2871535426, in case anyone wants to enter it. I'm guessing there's more translated stories in the other missing issues. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:19, 20 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: Spot-checking a few "Make Variant" submissions currently in the queue, I see a couple of relatively minor issues:
+
== French Potter ==
:* "Disambiguated author" warnings are displayed twice under some circumstances
 
:* Series names are not linked in the left column
 
: I will start working on fixing them shortly. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 17:09, 13 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Fixed. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 18:22, 13 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.google.com/search?q=potter+scalehunter+ebay; I just added an Archive.org link to Scalehunter in a pending edit and I don't see that art so I don't know if it's in a limited edition or what but I noticed it's also here, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?727762; French cover art should be a variant, I think. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:46, 20 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::: Consider showing the warning only if the languages are different and the child title lacks the translator template. Would function as a reminder for the editors. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 13:03, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== L. Ron Hubbard's Colon ==
  
:::: An interesting idea. Thanks. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:51, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?8224; I've been adding links to copies of this series including several that are only Open Library non-preview and I noticed that editors over the years entered the title randomly with it being almost evenly divided between commas after Future or not. So a standard should really be decided on and titles fixed so they all match, although I think going by ISFDB rules they should all have a colon after Future, right? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:28, 20 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::::: I noticed the yellow warning is also shown when varianting art titles (see [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5390345 this edit]). This is confusing, because art titles don't need the translator template. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 15:13, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Boom! Comics - Firefly/ Serenity ==
  
:::::: Perhaps we should get rid of the "Different languages" warning and replace it with a "Translator template" check for non-COVERART/INTERIORART titles. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 16:48, 14 August 2022 (EDT)
+
Is there anywhere a list of the stories Boom! Comics have produced for the Firefly/ Serenity series?
 +
The usual artist is Greg Pak.  
  
== JFIF ==
+
The company's website is a mess and they don't seem to announce anything. {{Unsigned2|14:35, May 20, 2023‎|Femmefan1946}}
 +
:They're likely all listed over on [https://firefly.fandom.com/wiki/Firefly_(comic_series) the Firefly Database]. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:27, 20 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Luminist.org includes some author photos with a .jfif extension, which is accepted here as I added Evelyn E. Smith's photo recently and there was no problem, and a search revealed it's the only .jfif image on all of ISFDB. Anyone familiar with it? --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:47, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Canonical name Amir Zand ==
  
: I was only aware of its existence, and knew nothing about the technical details, but [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Media/Formats/Image_types#jpeg_joint_photographic_experts_group_image Mozilla's image format docs] indicate that it's basically JPEG, and that there's shouldn't be any issues with any browsers rendering those images.
+
There is an canonical author [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?284398 Amir Zand (San)] but only one title is credited to him. 10 titles are credited to his alternate name Amir Zand. Wouldn't it be useful to change the canonical name? --[[User:Zapp|Zapp]] ([[User talk:Zapp|talk]]) 16:11, 20 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Go ahead and make the switch. Please add his [https://amirzand.art/ website] to the new canonical name. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 17:24, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Done. --[[User:Zapp|Zapp]] ([[User talk:Zapp|talk]]) 08:16, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Tevis Dillon Cover ==
+
::: Thanks! Christian [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 08:55, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?184021; I added FantLab ID because it shows the back cover, and noticed that 1 of the 4 PV here wrote a note about cover art being signed "illon"; Leo and Diane Dillon did a cover for Fawcett the previous year, so I think it's probably them, as several websites agree with. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:38, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:::: Next time, please do not use "'Make This Title a Variant' (breaking the relationship) and 'Delete This Tile (previous canonical) for titles only published under the previous alternate name. Use advanced search and then merge the two titles, paying attention to the radio buttons. Not only is this one edit instead of two, but will save the information from the previous canonical title record. Delete should always be your last option! [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 09:08, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Double quotes in untitles award authors and plus signs in all author names disallowed ==
+
== Fantasist Anthology ==
  
The following bugs were fixed in the patch installed a few minutes ago:
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5670646; This book, even though it has a PV, had a lot of stuff missing/entered wrong, so after approval please take another look to make sure I caught everything or didn't make a few mistakes myself. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:21, 21 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Since Don is no longer present, I will accept the edit and make some other updates based on the Internet Archive scan. But first, I'm going to point out the existing bad page number to Ahasuerus as it seems like the clean-up report should have caught that, but it is not listed. Thanks. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 12:28, 21 May 2023 (EDT)
  
* Author names associated with untitled awards could include double quotes even though double quotes are automatically converted to single quotes for all other author names. This was preventing the software from matching author records with untitled award records, e.g. George "Lan" Laskowski vs. George 'Lan' Laskowski. 25 award records will need to be fixed manually, which I plan to do later today.
+
== Rebecca M. ==
* The way the software is currently designed, plus signs can't be used within author names. A minority of data entry fields automatically stripped them during the data entry process while most didn't. The software has been upgraded to display a pop-up message telling you that plus signs are not allowed in author names. (Eventually I plan to upgrade the software design to allow plus signs, but it's a long term project.) 2 author names will need to be fixed manually, which I plan to do later today.
 
  
If you encounter any issues, please post your findings here. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:03, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisheryear.cgi?40797+2012; I added image to Sparks; cover artist is obviously the same person for both books but spelled differently, Amazon previews don't reveal anything helpful, so if anyone knows a way to see how she's credited that can be fixed. Also, while looking for the publisher I saw there's another Earthbound, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?354536, which may or may not be the same, but there's a problem in that the book is called 3rd in a series but the first 2 on ISFDB were published years later by a different author. So that might be a mistake. EDIT: 1 of Mr. Lobe's books available and entered here by me, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5670781. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:57, 21 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: All affected records have been fixed. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:48, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Darker Places ==
  
== Helicon Award ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?66822; I'm sure there aren't many Matheson collections that don't have numbered contents here so I thought I'd found something special when I saw FantLab's page, https://fantlab.ru/edition117836, until I saw the note (RIGHT-CLICK to translate) which is kind of unclear. So if anyone has a copy maybe they can say what the numbers should be and enter them (unless someone understands what the FantLab writer was trying to say). --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:18, 21 May 2023 (EDT)
  
I just ran across [https://heliconawards.com/ the Helicon Award], offered in a number of different categories since 2019. Here's the basic info:
+
== Earthsea numbering ==
  
*'''Short Name:''' Helicon Award
+
Gollancz are putting out a new hc of the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?39404 Tales from Earthsea] collection this week, and I noticed that a few places such as [https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Earthsea-Fifth-Book/dp/1399602411 Amazon UK] and [https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Earthsea-Fifth-Book/dp/1399602411 Gollancz] are listing it as "The Fifth Book of Earthsea".  However, [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?4220 the series page here] has this collection unnumbered, with [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?21392 The Other Wind] as #5. In turn, Amazon UK and Waterstones have The Other Wind listed as book 6 of the series.
*'''Full Name:''' Helicon Award
 
*'''Awarded For:''' "Recognizes the best in science fiction, fantasy and horror for each calendar year."
 
*'''Awarded By:''' The Helicon Society
 
*'''Poll:''' No
 
*'''Covers more than just SF:''' No
 
*'''Webpages:''' https://heliconawards.com/
 
*'''Note:''' (from the website) Named after the mountain that the mythological Nine Muses called home, the Helicon Awards recognizes the best in science fiction, fantasy and horror for each calendar year. The 2019 Helicon Awards served as the awards’ inaugural year and covered works originally released in 2018. A selection committee meets several times prior to January 14th to select nominees and final winners for each category. Nominated works must have been published for the first time between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31 of the previous year. Membership in the Society is not a requirement to be considered for an award.
 
  
Categories (2019):
+
Now, I appreciate that the often crappy data that appears on retailer sites doesn't necessarily count for much when determining what gets recorded in ISFDB.  However, I do see that the Gateway ebooks of these titles - not currently recorded here, although I'll try to rectify that shortly - do have "The Fifth/Sixth Book of Earthsea" as subtitles on their title pages, which perhaps lends more weight to that numbering scheme? 
*Best Science Fiction Novel
 
*Best Fantasy Novel
 
*Best Military SFF Novel
 
*Best Alternate History Novel
 
*Best Media Tie-In Novel
 
*Best Horror Novel
 
*Best Anthology (SF/F/H)
 
*Melvil Dewey Innovation Award
 
*Laura Ingalls Wilder New Author Award
 
*Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award
 
  
Categories (2020):
+
I've double checked my Orion UK tps of these, and neither has any such subtitle.  I also have the UK ebook of the collected Vess illustrated edition, and whilst I haven't spotted anything that explicitly says either book is numbered 5 or 6, there's an afterword that states (my emphases): "Here at last, for the first time, is Earthsea, in English, '''all together in the right order'''. .... The six books of Earthsea ... and in England one publisher calls it a quartet, and '''another reversed the order of the fifth and sixth books as if it didn't matter.'''"  This also makes me think that 5=Tales/6=Other Wind might be the more correct/author-approved numbering.
*Best Sci-Fi
 
*Best Fantasy
 
*Best Military SF/F
 
*Best Alt History
 
*Best Media Tie-In
 
*Best Horror
 
*Best YA
 
*Best Anthology (Book or story)
 
*Best SF/F Movie
 
*Best SF/F TV Series
 
*Best SF/F Comic Book or Graphic Novel
 
*Best SF/F Game
 
*Melvil Dewey Innovation Award
 
*Laura Ingalls Wilder Best New Author Award
 
*John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award
 
*Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award
 
  
Categories (2021):
+
(FWIW, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthsea the Wikipedia page] doesn't number them; it does state "the fifth and last novel of the series, The Other Wind", but obviously that's qualified by "novel" rather than "book".)  [[Template:TitleFields:SeriesNum]] doesn't indicate anything about collections being treated differently to novels when it comes to series numbering.
*Best Sci-Fi
 
*Best Fantasy
 
*Best Military SF/F
 
*Best Alt History
 
*Best Media Tie-In
 
*Best Horror
 
*Best YA
 
*Best Anthology (Book or story)
 
*Best SF/F Movie
 
*Best SF/F TV Series
 
*Best SF/F Comic Book or Graphic Novel
 
*Best SF/F Game
 
*Melvil Dewey Innovation Award
 
*Laura Ingalls Wilder Best New Author Award
 
*John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award
 
*Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award
 
  
Categories (2022):
+
Despite owning duplicate copies of these, I've never actually read any of them, so I don't have a dog in this fight, but wondering if there might be consensus for a change? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 07:58, 22 May 2023 (EDT)
*Best Sci-Fi
 
*Best Fantasy
 
*Best Military SF/F
 
*Best Horror
 
*Best Alt-History
 
*Best YA
 
*Best Anthology
 
*Best SF/F Movie
 
*Best SF/F TV Series
 
*Melvil Dewey Innovation Award
 
*Laura Ingalls Wilder Best New Author Award
 
*John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award
 
*Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award
 
  
I'll be happy to populate them if the award is created. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:03, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
: I've read the first four novels so far only, so I can't comment on the contents of ''Tales from Earthsea'' and ''The Other Wind''. But I own the {{P|678370|German edition of the collected Vess illustrated edition}}, which contains an introduction by Le Guin, written by her in 2016 and which should be {{T|2437124|this one}} in the English edition. In this introduction, she's mentions the "six Earthsea volumes" and explains, how ''Tales from Earthsea'' and ''The Other Wind'' came into life. She stresses that ''Tales from Earthsea'', "the fifth book" (!) has been treated as marginal, but, according to her, is essential for the series. As a result I'd say you are correct: 5=Tales/6=Other Wind. That's also the order the works are printed in the illustrated edition. Jens [[User:Hitspacebar|Hitspacebar]] ([[User talk:Hitspacebar|talk]]) 15:04, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
: The name rang a vague bell, so I did a bit of Googling - IMHO it's a Sad/Rabid Puppies-esque culture war thing for the founder to give prizes to his friends.  From [https://file770.com/tag/helicon-awards/ File 770], which is not exactly a completely unbiased source - see below the quotes - but I'm open to other coverage/documentation:
+
:: Thanks - if I don't hear any objections, I'll do the 5/6 renumbering in a couple of days. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 13:14, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
: ''(15) HELICONIA WINTER. Richard Paolinelli handed out the 2021 Helicon Awards [Internet archive link] yesterday, some to bestselling sff writers, two to L. Jagi Lamplighter and Declan Finn, but if you want to know what’s really on Richard’s mind look at this entry on the list:''
 
: ''John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award – J.K. Rowling''
 
: ''Paolinelli also presented awards named for Melvil Dewey and Laura Ingalls Wilder, which he created after their names were removed from two American Library Association awards in recent years.''
 
: ''....''
 
: ''(13) HELICON AWARDS. Richard Paolinelli celebrated the Fourth of July by announcing the ten inaugural winners of the Helicon Awards on his YouTube channel. Sad Puppy Declan Finn won the Best Horror Novel category, which is probably more informative about where these awards are coming from than that Brandon Sanderson and Timothy Zahn also won.''  
 
: ''....''  
 
: ''Throughout the presentation Paolinelli keeps using the pronouns “we” and “our” without shedding very much light on who besides himself is behind these awards. The slides for the winners bear the  logo of his Science Fiction & Fantasy Creators Guild, opened last year with the ambition of rivalling SFWA. The Science Fiction & Fantasy Creators Guild closed group on Facebook is listed as having 275 members – you can’t see the content without joining, but FB displays a stat that it’s had 6 posts in the last 30 days. The SFFCGuild Twitter account hasn’t been active since February 2018.''
 
: ''Paolinelli’s blog claims sponsorship of the awards, but in the video he says not only won’t winners be receiving a trophy, he hasn’t even designed a certificate for them, though he might do that in a few weeks.''
 
: ''In addition to the 10 Helicon Awards, Paolinelli named “three individual honorees for the Mevil Dewey Innovation Award, Laura Ingalls Wilder Best New Author Award and the Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award.”''
 
: ''So far as the first two awards are concerned, it’s likely that what did most to persuade Paolinelli to give them those names was the decision by two organizations this past year to drop the names from existing awards – in Wilder’s case (see Pixel Scroll 6/25/18 item #5), the US Association for Library Service to Children said it was “over racist views and language,” while the American Library Association dropped Dewey (see Pixel Scroll 6/27/19 Item #13) citing “a history of racism, anti-Semitism, and sexual harassment.”''
 
  
: I note that one of [https://heliconawards.com/2022-helicon-awards/ the 2022 winners] is a book entitled "China Mike", which I'm sure by complete coincidence is a derogatory nickname that the Puppy crowd use to refer to Mike Glyer of File 770. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 18:35, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== BM ==
  
:: It looks like the core eligibility issue here is whether the Helicon Society has a non-trivial number of members beyond {{A|Richard Paolinelli}}. If it's effectively a one man show or a small press trying to promote its authors, then we wouldn't want to include the award. If it's more than that, then it's a different story.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5671406; https://www.amazon.com/Beastmaster-Myth-Richard-Knaak/dp/1439144176; I can just make out "51600" in archived copy's back cover barcode through the sticker but that Amazon page linked above has a much higher price but the same ISBN and look inside has the same number line, so if anyone knows if there were later printings or something let us know. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:31, 22 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: Here is what I am seeing so far. The main award page says the following about the Helicon Society:
+
== Ayan(n)a Mathis ==
::* The Helicon Society was founded in 2018 and is a collective of SF/F authors and other creators who subscribe to the Superversive approach to creating SF/F media and look to promote good quality sci-fi/fantasy entertainment to their customers.
 
::* It is not an official organization, it collects no fees and membership is by invitation only.
 
::* Membership in the Society is considered private, unless the member chooses to publicly announce they are a member of the Society.  Any inquiries, or requests for a membership list, will be ignored.
 
  
:: This makes it hard to tell whether it's a one man show. https://scifiscribe.com/ , Paolinelli's Web site, used to have a Web page about the Helicon Society, https://scifiscribe.com/the-helicon-society/ . Unfortunately, it and other Helicon Society-related Web pages at that Web site are no longer available. The Wayback Machine says [https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://scifiscribe.com/the-helicon-society/ This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine].
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=na+mathis&type=Name; I added a link to the Times supernatural issue and it is Ayana, but I can't get a clear idea of how Ayanna is credited or which is her real name because she's called both all over the web, plus a Christian website I came across congratulated her on getting married and changing her name from Ayanna Thomas. So does anyone know more about her? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:28, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: Luckily, Google still has a cached version of the main Helicon Society page. The "Reviews" section has two bullets: "Reviewers Wanted" and "Richard’s Reviews", which suggests that the only reviewer is Paolinelli. The "ABOUT" section has one link to a sub-page about "TUSCANY BAY BOOKS" -- see [https://tuscanybaybooks.com/ their Web site] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?70305 the ISFDB Publisher page], including the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher_authors.cgi?70305+name Author breakdown page for this publisher].
+
: I have absolutely zero knowledge of this author or their works, but the impression I get from Google results (and the photos next to the various results) is that there are 2 different people, with the single-n one being an author who's the most likely candidate to be the one of interest here, based on [https://www.ayanamathis.com/ author website] and [https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/authors/155206/ayana-mathis/ publisher site]. The double-n one seems to be some sort of influencer/self help guru?
  
:: The other thing that I noticed after reviewing [https://heliconawards.com/blog/ the list of 2019-2022 winners] was that there was a shift in the winning authors in 2022. In 2019-2021 the winners included {{A|Robert J. Sawyer}}, {{A|Ann Leckie}}, {{A|Jack McDevitt}}, {{A|S. M. Stirling}} and other established authors. In 2022 the winner in the "Best Sci-Fi" category was "Eerie" by Gibson Michaels, which has no ratings or reviews [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59011246-eerie on Goodread] after 11 months. The winner in the "Best Fantasy" category was "Dusklight" by N. R. LaPoint, which has 4 ratings and 2 reviews [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58471284-dusklight on Goodreads] after 14 months.
+
: The two titles associated with the double-n author name are from the same fairly recent PVed pub by Gzuckier, so I'll post on his page to look at this item. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 19:05, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::I'm looking at the Times archive online, and it looks like I misentered the recent review, and it should be Ayana. I'll change it. Thanks for the alert. [[User:Gzuckier|gzuckier]] ([[User talk:Gzuckier|talk]]) 23:18, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:: At the moment I have more questions than answers. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 21:31, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Ace Books / Ace Fantasy Books ==
:::Yeah, I don't know that I'd trust File 770 to be impartial about anything related to Sad Puppies as there is a long history of animosity on both sides. Regarding Goodreads, it is (at least in my experience) really hit or miss when it comes to number of reviews something gets there. I've noticed that a lot of more conservative authors tend to have fewer people reviewing their works on the site, even if they have sold well (even reaching #1 in multiple categories on Amazon in multiple cases). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:26, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:::: I wasn't aware of possible major discrepancies between Goodreads and Amazon rating. Curious.
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?18305; All 3 Ace editions are on Archive.org so I added links but while they all say "Ace Fantasy Books" on title page only 1 edition says that here. There's over a hundred here as by that name so I just thought it was odd; I wonder how many other books here as by "Ace Books" are actually by the longer name and whether it would matter to anyone to fix those; did they officially change their name to the shorter version at some point after 1986? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:43, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
:::: Checking [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09C2NMKDP Amazon.com's record for ''Eerie''], I see that the book has  2 ratings and no reviews. Its rankings within Amazon's browse node system is as follows:
 
::::* #1,980,551 in Kindle Store
 
::::* #9,228 in Historical Fantasy (Kindle Store)
 
::::* #15,617 in Fairy Tale Fantasy (Kindle Store)
 
::::* #16,482 in Historical Fantasy (Books)
 
  
:::: ''Dusklight'' [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B097N5VFCY fares somewhat better]: 4 Amazon ratings and the following rankings:
+
== Pyramids ==
::::* #320,712 in Kindle Store
 
::::* #271 in Christian Fantasy (Kindle Store)
 
::::* #299 in Christian Fantasy (Books)
 
::::* #476 in Religious Science Fiction & Fantasy (Kindle Store)
 
  
:::: At the same time, Gibson Michaels, the author of ''Eerie'', was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dragon_Award_nominees nominated for the Dragon award in 2016], which suggests that there may be more going on than someone "giving out awards to their friends". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:50, 16 August 2022 (EDT)  
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?697334; I was fixing a few Zebra Books from 1986 and on that should have had Kensington as part of the publisher; I got most of them except a few romance junk novels that were reprinted like a thousand times so I didn't even bother with those because I'm not even sure if they belong here. However, I was disturbed to discover afterwards that many of the old 70s-early 80s Zebra Books have Kensington as part of the publisher (?) I suspect I know who entered many of them so I will now start fixing those but the first one I looked at wasn't entered by that person but rather by Artisan, who I don't believe is around anymore. Not sure why it was accepted because the author is not above threshold in the slightest and this book is seventies paranormal "non-fiction" nonsense. So it should probably be deleted, but if not at least the regular date should be changed to March because editor mentioned that in their note but didn't actually make it so. EDIT: After further investigation I think, unlike Leisure Books and their later separate history with Dorchester, Zebra Books used Kensington even in their older books. So I think I've finished cleaning up (except for Death Screen, can't find info on that one) but this book still doesn't belong here, I believe. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 17:45, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
::::: Top post on [https://www.facebook.com/sentiencetrilogy/ the Gibson Michaels Facebook page]: ''It's been a slow process, but Gibson Michaels' last work is now available for pre-sale on Amazon.com.  Publish date is set for Sept 7, the anniversary of his passing. I'm very grateful for the help of Richard Paolinelli and Dawn Greenfield Ireland for their contributions to help me get Mike's last work out there.''  What exactly that refers to is unclear, but it would seem there is/was some relationship betwen Paolinelli and and Michaels.
 
::::: Also, based on [https://rosieoliver.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/helicon-awards/ the Rose Oliver blog post], [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?71220 Midlands Scribes Publishing] - the publisher of the 2021 Mil SF category winner - is a Paolinelli company; he also contributed one story and the cover.
 
::::: 2020 anthology winner [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2653304 Places Beyond the Wild] is from a different publisher, but amongst the contributors listed on the Amazon UK product page are Paolinelli, Declan Finn (seemingly the most prolific author at Tuscany Bay Books) and at least one other author who's had multiple titles published from Tuscany Bay. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 17:45, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
::::: Update: The 2022 Best Anthology winner (not currently in the database, ASIN is B0B72GZMMV) was also published by Tuscany Bay in its first edition, per the Amazon preview. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 18:24, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::: Regardless of any of that, I don't know that we should be making decisions on which awards to include based on what boils down to politics. We've had other awards that are handed out by unknown judges who use unknown methods in choosing the winners. I think the fact that this award has been given out to a fairly broad range of well known and lesser know authors would indicate that, whoever the judges are, they are doing more than simply giving out awards to their friends. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:26, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Italian Valancourt Edition ==
  
:::: Politics is certainly not a criterion when deciding which award-sponsoring organizations are eligible for our purposes -- we list everything from the Prometheus Award given by the Libertarian Futurist Society to the Soviet-era Aelita Award. The question that I am struggling with is whether this particular award sponsor is more than one or two people. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:50, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://archive.org/search?query=blackburn+beastly-business&sort=-addeddate; Italian price on back cover and notice on last page about being printed in Italy in 2022; does this require a separate record here or can I just add the link to the current edition? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:50, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
  
[Resetting indent to respond to some of Nihonjoe's and Ahasuerus comments]
+
== The Witch Book ==
  
<blockquote>Nihonjoe> I've noticed that a lot of more conservative authors tend to have fewer people reviewing their works on the site, even if they have sold well</blockquote>
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5672915; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5672916; If anyone owns a copy or knows where one can be seen online most of the page numbers need entering and author/title verification is needed for most of the stories; also, I replaced the cover because new cover has the price sticker or whatever it is on the top corner but it's not a great image so if anyone can replace it with a better one with that sticker after my edits are approved that would be great. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:13, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
  
I agree with this - e.g. I've been regularly scraping [https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/nielsen/xscifi.html the Publisher's Weekly monthly genre top 10s] and for the past few years, and David Weber is one of the few "new release" authors who can get (some of) his pubs into that chart, yet he has somewhat underwhelming numbers-of-ratings on Goodreads (whilst still outperforming other authors who write in the same niches).  So, whilst [https://sf.ersatzculture.com/award-charts-2020/ Goodreads stats are an interesting thing to look at], they should be taken with a large pinch of salt, especially when [https://twitter.com/ErsatzCulture/status/1555155113148293122 there's any amount of fake/bot activity on there for several years].
+
== Macbeth ==
  
<blockquote>Nihonjoe> ...even reaching #1 in multiple categories on Amazon in multiple cases<br/>
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?582305; Macbeth link leads to B. Coville version published many years after J. Blackburn review. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:53, 23 May 2023 (EDT)
    Ahasuerus> [other stuff about Amazon rankings]</blockquote>
+
:I've asked a verifier of a pub containing the review if they would check. Thanks. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 09:08, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::I've re-pointed the review to the correct title.  Thanks. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 09:59, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
The problem I have with Amazon rankings as any sort of meaningful indicator of popularity, is that I don't think Amazon have ever described how exactly those rankings are calculated, specifically in terms of the time periods they cover.  e.g. if the rankings are only based on a very short period, then being one of the top ranked books in some subgenre probably doesn't mean very much.  (If anyone does know more about how Amazon rankings are calculated, I would genuinely be very appreciative of that info.) 
+
== Alex Ebel ==
  
<blockquote>Ahasuerus> Gibson Michaels, the author of ''Eerie'', was nominated for the Dragon award in 2016</blockquote>
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?25577; Short story isn't by the artist who died years before it was published but this person, https://sites.google.com/view/alexsebel. The archived story link seems missing, however, so it's possible story header says "Alex S. Ebel" since that's the name in his site's URL. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:02, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Author separated from artist. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:56, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
That was the first year of the Dragons, and IIRC they weren't publicized very widely.  I would contend there are a number of "interesting" results in that first year which [https://womenwriteaboutcomics.com/2016/09/winners-announced-for-inaugural-dragon-awards-or-should-that-be-puppy-awards/ others have documented more thoroughly].
+
== Bruce Campbell Biography ==
  
<blockquote>Nihonjoe> I don't know that we should be making decisions on which awards to include based on what boils down to politics<br/>
+
I'm holding [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5662375 this submission] to add what looks like a biography of the actor Bruce Campbell.  I see that we have an earlier {{T|103703|biography}} already in the database, but it appears that it was added by virtue of being nominated for Stoker and IHG awards.  My sense is that the new book would not be in our scope, but I wanted to put the question out to the community first.  Thoughts?  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 14:57, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
    Ahasuerus> Politics is certainly not a criterion when deciding which award-sponsoring organizations are eligible for our purposes</blockquote>
+
: Out of scope I think. A biography of an author is arguably eligible (as it will talk about some of the books after all). This one seems to be one additional step removed from that. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 15:01, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
  
I agree. (Note that I personally added 2020's Prometheus Best Novel finalists, and I'm currently trundling through this year's Dragon finalists, both of which could reasonably be argued are on the right hand side of the awards spectrum.)  However, when the Helicon Awards has the "John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award", with past winners being Larry Correia, JK Rowling and Orson Scott Card, does anything think those are legitimate awards, as opposed to using culture war icons for trolling purposes?  (As an aside, I see zero indication that they have obtained permission from the relevant estates to name the "John W. Campbell Diversity in SF/F Award" or the "Frank Herbert Lifetime Achievement Award" the way they have.)
+
:: Back in 2020 we [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Rules_and_standards_discussions/Archive/Archive18#Eligibility_of_NONFICTION_about_non-written_SF clarified the "Rules of Acquisition"] as follows:
 +
::* ''Included'': Published non-fiction works ''about'' speculative fiction which can be plausibly linked to ''published'' (as defined above) speculative fiction. This rule allows the inclusion of secondary bibliographies, i.e. bibliographies of bibliographies, which are two steps removed from published speculative fiction. It also allows the inclusion of non-fiction works about shared cross-media universes like "Doctor Who" and "Star Wars", but only as long as there is a plausible connection to the universe's ''published'' component. Thus a book about "Star Trek physics" can be included (because it applies to all types of media including novels) while a book about Star Trek movie outtakes and bloopers should be excluded.
 +
:: Since Bruce Campbell is an actor with no published speculative fiction credits, I think his biographies should be out unless they trigger some other condition. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:18, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Groovy. I will cancel my edit. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:33, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
  
<blockquote>Nihonjoe> I think the fact that this award has been given out to a fairly broad range of well known and lesser know authors would indicate that, whoever the judges are, they are doing more than simply giving out awards to their friends.</blockquote>
+
== Graveyard Reader ==
  
I disagree.  Putting well-known and respected figures (e.g. Stephen King, Neil Gaiman) alongside their clique was [https://whatever.scalzi.com/2016/04/27/four-things-about-the-hugos-42716/ a key part of the Puppy Hugo slating tactics], and was repeated for [https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/9/16118054/john-scalzi-alison-littlewood-dragon-awards-controversy-sci-fi-horror the second year of the Dragons]
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?45152; I just added a link in an edit to the anthology of the same title and judging by ID it was published April or May, but story is October which is when it next appeared. So I think it should either have month changed to 00 to match the anthology or anthology month should be changed to 04 or 05 if anyone can pinpoint date and then story month changed to that. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:53, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
  
Some general comments and observations:
+
== Fugue XXIX ==
  
* I don't see that SFADB has covered this award
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?869505; Same editor entered both TP, I think, but one could probably be deleted because it has same ISBN as HC and was likely a mistake that didn't get erased, although it has cover artist and correct (?) page count unlike TP with unique ISBN. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:28, 24 May 2023 (EDT)
* The [https://twitter.com/helicon_society Helicon Society] Twitter account has all of 37 followers and none of its Tweets have had more than low single digit interactions.
+
:Deleted. Locus1 lists the format as "hc", but with the "tp" ISBN. This was the source of the original record. I added notes to the other pubs to clarify the discrepancy. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:48, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
* The top few Google search results for "helicon awards" (which may well be different for other people are): the File 770 tag I posted earlier; the heliconawards.com site; [https://rosieoliver.wordpress.com/2021/01/14/helicon-awards/ a blog post] by a contributor to one of a winning anthology (thanking the publisher, Richard Paolinelli - what an amazing coincidence...), a couple of other blog posts by other winners/finalists, and unrelated results
 
  
None of these convince me that this is a widely recognized award.
+
== Onyeama ==
  
NB: I am quite possibly being overly negative about this particular award; there are several high profile awards that strike me as having an overly close link between their current or former organizers and the works that get nominated and/or win, so picking on this particular one is perhaps unfair.  However, their own statements about "It is not an official organization, it collects no fees and membership is by invitation only." and "Any inquiries, or requests for an official membership list, will be ignored." make me unwilling to consider it at all seriously. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 14:51, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://vaultofevil.proboards.com/thread/8116/dillibe-onyeama; https://openlibrary.org/search/authors?q=dillibe+onyeama; 3 novels pictured on Vault seem genre, other titles on OL possible, no copies of any book by him on Archive.org except one with the N word which likely isn't genre, so an author that somehow was never added here, anyone own any copies? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:09, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
:Does an award need to be "widely recognized" to be included here? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:40, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: I don't think it does. Regional and specialized awards often have a limited number of people involved and that's fine.
+
== S. B. Divya != Divya Srinivasan ==
  
:: The question -- in my mind -- is where do we draw the line? A single person giving awards to his or her friends is clearly not a real award. A small press giving "best of the year" awards only to its authors is presumably not a "real" award either. However, we include [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?1 the Analog Awards], which is limited to works published in ''Analog''. We also include [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?80 АБС-премия / ABS-premiya], which, for the first 13 years of its existence, was controlled by a single prominent SF author:
+
I don't believe [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?205470 the author/editor S. B. Divya aka Divya Breed] is the same person as [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?262086 the artist Divya Srinivasan].  Their photos - [https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/childrens/childrens-authors/article/87011-q-a-with-divya-srinivasan.html PW interview] for the artist - don't look like the same person to me, and their respective sites (sbdivya.com and pupae.com) don't make any reference to the works of the other person.  I can't see the edit history to know who to chase regarding why they were made as alternate names, maybe a moderator can take a look? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 19:56, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
::* [Boris Strugatsky] was responsible for appointing jury members and the nominating commission as well as selecting nominees based on the commission's recommendations
+
: You want to talk with [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Dirk_P_Broer Dirk]. :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 20:14, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
:: I am trying to think of a single rule which would help us determine award eligibility, but there are too many possible permutations :-\ [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 08:59, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
: PS: No moderator notes on this edit or on any of his other edits on both authors around the same time. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 20:18, 25 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Thanks, have left a note on his page pointing here. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 08:33, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I agree, they are not the same person. One was born in India (the science fiction author) and the other was born and raised in the United States (the artist, per the PW article). Based on that, I've separated them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:29, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: According to Wikipedia they ARE the same person: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._B._Divya#:~:text=S.%20B.%20Divya%20is%20the%20pen,%2C%20through%20April%208%2C%202022. "S. B. Divya is the pen name of Divya Srinivasan Breed"].--[[User:Dirk P Broer|Dirk P Broer]] ([[User talk:Dirk P Broer|talk]]) 17:02, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: But Divya Srinivasan and Divya Srinivasan Breed can possibly be different people? Do we have a connection that establishes them as the same one?  [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 17:09, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5675343; I made an edit with 3rd printing of Runtime, saw somewhere that obliquely mentioned eff-words.com, current site defaults to sbdivya.com so I added archived site which started nearly 10 years ago, it may offer old/new info removed from current site because there's nothing in archived bio about "My gender doesn’t conform to social standards" so other things may have been added/dropped over the years. There's a picture of her at the back of Runtime, also, with a short bio. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:20, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::: I noticed the different places of birth and appended to the notes in both records.--[[User:Dirk P Broer|Dirk P Broer]] ([[User talk:Dirk P Broer|talk]]) 18:36, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: I wasn't aware of that criterion. The UtahSF Awards certainly weren't widely known, and they were only given out for 3-4 years, but we've included them. They were definitely a regional award. And SFADB is hit or miss as far as covering awards, in my experience.
+
== Doctor Who 'nonfiction' vs Nonfiction on 'Doctor Who' ==
:Regarding "putting well-known and respected figures (e.g. Stephen King, Neil Gaiman) alongside their clique", it seems you may be overly biased against the Sad Puppies as that's misconstruing what I've read on the topic. Everything I read showed that they based their selection criteria off which books and stories they enjoyed the most, regardless of who wrote them. I definitely don't agree with how the Sad Puppies approached some things in their various campaigns, but that part seemed consistent throughout all of them. Note that this is the Sad Puppies, not the Rabid Puppies (whose only goal was to destroy the Hugos). It's possible you were conflating the two different groups.
 
:As for refusing to divulge their membership list for an organization that isn't really organized, who cares? ··[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:40, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: It's not a requirement, it's just something that might help us determine whether this society/award are more than a single person. Then again, it's also possible that this society's (active) membership has fluctuated over the years. When a new organization is formed, it's often due to a surge of interest in some topic and then that interest dissipates over time, leaving only a few people involved. That's what happened to {{A|Mack Reynolds}}'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Labor_Party_of_America Socialist Labor Party of America], which had the support of tens of thousands of voters during the 20th century, but has faded away over the last few decades.
+
Anyone know there are two separate series? [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?16381 The former] has well over a hundred entries (including a few subseries), [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?54805 the latter] just three titles.
  
:: In addition, I am thinking that the fact that this award was apparently created as a side effect of fandom politics may be a minor argument in favor of its inclusion. An award created out of desire to promote some kind of common cause -- in this case adherence to "superversive principles" -- is arguably of more interest than an award given to its creators' friends. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 09:21, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
The quotes around 'nonfiction' implied - to me at least - that it might be "in-universe" non-fiction like technical manuals, but it seems to me that it has just been used for anything that isn't conventional narrative fiction.
  
:::I think it likely was created as part of the "superversive" movement (though that was around prior to the Sad Puppies). And I agree that would be a good point in favor of including it. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 11:11, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
Any objections to moving everything from the smaller series into the bigger one, and removing the quotes around 'nonfiction'? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 17:19, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Looking at the history of the titles in the series, the smaller one (Nonfiction on 'Doctor Who') had been created and used by a single editor (Stonecreek) mostly moving the books from pre-existing other series (some of them later deleted, some of them still existing). You may want to ping him and see what he may have been thinking but considering that the edits are from years ago and he never bothered to do more (or to write ANY notes explaining what he was doing and what is to be used for what), that looks like something that should not have happened, especially without discussing with the community first. I think it is safe to move the 3 books back where they belong and delete the extra-series but ping him anyway in case he actually had a plan and a good explanation. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 17:38, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: Thanks for digging.  I see from the edit histories of those three titles that there's also been "Doctor Who Reference Books" and "Doctor Who Non Fiction" in the past, so I'll wait for further feedback before making yet more changes.  (Will also see if I can wrangle anything out of wiki search w.r.t. any prior discussion.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:49, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
  
: As I mentioned before, there are any number of organizations that give out awards that don't provide specifics as to how they settle on the finalists or the winners. Some of them don't provide the names of the judges, either, but they are still included here. Listing it here doesn't lend it any more legitimacy than they currently have (however much that may be). It's simply providing the information for people to find, documenting speculative fiction information. The awards don't require a fee to enter, and it's not some marketing company (as far as I can tell) trying to drum up more business. That's the main reason I suggested they be included here. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:40, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
==Some new Japanese awards==
 +
There are a few new Japanese awards I think out to be included here, so I'll group them under one heading to make it easier than a bunch of different sections. This will also allow us to learn the names of some of the Japanese fanzines out there, and therefore be able to find information on them and add them to the database here.
  
:::: I feel like I am wasting my breathe in continuing to argue this, given that some of my prior points have gone unresponded to, but let me try one (final?) tack: there are rules of acquisition for pubs, if there were similar ones for awards, would this qualify. In particular, a story is not eligible for inclusion if it has just been thrown up on an author's blog, or some general site like Wattpad - so it seems strange to me that we would consider for inclusion an "award" that doesn't seem to have anything (digitally or physical) tangible beyond a domain name and Wordpress.com site, and a low traffic/follower Twitter account.  (Maybe there's more on Facebook, but I didn't see anything much in a search - but this may say more about FB search and my minimal footprint on that platform.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:00, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
+
===Nippon SF Fandom Award===
 +
This award (日本SFファンドム賞) was given out from 1965-1969, then replaced by the Seiun Award. We have the latter in the database, but not the former. I'll be happy to enter the information for it. There aren't too many to list, as shown [https://www.sf-fan.gr.jp/etc/fandom_award.html here] (same website/group where they host the Seiun Awards). It was given by the same group that gives out the Seiun Award, and there is only one level (no categories), so it's an uncomplicated award to enter.
  
::::: I think both you and Nihonjoe have raised good points; you have certainly provided a significant amount of evidence suggesting that this award is closely linked to a single person.
+
: Sounds pretty straightforward. If there are no objections, I will add these on Monday. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:24, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::::: I believe the underlying problem is that [[ISFDB:Policy]] doesn't say anything about award eligibility -- there is a single reference to "major awards", but the term is not defined -- so we have to decide on a case by case basis. After reviewing the arguments for and against I am thinking that we should put the issue of this award's eligibility on hold and come up with a general award inclusion policy on the Rules and Standards page first. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:57, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:: [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?105 Done]. Please feel free to edit the record and add a category. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 08:38, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Thanks! I'll work on them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:34, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
  
::::::I'm fine with that. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:52, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
+
===SF Fanzine Awards===
 +
This award (SFファンジン大賞) was given out between 1982 and 2003 to speculative fiction fanzines in Japan. The winners were decided by a committee that changed annually. Japanese site [https://www.sf-fan.onn.jp/184/185/ here]. It had several categories:
 +
*Fanzine Grand Prize (ファンジン大賞)
 +
*Creative (創作部門)
 +
*Critique (評論部門)
 +
*Translation/Presentation (翻訳・紹介部門)
 +
*Art (アート部門)
 +
*Layout (レイアウト部門)
 +
*Editorial Work (エディトリアルワーク部門)
 +
*Research (研究部門)
  
:::: Other than the fact that RP has called these "awards", is there any meaningful difference between them and a blog posting their favourite books of the year ([http://www.nerds-feather.com/2021/01/top-9-books-of-year.html example])?  I guess there's the fact that they are put into (sub)genre categories, but that seems pretty tenuous personally.  As an aside, I find it odd that only winning works have been announced, but no longlist/shortlist/nominees/finalists - are there any other awards for works that do that?  (i.e. not stuff like SFWA Grandmaster awards to individuals.)  
+
: Looks like Layout was merged with Art in '84 and '85 before being dropped entirely?  Dunno if that merits a separate category being created for those 2 years... [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 08:51, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:::: Also, I have my doubts about the motivation for these awards.  Prior to their advent, RP was [https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/the-first-annual-timothy-the-talking-cat-award-for-excellence-in-the-field-of-excellence/ called out for misrepresenting the award status of his books in advertising] (claiming they were award winning when they weren't; claiming to be a "Nebula nominee (non-finalist)" which is pretty meaningless; listing pay-to-play awards], so what better way to avoid that sort of embarrassment than creating your own set of awards that you control?
+
:: A new award type [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?106 has been created]. Please feel free to create award categories. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 08:41, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Thanks! I'll work on them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:34, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
  
:::: (As a further aside, RP has [https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/2018/03/31/reviews-aggregation-and-consent-to-be-talked-about/ a history of being pissy and abusive online to people who aren't complimentary to him], so I do wonder if/when I might fall into his sights for having the temerity to question one of his pet projects.)
+
===Takumi Shibano Award===
 +
This award (柴野拓美賞) was given at the same time as the SF Fanzine Award, but was judged solely by [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?23499 Takumi Shibano]. It was a single award given out each year (though a few times people shared the award in a single year). [https://www.sf-fan.onn.jp/184/185/ Same site] as above. It's considered a separate award from the SF Fanzine Awards rather than a category under that award.
  
:::: And just to summarize and reformat details I've (mostly) already posted above: in the 4 years these awards have been running, there have been 29 winners of the prose categories. Of those, by my reckoning, 7 of these have editions published (currently or formerly) by and/or have contributions from RP.  A further 2 are from other publishers, but by authors who have other books published by RP; 1 more seems to have had RP involved in getting it published.  i.e. just over a third of prose category winners have an explicit connection with the only person publicly identified with this award.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 12:00, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
+
I'll be happy to add these. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 20:57, 26 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:::::To respond to your comments in order:
+
: [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?107 Done]. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 08:46, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
:::::#That's an interesting thought regarding "rules of acquisition" for awards. It might be difficult to define them, however.
+
::Thanks! I'll work on them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:34, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
:::::#Regarding lack of much social media presence, I don't think that should play into it at all. Not everyone is good at social media, and it can require a lot of time. I think this is pretty much irrelevant from ISFDB's point of view.
 
:::::#I wouldn't put a lot of stock in anything coming from Camestros Felapton when it comes to discussions of anything or anyone remotely connected to Sad Puppies. They (whoever they are, since that's not their real name) are extremely biased in that regard. Maybe those reasons were why the awards were created, but since we can't read minds, we can't know for sure.
 
:::::#Regarding whether you might be noticed by RP, again, Camestros Felapton is an extremely biased source for that. Unless you are equally as visible as that pseudonym, I wouldn't worry about it.
 
:::::#If 1/3 of the winners are as you describe, that means a super majority of them are not.
 
:::::We can always put a disclaimer on the description of the awards (though it may be good to work out rules as mentioned). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:55, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== To the Sound of Freedom ==
+
== Banner Art ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?269192; Does anyone know if this was published? There's a few mentions online but no cover images anywhere, no Archive copy, nothing. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:06, 15 August 2022 (EDT)
+
The last banner art that I uploaded was in 2009. The first banner art was put together in 2007 on a glass CRT with VGA resolution (640x480 pixels), and the last one was done on my first LCD display with DVI resolution (1920x1200 pixels). The banners are 90x900 pixels, which was about 40% wider than the VGA screen, and about 50% of the DVI screen, which seemed like a pretty substantial size at the time. My current display is 5120x2880, so a banner is now about 3/4 inch tall, and pretty difficult to see any detail. So a few things:
  
== Google Drive ==
+
1. I've been upscaling the banners using an AI tool. I'm running them on isfdb2.org at 180x1800, which seems to be a pretty good match for my current browser width. They are pretty good, but not perfect (especially some of the smaller lettering) but my 2009-era computer doesn't turn on any more, so the original photoshop files may be lost.
  
I did a search in Advanced Search for publication webpages containing drive.google and several hundred came up; I replaced the 2 books' links, Falcons of Narabedla and The Elemental, with Luminist PDF, but all the rest are magazines, with a couple of hundred Analog/Astounding, single issues of other magazines, some webzines, etc. So there might be a need for Archive links for the print zines and online links for the webzines, etc. because Google Drive links are unstable at best. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:57, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
2. In 2020 Ahasuerus put a notice on the [[Banner Art Credits]] page to post new images here. I have been working with Generative AI at work, so I thought I would apply some of that to generating a new banner art candidate. It's artwork from a 1950s-era magazine that never existed on our timeline - let's call it "Interplanetary Stories". All the images were created by DALL-E, with prompts to push it towards an early 1950s artwork style. Obviously, it is copyright free. (The version of the banner displayed below is smaller than 90x900, in order to meet the 200kB size limit of the wiki. See the 180x1800 size version here: [https://www.isfdb2.org/IsfdbBanner13.jpg])
  
== A Lion Books Checklist ==
+
[[File:IsfdbBanner13.jpg]]
  
I recently created a new record for a reprint 1956 Lion Library edition of the original 1952 Lion Books edition of The Naked Storm by Eisner/Kornbluth, using the Luminist.org copy (which is not the usual PDF that almost all of their books are now but a weird Adobe document thing), and thought it was something special I'd found until it was just approved today and I saw online that fadedpage.com has it fully readable in a half-dozen different formats (odd that nobody ever entered it here). Damn it. Anyway, two questions: can anyone verify whether the 1952 edition's title page has the ellipsis or not, and is this book, https://books.google.com/books?id=WLt9awonT5gC, reliable, because it's not on ISFDB and the publisher seems shady judging by the note in their record here. The author did the other 2 Ultramarine non-fiction books entered on ISFDB. None of the 20 Lion Books on ISFDB have the day entered as part of their date, so if it's reliable then the days could be entered. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:54, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
3. If anyone has requests for a banner honoring a specific magazine (from our timeline), post it here or on my talk page. Otherwise, I may pull over a few more alternate timeline magazines. [[User:Alvonruff|Alvonruff]] ([[User talk:Alvonruff|talk]]) 20:32, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Borderlands 2 ==
+
: The new banner looks pretty good except for the second woman from the right whose face looks off. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 07:44, 28 May 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?302701; I've mentioned at least once on these boards that a few years ago I picked up a very new-looking copy of the White Wolf edition of the horror anthology Borderlands 2, even though it came out way back in 1994. That still puzzles me, but today while entering/fixing some stuff for White Wolf Borderlands editions I thought I would PV my copy, only to find out that it seems to not be quite the same as ISFDB's, having the same ISBN but a "printed in Canada" on the title page and an additional $6.99 Canadian price on the back. More importantly, in my copy every story from "Androgyny" on p. 92 to "Slipping" on p. 259 actually begins 1 page ahead of what the contents page says, and the book actually ends on p. 280, with a 1-page About the Editor, an ad for the HC of Dark Destiny, and a 6-page extract from In the Forests of the Night. White Wolf, as anyone who's done any edits for their books here surely knows, were an insane mess in many ways, so I'll ask if anyone owns the copy on ISFDB with just the American price so that it can be verified that this shoddy page numbering is not just Canada's fault (unlike J. Trudeau) and it can be fixed here. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:24, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:: What about the "leaf woman"? Her forearms are totally merged together. I'm sure that's explained in the cover story. How about this new blaster woman?
  
== Error when submitting Make Variant  option 1 ==
+
[[File:NewBlasterWoman.png]]
  
I got this error when submitting a Make Variant option 1. The request is in the Pending Queue as [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5392848 this submission].
+
[[User:Alvonruff|Alvonruff]] ([[User talk:Alvonruff|talk]]) 22:18, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
  
<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'> Python 2.5: /usr/bin/python
+
::: The face is much better! The way she holds the blaster looks a bit odd, but then I have never held a functional blaster, so what do I know? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 08:49, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
Tue Aug 16 15:29:15 2022
 
A problem occurred in a Python script. Here is the sequence of function calls leading up to the error, in the order they occurred.
 
  
/var/www/cgi-bin/edit/submitmkvar1.cgi in ()
+
== Alan Brennert Questions ==
  67                update_string += "    <ModNote>%s</ModNote>\n" % (db.escape_string(XMLescape(form['mod_note'].value)))
 
  68        update_string += "  </MakeVariant>\n"
 
  69        update_string += "</IsfdbSubmission>\n"
 
  70
 
  71        submission.file(update_string)
 
submission = <isfdblib.Submission instance at 0x8919b0c>, submission.file = <bound method Submission.file of <isfdblib.Submission instance at 0x8919b0c>>, update_string = '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>\n<Is...me</ModNote>\n </MakeVariant>\n</IsfdbSubmission>\n'
 
/var/www/cgi-bin/edit/isfdblib.py in file(self=<isfdblib.Submission instance at 0x8919b0c>, update_string='<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>\n<Is...me</ModNote>\n </MakeVariant>\n</IsfdbSubmission>\n')
 
  450                if isinstance(self.viewer, str):
 
  451                        from viewers import SubmissionViewer
 
  452                        submission_viewer = SubmissionViewer(self.viewer, submission_id)
 
  453                else:
 
  454                        self.viewer(submission_id)
 
submission_viewer undefined, SubmissionViewer = <class viewers.SubmissionViewer at 0x8de677c>, self = <isfdblib.Submission instance at 0x8919b0c>, self.viewer = '', submission_id = 5392848L
 
/var/www/cgi-bin/edit/viewers.py in __init__(self=<viewers.SubmissionViewer instance at 0x8deb68c>, method_name='', submission_id=5392848L)
 
4120                if not self.submitter:
 
4121                        self._InvalidSubmission('Submitter user name not specified')
 
4122                getattr(self, method_name)()
 
4123
 
4124        def _InvalidSubmission(self, message = ''):
 
builtin getattr = <built-in function getattr>, self = <viewers.SubmissionViewer instance at 0x8deb68c>, method_name = ''
 
<type 'exceptions.AttributeError'>: SubmissionViewer instance has no attribute ''
 
<br>[[User:Philfreund|Phil]] 15:35, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
: Yes, I've gotten the same thing when I've made variants in the last few days; when I look in my edit list, though, everything looks as it should. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:47, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: Investigating... [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:56, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?274235; https://archive.org/details/weirdromancetwoo0000menk; PV doesn't respond to much these days, so does anyone know why ISBN is different? Did Samuel French release different editions? Also, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?58584, where someone added a link but according to a note on the Archive.org page Brennert's story "The Second Soul" was removed at his request and seems it was never reprinted in print, so maybe someone knows some shadowy ancient archived SF site or something where they reprinted it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:46, 27 May 2023 (EDT)
  
::: Bug identified. Working on it. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 16:08, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== German Pfister ==
  
:::: OK, I think I got it. Please let me know if anything is still off. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 18:19, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=pfister&type=Name; Last 2 authors are likely the same. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:07, 28 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Bruce McAllister ==
+
== Charnas Stories ==
  
Heads up that his collection The Girl Who Loved Animals, which has no Archive.org copy, was released by Cemetery Dance as an e-book in 2012, never entered on ISFDB, so I made a go at entering it. Also, while being known for SF/fantasy he seems to have shifted into horror in recent years, with several recent stories in CD Magazine and 1 in their Shivers VIII anthology, but what may not be known here is he's contributed 3 short-short stories to their website cemeterydance.com under the Free Fiction section. Haven't read the 3rd one yet, but the first 2 are pretty creepy, especially the one about the guy who killed a lady scientist in Africa because the hyena she was studying told him to telepathically; he brought it home to America and passes the time going out at night and watching as it kills junkyard dogs. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:47, 16 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?273; A couple of questions about her stories. "Oak and Ash" was published in a 1992 issue of Pulphouse Magazine which nobody's going to have, I'm sure, but it was reprinted in a shady sex anthology in 2001, Sextopia. I can't get any info about that, so maybe someone will admit to having it. Also, "Land of Lost Content" is in 1998's Streets of Blood, one of a million Martin H. Greenberg anthologies, as original but online info suggests it's Chapter 2 of her 1980 novel The Vampire Tapestry. No copies of the anthology, either (there's a 15-photo copy on eBay but the seller seemed more interested in showing the covers from every angle instead of taking a clear photo of the acknowledgments page), so if anyone owns a copy maybe it mentions this so a note can be added here about it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:41, 29 May 2023 (EDT)
  
== Alex/Al Saviuk ==
+
== A Wrinkle in Time Cover Art ==
  
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?25416 Alex Saviuk] (9 art credits) and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?25419 Al Saviuk] (3 short fiction - or possibly comic? - and 3 art credits) both appear in today's birthdays, and both link to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Saviuk the same "Alex Saviuk" Wikipedia page].  I propose to make the latter a pseudonym of the former (and variant the titles), unless anyone thinks it should be other way around?  (The Wikipedia page indicates he was more prominent in the comics world, so maybe one of those name variants is more widely known there?) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 08:41, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1079586; It's unlikely that the 1976 date is correct because the artist's next credit is 1990. I think there's some confusion with this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?581503, which has similar art. EDIT: This page, https://www.tor.com/2023/05/25/can-you-solve-the-classic-wrinkle-in-time-cover-mystery/, doesn't mention John Berkey who did other 1976 Dell covers, but this page, http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nmFZMfSDiAMJ:https://70sscifiart.tumblr.com/post/179261051240/john-berkey&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1&vwsrc=0, says he did it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:56, 30 May 2023 (EDT)
  
:Making Al the pseudonym of Alex is i.m.o. the most logical solution. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 09:56, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Self-nomination for self-approver - Philfreund ==
  
Also, can anyone with knowledge of Dutch sanity check that [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?164668 "Bouke IJlstra"] is a correct use of capitals, rather than an artifact of sloppy shift key usage?  A very cursory skim of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IJ_(digraph) Wikipedia] indicates the former, but I'd defer to anyone with relevant expertise.  (May be worth having an author note to explicitly state that capitalization is correct?) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 08:41, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
I would like to nominate myself to be a self-approver. If that's granted, I'll be certain to continue to ask for help if I'm uncertain as to the best approach to take. Granting me this will likely shorten the submission queue significantly since I'm entering a lot of ClonePub submissions on a daily basis, mainly for audiobooks and audio/MP3 CDs. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 13:56, 30 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Support. Had not seen too many hiccups with Phil's submissions in the last months and he had shown a willingness to seek and listen to advice (and remember it for future submissions). [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Support, [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 19:03, 30 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Support[[User:Kraang|Kraang]] ([[User talk:Kraang|talk]]) 00:11, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: SupportNo complaints! --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 08:27, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
  
:Yes, this was on purpose. The Dutch "IJ" is considered to be one letter and is one of the things that make Dutch a difficult language. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 09:56, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
=== Outcome ===
 +
 
 +
Self-approver flag has been set on the account. Congratulations! [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:01, 5 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Thanks everyone! [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 12:32, 5 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== K. Sano ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=iko+sano&type=Name; Kazumiko only has 1 credit; may be the same as Kazuhiko. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:49, 30 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
:It's definitely an unusual name (Kazumiko). However, that credit was a decade prior to anything by Kazuhiko, and as [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/hiller_b_b SFE] and [https://gamebooks.org/Item/2764/Show others] also list the credit as "Kazumiko", I think we should stick with things as they currently are. It's possible it's a typo, but it could also be a rare name. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 19:05, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Bad Poetry ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?11176; https://ibecomethebeast.com/autumn-2023/; The poem by John Grey, "Man/Beast", was published in an old 1998 issue of Jack Fisher's Flesh & Blood as "Man-Beast". The other Grey poems may qualify vaguely as genre so if anyone thinks it's worth entering this magazine for that I'm just mentioning it. Also, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?21876, where I believe the essay is correct but the poems should be with John Grey since John Gray is an alternate name for him. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 07:58, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Portuguese titles capitalisation / rationalisation ==
 +
 
 +
For anyone with an interest in Portuguese titling, please take a look at [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Rules_and_standards_discussions#Portuguese_titles_capitalisation_.2F_rationalisation this discussion]. Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 16:00, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Sexpunks BC ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?29722; I and another editor have been doing a few edits for early 90s Spine-Tingling Press cassettes (at least 2, by Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Matthew Costello, are MIA) and there are some annoying details but this one I think someone can answer. A note, likely written by me some time ago since it's in my particular style, mentions that Mark Molnar did the back cover for a book that almost certainly never would have been published if the author didn't run the company, Sexpunks & Savage Sagas. Is it possible the artist is this man, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?263913? From the back of a book of "erotic" stories by an obscure publisher to doing a cover for an edition of Dune, one of the most famous SF books of all time, from an expensive specialty publisher? Can it be true? Also see this thread, https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Username#Monsters:_Three_Tales, in case anyone has anything helpful to say about those issues. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:52, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Ace Earth Abides ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5679463; Any of the many active PV think this should be by Ace Star since it does say that on cover and copyright page? ISFDB has 31 "Ace Star" books and 4 "Ace Star / Ace Books" books. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:02, 31 May 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Barrington J. Bayley ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5679804; I added a new link; story text is different than old link on Weird Fiction Review. Were Bayley's stories revised for his collection? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:43, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== German Ghost Book ==
 +
 
 +
[https://archive.org/search?query=cynthia+asquith&and%5B%5D=mediatype%3A%22texts%22&and%5B%5D=language%3A%22German%22]; Link to the German edition of 1950s anthology The Second Ghost Book from 1971, I think, in case anyone wants to enter it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:20, 1 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Grand Canyon Artists ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1347049; I have 2 edits, adding cover image (from SFE) to Brit edition and price to American edition (also fixed author's name because it's the same in both editions and there really was never a variant); however, there are signatures on both covers. Brit, lower right, looks like 2 initials followed by Lupton, while American, lower right, has KW. Artists for other books by the publishers on ISFDB don't match up to either so if anyone can find out more reply here. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:38, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Costello's Vacation ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1309571; MLB PV a transient copy of HC which has author's name wrong, Google Books copy says there's no J., TP uploaded in 2021 is raggedy and has no title or copyright page but also has no J. on cover, supposedly CD edition has no J., so as usual there's not really a variant name and they're all by Matthew Costello, no J., in case anyone can see TP title page which would clinch it and then HC and TP can be changed to no J. and variant deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:08, 2 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== German Horseman ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?42064; https://archive.org/search?query=horseman+hubble%27s&sort=-addeddate; I entered Archive.org link, fixed page count, and added cover artist in a pending edit to the American edition of Hubbles' Treasure Hunt and while doing so saw that book linked above which is a 1971 (?) translation of Hubble's Bubble, in case anyone wants to enter that. The publisher, Union Verlag Stuttgart, seems to have no books on ISFDB, but I'm guessing there are probably some that should be; 31 hits on Archive.org including another kid's book, Golden-Eye, that looks promising and a title with Hexen in it which I think means "witch" so that's a possibility, too. Ignore the Hans Holzer psychic photography "non-fiction" book which is in English but likely was published in German first by that publisher. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:50, 5 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== ISFDB recording Gateway as imprint ==
 +
 
 +
I suspect Gateway as imprint (or even publisher?) is coming to us from Amazon into Fixer, but Gateway is only a marketing website set up by Gollancz. This is noted on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Gollancz_Ltd this page] under the sub-heading "SF Gateway website", and with more detail here [https://www.gollancz.co.uk/category/sf-gateway/ Gollancz] and here [https://www.sfgateway.com/ sfgateway]. If it's agreed, could we have a Fixer tweak so that pubs/ebooks coming onto the DB start out as imprint/publisher Gollancz / Orion? See [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubseries.cgi?9 this example] of the disparity. Thanks, Kev. --[[User:BanjoKev|BanjoKev]] ([[User talk:BanjoKev|talk]]) 21:04, 5 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Ever since Amazon killed off API access to Amazon UK data - circa 2019? - I imagine I've added more Gateway pubs than Fixer has, so changing the Fixer config might not help that much.  My recollection of things is:
 +
: * "Proper" Gollancz releases are listed on Amazon, Blackwell's, etc, as being published by Gollancz.  (Waterstones are annoying, as they just bundle everything as the parent Orion group - grr)
 +
: * SF Masterworks are listed as being published by Gateway, but actually have Gollancz on the title and copyright pages.  e.g. see Roadmarks [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?930344 tp] and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?943450 ebook].  I know when I first started actively submitting pubs, I did a few of these as "Gateway", but when I saw that PVers were subsequently changing them to Gollancz, I've got a mental note to change the submission accordingly.
 +
: * I *think* there might be an exception to the former if there was previously a Gateway ebook that has been "promoted" to be a Masterwork, but retains the same ISBN.  I think those might just get a new cover image slapped onto the ebook, but the title page still has Gateway branding.  I think I might have a Silverberg that falls into this category, will try to dig it out in a bit.  '''EDIT''': Some inconsistent findings: My purchased-in-2021 ebook of Silverberg's The Book of Skulls has an SF Masterworks cover, but the title page has Gateway.  Other than the cover, I suspect this ebook is identical to [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?447130 the 2011 "yellow cover" Gateway pub] recorded here.  OTOH, my ebook of Clarke's Imperial Earth still has Gateway branding on the cover, even if I download a fresh copy on a different device.  The metadata in the title does claim it's [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?943090 an SF Masterworks edition], but there's nothing to support that.  Both of these ebooks have Gollancz on the copyright page FWIW.
 +
: * "Proper" Gateway releases have "Gateway" on the title page, even though they may well have Gollancz on the copyright page.  An example of this is [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?827485 my PVed Warm Worlds and Otherwise ebook]; although it's not explicitly stated in the note, I have just opened the ebook, and the title page has the "Gateway" logo with www.sfgateway.com below.  My understanding of the rules is that the title page trumps the copyright page, so these should be recorded as "Gateway / Orion" (or some variant thereof) rather than "Gollancz / Orion" (or some variant thereof).
 +
: The impression I get is that there's no meaningful separation of Gollancz and Gateway in terms of staff, office, etc, but there are a few peripheral things I've noticed that make me inclined towards keeping the entities separate here:
 +
: * The Gollancz site no longer lists SF Masterworks, or at least the majority of them e.g. [https://www.gollancz.co.uk/contributor/roger-zelazny/ the Zelazny page] doesn't have the aforementioned Roadmarks - or any of his other Masterworks pubs - but they are on [https://www.sfgateway.com/contributor/roger-zelazny/ the Gateway site].  This wasn't the case a few years ago; there seemed to be an active decision to separate Masterworks from the Gollancz site.  (Even though they have Gollancz on the books themselves..) 
 +
: * Similarly, Masterworks pubs used to be listed in the Orion trade catalogues, but nowadays they just get (at best) a brief mention of the line in the Gollancz section, with no details about what pubs might be coming out that period.
 +
: [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 06:33, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Picazo Format ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5672945; All the 25+ Marte XXI series books are TP so I changed the final one to the same, mod says a site he checked disagrees, I doubt they changed format for one book so Linguist, who seems to be in edit history for most of these books, or someone can possibly say what it really is and hopefully my edit can be un-rejected, although the fact that page count is much higher for the last book and cover artist is different than all others points to a slight possibility that maybe they got fancy when they knew the series was coming to an end and jacked up the size. I also note that only a few have prices and 2 are missing cover artists in case anyone can fill in that missing info. I was pretty surprised to see that none are PV, unusual for old SF series on this site. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:08, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Did you look at the cited sources? All three agree the size is 18cm x 11cm. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 11:07, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::As you say, but since none are PV I wonder if they really changed format for the last in the series or whether some or all of the earlier ones should be TP, too. In this case I wonder if those sources confused this particular edition with its earlier '62 Fleuve Noir PB; there's a note in the previous book's record about confusion between Picazo and Fleuve Noir. Also, another Picazo series here has 4 Asimov books with 1 having an unknown format, so maybe someone knows that, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:37, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Todd Ritter = Alan Finn = Riley Sager ==
 +
 
 +
Currently author [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?191380 Todd Ritter] has the alternate name [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?209069 Alan Finn], with one shortfiction for the former and a novel for the latter.
 +
 
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_Sager Wikipedia] informs me that [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?313188 Riley Sager] is another pseudonym.  That author currently has 2 novels in the database - both of which have title notes explaining that their eligibility here isn't 100% certain - and the aforelinked Wikipedia page indicates the Sager alias is the most profilic and current one.
 +
 
 +
Any preferences to which one should be the primary?  I'm slightly inclined towards Sager, but happy to go with any consensus. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 17:41, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: How many of the Sager novels are genre? It won't matter that he uses that for most of his thrillers if they are not genre. I am leaning towards Ritter quite honestly (when the numbers are about the same, I'd go with the legal name or the currently used name) - unless we have enough Sager novels to balance it that way a lot more. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 17:47, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: No idea - he wasn't on my radar at all, until I skimmed through the forthcoming list and saw there was one out today.  I've glanced through the blurbs on his site, and of the 7 novels, if we take away the two already in the database, only one looks like it might possibly be relevant here, and TBH it feels like it's more gothic than supernatural.  I looked at a couple of them on GR, and saw no mention of speculative elements, so I think it's just the two we already have.
 +
:: I don't mind keeping Ritter as the primary, as I guess that'll be slightly less work (no need to redo the Finn author alternate)?  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:12, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: The gothic ones always get me - it is very hard to sort out which one belongs if you do not read it. We can always reverse the direction if need be. :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 18:21, 6 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::: I have 2 pending edits adding Archive.org links to the print editions of his novel and also fixed their page counts; also have an edit for the author adding Wikipedia link and his Amazon photo. There is almost no mention of his short story online; I hope someone can find that somewhere someday and add a link. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:41, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::: I've just done the author and title varianting; there's a rilersagerbooks.com link that I guess should be moved from the RS author record to TR, but I'll wait for those other edits to be accepted, just to avoid any risk of async approvals losing anything. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 16:16, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Broken Fantascienza Author Image ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.fantascienza.com/catalogo/autori/NILF17713/james-lovegrove/; I made a couple of edits for James Lovegrove books and then decided to replace his B&W image with 1 of 2 nice color images on FantLab; I like to add unique images and since Open Library has none and Fantastic Fiction uses the same image as Amazon that leaves Fantascienza, but unusually the image is broken. Anyone know how to find out what it is/was so I don't use the same image from FantLab, assuming there is a match with one of them? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:57, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Neely ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1096598; https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5685960; As can be seen in my edit I changed the publisher name; I think the 1906 edition may be a date error (there's no edit history) and can probably be deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:37, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Clarkesworld ==
 +
 
 +
We had a conversation about this one a few times and it never went anywhere so let's try again. We have two separate series for the magazine:
 +
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?35233 Clarkesworld (print issues)] - the print versions
 +
* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?26273 Clarkesworld Magazine] - the ebooks and the webzines
 +
In addition, the 2022 issues are entered with different editors in both: just Clarke in the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3087880 ebooks] and Kate Baker, Neil Clarke, Sean Wallace on the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3014672 print issues]. The magazines are essentially the same and even if they had some extra content, that had not stopped us using a single series elsewhere. I propose to merge the two series and to clear up the editors. Based on the masthead, I favor the 3 editors vs just Clarke but it can be interpreted either way. Any objections to the merge and any thoughts on the list of editors? [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 12:52, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Agree 100% with merging the two series. My choice is to credit the Editor-in-Chief, but I have no objection to crediting all three. Some of the publication records could also use some cleanup. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 14:03, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::I've no concerns with combining the series.  I too feel that we should go with a single editor.  I had previously thought our policy was to go with the Editor-in-Chief when multiple types of editors are listed, but the last time I researched that I couldn't find it documented.  I'd go with the Editor-in-Chief.  I will note that neither Miller/Contento nor Locus1 list an edition.  FictionMags doesn't for the early issues, and lists Sean Wallace for the most recent ones.  He is also listed on Galactic Central.  For the single issue for which I have a hard copy, Kate Baker is credited as Non-Fiction Editor/Podcast Director which seems a little attenuated to me.  I'd like to avoid getting into a situation like the semiprozine Hugo nominations for [https://file770.com/2022-hugo-award-finalists/ Strange Horizons].  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:02, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Yellow Peril ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?287140; I added Archive.org link to PB and saw LCCN says 383 for HC which is much higher than what's on ISFDB; does anyone own a copy who can correct page count if necessary? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:25, 7 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Times Mirror ==
 +
 
 +
After coming across countless NEL books that say "Times Mirror" on title page I realized it wasn't a co-publisher or imprint but just distributor or parent company or something similar and shouldn't actually be entered here as part of the publisher name; I removed the ones I had changed to New English Library / Times Mirror a while back (thank goodness there were only 4) but this one, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5447529, was not done by me. I suspect I must have seen this and followed along blindly. The note is not by me, I just added Archive.org link, but notes in a couple of the other records are written similarly so I probably just cut-and-pasted this original note. So if anyone (I think 1 PV, Spacecow, is still sort of active) wants to make publisher of this one just New English Library that's up to them. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 00:02, 8 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Rest In Agony ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?828278; I replaced Younger's Pharaoh book cover and uploaded new cover for this book from Bookscans; ID doesn't match what's on the cover. I don't know who's responsible for that, MLB who uploaded the old cover, RTrace who secondary verified stuff, Rosa, anybody else that worked on this, so someone may want to decide what to do about that. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:16, 8 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Magic Ring ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1135737; The Valancourt TP was just upped on Archive.org, I made an edit, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5687545, but there's problems. Someone named ElectricStarboard was the last one to edit the HC and seems to have altered the title. Judging by their page and the fact that almost every message is about how they fixed or merged or did other stuff incorrectly I'm guessing that the HC should also have the subtitle; if it does, and assuming the Sturgis intro is just the TP intro ported over verbatim, then TP intro I entered and HC intro can be merged. I'm pretty sure, being a deluxe edition, the HC would also have the short story "Field of Terror" that as of now is only in the TP. Whenever there's a "data from Amazon" note that usually means page count is wrong and I fixed it for the TP but even though HC also says the same in the note judging from online info that page count may be correct, although almost certainly Roman numerals would need to be added to it for all the essays and other stuff at the beginning. Does anyone own the HC? That would be very helpful. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:45, 8 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Ah, Sweet Mystery of Life ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5687723; ISFDB has a 1989 edition which is barebones, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?37485, and the Knopf edition I edited says original was by Michael Joseph in 1989 so I assume that's what it should be here. Surprisingly, only 2 editions are on Archive.org, Knopf and a 14th (?) printing of 1990 Penguin with a cover from some completely different book by another author for some reason. I assume the preface I entered comes from the 1989 edition so if anyone has it and enters it the preface can be re-dated and merged. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:16, 9 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Archives of Haven ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?20178; Notes in other 2 books in the series about getting Corgi Joe Petagno cover credits from R. Holdstock's Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, no credit for this book, there's a copy of the encyclopedia on Archive.org with no mention, it seems, of this book but a few online sites identify it as by Petagno. All 4 PV are gone so does anyone know if it's him or not? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:42, 9 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Wrong Titles On Archive.org ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5688508; A cautionary tale here. Elizabeth Engstrom's 1992 20-story collection Nightmare Flower was upped last month so I added a link and fixed/added various things. On a whim I decided to enter her name in the search page but in text contents instead of metadata. Not really expecting to find anything I hadn't already entered I was stunned to see her first book, When Darkness Loves Us, a 1985 two-story collection. Since Valancourt put out their reprint edition a few years ago I've tried many times to find somewhere online that showed any of the several earlier editions and could never find any site that showed a contents page so I could enter the numbers, which was very annoying. It turns out the reason why it couldn't be found on Archive.org specifically is because whoever upped it way back in 2011 got it mixed up with a completely different title from another author and publisher. They're not even close. This is far from the first time a book had the wrong title on that site but for some reason I had never thought to search contents for this one. So to anyone looking for anything on that site I suggest searching for titles/ISBN/whatever in contents because you may find a lot of stuff you didn't think was there if you just searched for them the regular way. I'm very happy about this but a few things remain that need doing; the Tor edition has the same page count as the HC and I assume page numbers are the same, so if anyone owns a copy they can verify that and enter them. The Apex edition has a completely different page count which may or may not be right; maybe someone has a copy of that, too. Finally, the first story says it's a novelette but page count is almost 70, way over the 50-page limit for that length, yet in the Hartwell anthology that it was reprinted in the count varies from 30 pages in the HC to around 60 in the PB while in the Valancourt PB (which I edited last year using a library copy) it's 65. So I have a feeling it should be a novella, too, like the second story in the collection. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:43, 9 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Your submission is approved. My rough count was approx. 19,000 words. I would approve the change. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 20:05, 9 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Done. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:08, 9 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::I added WorldCat ID to the Apex edition and noticed note says "data from Amazon" which is a signal that info, especially page count, is probably wrong; WorldCat says 201 pages, not 218, so I made an edit changing it since that's probably correct or closer to it, anyway. I also noticed it says "updated foreword" on their page but I don't know what that means because Theodore Sturgeon was dead for nearly 25 years when this edition came out (I see he died in May of 1985 so the foreword was likely one of the last things he wrote before he died; sad). Supposedly this edition is in 2 public libraries down south in North Carolina and Kentucky which makes sense because Apex is based in Kentucky, but there's also a copy in a university in Taiwan (?!?). --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 16:10, 13 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Change series name: Chubby Lewis Barnavelt ==
 +
 
 +
I'm not sure how the series name [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?1404 Chubby Lewis Barnavelt] was created but I think it's offensive as-is. I suggest it should be changed to simply "Lewis Barnavelt". Are there any objections? [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 08:01, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I updated it. Regardless of the offensive part, searching for "Chubby Lewis Barnavelt" produces only 11 hits[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Chubby+Lewis+Barnavelt%22]. Strickland's books have "John Bellairs's Lewis Barnavelt in TITLE" on cover and title page. It seems more reasonable people would be looking to find this as "Lewis Barnavelt" than "Chubby Lewis Barnavelt". --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:49, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: The series was called "Chubby Lewis" in the 1997 [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/fe/bellairs_john Encyclopedia of Fantasy]. I can't find the word "Chubby" in the e-text that I have. I'll need to check my paper library to see if I have an early edition. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:30, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::https://bellairsia.blogspot.com/2005/09/who-is-chubby-lewis.html. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:48, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::: Checking the 1993 reprint of the first book, I see that other children call the protagonist "Fatty" on a couple of occasions, but there are no references to "Chubby" that I can find. I found a reference to "her chubby friend Lewis" in ''The Ghost in the Mirror'' (volume 4, 1993, completed by Brad Strickland), but that's it.
 +
 
 +
:::: I guess we can add a note explaining that the protagonist is called "Chubby Lewis" in the ''Encyclopedia of Fantasy'', the ''Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy'' and in Don D'Ammassa's ''Encyclopedia of Fantasy and Horror Fiction'', but we can find no occurrences of this nickname in the editions that we have access to. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:35, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::: Back cover of this book says "Chubby Lewis": https://archive.org/search?query=%22barnavelt%22+%22chubby+lewis%22&sin=TXT. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:43, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::: Thanks. I have updated the Notes field with the information that we currently have. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:08, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Williamson Effect Intro ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5689255; One of those OL-only copies with no preview; while correcting page count I noticed intros in HC and TP are entered differently. There's also a similarly titled essay in a 2008 David Brin collection, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=love+with+change&type=All+Titles, but it has a 2006 date with no note about where it came from. So the '96 intros can be merged if someone decides which one is more properly titled; whether the later essay is the same one is hard to say because there's no copy of that collection. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:36, 10 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Jelly Ink ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=jelly+ink&type=Publisher; I just made an edit adding a link to the 4th printing of Stranger Things Happen by Kelly Link; publisher is Jelly Ink / Small Beer Press even though Jelly Ink is only mentioned on copyright page, but a chapbook by Link, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?28159, is as by Jelly Ink Press with a note about being an imprint. Both of those things can't be right so which publisher name should be the parent? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:50, 11 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Later printings of "Stranger Things Happen" (with unknown dates of publication) are verified, so we shouldn't change them. [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 12:14, 11 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::PV Andrewk and Teddybear are no longer active. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:34, 11 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Math Book ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?249351; I see in history that I added cover and price nearly 2 years ago but this book really doesn't belong here, being non-genre and with no review, so should probably be deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 17:51, 11 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Agreed. I've removed it. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 14:48, 12 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Golden Enemy ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?20192; A discussion of a book by Alexander Key on the boards here prompted me to add a few minor things to 2 of his books I'd edited long ago but I also noticed The Golden Enemy, which I never edited, has a copy on Archive.org, https://archive.org/search?query=golden-enemy, which is 166 pages, not 176 like ISFDB and many other sites say, while there's an Open Road reprint that says 156 pages. This copy, https://picclick.com/The-Golden-Enemy-by-Alexander-Key-194249590087.html, looks like it has the same copyright page so I don't think the archived copy is book club or anything, and there are no Westminster book club editions on ISFDB. So if anyone can solve this mystery, respond here. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:18, 11 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
I have collected Alexander Key books for years, and I find that with Westminster Press it can be very hard to determine what printing you have. They did not bother marking First Editions or reprints until sometime in the later 1970's, from what I have seen. I recently posted a copy of "The Forgotten Door" that I belive is a First Edition, mainly because of the ads on the dust jacket. I think some titles had very few printings, if not just one. While a few titles were quite popular and were probably reprinted numerous times. I know "The Forgotten Door" was reprinted, because I own a few differnt editions, including later printings with number strings on the copyright page for a 13th printing, and a 14th printing. I believe "The Golden Enemy" was also popular and reprinted several times. This could be part of the page numbering issue, but it could also just be a cataloging mistake. The Library of Congress records a copy with 176 pages. I have seen cases where the mistake of one library is copied by cataloging departments in several libraries. Basically if someone in The Library of Congress made a mistake, it may have been replicated may times. I have an early copy of this title, but it is packed away right now, so I can't check it. I have seen books where the page numbering was changed to include an "About the Author" page, or an afterword, but 10 pages does seem to be a bit much. [[User:Bernarrd|Bernarrd]] ([[User talk:Bernarrd|talk]]) 16:49, 18 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Heads up on making edits to several hundred pubs, some of which may have verifications ==
 +
 
 +
Per [[User_talk:Ahasuerus#Weird_broken_Amazon_image_URLs]] , there are ~600 author and pub record that have Amazon image URLs that are now broken.  Most of these URLs can be fixed programmatically, and I've got a simple script to submit the edits via the API.
 +
 
 +
Some of these pubs may well have verifications, apologies for any notification spam you might get for them, but I don't think there's any need to create talk page items for everyone whose edits may be affected.
 +
 
 +
Although the process is simple, the clicking through approvals for several hundred edits (especially on the selfmoderator pages?) will be tedious, so I'll probably be doing this over the next few days. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 07:52, 12 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Kevin Clarke: two different people? ==
 +
 
 +
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?3708 Kevin Clarke] has a late '80s Doctor Who novelization, and 3 bits of fanart from the early 80s, on his page.  I strongly suspect these are 2 different people:
 +
 
 +
* [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/clarke_kevin The SFE page] only mentions his Doctor Who work
 +
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Clarke_(writer) Wikipedia] only mentions involvement in music, TV and academia, although I suspect a few bits of fanart wouldn't get much of a mention.
 +
* [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Kevin_Clarke TARDIS wiki] (not currently linked from here) doesn't have much, but only mentions TV work
 +
* Googling for '"kevin clarke" bsfa' indicates he may have been active in UK fandom earlier and later than the work on record here e.g. [https://news.ansible.uk/a04.html November 1979 Ansible], [https://efanzines.com/Prolapse/Prolapse04.pdf a 2006 fanzine] (PDF, pages 20 and 26); possibly [https://fanac.org/conpubs/Novacon/Novacon%2040/N40_PR1_colour.pdf a 2010 Novacon progress report].
 +
 
 +
At the very least I feel this merits an author note, but would there be any objection to separating these out into two different author records? [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 10:03, 13 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Adding a note is a sure thing for sure (Sure? Sure!). I do have some reservations about dividing the entries / authors: things like those do happen (a fan being active in two areas): there are some who do both, and others who begin in one field (say drawing) and do find their fulfilment in another one (say writing, or vice versa). That the candidate(s) both was/were active in the 1980s and seem(s) to stem from the British Isles, leaves the distinct possibility that it is the same person, I'd think.
 +
: And none of the given sources would mention fan artwork, I'd think (because they aren't aware of it). Christian [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 14:43, 13 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Stories from the Twilight Zone ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?33354; I have an edit adding LCCN ID to this TP edition but noticed there was a 1989 PB on Archive.org which somehow was never entered here so I made an edit for that, too, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5691762, but there's a cover art question; 1986 says Roger Bergendorf did the "cover photo" but 1989 says Stan Watts did the "cover art" which has a 1986 copyright date. It looks like art to me so if anyone is familiar with Watts' style maybe they can identify him as the artist and his name can be entered, possibly with a note in TP record about wrong cover credit. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 01:52, 14 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:You'll have to discuss with the primary verifier, who's active as editor. [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 05:08, 14 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::TP PV is transient so they wouldn't have their copy anymore and they probably have no idea about the art question because they didn't even enter Bergendorf as cover artist (maybe they thought photos don't count as art, even though by looking at it closely it appears to be artwork and not a photo). There's no PV to ask about the PB because that edition wasn't on ISFDB until I added it (approval pending). Maybe someone is familiar with Watts' art and can identify it as his or there's a clear copy with a signature somewhere on the cover. It wouldn't make sense to have 2 separate art credits here for what's obviously the same art so one artist should be decided on and entered. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:07, 14 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Eclipse Pages/Dates ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5692038; Most of Beford's books are either on Archive.org or in 2 cases OL-only no-preview editions; the last one I edited has a couple of issues. Note says it should be 309 pages per ISFDB but it should really be 311, right? also, these Edge books sometimes have that Canada/USA date thing on copyright page; how to tell what's a USA edition if they just put both dates? Couldn't this book just as easily have a 2006 date? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:20, 14 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Daw Duplicate ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?669885; Should the non-PV record be deleted? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:09, 15 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: It has a different ISBN and based on the ISBN and the fact that it is a later one, I'd say it is a reprint and probably a 2000 one (See the rest of the ISBNs starting with the same numbers [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/adv_search_results.cgi?USE_1=pub_publisher&O_1=exact&TERM_1=DAW+Books&C=AND&USE_2=pub_isbn&O_2=starts_with&TERM_2=08867788&USE_3=pub_title&O_3=exact&TERM_3=&USE_4=pub_title&O_4=exact&TERM_4=&USE_5=pub_title&O_5=exact&TERM_5=&USE_6=pub_title&O_6=exact&TERM_6=&USE_7=pub_title&O_7=exact&TERM_7=&USE_8=pub_title&O_8=exact&TERM_8=&USE_9=pub_title&O_9=exact&TERM_9=&USE_10=pub_title&O_10=exact&TERM_10=&ORDERBY=pub_title&ACTION=query&START=0&TYPE=Publication here]). Looking up that second ISBN online (0886778832), I see some records so seems like a valid one indeed. I will do some more digging and eventually re-date to 0000-00-00 for now if I cannot confirm the 2000 and if it still looks like a reprint. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 22:07, 15 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== French Replay ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?528161; https://archive.org/search?query=grimwood+seuil; As I was adding edits to some editions of K. Grimwood's Replay I found that French one. Edit history shows only Hauck who according to his page here wants nothing to do with this site and says it's no use to "left" messages, so any other French-fluent editors who want to enter that (price is different on the back so I assume it's some other printing) can do so if they wish. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:25, 16 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== New cleanup report: pre-1967 pubs with an ISBN ==
 +
 
 +
A new cleanup report has been deployed. It looks for pre-1967 publications with an ISBN. The data will become available tomorrow morning. I expect the report to find 49 suspect records. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:15, 16 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Thanks! ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 17:27, 16 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Desert of Death's Domain ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5694536; I think all 3 PV are gone so someone who's into these Rhodan books may want to look at this one because I see some possible problems with series being part of title and title in contents being shortened and also having one with a # and one without. Maybe this is correct and the way others in the series were entered but I doubt it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:03, 16 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Yellow warnings for ISBNs enhanced ==
 +
 
 +
In NewPub/AddPub/EditPub/ClonePub submissions, post-submissions yellow warnings for ISBNs have been enhanced as follows:
 +
 
 +
* Multiple yellow warnings are now fully supported. In the past, only some combinations of yellow warnings were displayed.
 +
* The threshold year for pubs with ISBNs has been changed from 1970 to 1967. The language of the warning has been clarified to indicate that ISBNs are not allowed for pre-1967 publications.
 +
* If you edit a publication with an ISBN value and change the publication date value to a year prior to 1967, the same yellow warning is displayed in the publication date row.
 +
 
 +
[[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:56, 17 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== R. Dunkley Story Title ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1374862; Open Library lists contents and they say "Zane", not "Zazine"; little photo evidence of this book online, so maybe someone here has a copy and can verify what it is and fix if needed. On the plus side, while looking into this I found that Dunkley has a website and Nick Bantock did the cover art for The Twilight Book, so I made edits adding both. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:33, 18 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Black Is A Man ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?815472; A copy of this rare novel was upped last November so I added a link along with LCCN. There's an awesome sticker on the cover from J.M. Fields with a 57-cent price; that store went out of business in 1978 according to Wikipedia so this copy's at least 45 years old. I didn't see any artist credit inside the book but it may be hiding somewhere in that creepy artwork in case anyone can find it. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 17:26, 18 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I couldn't see any signature on the front or back cover, or on the flaps. I added a note to that effect. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:52, 20 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== King's The Plant ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?92669; http://jerryshouseofeverything.blogspot.com/2017/08/forgotten-book-plant.html; I'd like to know the best way to enter that PDF mentioned at the bottom which is a dead link but is still online at club-stephenking.fr. Is it a novel? A chapbook? It was published electronically in 2000 (note the Stoker nomination here) but it has page numbers. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:06, 20 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:Looks like each part should be a SERIAL, with its publication a CHAPBOOK. Although it's unfinished, in composite they would be a novel, so you'd variant all six to a parent NOVEL record and note that it is unfinished. [https://stephenking.com/works/other-project/plant-zenith-rising.html stephenking.com] has info and PDFs for groups of three.  I see the site you linked has a PDF for all 6.  I would use the page numbers to compute "pages" for the installments and note the actual number range in each one.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 13:50, 20 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Biomass Bob (Robert E. Lumpkin passing 6/20/2023) ==
 +
 
 +
Hello ISFDB Community,
 +
My father asked me to share his passing with you all.  He died yesterday 6/20/2023 of pneumonia. My brother and I were with him and he died peacefully. The illness came on very suddenly, but once it took hold, it proved impossible to beat.  He valued this site and all the contributors so much.
 +
 
 +
My brother and I will be selling his spectacular collection of science fiction/fantasy books/media in the next couple of months.  We don't share his love of the material and we want it to go to a good home.  If anyone can direct us to an appropriate dealer or place to talk about selling his collection, it would be greatly appreciated. We will check back here periodically.
 +
 
 +
I apologize if I have placed this notice in the wrong place. Best, Nancy Sowers
 +
 
 +
: Hello Nancy,
 +
: No, that's the perfect place for it. I am so sorry for your loss. Bob was a part of the site and of our community and we will sorely miss him. I hope you find some solace in the fact that he won't be forgotten. Try to find some time for yourself in these hard times and we will all miss Bob :( [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 16:36, 21 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: I am very sorry to hear about Bob's passing :-( He was always very dedicated and a pleasure to work with.
 +
 
 +
:: I am afraid I can't help with finding a dealer, but some of our contributors may be in a better position to point you in the right direction. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 17:12, 21 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:I'm so sorry to hear that. Our condolences to you and your family. Bob will be missed. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 19:16, 21 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::Bob was always a pleasure to work with. Sorry to hear he's gone, I'll miss him. As for the collection, you might try Centipede press (mail to jerad@centipedepress.com). Sometimes they sell special collections for family of former customers. I think Bob was one of their better customers, recently he helped them with a [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Biomassbob#Strange_Plasma_issue_8 rare Lafferty story] and his collection is certainly special. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] ([[User talk:Willem H.|talk]]) 08:28, 22 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::My condolences as well.  Your father was one of my favorite ISFDB collaborators to work with.  I will miss him greatly. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] ([[User talk:MartyD|talk]]) 10:55, 22 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::He will definitely be missed here. He contributed quite a bit over the years. My condolences to you and to your family. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:35, 22 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::I am so sorry for your loss, Nancy. Bob was great to work with, I valued his input on many projects and he will be missed here. May his memory be a blessing. Rest in Peace, Bob. [[User:PeteYoung|PeteYoung]] ([[User talk:PeteYoung|talk]]) 03:43, 23 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::I'm so sorry to hear about Bob. I had lunch with your Bob and your brother at the Windy City Pulp collector's convention in 2019. It was one of most enjoyable encounters I have had in the last several years and I'd hoped to meet with him again.
 +
 
 +
:::If you can wait until ~April 2024 to sell his collection, the upcoming Windy City Pulp convention will give you the opportunity to contact 50-100 dealers, and you might be able to arrange for an estate auction.[[User:Rkihara|Rkihara]] ([[User talk:Rkihara|talk]]) 12:27, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?178737; Maybe someone here who knows his personal info would like to update his record. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:52, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::I've updated it with his date of death and linked it to his user page here. If anyone can find an obituary for him, we can update it more. I've had no luck finding one. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:17, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::::I've been in and out of the hospital myself recently, so I missed Bob's death, but I've always found him a helpful editor and moderator, ever since I started here eleven years ago.  He will be missed. [[User:MLB|MLB]] ([[User talk:MLB|talk]]) 00:33, 21 August 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Golem Questions ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5698892; This is the original edition, I think. Then there is this, https://archive.org/search?query=meyrink+golem+wolff&sort=-addeddate, where the 2 Golem editions are by Kurt Wolff but are different on title/copyright pages. Any of the many German editors here may want to approve my edit and then add details to it which escaped me, being non-fluent in the language, and also enter those other 2 which are likely later editions. On a semi-related note I asked 2 PV recently about Bester's Golem 100 but one of them is now deceased so if anyone knows the answer, possibly the other PV, thanks. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:21, 22 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5698892; Someone finally got around to my Golem edit but rejected it because of the date, although I think it's because it was published in December and, as so often, books published at the end of the year have a copyright for the following year. But whatever. If anyone ever does anything with this they can decide if the archived copy is a first printing, a later edition, whatever. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:57, 3 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Madrone Tree ==
 +
 
 +
https://archive.org/search?query=the-madrone-tree; There was a recent message here about an A.C. Clarke cover being originally from Dark Dominion by David Duncan; I see his "reviewed in The Arkham Sampler", almost genre, novel The Madrone Tree was recently upped but there's no cover and copyright page is pretty bare so I suspect it's some kind of book club edition, in case anyone can figure out from a gutter code or something what exactly it is and wants to enter it here. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:59, 23 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Derek Hegsted ==
 +
 
 +
I was adding a few edits to editions of L. Ron Hubbard's Fear when I noticed the note for the 1991 HC said they're not sure where the internal art credit came from, so I found a 1994 article on www.deseret.com which mentioned Hegsted and said he did art for 3 books including Serpent Catch and Murisaki. The first is by Dave Wolverton and credits Derek Hegstead so I did all the needed variants and such but the second is unknown; searching for that title on WorldCat found 1 musical score for the harp and nothing else, so if anyone knows what it is (novel?) that would be great. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:01, 23 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:They might mean [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?928491 this anthology], though the art is apparently by Stephen Youll. I actually have this anthology, so I will check it when I get home from work. I also have Serpent Catch, so I can check that one, too (for the spelling of his name). ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:49, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
::I have 2 pending edits for Serpent Catch. After those are approved I don't think you'll need to do anything else with that book. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:08, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Complete Cthulhu ==
 +
 
 +
For Lovecraft fans, https://archive.org/search?query=complete-cthulhu&sort=-addeddate; not sure which edition it is, leather bound or collectible ("collectible" didn't show up in a text search and "leather" only shows up in some of the stories) and it's a 3rd printing, I think, but ISFDB has a 9th (!) printing. So I mention it in case anyone wants to enter. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:41, 24 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Baen Books vs. Baen Fantasy ==
 +
 
 +
See this discussion, https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Dirk_P_Broer#Warriorwards, in case any of the many PV agree and want to make Baen Fantasy a publisher series and make Baen Books the publisher. This is similar, I think, to how most people entered the countless Tor publications as just that but a handful decided to enter Tor Horror, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?73896, as if that's a separate publisher or something. EDIT: There's also a related issue where a handful entered Avon Horror as a series, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubseries.cgi?9753, when it isn't. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:47, 24 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== 2 Vikings ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubs_not_in_series.cgi?67171; First book is by cheap UK 50's PB publisher while others are UK editions of major American publisher Viking so something should be added to PB publisher to differ. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:25, 24 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== WSFA Small Press Award ==
 +
 
 +
(discussion moved from the Help Desk)
 +
 
 +
Is the [https://wsfasmallpressaward.org/ WSFA Small Press Award] in the database? I was checking a few authors who were already nominated for it but couldn't find it in neither their pages or in the Awards Directory. [[User:Alittlebook|Alittlebook]] ([[User talk:Alittlebook|talk]]) 18:55, 16 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:It doesn't look like it's been added yet, looking at the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_directory.cgi list of awards]. I think it's likely eligible. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:26, 19 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::Thanks! Where is the best place to propose a new addition to the Awards directory? [[User:Alittlebook|Alittlebook]] ([[User talk:Alittlebook|talk]]) 00:58, 24 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Ahaseurus usually adds the award itself, and then any moderator can add categories to it (if needed) and any editor can add awards to various titles and moderators will then approve them. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 16:23, 26 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::: Sorry I missed the question when it was posted on the Help Desk. I agree that the award looks eligible. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 17:19, 26 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::: If there are no objections, I will create this award type tomorrow. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 23:41, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::: The Award Type [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?108 has been created]. Thanks for bringing it to everyone's attention. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 09:18, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Manfred W. ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=manfred+wil&type=Name; Usual PV for these languages, Stonecreek, JLochhas, Rudam, Willem, so if any of them know whether these 2 guys are the same or whether one or the other is misspelled and needs to be made a variant or if they're not the same guy at all, have a look. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 17:54, 26 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== James Barry ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?141183; I made some edits for Mutants recently and noticed clicking on James Barry leads to another person's record; some variant is needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:16, 27 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I disambiguated the two James Barry's. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 01:50, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Two review books ==
 +
 
 +
I have two anthologies that are nothing, or almost nothing, but reviews on slick paper.  One is [https://www.amazon.com/Paperback-Fantastic-Horror-Justin-Marriott/dp/B0B92HCLRL/ref=sr_1_2?crid=1ZY6MCRPL0TRU&keywords=Paperback+Fantastic+Horror&qid=1687909120&s=books&sprefix=paperback+fantastic+horror%2Cstripbooks%2C104&sr=1-2 Paperback Fantasic #3] and [https://www.amazon.com/Collected-Pulp-Horror-One/dp/1793987548/ref=sr_1_1?crid=19Z86H7GZ1TFN&keywords=the+Collected+Pulp+Horror&qid=1687909847&s=books&sprefix=the+collected+pulp+horror%2Cstripbooks%2C128&sr=1-1 The Collected Pulp Horror].  Both are profusely illustrated with book covers, some in color.  Do I list the cover reproductions/reprints along with the reviews and articles?  Is there a rule about this?  I have no life, so either way is fine, and I got the time to list everything. [[User:MLB|MLB]] ([[User talk:MLB|talk]]) 20:03, 27 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: If the reproductions are of genre novels and books - YES - as interior art that then gets varianted into the covers when possible! If they are not - as long as the reviews are of eligible books, the whole book is eligible so... yes. There is actually a chance that you may discover previously unknown artists for some of our books - in which case you can add a coverart record crediting the books you are holding and then use that as a parent for the reproduction. :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 20:48, 27 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Angry Candy Art ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?123061; I was adding 2 links to Houghton Mifflin and 1 to Mariner (+ page numbers) when I noticed the odd page numbering for the art in Plume; very early 2007 PV here so maybe that was the thing back then but now it doesn't need page numbers, does it? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:00, 28 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Hughart Omnibus ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?136566; Finding a photo of Barry Hughart on FantLab spurred me to add archived links to editions of all 3 of his novels but his omnibus is nowhere to be found. The original publisher apparently published nothing else and the Subterranean edition was re-released with corrections. Someone here must have a copy of one of these books; if they do, I'm sure some info can be fixed/added. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:00, 28 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Cleanup Report: Potential Duplicate E-book Publications ==
 +
 
 +
I just noticed that all of the titles by Glynn Stewart that have a Patreon edition ebook publication are showing up on the Potential Duplicate E-book Publications Cleanup Report. For example: "A Question of Faith". Right now there's only about 35 of them but is there any way to tweak the report criteria so they aren't on it? They are very definitely not duplicates. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 15:58, 28 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
: Thus the word "Potential" - these reports have a hidden functionality in them :) Moderators can ignore the ones which are valid and do not need to be flagged. For non-moderators, if you provide a list of the valid ones in a Moderator Board post, a moderator will look them over and click on the ignore for you. This is valid of a lot of our reports - they don't always mean that there is an issue - or that what they are flagging is the issue - they are just a "go check this again" warning based on automatic checks. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 16:10, 28 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Itsy Bitsy Spider ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1013230; This is a very confused title. I just made 3 PENDING edits removing title from Shivers III, importing title from Read Your Fears into Shivers III, and re-dating that title to date of Shivers III. Now the problem is that the parent title is wrong because this story was co-authored with his daughter (and the 1994 date is also wrong) but his collection Aftershock does list the title in table of contents as Itsy Bitsy Spider and doesn't mention a co-author. Archive.org copy of Aftershock is messed up and doesn't allow any searches so I think the correct thing to do would be to add co-author to parent title and then re-title it and date it to match the kid's anthology it first appeared in and for someone who has access to Aftershock to verify what's on the story's title page and fix if needed. Anyone have it? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 01:20, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I reversed the variant and parent so that the original title with both authors is now the parent. Looking at the Amazon Look Inside for ''Aftershock & Others'', Meggan C. Wilson is listed in the acknowledgements for "Itsy Bitsy Spider" and searching her name within the Look Inside shows a hit on page 151 (page story starts on) even though the page is not shown. As such, I added her to that story. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 02:02, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Lucifer and the Child ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5705474; Judging by the wartime note on copyright page and 1944 dates of writing on last page I think book date should be changed to 1945 like WorldCat says. What say you? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:49, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Spanish Genesis ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?88476; https://www.amazon.com/-/es/dp/8432037427; I was entering several edits for Harbinson books and came across this. Someone more familiar with Spanish publications may know what the "2d" on the cover means, whether this is a reprint of the original Planeta or if there was an earlier edition from someone else, and I'm sure the seller's description in Spanish has some info that could be useful. In case anyone wants to enter anything. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:29, 29 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Betancur ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=betancur&type=Name; Likely the same artist. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:49, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== It-Alien Nation ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3405; Some weird uploader from Canada has 3 obscure Canadian non-fiction items in their account and a HC Italian edition of Alan Dean Foster's novelization of the 1988 film Alien Nation, https://archive.org/details/aliennation0000fost, in case anyone fluent wants to enter that. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:34, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Out of the Everywhere ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?37423; I added Archive.org link in a PENDING edit to 1981 US PB, someone's note about comma only on cover and spine but someone added it to cover art and Canadian PB title, needs removing, also someone's note about LCCN not being on LoC but someone added it to both US and Canadian, needs removing from External ID and adding number to notes. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 23:02, 30 June 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Caramine ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=weapon+master&type=All+Titles; I don't usually dabble in old pulp but I think I stumbled across something here. Note in Caramine's record says it's a pseudonym of a SF guy; search for title and Robert Hoskins gets a few mentions in SF bibliographies but this search, https://archive.org/search?query=%22weapon+master%22+%22a.+l.+caramine%22&sin=TXT&sort=-addeddate, shows a few copies of the zine where Caramine's credit was. This review of the zine where the Hoskins credit was, http://andrewdarlington.blogspot.com/2015/12/retrospect-science-fiction-adventures.html, mentions Newcastle and Jordan's Delight, 2 places mentioned in the Caramine story, so I think it's obvious that Hoskins reprinted the story under his own name. Also interesting is that the note here, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?212773, mentions "Ac" as artist for the Hoskins story; Ac=A. Caramine? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 13:33, 2 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Jason ? Brock ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=dark+sea+within&type=All+Titles; Last item has no period after V in Brock's name; eBay copy also shows no period on contents page and Kobo preview shows no period on acknowledgements page but all-important story page wasn't seen, so if anyone owns/knows where a readable copy is it would help to decide whether it needs to be a variant or merged. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:44, 2 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Lee Ann Barlow / Lee Kuruganti ==
 +
 
 +
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?248792 Lee Ann Barlow] appears to be the married name of [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?102605  Lee Kuruganti].
 +
* Lee Ann Barlow - 49 titles, earliest 2016-10-00.
 +
* Lee Kuruganti - 109 titles, latest 2016-01-00.
 +
Normally we would make Lee Kuruganti the canonical name. Are there any objections to making Lee Ann Barlow the canonical name? This will avoid having to reverse the relationship at the point where Lee Ann Barlow is the most recognized. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 10:57, 3 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Ordinarily, recently published titles have more "weight" when determining "the most recognized name for the author within the SF genre", so I would be agree with the proposal if the numbers were close. However, 49 vs. 109 is rather lopsided and there is no guarantee that the artist will continue publishing as by "Lee Ann Barlow" going forward, at least at the same rate of publication. It makes me hesitant to create an exception. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:34, 3 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: Your point regarding future publications is valid. I'll make Lee Kuruganti the canonical name for now. We can revisit if the credits equalize. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 14:20, 3 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Mr. Scott ==
 +
 
 +
I added cover artist to American edition of The Jules Verne Companion, Steve Hofheimer, thanks to FantLab, but the British edition is confusing. Both American and British (searchable on Google Books) say "Designed by Christopher Scott" on title page. ISFDB has a Chris Scott, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?228831, with cover art credit for the British, and a Christopher Scott, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?112902, with interior art for another Peter Haining anthology. Both Scotts also have short story credits for some other Scott with the same first name; whether author Chris and author Christopher are the same guy is another question. So anyone who maybe owns the British and can verify it says "Chris" on a flap or something would help. Separating authors from artists is also needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:36, 3 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Independence Day ==
 +
 
 +
https://media.tenor.com/13bNRuU9yDIAAAAC/july4th-yes.gif; https://media.tenor.com/YOYXiSoDol8AAAAd/happy4th-of-july-4th-of-july.gif. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 00:46, 4 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Manor ISBN ==
 +
 
 +
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/adv_search_results.cgi?USE_1=pub_title&O_1=exact&TERM_1=&C=AND&USE_2=pub_isbn&O_2=contains&TERM_2=1532&USE_3=pub_publisher&O_3=contains&TERM_3=manor&USE_4=pub_title&O_4=exact&TERM_4=&USE_5=pub_title&O_5=exact&TERM_5=&USE_6=pub_title&O_6=exact&TERM_6=&USE_7=pub_title&O_7=exact&TERM_7=&USE_8=pub_title&O_8=exact&TERM_8=&USE_9=pub_title&O_9=exact&TERM_9=&USE_10=pub_title&O_10=exact&TERM_10=&ORDERBY=pub_title&ACTION=query&START=0&TYPE=Publication]; Killer Pack is the only Manor book which starts with 1532, just over 200 Manor books on ISFDB start with 0532, this eBay copy, https://picclick.com/Killer-Pack-Herbert-Myers-Paperbacks-From-Hell-285355696448.html, has no starting number on the spine, should it be changed from 1 to 0? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:20, 4 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Twilight Tales Presents, September 1998 ==
 +
 
 +
What happened to the cover? Also, it's verified for Locus1, but where is it listed there? I thought Locus was only for books. --[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] ([[User talk:Rosab618|talk]]) 14:08, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
: [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?386118 Twilight Tales Presents, September 1998]. Galactic Central either moved the cover or had to delete it for some reason - the risk in using outside/non-ISFDB hosted covers. If it was moved, someone may be able to track it. If it is deleted, we need to find it elsewhere...
 +
: As for Locus1 - check with Ron. Part of it is that some of the things we consider magazines are considered anthologies by others (and vice versa) but the verifier can tell you what the answer is better than anyone else. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 14:28, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Thanks, Annie. Sorry I didn't put the link in my post. I wonder why Galactic Central deleted it… --[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] ([[User talk:Rosab618|talk]]) 14:31, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: Copyright challenge, personal information (if there was a label on it?), a mistake by someone, just moving it somewhere, a better cover was uploaded but the name not used for some reason - who knows what happened. Their covers are usually stable (unlike their links) but things happen. You can always ask them if you want :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 14:38, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::Locus1 actually does cover magazines in addition to books.  Hope this helps.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 15:13, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::So I did ask Phil S-P, and this is what he said: "[''Twilight Tales Presents''] is one of those strange borderline publications that is sometimes classed as a magazine and sometimes as an anthology (I see that the ISFDb currently tries to have it both ways by listing some issues as magazines and some as anthologies!). My view is that it was an anthology series and, as such, falls outside my core remit."
 +
:::::Disappointing. —[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] ([[User talk:Rosab618|talk]]) 14:32, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Linking Award details on Award Type and Award Category pages ==
 +
 
 +
We currently use asterisks ("*") on Award Type and Award Category pages to link to nominations without a numeric value. See [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ay.cgi?23+2023 ''2023 Hugo Award''] for an example of an Award Type page which has no numeric values because only nominations have been announced: every link is an asterisk.
 +
 
 +
As [[User:ErsatzCulture]] pointed out earlier today, these asterisks are not particularly intuitive; it's hard for our users to tell that you need to click on an asterisk to see each award's detailed data. How about we replace "*" with the word "Details"? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:42, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:I think having the word "Details" would clutter up the page, especially given how those tables are displayed. Maybe use the Unicode 🛈 (U+1F6C8) or Ⓘ (U+24BE). Some other possibilities: ⎆ (U+2386), ⎘ (U+2398), ⏵ (U+23F5), Ⓓ (for "Details", U+24B9), ▶ (U+25B6), ► (U+25BA), ➤ (U+27A4), ➨ (U+27A8), ➔ (U+2794), ➜ (U+279C), ➥ (U+27A5), and ⮩ (U+2BA9). You could use one of these if "Nominated" was selected: 🅝 (U+1F15D), 🄽 (U+1F13D), 🅽 (U+1F17D), or 🇳 (U+1F1F3). If they're a finalist, there are the equivalent versions of "F": 🅕 (U+1F155), 🄵 (U+1F135), 🅵 (U+1F175), and 🇫 (U+1F1EB).
 +
 
 +
:I lean toward one of these two (out of those I listed):  ▶ (U+25B6), ➤ (U+27A4). If you like the letters for "Nominated" and "Finalist", then I like 🇳 (U+1F1F3) and 🇫 (U+1F1EB). [https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/category/So This] is where I found these. Looks like they also have medals, too, for first (🥇 (U+1F947)), second (🥈 (U+1F948)), and third (🥉 (U+1F949)) places. That might be a little too fancy, though. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:47, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: I'm getting horrible flashbacks of sitting in meetings where a project manager and a graphic/UI designer were having a screaming fit about whether a white-i-in-a-blue-circle, or a question-mark-in-a-circle were best icons for this sort of link ;-)
 +
:: I do agree that "Details" might be a bit long, my initial thought was something like Heavy Asterisk ✱ (U+2731) and/or doing with the CSS to have a min-width on the link to make it easier to click on. 
 +
:: However it then struck me - "Details" is perhaps overselling things for the majority of awards - in many cases, the award detail page doesn't (IIRC) have any info that isn't already shown on the ay.cgi list page.  Could we perhaps do something like this for the link text:
 +
:: - if there's a number, show that (like we do at present)
 +
:: - if there's a note for the award - i.e. if the award_note_id is not NULL or zero - then show "More", an arrow icon, or something else that indicates there's more info available if the user wants it.  (NB: we don't care what that info is, only if it exists, so there's no need to join onto the notes table in the underlying query)
 +
:: - if there's no note - i.e. award_note_id is NULL or zero - then show an asterisk, or some relatively uninteresting UI element, which facilitates clicking through  to the award_details.cgi page, but doesn't mislead a user into thinking there's anything interesting to be found behind the link
 +
:: [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 16:27, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::: I believe you are correct: the only thing that the Award page shows that isn't available on higher level "list" pages is Notes. I like the idea of having some kind of indicator to distinguish award records with Notes from award records without Notes. "More" is probably the most straightforward way to do it without adding clutter to the page.
 +
 
 +
::: Re: Unicode characters like 🇳 and 🇫, it's a complementary idea which can be addressed separately. We can certainly use them instead of asterisks for specific "award levels". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 17:46, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::: Here's a barebones implementation (less than a half-a-dozen lines changed) of what was discussed, at least as I understood/interpreted it
 +
:::: [[File:BasicAwardLinkImprovement.png]]
 +
:::: My initial thought is that "More" makes that column a bit too wide; maybe instead use something like [https://prod.emojipedia.org/information/ one of these images]?  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 17:57, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::: We already use "&#x24d8;" to indicate that a record has Notes -- see the "Translations" table on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1302553 this page], so I guess we could use the same symbol on Award pages. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:22, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::: {{FR|1579}}, "Display a mouse-over Notes bubble for award records with Notes", has been created. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 17:36, 15 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Profit of Doom ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5712870; I'm starting to slowly go through ErsatzCulture's very useful list of books published only in the UK and this one had a note from the long-missing PV "Prof Beard" with a link to the photo, so I uploaded it. The publisher has about 20 books on ISFDB with either David Hardy or David A. Hardy as cover artist so it's very likely the same guy but a jacketed copy would need to be seen in order to know how he was credited. This book seems to have fallen off a cliff into a black hole because there's almost no info about it anywhere, so if anyone can do better and find an online copy or owns one then the artist will probably be able to be entered. Unless they didn't credit him at all. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:55, 7 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Russian Sheckley ==
 +
 
 +
https://archive.org/details/belaiasmertfanta0000shec; While fixing some title dates and adding a link to Dead Run re: Robert Sheckley's Stephen Dain novels I ran across this, an omnibus of all 5 of those books plus The Man in the Water, in case anyone fluent in Russian would like to enter that nearly 1,000-page monster. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 00:26, 8 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Series Map ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?2147; Should a map really be part of a series or is that a mistake that should be removed? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:52, 8 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Five Star Questions ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?933215; I've done a ton of edits for Five Star books today; 2 issues: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?933215, should those credits be separated since art is different? Also, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1150004, title date is November, book date is December, search of Google Books copy can't get a grasp on the copyright page credit, intro month needs adding, so anyone who can verify what's the month can fix title or book date and add month to intro. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:49, 8 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Trek Ladies ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5713417; There's no photo on Culbreath's Wikipedia so I found one but her writing partner Sondra Marshak has a photo of Vonda N. McIntyre on her Open Library page; I recognize it because some time ago I added 3 different versions of the same photo to her record here, each one better than the last, until I found the best one that's there now. Vonda's Open Library page has a much later photo that's correct because it shows up elsewhere online on pages re: her death. Any idea why her older photo is on the wrong page or why Culbreath's birth date on Wikipedia is several months later than what's here? Now that I think of it, it's possible Culbreath's photo isn't really her, either. Some older SF people here will probably recognize everyone and chime in. EDIT: Good Lord, it isn't her. An obituary on file770.com reveals that image is of Shirley S. Maiewski, another Trek writer, so I cancelled Culbreath and added the image to Maiewski. The mystery remains of what Culbreath and Marshak really look like and what's Culbreath's real birth date. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:06, 8 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Witches Wraiths Warlocks ==
 +
 
 +
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?916737; I added 2 links to 1971 edition and 1 to 1973 edition, plus changed title from and to & like it says on cover and title page. Sadly, PV of all 3 editions is gone and 1988 edition says and on cover so he can't be asked if it's really & on title page and the 1 eBay copy shows back cover but not title page. So does anyone own the 1988 edition? Introduction would also need re-titling if it's &. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:10, 9 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Robert C. Goldston ==
 +
 
 +
{{A|Robert C. Goldston}} (1927-1982) was an American author who published 4 speculative fiction novels (we have 3 on file) and a significant amount of non-SF, some of it as by "James Stark". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:04, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: I have added the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3206757 missing title] and sent a correction to SFE. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:02, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
Our record currently links him to the "James Stark" who illustrated ''Nebula Science Fiction'' in 1956-1958. A SFE contributor has suggested that the US author and the UK artist were likely two different people. Would anyone happen to know more about this issue?
 +
 
 +
Also, we don't have Goldston's exact date of death on file. In a [https://groups.google.com/g/alt.obituaries/c/dlHahRx81_M 2017 Usenet/Google Groups discussion] one of the participants claimed to be Goldston's child and wrote:
 +
 
 +
* He died at the age of 54, in Palma de Mallorca on Jan 15 1982 after a short-lived and vicious battle against renal carcinoma. His death was attended by all of his family who would be the only ones who have this information, simply because nobody ever asked us.
 +
 
 +
I hesitate to add the date to our record without additional verification, but perhaps it may point someone else in the right direction. Palma de Mallorca is a Spanish city; perhaps a local/regional/national newspaper may have mentioned it? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 11:04, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: I would take the cautionary way and add '1982-01-00' with an accompanying note that it has to be verified. [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 10:23, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: Thanks for the feedback. Since we don't seem to be able to find a (semi)official source, I left it as "1982-00-00" and added the Usenet/Google Group quote to Notes. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:57, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
: Re: the other point (the James Stark pseudonym): The Wikipedia entry states that he at "one time was a science-fiction cover artist under the pseudonym James Stark for Nebula Science Fiction.[6]" (the [6] referring to a now defunct source: sfcovers.net), so it seems quite possible that the two names belong to the same person, also for the cover artwork. Christian [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] ([[User talk:Stonecreek|talk]]) 10:23, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebula_Science_Fiction Wikipedia's article about ''Nebula Science Fiction''] mentions {{A|David A. Hardy}}'s article [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1560681 Art & Artists] in {{A|Robert Holdstock}}'s [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?204909 1978 ''Encyclopedia of Science Fiction'']. Checking page 129 of the book, I see that Hardy wrote:
 +
::* The Sottish-based magazine ''Nebula Science Fiction'', which appeared between 1952 and 1959, also gave cover space to artists including Eddie Jones, Alan Hunter, James Stark and Gerald Quinn. Stark's covers were often just that: severe portrayals of technology against which men were mere ants.
 +
:: Hardy doesn't mention the Goldston connection, which I suspect he would have done if he had been aware of it.
 +
:: ''Galactic Central'' [http://www.philsp.com/homeville/SFI/n01675.htm#A199 doesn't link] James Stark the artist to Robert C. Goldston either.
 +
:: It would appear that the only specialized bibliographic source that is not the ISFDB and that links the two people is the defunct SFcovers.net site -- see [https://web.archive.org/web/20140819040154/http://www.sfcovers.net/Artists/bpage017.htm this archived Web page]. It's even possible that they got the idea that the two authors/artists were the same person from us.
 +
:: Given the above, I would be inclined to break the Alternate Name link and document what we know in Notes. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:28, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::: Hearing no objection, I have broken the link between the two author records, deleted/adjusted the VTs as needed and added Notes to both author records. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:26, 15 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Bear II ==
 +
 
 +
https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Community_Portal/Archive/Archive50#Bear; A copy of this was just uploaded and my edit adding a link was just approved; if anyone can stand to read it then it can be determined whether it's really genre or not. From skimming I get the feeling it's not, so deletion is possible. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:07, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Awards where the title has multiple authors, but some have declined ==
 +
 
 +
(This is a slightly edited version of an item I posted on Ahasuerus' page, but he suggested I post it here for wider opinion.)
 +
 
 +
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?205470 S. B. Divya] has announced that she declined 2 Hugo nominations.  One is a novelette, and I've added [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?78990 an appropriate entry for that], even if I guess it's not technically official until the stats report becomes available.
 +
 
 +
The other is more awkward, as it's a joint editorship of a semiprozine.  I've added [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?78952 a note] to explain the situation, and to try to pre-empt any complaints.  However, this isn't visible on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3137421 the title page] or [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/eaw.cgi?205470 her award page].
 +
 
 +
One "solution" would be to unlink the award from the title, which I think might then allow you to edit the authors?  I'm definitely not going to try that without a second or third opinion, and losing the link to the title record doesn't seem good.  There might be some hack with editing the award_author value to lose the leading "S. B. Divya+", but I don't think that would solve the problem with the title.cgi or eaw.cgi pages?
 +
 
 +
Ahasuerus' response:
 +
 
 +
    "Some authors/editors accepting a nomination and some authors/editors declining it" is a scenario that I don't think I have seen before. I can't think of a way to handle it given the current database schema, but perhaps I am missing something. I would suggest starting a discussion on the Community Portal to see if other editors may have other ideas.
 +
 
 +
Anyone got any thoughts on how we might be able to best handle this?  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 11:57, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
: I consider our awards pages an extension of our publication pages, not our author pages. So I'd just add a note in the second case and that will be it - in the same way how we won't delete a book just because an author is now embarrassed of it (or something). If they are on the title record and the title wins an award, we mark it as such. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 12:15, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:: At the moment we have two types of awards: title-based awards and "everything else" awards. We also have outstanding requests to add support for author awards ({{FR|583}}), publisher awards ({{FR|269}}) and series awards (no FR yet), but no work has been done on them as of yet.
 +
 
 +
:: For title-based awards, we link award records directly to title records. Our software then uses the linked title's author(s) and title when displaying the award; there is no way to have an award record display different authors or a different title. Award records are then given a "nomination level", which can be anything from "win" to "finalist" to "ineligible" to "withdrawn -- nomination declined".
 +
 
 +
:: This approach reflects how actual awards are structured reasonably well most of the time, but we have seen borderline cases which our software didn't support. For example, if an award has no provisions for an author withdrawing a nominated title, it's possible for a text to be both "nominated" and "withdrawn".
 +
 
 +
:: The situation described above reflects another issue with our model. If a title has multiple authors/editors and a subset of the authors/editors declines the nomination, we have no way of capturing the scenario in the database outside of Notes.
 +
 
 +
:: I guess one way to handle it at the data model level would be to create a separate "accepted/declined" multi-field with one value per author. It would be fairly time-consuming to implement and we would want to make sure that this solution doesn't have any holes in it before we create an FR. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:08, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::: I really don't think that we need more than notes here. When all authors decline a nomination, the title is not nominated - we can handle this case already. When at least one does not decline, the title gets nominated and can even win - these are nominations for the texts, not for the authors after all. What happens if someone gets an award somewhere and a year later decides to withdraw (because they just learned about it and really dislike the body giving the award for example)? Or if whoever gives the award ignores a nomination rejection? I think we should just use the notes to document the cases where a rejection does not influence the title becoming a nominee/winner... [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 13:33, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::: For the moment, I've edited the note on [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?205470 her page]; more than happy if someone else wants to refine the wording.  I don't think we need to do anything with [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3137421 the EDITOR title record], as that doesn't show any author/editor names in the awards section.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 14:06, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::: I disagree with adding this note to the author's Summary Bibliography page. It is not our function to highlight what is really a personal decision. As bibliographers, were record the award and leave it at that. I'm fine with moving the note to the award record. Even if the consensus agrees with the current placement, the comment regarding our software is inappropriate and should be removed. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 14:53, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::: I agree - the note does not belong on the author note level - it should be on the award level - that is where it is relevant. I'd be ok for it to be on the title level (for better visibility) but it definitely does not belong on the author level. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 15:26, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::: You may be unsurprised to find that I disagree.  I don't think we should have a page saying "Author X was a nominee for Award Y" when they have made [https://sbdivya.com/fwords/2023/6/29/withdrawing-from-hugo-nominations a clear public statement] that they have not.  I think people would understand if we explicit acknowledge this error is due to technical reasons; obviously it would be better if that info only appears on the page it is pertinent to (the awards tab of the author page; it's not needed on the summary, alphabetical or chronological pages), but again that's not something currently supported.  As I said, I'm more than happy for others to finesse the wording, but I feel we need to acknowledge the info shown is incorrect for reasons that we're not able to fix currently.
 +
::::::: It's barely 6 months since a blow-up which ended up with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Speculative_Fiction_Database#History this] (final para of History section, see also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Internet_Speculative_Fiction_Database#Refusal_to_update_author's_name_change Talk page]) and [https://www.patreon.com/posts/76590909 this] and various luminaries criticizing this site e.g. [https://twitter.com/pnh/status/1603369239091376128 Tor editor-in-chief], [https://twitter.com/JonathanStrahan/status/1603174740654718976 Locus reviews editor and anthologist], [https://twitter.com/aphoebebarton/status/1603886416534069253 SFWA Director-at-Large].  (There are a load more than those three, but the broken Musk-era Twitter is only showing them to me on the Android app, not the web version.)  I imagine most of the editors here understand the structure of the database and site, but this stuff isn't apparent or easily understood to the wider audience.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 16:45, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::I think that was blown way out of proportion. While they claim to have been trying for "over a year", they never posted here (or on any of the other discussion pages) until [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=ISFDB%3AModerator_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=651183&oldid=650924 14 Dec 2022] about their concerns. Once we knew about the concerns, they were completely addressed [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=ISFDB%3AModerator_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=651480&oldid=651444 within about 5 days]. Their whining on Twitter and the coverage by Sanford were extremely one-sided and rather disingenuous. My guess is that the changes submitted (whatever they were, and whenever they were) didn't include appropriate documentation. Sanford also mischaracterized an editor's rather bigoted comment as by a "moderator", which was clearly false (not everyone who posts on that noticeboard is a moderator). We try to be as accommodating as possible, but when what they are complaining about is historical, they really don't have much ground to stand on. We document information as it was at the time of publication. We don't have a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministries_in_Nineteen_Eighty-Four#Ministry_of_Truth Ministry of Truth] that wipes out historical information. All things considered, I think we did a great job handling the issue once it was brought to our attention. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 18:04, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::: I agree that the issue, once posted on the Moderator Noticeboard, was handled expeditiously. As I wrote below, "when Lee Mandelo [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Moderator_noticeboard/Archive_31#Records_Correction_-_Name_.26_Profile_Display asked to have our records updated to make "Lee Mandelo" the canonical name] in December 2022, we requested additional information to support the notion that "Lee Mandelo" was "the most recognized in-genre name" as per the ISFDB policies. Once the supporting information was provided, the canonical name was changed."
 +
 
 +
:::::::::: That said, the scenario where "the changes submitted (whatever they were, and whenever they were) didn't include appropriate documentation" is fairly common. There is a big knowledge gap between casual ISFDB users and experienced ISFDB contributors, especially moderators. When reviewing a new contributor's submission which seems to go against ISFDB rules, it's important to query the contributor to determine what the intent of the submission was. It's been my experience that many seemingly wrong or even nonsensical submissions contain good information once you figure out what the submitter was trying to do. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:58, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::Perhaps we should add something like the following to '''all''' database editing forms. If it was placed at the top, and made very obvious (perhaps put it in a box with a yellow background?), it might help alleviate such issues:
 +
:::::::::::<blockquote>When submitting new information or changes to existing information, please include in the ''Moderator Note'' field references to where you got the information. This can be URLs to specific web pages, book or magazine titles and page numbers, that you spoke directly with a relevant person (please include details of the conversation), or anything else that will help us verify the changes you are submitting. This information should also be included in the publication or title note fields, as well. Doing this will help speed up the process of approving the submitted changes. Thank you!</blockquote>
 +
:::::::::::Thoughts? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:35, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::: A few things come to mind:
 +
::::::::::::* We could limit the display of the proposed "yellow box" to editors with fewer than 20 Wiki posts. It would be similar to the way we color-code submission rows on the Moderator Queue page. The text could start with something like "Hi! Since you haven't made many posts on the ISFDB Wiki, it looks like you are a new editor. Please be aware that the ISFDB database and its data entry rules are complex and may not be intuitive at first glance. When submitting new information or changes to existing information, please include [etc].
 +
::::::::::::* We should use "Note field" as opposed to "publication or title note fields" because the proposed box will appear on all Edit pages.
 +
::::::::::::* I am not sure asking new editors to duplicate what they enter in regular Notes in Moderator Notes would be a good idea.
 +
::::::::::::* This topic probably merits a separate Community Portal section since we are up to 12 levels of indentation.
 +
:::::::::::: [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:13, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::: I see three separate issues here. The first one is the accuracy of our data. The second one is the substance of ISFDB policies and what various people think of them. The third one is whether our practices match our policies.
 +
 
 +
:::::::: Re: accuracy, our software doesn't let us create a comprehensive picture of award records where only some of the co-authors/co-editors declined a nomination (outside of Notes.) There are three primary ISFDB pages which display this award in an incomplete manner due to software limitations:
 +
::::::::* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?78952 the award record]
 +
::::::::* [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3137421 the EDITOR title record]
 +
::::::::* {{A|S. B. Divya}}'s [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/eaw.cgi?205470 Award Bibliography page]
 +
:::::::: I think it would be best to have a note on all 3 of these Web pages in order to make sure that we don't inadvertently mislead our users with incomplete data. At this time the Award record and the Author record already have notes while the Title record doesn't have a note.
 +
:::::::: In addition, we may want to clarify the language of the note. Something like "Note that the ISFDB award record for ''Escape Pod - 2022'' states that it was nominated for the 2023 Hugo award, which is only partially accurate due to software limitations. One of the co-editors, S. B. Divya, declined the nomination on 2023-06-29 while the other co-editor, Mur Lafferty, remains nominated as of 2023-07-10. See the award record for details."
 +
:::::::: Re: the substance of ISFDB policies and what various people think of them, as the ISFDB FAQ says, we do not have official social media presence. If someone wants to suggest a change to the ISFDB policies, they are welcome to post on the Rules and Standards page.
 +
:::::::: Re: the issue of whether our practices match our policies, when Lee Mandelo [https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Moderator_noticeboard/Archive_31#Records_Correction_-_Name_.26_Profile_Display asked to have our records updated to make "Lee Mandelo" the canonical name] in December 2022, we requested additional information to support the notion that "Lee Mandelo" was "the most recognized in-genre name" as per the ISFDB policies. Once the supporting information was provided, the canonical name was changed. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:41, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::The problem comes up in several scenarios with title based awards.  Those awards currently have a one to one relationship with a title record.  Thus, for a title based award, we will always display the Title and Author fields from title record.  I believe that schema for the awards table has its own title and author fields, and they used to be exposed and could vary from that of the title record.  I had been using that feature to record differences between who was nominated vs who is on the title record when they varied, but [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] asked me to stop doing that in a prior discussion and we cleaned up any records where they differed.  Aside from the current question (a nomination does not list all the editors for the magazine), we also have issues of having to enter multiple awards for a single nomination (same magazine for the 2023 Hugos, as there was a change in editors).  We've had issues where the nominees for a title include someone in addition to the author of that title (see [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?63684 2019 Best Art Book] which was awarded to Charles Vess and Le Guin).  We've also had instances where the title of the work differs from the title as published (see this [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_details.cgi?68201 2021 Novelette nominee] which was nominated as "Helicopter Story" which is the author's preferred title).
 +
:::::::::I think one way to solve these problems would be to allow the title and author fields for the award to vary from that of the linked title.  I would also recommend that a single award could be linked to multiple title records.  The award could then be listed in the author's award list for those authors from the award record and in all the title records that are linked.  I'm not sure how radical a change that would be, though I suspect linking one award to multiple titles would be non-trivial.  However, it would solve the issues noted above.  I had seen Divya's announcement, but planned to wait to add the withdrawal until the Hugo statistics are published after the award ceremony.  I hadn't worried about the magazine credit, because I'm used to the fact that magazine awards frequently do not reflect the persons nominated due to our software.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 19:25, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::::::::: Sorry about the delay; I am still thinking about the issues raised in your comments. There are some similarities with the way we handle REVIEW records. I am also trying to figure out how any future changes may affect the outstanding FRs for series-, publisher- and author-based awards. Lots of implications to consider. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:34, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::: A few thoughts after sleeping on it:
 +
::::::::::::* Back when title-based award records had separate titles and author names associated with them, it could -- and did -- cause data consistency problems. Let me use a real life example. Suppose an editor creates an award record for a cover by {{A|Mel Odom}} and links it to the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1476319 COVERART record]. A year or two later another editor discovers that Mel Odom the writer and Mel Odom the artist are two different people, then changes the COVERART record to be associated with "Mel Odom (artist)". At that point the COVERART record is associated with "Mel Odom (artist)" while the award record is associated with "Mel Odom". The same thing could -- and did -- happen when editors corrected the spelling of author names and/or titles. Over time it resulted in a significant number of discrepancies.
 +
::::::::::::* Adding support for "titles and title authors as stated in the award nomination" wouldn't automatically address the issue that this discussion started with. What we are dealing with is a title record with two authors and two (effective) nomination records, one "nominated" and the other one "declined", a different scenario.
 +
::::::::::::* From a purely technical perspective, the way award authors were originally captured in the database was very poor. Instead of having a separate table to capture the "one title - many authors" relationship that a properly designed database would have, the award table had a single "award_author" field. If an award was associated with multiple authors, they were all entered in the same field using "+" signs as delimiters. Anyone familiar with database design knows that this is a terrible idea which causes no end of problems. If we were to separate "title authors" and "title authors as stated in the award nomination", we would need to redesign and re-implement this part of the software. It would be doable, but non-trivial given how many different Web pages and internal data structures would be affected. The same table and field(s) are used by "untitled" awards, so they would be affected as well. If we were to add support for "transliterated titles/author names" -- as may be needed to capture non-English awards -- it would make an even bigger project.
 +
::::::::::::* Award committees frequently use different forms of author names, including collective names like "The Brothers Hildebrandt", interchangeably. The first ballot may use one form of the name, the final ballot another and the name on the award document a third one. We'd have to come up with data entry rules for these scenarios.
 +
::::::::::::* Letting title-based awards be linked to multiple title records is an interesting idea. It would require a fair amount of work, but it wouldn't raise the same design issues that adding support for "titles and title authors as stated in the award nomination" would raise.
 +
:::::::::::: That's all I have been able to think of for now. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 13:06, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::::::I fired up my MySQL instance (from a 2021 backup) and I see some of what you mean. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:08, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::::: Although awards-related tables haven't changed since 2021, I would recommend using the latest MySQL backup file to ensure that we are all looking at the same data structures. New tables and fields are added reasonably frequently; I added recognized_domains just a couple of weeks ago. Barring that, [[Database Schema]] should be up to date and display more information than MySQL's "describe" command. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::::::::::: I actually recall using the + signs in my very early days of editing here.  It does look like is an intermediate table that could be used to link one award to many titles (title_awards).  Of course, the software would have to be altered to look at it that way. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:08, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::::: I believe you are right about "title_awards": it should be able to support a "one award - many titles" relationship as it currently exists. The problem lies in the software, which assumes that there can be only one title record per "title-based award" record. For example, the "Link Award" page tells you to enter "0 to break the link" between the displayed title-based award and its title record. It would have to be changed to be more like the "Make Alternate Name" page, which lets you specify which parent-title relationship to remove. Doable, but it would take time. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::::::::::: Despite the sloppiness of some award committees in changing credits and titles, I think we are trying to model a real world object (an award) that naturally has a title and authors.  Since they don't necessarily match our data model (for books, etc.) we run into the problems I mentioned earlier as well as the issue that spurred this topic.  I do think that having distinct award titles and authors that differ from title record titles and authors would solve this issue.  We would still need to have two records in the awards table (1 for the declined nomination and 1 for the nomination).  I think maybe if I explain the use case.  The award records would include:
 +
:::::::::::::* Record 1 - Title: Escape Pod; Authors: Mur Lafferty, Valerie Valdes, Benjamin C. Kinney... (there are 7 editors, assistant editors, etc listed in the nomination; award level nomination, linked to titles {{T|3137421}} and {{T|3133670}}.
 +
:::::::::::::* Record 2 - Title: Escape Pod; Authors: '''S. B. Divya''', Mur Lafferty, Valerie Valdes, Benjamin C. Kinney... (there are 7 editors, assistant editors, etc listed in the nomination; award level withdrawn nomination declined, linked to titles {{T|3137421}} and {{T|3133670}}.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:08, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::::: This is a very interesting example since it raises an issue that I haven't considered before. [https://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2023-hugo-awards/ This nomination], like a number of other recent nominations, lists a number of people who are -- explicitly -- not editors. The list reads:
 +
::::::::::::::* co-editors Mur Lafferty & Valerie Valdes; Assistant editors Benjamin C. Kinney & Premee Mohamed, host Tina Connolly, producers Summer Brooks and Adam Pracht
 +
:::::::::::::: The question that it raises in my mind is whether this award should be linked to our EDITOR record, which is limited to two co-editors. I am thinking that it's best described as an "editorial team award" and should be entered as an "untitled award" instead. Not only would it, arguably, be a more accurate representation of the relationship between the award record and other ISFDB records, but it would also make the award record appear on {{A|Benjamin C. Kinney}}'s, {{A|Premee Mohamed}}'s, {{A|Tina Connolly}}'s and {{A|Adam Pracht}}'s Award Bibliography pages (Summer Brooks doesn't have an author record in the database.) [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::::::::I would argue that entering magazine awards as untitled awards would not be what most users would expect.  The category for the award, semiprozine, is for the all the issues of a magazine for a calendar year.  The EDITOR title record (or records) is the only title record that we have for magazines and fanzines.  I think folks would expect to see the award in question listed on those title records.  This would be especially confusing if we used untitled awards only in cases where the named persons in the award for a given magazine differ from those we list in the author field of EDITOR titles for the year.  I think the ''Escape Pod'' nomination is an excellent example of the issues with magazine awards.  It has both multiple EDITOR records for the calendar year, and differences between persons listed on the award vs listed in our title records.  I do understand that software changes would be required for any of the changes I've proposed, and that we have limited resources for making such changes. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:01, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::::Both awards would be displayed in the award pages as is currently done. The software could be altered to display the records in the authors list based on the authors in the award record.  Thus, S. B. Divya would show only record 2, whereas Mur Lafferty would show both records 1 & 2.  The software would also be altered to display the awards on each linked title record, but the title records would not cause the linked award to propagate its authors' records. 
 +
:::::::::::::This approach would solve the problems of not showing the non-declined nomination on Divya's award list. It would also solve the problem of having to have multiple award records in order to link to multiple title records.  Lastly, this would also allow us to include authors (assistant editors, podcast hosts) that are in the official nomination, but who we don't credit in our title records.  The one wrinkle I thought of after my original post, was that we potentially have variant titles or variant author names that do not exist in our database.  One solution to that would be to allow the creation of titles and authors that only appear because of an award.  Variants would roll up to the canonical records as they currently do.
 +
:::::::::::::Regarding the sub-optimal author arrangement in the awards table.  I agree that it should be changed, but I don't see that it would be necessary in order to allow the author name on the award to be editable, and to allow it to differ from that of the linked title.  After all, it worked that way a few years ago, until editing those fields on the award record was locked down.
 +
:::::::::::::Agreed that we would have to come up with rules as to what the authoritative source is for award recipients and titles.  This is currently an issue.  I try to match the award to the title that matches the title and name announced for the award rather than linking them to our canonical title record.  They roll up anyway.
 +
:::::::::::::I think this approach solves a number of problems.  If others agree, it still sounds like the required changes would be extensive and non trivial.  Perhaps there are incremental changes that could be made to move us forward.  Thanks.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:08, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::: @Ahasuerus re your final 2 paras. Fair point: I'll try to put something together to post over the next 2 days, although given that researching the Chengdu/Hugo stuff seems to turn up a new weird-and-wonderful thing every day (not all necessarily relevant to ISFDB), I'm not sure it might take a bit longer.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 19:31, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::::::: Apologies for not coming back on this; I've been preoccupied with other things the last few days.  Re. some of the points raised, I know that there was a lot of work done to get the records changed; my concern is that a lot of ill will seemed to be generated due to initial stonewalling (or at least, the perception of it) by pointing to the existing Rules & Standards as a reason not to make those changes.  I'll try to get a proposal posted by Sunday at the latest. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 12:52, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::: No problem. Re: the "perception of stonewalling", I suspect that it's related to the previously mentioned gap between what new contributors know about the data entry rules and what moderators know about them. When a moderator says "This isn't how we enter bibliographic data", it's based on multiple layers of understanding of what the rules say and why they say what they say. In the case mentioned above, once the rules and the reasoning behind them were explained in detail, Lee Mandelo realized that we were missing a significant amount of relevant information and provided it in a follow-up comment. It clarified the situation, at which point we were able to clean up and reorganize the data quickly.
 +
 
 +
:::::::::::: Based on that discussion we added [https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:FAQ#How_does_the_ISFDB_deal_with_author_name_changes.3F a new entry] to the ISFDB FAQ, but it's relatively short. Perhaps we should create a new Help page or template explaining that we make a distinction between legal names, socially used names and professionally used "working names" and the reasons why the data entry rules are the way they are. Basically a summary of what I wrote in response to Lee Mandelo's original post. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:53, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::::::::::::: Sorry for making an already complicated item even more messed up, but I only just noticed Rtrace's comment from a week ago: "I had seen Divya's announcement, but planned to wait to add the withdrawal until the Hugo statistics are published after the award ceremony.  I hadn't worried about the magazine credit, because I'm used to the fact that magazine awards frequently do not reflect the persons nominated due to our software."  It definitely crossed my mind about whether I was jumping the gun on making those edits based on what an author said, as opposed to what the award body had publicly stated.  If it had just been a regular single author record that had been declined, I wouldn't have changed anything; it was the magazine credit that concerned me.  Given that was backed up by the author's statement, which mentioned both nominations, I made the (debatable, I'm more than happy to concede) decision to address both of them.  Next time something like this comes up, I'll raise it here rather than making pre-emptive edits.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 19:19, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::::::::::No worries, I'm just a little hesitant since the notice of declination didn't come from the official source.  I suspect there are other declined nominations that we don't know about.  They all should be reported in the official nomination statistics that are released after the ceremony.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:08, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Contacting Kenneth R. Johnson ==
  
:: Thanks - I've now updated both of these authors (and varianted the works for the first one) as described. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 09:11, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
Can anyone tell me how? I found some vintage SF pornos that he should know about, and add to his bibliography, if he ever revises it. Thanks for any help. —[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] ([[User talk:Rosab618|talk]]) 14:34, 10 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Never mind. Phil S-P helped me get in touch with him. —[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] ([[User talk:Rosab618|talk]]) 02:28, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Nightworld ==
+
== Poem/Story ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?24292; The NEL HC cover is on Amazon with somebody's junk in the background, but FantLab seems to have gotten a photo where that stuff was cropped out and the lens flare removed, so I added that here, but Bluesman, a long-gone editor, uploaded the Dark Harvest cover as the NEL PB cover and didn't size it properly anyway, so if anybody can find the NEL PB cover they can upload it and replace the wrong one. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:10, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5703635; If anyone's interested, I think it's a story, mod disagrees, hardly matters because it seems to be some squib from a much earlier play or something so if the link isn't added it wouldn't be much of a loss. I made a more helpful edit adding the Encyclopedia.com link I mentioned and also the archived jmichaelyates.com site, which goes back many years, because his site currently online is weird with many links going to an error page but other pages working just fine. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 18:36, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:[[User:Username|Username]] omitted one piece of important information. {{Locus}} lists this as a poem in their entry for {{P|34858|Tesseracts 8}} which contains the item. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 19:02, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Yeah. Also, the Encyclopedia.com mention is in the discussion with mod on my user page, not in the rejection above. Just to clarify. A reply from anyone would be helpful so I can leave this minor edit behind; I've got 1,000 others waiting to be approved. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:27, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Pub ==
+
::: The work is short fiction not poetry. I've added an internet archive link onto the author's [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?116209 Summary Bibliography]. Open the site and select the short fiction tab. Open the drop down list on your left and you will see the story. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 19:33, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::Yay. Also, RTrace, while I'm here I noticed you added some Star Trek slash fiction, Companion, and the cover artist is Gayle F. but it's signed Feyrer, who is on ISFDB as the cover artist for a later non-Trek magazine, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=gayle+f&type=Name. Whose name do you consider the parent so I can make a variant? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:40, 11 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::::OK, thanks John for finding that.  I've approved the submission.
 +
:::::Regarding Gayle F./Gayle Feyrer, [https://fanlore.org/wiki/Gayle_F Fanlore] lists her as "Gayle F" which I suspect is how she is most frequently credited.  It also appears that she also uses the pseudonym "Sylvia Knight", though we have no titles using that byline. In any case, I'd go with "Gayle F." as canonical.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 07:06, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::::Feyrer has been made a variant. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:06, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubseries.cgi?2534; I added pub. series # to Death Guard based on dustjackets.com spine and the list at seriesofseries.owu.edu, then noticed 2 of the books weren't on that list, so I added (Hutchinson) to their 2 books to differ the series from Unwin's. Then I had a random thought; every time I do an edit it seems weird that every field starting with pub has no period; pub type, pub series, pub series #, and pub note. Is it possible to add one or would that require something major? The way it currently is makes it look like a tourist's guide to the local bars. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:07, 17 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Malcolm for President ==
  
== Ghost of Sherlock Holmes ==
+
I'm holding [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5704973 this submission] to update {{T|24965|this title}}.  There is an Amazon review asserting that this is an original story, though based on characters from the television series, which would seem to make the novelization flag invalid.  However, I'm not certain that this title is eligible at all.  From skimming reviews, I don't detect anything speculative about the novel.  I also would question whether the authors {{A|Dan Danko}} and {{A|Tom Mason}} are above the threshold.  If we determine that they are, I think the title should be marked as non-genre. What are other folks' opinions on whether this title should be deleted?  Thanks. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 10:04, 12 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
: I don't see anything genre or even genre-adjacent in the novel either. Nor I see a reason for the authors to be considered above threshold. So I vote to delete the book altogether. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] ([[User talk:Anniemod|talk]]) 12:48, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Hearing nobody coming to this title's defense.  I will zap it.  Thanks. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 19:43, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?286757; I own a small number of paperbacks and I never PV some of them, so while doing that today I realized that when I worked on this Halliwell book long ago I wrote a note about the Academy Chicago sticker on the back, only realizing now with more experience here that it's actually the American edition, so I deleted the note. What's interesting is that while looking at this I saw that while my copy has a sad little white sticker on the bottom left corner of the back cover with American publisher and price, the copy on Archive.org, which I assume I linked to back then, has a gigantic medieval-looking thing on the back with the publisher name/address and a white sticker with just the price. So if anyone thinks that copy really needs to be entered here as a separate edition it's available. I don't think there's any differences in the book itself as far as the stories or anything else; it's one of those "we can't be bothered to print new info so we'll just stick the details somewhere" type of thing. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:27, 18 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Fright Night Covers ==
  
== Curtis Books ID ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?289979; [https://web.archive.org/web/20071008121652im_/http://www.craigspector.com/frightnight.cover.jpg]; So I have been doing some Skipp & Spector edits, the splatterpunk co-authors who were so popular back in the 80s and 90s, and I discovered that Craig Spector's homepage URL now links to some foreign (Vietnamese?) site so I replaced it with the archived version which goes all the way back to 2005. While looking through the site I found that cover linked above; the Tor edition on ISFDB shows the villain of the movie, the head vampire played by Chris Sarandon, but the cover on Spector's site shows a totally different cover with one of the villain's minions, the girlfriend of the movie's teenage hero, played by Amanda Bearse, who would become famous a few years later for playing Al Bundy's neighbor Marcy on Married With Children. So was it re-released with a different cover? Is it an early mock-up that was changed before release? I'd like to know if anyone knows. It could have been worse; they could have used another one of the villain's minions, the hero's friend Evil Ed, on the cover, played by Stephen Geoffreys, who gave up mainstream acting in the early 90s and pursued a career in hardcore gay porn. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:13, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5391717; I'm going to make another edit simply adding the PDF scan, but I'd like to point out that if the mod's rejection note is correct then someone should let the editors who entered the five dozen or so other Curtis entries with full ID here that they entered the ID wrong, too, many of which are PV. EDIT: I just went to make that edit and discovered it was already there, because after rejecting my edit the same mod made his own edit adding the PDF link himself (and for some reason included the entire PDF URL verbatim in the Note to Moderator), so now it looks in the Edit History like he's the one that found it. Wonderful. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:56, 19 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Doubleday First Edition ==
  
== Night Screams ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?266014; https://archive.org/search?query=clickwhistle; https://www.ebay.com/itm/153845632156; I replaced cover image with another Amazon one with a different URL that looks exactly the same but is much bigger. I wanted to add the Archive.org link but over time I've come to realize that a lot of Doubleday (and probably many other publishers) books I and others here have linked to may not have been the true first edition because, as can be seen in the links above, the 1 useful copy on eBay shows the copyright page with "First Edition" while the archived copy does not say that. So is there a way to tell which edition it is? Gutter codes or something? EDIT: Also this, https://archive.org/search?query=watkins+the-god-machine. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:58, 13 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?187393; The collaborations between Pronzini and Malzberg have had copies added to Archive.org over the last few years, and this one has a weird note where the editor, Mhhutchins, who PV way back in 2007, determined the month was May by oddly using the date stamped on the library copy at the back; I see a March 1 date on Kirkus Reviews and Amazon, but don't really see May anywhere, so if any mystery experts can determine the exact date, it's probably not May. I've fixed the cover art date to May to make everything the same, but of course if the exact date is determined all the fields will have to change. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:01, 19 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Zebra ==
  
== File 770 ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubs_not_in_series.cgi?52948; I'm trying to get this page down to zero. What I've done today is add Kensington Publishing to publisher for 1987 edition of Time-Kissed Destiny because that's what it says on title page (also added author's note on last page); first edition of Once In a Lifetime already has Kensington in it on ISFDB. So ElectricStarboard, who entered the later editions of those 2 novels, may want to chime in with whether they have Kensington on their title pages so it can be added. That Warren Smith book is 70s "non-fiction" junk about space pyramids and should be deleted. I asked NihonJoe about whether his PV copy of Book of Space says Kensington and he put my edit on hold a long time ago but never responded so I cancelled it; if he reads this maybe he can say now what it says on title page. Dracula's Guest, which I just made an edit for fixing the cover artist (turns out it's not Greg Theakston but rather the mysterious FMA, who has about a dozen ISFDB credits), has 1 copy on eBay with photos but doesn't show title page. As far as Death Screen, I don't know, can't find it anywhere. So after my Time-Kissed edit is approved and Book of Space has Kensington added, I hope, and the pyramid book is deleted, that will just leave 4 books. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 11:51, 15 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Joe just fixed Book of Space; only a few more to go. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 12:31, 26 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?28984; In a weird sequence of events today, while adding prices and page numbers to Gerald Kersh books I saw there's a publisher called London Books that reprinted his 1938 novel Night and the City in 2007, and while adding the Archive copy I also entered the intro by John King. Somehow there's only one John King on all of ISFDB, and even that's a pseudonym, but I saw somebody named John King Tarpinian in the name search list and being an unusual last name I clicked on it, and noticed 1 of the essays he wrote had 2 obviously misspelled words. Checking the file770.com PDF of the December 2014 issue I learned there were several other spelling mistakes so I corrected them all in an edit, but I didn't do a thorough check so there might be more. The Edit History doesn't reveal who entered the contents, but as can be seen at that link above, there are many, many issues on here, so I have a feeling  there are probably many more mistakes. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:34, 19 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Geller the Artist ==
  
== Best SF Two (1) ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=geller&type=Name; M. Geller is almost certainly Martin Geller because they did covers for a single St. Martin's Press book each, one in '78 and one in '79. However, the credit for Infinite Dreams by Martin says design, not art, so probably shouldn't have any credit except in notes. So should it be moved to notes and M.'s legal name be made Martin (this is assuming, of course, that M.'s credit really says art in the book like it says in the PV's notes)? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 02:14, 16 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://archive.org/details/bestsftwoscience0000cris; Someone uploaded this recently, called it Best SF two, it's actually the first in the series, price-clipped with a Faber sticker on front flap, I just added the Archive link but if anybody owns a copy of this 1969 printing they can always add the real price. --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:00, 19 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Mary Shelley Award for Outstanding Fiction ==
  
== RHCP ==
+
I'd like to add this award to the ISFDB data base -- here is a list of past recipients https://media-ecology.org/Past-Awards (scroll down for Mary Shelley Award) [[User:PaulLev|PaulLev]] ([[User talk:PaulLev|talk]]) 20:27, 16 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=rhc&type=Publisher; There's 400+ RHCP but also 22 RHCB, all of which should probably be RHCP; also, 6 of those 22 have page numbers entered even though they're e-books, which I don't think is correct. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:47, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
: I am not familiar with Media Ecology Association, but their [https://media-ecology.org/board Executive Board] and the list of present/past officers include a number of scholars at accredited universities, so it appears to be legitimate. [https://media-ecology.org/Past-Awards Award recipients] include {{A|Ted Chiang}}, {{A|William Gibson}} and {{A|Ernest Cline}}. Curiously, they are associated with [https://media-ecology.org/affiliations The Institute of General Semantics] which was founded by Alfred Korzybski, who influenced a number of SF authors like van Vogt and Heinlein back in the day. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 21:23, 16 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:: I'm not sure a win for Ready Player One does much for their credibility /s {{unsigned|ErsatzCulture}}
  
: Personally I'd be wary of rushing into changing these. Loads of UK ebooks are listed on Amazon/Kobo/penguin.co.uk as being from "RHCP Digital", but if you look at the title pages, in many cases - quite possibly the majority I suspect - it's actually Penguin, Puffin, or one of their umpteen other imprints list.  [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?910301 Example].  Cornerstone (Digital) is another name that PRH use to make life difficult [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?902988 example]
+
::: I realize that it's a joke, but let me clarify for the benefit of new editors. We determine whether an award is legitimate based on what kind of organization administers it and for what purpose. Awards given by publishers or promotional/advertising companies to promote their clients' books and stories are generally not considered "real" awards for our purposes and are not included. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 12:07, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::: Sorry - more than happy for that cheap gag to be removed/struckthrough/whatever, if you think that would be best.  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 13:40, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
  
: I only came across a product listing using "RHCB" in recent weeks - probably because I've only recently ventured into trying to attack the backlog of kids books that Fixer never submitted - but I don't recall what was actually listed on the title page when I looked up the preview on Amazon.  I absolutely wouldn't automatically presume it anything listed with RHCB would be RHCP though.  Fortunately 22 pubs shouldn't be an overly onerous job to check the previews on individually, not that I'm volunteering to do it personally ;-)
+
::::: No worries, it created an opportunity to clarify our eligibility criteria. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 14:09, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
  
: I have been tempted to add publisher notes for RHCP Digital, Cornerstone Digital etc saying that pubs listed against them may be misleading - I dunno what anyone else thinks?
+
:: But seriously, this looks like a good addition to my eyes.  I have a couple of questions relating to practicalities, which maybe PaulLev knows the answer to:
 +
:: * What exactly is the eligibility period?  [https://media-ecology.org/Call-for-Nominations This page asking for 2024 nominations] says "Open to novels, short stories, hypertexts, plays, scripts, comics, audio recordings, motion pictures, videos, and other narrative forms, published or released in 2019 or later...", so is it a rolling 5-year period?  (TBH, if that's the case, that's pretty cool - one of my problems with awards is that they're all seemingly based on the past 12 months, which privileges stuff that has a lot of hype and frontloaded readership.)
 +
:: * Besides that list of recipients, is there any sort of press release that has more details about the winners?  I know when I've added stuff like this year's Locus finalists, when you get down to some of the more obscure categories where nominees weren't already in the database, tracking them down, working out if their pubs are eligible for inclusion here, etc can require a fair bit of legwork.  If there's some info about the winners published, that would help in reducing that burden.
 +
:: * I looked up 2017's winner on [https://www.amazon.co.uk/Surveys-Novel-Semiotext-Native-Agents/dp/1584351780/ Amazon UK], and it doesn't appear to have any speculative element.  For such works, I guess doing an "untitled award", with a note saying it's not speculative, is the way to go?  (Again, any PR that describes the winning work will be helpful in determining the speculative-ness.)  For awards like [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category.cgi?860+1 Goodreads Choice Mystery & Thriller category], we only add the speculative works, but given there's just a single winner here, maybe having an untitled entry will make it clearer?
 +
:: {{unsigned|ErsatzCulture}}
 +
::: Good questions!  1. Yes, the eligibility period is a rolling 5-years. 2. This announcement is put up on the Internet every year https://media-ecology.org/2023-MEA-Awards 3. The only criterion is "fiction" -- so, yes, in principle, there could be an award given to a work that is fiction, but not speculative fiction. But as far as I can tell, that happens very rarely.  Also, the award is not given every year. [[User:PaulLev|PaulLev]] ([[User talk:PaulLev|talk]]) 13:10, 17 July 2023 (EDT)
  
: Agree that the page numbers are probably wrong, unless those pubs are PDFs or similar, in which case that should be mentioned in the note. (Off the top of my head, I don't recall seeing any PDF ebooks from PRH, but it doesn't strike me as completely infeasible if they're kids picture books, and I know Bloomsbury lists PDF ebooks for current titles on their website, even if I've never gotten round to submitting any as yet.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:11, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:::: Hearing no objection, I have created an Award Type record and entered these awards for the [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category.cgi?1071+1 SF titles that we have on file]. I didn't create "untitled" award records for non-genre titles. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:55, 23 July 2023 (EDT)
:: I decided to try one and picked the only collection out of the 22, R. Westall's Break of Dark, and found it on Amazon India with the wrong cover, but Look Inside revealed that it is RHCP, so I fixed that. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:29, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Chaz/Charles Brenchley ==
+
::::: Thanks! [[User:PaulLev|PaulLev]] ([[User talk:PaulLev|talk]]) 23:25, 24 July 2023 (EDT)
  
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ch.cgi?2971 Chaz Brenchley] is an author with (mostly) prose works from 1991 onwards.  He is listed as being born in 1959 in Oxford, and legal name of Charles Brenchley.
+
== Cordwainer Smith Rediscovery Award ==
  
[https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?132907 Charles Brenchley] has some fanac (letters and reviews) between 1977 and 1979His letter in Matrix #15 is scanned on fanac.org, and (a) has a contact address of Oxford, and (b) not to put too fine a point on it, looks like it was written by a stroppy teenager.
+
Rich Horton [https://rrhorton.blogspot.com/2023/07/cordwainer-smith-rediscovery-award-for.html posted] about this year's winner, and I went to add them, only to find this award doesn't currently exist in the databaseTBH it's one that I only had vague awareness of, but it does have [http://www.sfadb.com/Cordwainer_Smith_Rediscovery_Award SFADB] and [https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/cordwainer_smith_rediscovery_award SFE] pages, and has been going for just over 20 years.
  
Any objections to making the latter a variant of the former?  The 12 year gap in (recorded) activity might indicate different people, but everything else points to them being one-and-the-same. (NB: [http://www.chazbrenchley.co.uk/chronicle.html his personal site] says <i>"I sold my first story for £36 in 1977 and for the next 10 years writing for teenage and women's magazines and children's comics was my bread and butter."</i>, which seems a plausible explanation for that gap.) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:37, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
In essence, it's a single category award, just a winner, no nominees or finalists, and is to an author who the judges felt does/did not get as much attention as they deserved.  Most of the past winners are names that I recognize, even if I think I've only read half-a-dozen or so of them. (Possibly the sort of scenario that the award was set up to address?)
  
: In a [https://fogcon.org/2014/02/guest-post-interview-chaz-brenchley/ 2014 interview], Chaz Brenchley said:
+
[http://www.cordwainersmith.com/award.htm The award's site] lists who has been on the judging panel; again they're people I recognize and who are respected in the field. (Although it looks like that page hasn't been updated for a decade?) [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 03:57, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
:* I’d known about fandom since I was a teenager, but it was mostly something that happened somewhere else, and required money I didn’t have, and social skills that were not at my command. I had friends who were quite heavily involved with the BSFA and fanzines, and I did some work with them, but I never went to anything - until I moved to Newcastle and actor-friends from Oxford phoned to say they were involved with a play at this SF con in my new city and could they come and stay with me to save the hotel costs? ... That was Mexicon in 1984.
 
: This tells us that he "did some work" with "BSFA and fanzines" as a teenager and that he lived in Oxford until he moved to Newcastle in the early 1980s. Overall, I think it's more than enough evidence to support the notion that they are the same person. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:03, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
 
:: Thanks for digging that out.  Assuming no-one raises any objections in the mean-time, I'll do all the necessary varianting tomorrow. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 16:17, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
 
::: The author link has been done, and all the titles varianted to the parent author. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 10:21, 22 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== Battlefield Earth Cover ==
+
: I thought we already had an Award Type for this fairly well-known award, but apparently not. Must have been an oversight. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 10:51, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?3704; There's more than 1 active PV, and it's clear that's the wrong cover because the sticker says soon to be a movie and that was in 2000, so original 1984 cover needs to replace it. They reprinted so many of this loon's books over and over again that it may be difficult to be sure which is the original. Oh my God, now that I've called him a loon online the Scientologists may come for me. Oh well, at least I'll get to meet Travolta. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:40, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:: I must confess all the less-well known awards named after people who were active years ago blur into one in my mind - the non-Astounding Campbell, Crawford, Crook, Wellman, this one - blur into one in my mind.
 +
:: If and when this gets set up, I'll add all the winners - should be pretty straightforward compared to the likes of Hugo and Locus. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 11:04, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Witchdame ==
+
::: Since this is a no-brainer, I have created an [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/awardtype.cgi?109 Award Type record] for it. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 09:16, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::: Thanks - unless someone else beats me to it, I'll probably add all the winners on Saturday. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 12:01, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::: A day later than I'd promised, but these are all in now.  Thanks again for adding it. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] ([[User talk:ErsatzCulture|talk]]) 18:02, 23 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1121377; Berkley edition uploaded to Archive in '10, PV didn't link so I added OL ID but artist is spelled MEITZ on copyright page, a search of text contents on Archive revealed it's the only "by Don Meitz". PV barely responds to anything anymore, so if another mod wants to change it or contact him somehow; Don Maitz has extensive ISFDB credits but the only alternate name listed is Maitz. EDIT: https://archive.org/details/magicon-worldcon/Abracadabra%20--%20Program%20newsletter; 1 search result for "Don Meitz". --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:52, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:::::: Thanks! [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 18:27, 23 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Cold Fear ==
+
== Alex Gordon ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?885928; Someone just uploaded an Archive copy of the Brit edition; foreword as entered here says editor's foreword in the book, so I'd like to know if the American edition says the same so it can be fixed. Also, Pitman's name doesn't appear on the contents page because of the long poem title; is it the same in the American edition? In case anyone owns a copy and can say for sure. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:58, 20 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?6359; The essays are by this person, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0329966/, but they may not be eligible since he usually wrote about old movies in his long-running column for Fangoria. If they are eligible, some variant is needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 10:43, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Littlefinger ==
+
== Watson Bon-Bon ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?14255; John D. Keefauver supposedly wrote at least 700 stories during his lifetime, and recently a collection of his stories was published. I imported the first 5 stories because they all included the D. in his name, but everything after that does not, so those will require variants and such. What's interesting is that I discovered not only that several stories had the wrong date on ISFDB, but that his story How Henry J. Littlefinger... seems to be 1 of a series of stories he wrote about that character, with another in the men's mag Knight in 1976, this odd one, https://www.nytimes.com/1980/12/03/archives/shapely-nonsmokers-seek-brainy-bikers-lonelyhearts-needs-can-be.html, and most interestingly a novel in 1992, The Three-Day Traffic Jam, the Amazon description of which mentions the character and says it's set in the future, which means it probably should be entered here; maybe I'll try using the Google copy. So if anyone can provide more info this could be made a series; anyone who owns his collection could also add a lot, because there's a couple of dozen more stories in it. EDIT: I entered the novel, pending approval, but no cover image, although the Google copy clearly has an illustrated cover which can be seen partially while searching inside the book, so a cover image must exist online somewhere. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:51, 21 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=de+bon-bon&type=All+Titles; Copy of BBR #11 just uploaded, I made an edit adding link and adding/fixing other stuff, this Watson work was in French originally and reprinted in English in this zine, never collected, but as can be seen capitalization, subtitle, and whether it's fiction or essay are issues. So it's for someone else to decide what's best re: those things. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 19:20, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Masques Photos ==
+
== Fake Ring ==
  
https://fantlab.ru/images/editions/plus/big/196234_1?r=1519300680; I'm wondering if any software experts know how to cut-and-paste from an image like that one, because while most of the authors are famous genre figures with many online photos, there's also David Knoles with only the story in this book on ISFDB and Dennis Hamilton with 2, in this book and its sequel 3 years later. If so, their photos could be added to their records. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:20, 21 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://archive.org/search?query=ring00pier&sort=-addeddate; While adding links to 2 copies of Piers Anthony's 1968 Ace edition of The Ring I found a 3rd copy on Open Library but it's actually a completely different thing, a sampler of some T. A. Barron books, in case anyone thinks that's worth entering. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 21:30, 18 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== One Footprint in the Sand, Part 2 ==
+
== Canonical name change Willard E. Hawkins from Willard Hawkins ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Community_Portal/Archive/Archive50#One_Footprint_in_the_Sand; Someone just uploaded this rare book to Archive.org, so I'll finally be able to fix/add everything. I still love that cover; creepy. EDIT: Now that there's a copy to look at it turns out that the white smudge on the bottom of the back cover is actually a signature! Sadly, it doesn't match any cover artist for the publisher, William Kimber, and the copy is a ratty ex-library one that may have had the back flap ripped out, where the cover credit may have been. Damn it. However, someone here may know who it is. --[[User:Username|Username]] 16:16, 22 August 2022 (EDT)
+
Any objections to making [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?13700 Willard E. Hawkins] the canonical name and [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?13701 Willard Hawkins] the alternate? <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Scifibones|Scifibones]] ([[User talk:Scifibones|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scifibones|contribs]]) .</small> 05:38, 19 July 2023‎ (EDT)
  
== Marcelin ==
+
: No objections here. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] ([[User talk:Ahasuerus|talk]]) 09:09, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?169482; While adding/fixing stuff for their books I noticed Philippe is spelled wrong here, with 2 L's. Is that some ISFDB thing about spelling French names or is it a mistake, and would changing it in his record fix his name in all the books contained in his record? --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:26, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
+
:: Hearing no objections, the relationship has been reversed. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 19:00, 25 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== WorldCat loses Responsibility ==
+
== Chiller ==
  
The new WorldCat is here, after "coming soon" this weekend.<br>
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?961199; Someone named Aardvark entered this recently. I knew I'd seen that cover art before on one of Karl Edward Wagner's horror anthologies and I had, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1435921. So it apparently originated here, not the French book. Also, I saw on OL that Chiller is "based on" a 1972 novel by Sale, The Love Bite, whatever that means. Maybe that one belongs here, too. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:16, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
It appears to me that WorldCat.org has eliminated (display of) the "Responsibility" field that reports writer, illustrator, editor credits from title pages.
 
  
For instance OCLC 1008214608:<br>
+
== Cover Artist: Ampersand Book Covers ==
Served as https://www.worldcat.org/title/favourite-fairy-tales/oclc/1008214608 <br>
 
Also served as https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1008214608 [& today "/title"]
 
;Yesterday
 
* Author: David Grant; Anne Renier; Fernand Gabriel Renier; Jennie Williams; Collins (Firm); ''[link] All authors''
 
: [That short list atop, linked to a longer list in the Details frame that continues: "... Richmond upon Thames (London, England). Library Service,; William Collins Sons and Co.,"]
 
* Responsibility: Jenny Williams.
 
: [last line of the Details frame]
 
  
;Today at the new WorldCat
+
We currently have a cover artist named [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?306339 Ampersand Book Covers]. I just found the website for that artist and was going to add it to the existing Author record but noticed that the [http://www.ampersandbookcovers.com/ website] shows the name as "Ampersand Book Cover Design". So far the only titles that are credited to this artist use "Ampersand Book Covers" as per the statements on their copyright pages. I have several new titles that are by this artist (not credited but definitely by this artist per the website portfolio page) and wonder if I should just use the existing artist after adding the website data and a note about the full name to the existing artist record or if I should use the full name from the website and make it a variant of the existing artist record. Thanks. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 15:20, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
* Authors:David Grant, Anne Renier (Donor), Fernand Gabriel Renier (Donor), Jennie Williams (Illustrator), Collins (Firm) (Publisher), Richmond upon Thames (London, England). (Former owner), William Collins Sons and Co (Printer)
+
: I would credit 'Ampersand Book Covers' and a note in the canonical record.  [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 14:54, 20 July 2023 (EDT).
* [no Responsibility field; no mention of "Jenny Williams"]
+
: P.S. The pub still gets a note stating that the artist is uncredited. I 'm aware you know this already, but less experienced editors might be following this thread. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 15:39, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Will do. Thanks. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 15:31, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
  
(No change in this.) "Author" names are active linknames, which return catalog search reports. The hits are neither matches on title page credits nor matches on identified persons.
+
== Green Knight ==
  
In this instance (a book not in the database), illustrator {{a|Jenny Williams}} born 1939 is correct. "Jennie Williams" is a mistake.<br>
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?15963; Philfreund, Chavey, GlennMcG, letting you all know LCCN isn't on their site, should be removed and put in notes section. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 20:04, 19 July 2023 (EDT)
Neither the old nor the new display of record OCLC 1008214608 links to, nor clearly indicates, either of the persons, or identities,
+
:The LOC site isn't always reliable for older LCCNs. It's likely still valid, just difficult to find. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 20:05, 21 July 2023 (EDT)
* [https://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n50018054/ Jenny Williams, 1939–] at WorldCat; [https://lccn.loc.gov/n50018054 LCCN]
 
* [https://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n80018263/ Jennie Williams, 1949–] at WorldCat; [https://lccn.loc.gov/n80018263 LCCN]
 
who are two creators of English-language children's books.
 
  
[&] P.S. Today at this station, browser address bar displays the shorter URL with "/title" in place of "/oclc". --[[User:Pwendt|Pwendt]]|[[User talk:Pwendt|talk]] 12:02, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Swedish Vampires ==
--[[User:Pwendt|Pwendt]]|[[User talk:Pwendt|talk]] 12:02, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
 
: It's true, I mentioned their "coming soon" some time ago in a thread above called "New WorldCat?" and updated it today with some more comments; this redesign, I think, is going to lead to much angst here. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:05, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
:: I can't find any traces of the "Responsibility" field either. Hopefully, their development team will tweak things over the next few weeks. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:12, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5720694; After approval I'm sure those who are fluent in the language can improve upon my edit. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:52, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
::: The old pages were so low-tech, but now everything has giant pictures everywhere. Also, I like how when you type WorldCat on Google this page is one of the first results, "New WorldCat.org coming soon", but the link leads to this, https://www.worldcat.org/whatis, which isn't even working, so apparently someone forgot to tell someone else that the new WorldCat is already here. For once I'd like to see a site redesign where they go from a picture-heavy overcrowded site to a streamlined text site. Less is more. God, I hope this doesn't mean that all the hundreds of WorldCat links I've added, and the countless thousands that other editors have added over the years, won't lead to the right page anymore. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:38, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
== New cleanup report -- translation template mismatches ==
+
== Hound of Frankenstein ==
  
A new cleanup report, "Translations with Tr template in Pub Notes and no Tr template in Title notes", has been deployed. It's a weekly report, so it will run every Sunday morning. It's currently limited to "title type = publication type" cases, so it will find only 43 mismatches when it runs in 4 days. There is no "ignore" functionality at this time, but we may need to add it later depending on what we find. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 20:45, 23 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?284512; I'm not sure why I added that ponderous link re: the prices in the note a long time ago because the back cover is on FantLab, but anyway, while adding a link today to FantLab and replacing cover with theirs I noticed there's no "The" on title page but there is in the first Mammoth Book of Frankenstein edition which I checked via the archived link. So if anyone can verify there's a "The" in all editions of that anthology then the story title should be separated and made a variant of the original title. Also, someone added full date to chapbook from Amazon UK but I don't know if anyone trusts them enough to add it to the story itself. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 14:08, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
  
: Awesome, thanks very much for this! [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 06:22, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== George Wells ==
  
== John McNeil? ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?24739; I've been doing a lot of edits for old Arthur Stockwell books (there's a huge gap between the last older book and the recent ones) and came upon George Wells. As someone wrote, there may be more than one; I suspect it's 4 different guys since it's not likely a very obscure British author would write an article for an American pulp zine 25 years later and it's also not likely that the author of a cheap paperback horror novel would write a couple of stories for a semi-literary anthology series more than 20 years later. Also, cover of Taurus on Amazon has $2.95 on the cover so either the price on ISFDB, $2.50, is wrong or there's at least one reprint. EDIT: 1 copy of Taurus on eBay, it's Canadian thus the higher $2.95 price, like DAW Books in the 1980s Signet Canadian editions start number line with 2, glad someone wrote a note about that in another 1982 Canadian Signet book on ISFDB otherwise I would have entered it as a second printing. Should be approved soon; hopefully someone will upload a copy of this book to Archive.org someday. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:56, 20 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:I noticed this morning that another editor has separated old novel & article, '82 horror novel, and recent short stories into 3 separate Wells. While looking into this I discovered there's a George O. Wells but searching for his story title inside Archive.org I discovered it's George R. Wells, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5721607, so that's a bonus. There's also a G. A. Wells that wrote a story for a 1923 issue of Weird Tales the same year that a George Wells wrote the novel from Stockwell so could that be the same person? A lot of Brits wrote stories for that zine. EDIT: Jeez, it turns out the other entry in that zine with George R. Wells is wrong, too, it's Inside of a Piece of Sugar. There's nearly 100 issues of Science and Invention on ISFDB and I doubt I came across the 1 issue with wrong names/titles so a thorough check is probably needed. EDIT: Fixed this, https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3036272, quotes around Loaded. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 08:13, 21 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?5229; I added OL ID link to Archive copy of Little Brother and saw there's a story credit nearly 20 years after he died, but the Clarkesworld bio at the bottom of the story gives no info and the website doesn't, either, so if anyone knows who that McNeil is they can add something to his name to separate him from the dead guy. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:09, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Raw Brunettes ==
  
: Digging through his site, there's a link to [https://github.com/johnmcneil GitHub] and [https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-a-mcneil/ LinkedIn]. I can't see the latter (whilst I used to have an account there, I deliberately let it slide due to that site being awful in any number of ways), so I dunno if that has anything useful, but the GH profile indicates he is in the US, whereas the earlier one was British, so maybe "(US)" would be a reasonable disambiguator in the name field?  [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 11:02, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1256247; Wild Women pub. history, searched on Google Books, says "first two sections" so that one should have (excerpt) after it and be separated from its full appearance in the Wordcraft book. I've been doing a lot of Wordcraft edits and their Speculative Writers series numbering is a mess, whether their fault or editors here I'm not sure, so that will probably need some discussion later on. --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 15:19, 21 July 2023 (EDT)
:: OK, I'll add (USA) to his name since there are a half-dozen other authors with that here. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:45, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
 
  
::: His LinkedIn profile says that he's been a "Specialist at Hennepin County Library" since 2012 and that he is "Interested in opportunities in libraries and web development". [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:59, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Paksenarrion World Chronicles ==
  
== Scaremongers ==
+
With the publication (and entry) of Elizabeth Moon's new collection [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3209577 Deeds of Youth], I have created a new series named [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?70445 Paksenarrion World Chronicles]. Would there be any objection to placing the older collection [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1856054 Deeds of Honor] in it as number 1? I'd also like to remove the series name in the title and the cover artist (who's actually credited as the cover designer) from [https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?520995 this publication] which was sole PVed by the late Biomassbob. [[User:Philfreund|Phil]] ([[User talk:Philfreund|talk]]) 08:32, 22 July 2023 (EDT)
 +
:That would be fine. Please move the cover designer to the pub notes vs. completely removing. Thanks. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:38, 23 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?29003; 1 copy on eBay, added cover artist from it (only other credit: Scaremongers 2), but 4 stories had different titles, two which altered the title greatly and 2 which were just missing The at the start, but while 3 of them were only under the wrong title on ISFDB, Stephen Gallagher's story has all other appearances with The at the start, with story title in this book being the only one without it, so either it's another one of the countless variants someone made here that wasn't actually a variant in the publication itself, or it's possible that the title page has no The at the start. Rare book, so the only hope is that someone here has a copy and can check all stories against their title pages. If my edit's approved first and anything needs fixing by someone else it can be fixed. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:40, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
== Wrong Author and Their Variant ==
  
== Gerani ==
+
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5722391; I was going through Eerie, Indiana book series, got through first 4 before #5 only had a 3rd printing on Archive.org and I lost interest, but all of them (and I suspect the others, too) have a lot of missing/wrong info. Only 1 of the 4 was PV (O'Fearna) but 1 of the non-PV had a co-author who didn't co-write it. So now that I removed Mike Ford will the record for the book with his other name, Michael Thomas Ford, go away or does it have to be deleted or something? --[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 09:12, 22 July 2023 (EDT)
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1490758; His book has a later date, https://picclick.com/Top-100-Top-100-Horror-Movies-by-Gary-175326440714.html, of November 2013 and is copyright 2013, so what's the deal? --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:43, 24 August 2022 (EDT)
+
: The proper way to deal with the parent is with a merge. I took care of it for you. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 09:36, 22 July 2023 (EDT)
  
== Chetwynd-Hayes Story Title ==
+
== Bond, Stephen Bond ==
  
https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?889327; American edition of Cold Terror recently added to Archive.org, while making an edit I saw that "The Day That Father Brought Something Home" had no That in the title, and neither does the British edition's contents page on FantLab; I also added Tales To Freeze the Blood from Archive.