Search results

...date is no help here unless it's a first edition). The format is YYYY-MM-DD, so March 1973 is "1973-03-00". If you don't know the month (which you oft

...date is no help here unless it's a first edition). The format is YYYY-MM-DD, so March 1973 is "1973-03-00". If you don't know the month (which you oft

...nks. The format is: www.fantascienza.com/catalogo/cov/DD/DDddd.jpg, where "DD" are the first two characters of the five characters code DDddd in square b

..., 2013, which is entered into the publication record in the format YYYY-MM-DD: 2013-11-11.

...ub I just check that it’s syntactically correct (formatting of the yyyy-mm-dd, currency symbol in front of the price, etc.) and either approve or approve ...k reminder that the ISFDB doesn't understand the YYYY format. Only YYYY-MM-DD dates, e.g. 1891-00-00 in Haggard's case, will work. Thanks! [[User:Ahasuer

...now (books are only eligible 90 days pre-publication). PS: We use YYYY-MM-DD format for the dates in Notes - it is less likely to cause confusion -- out

All dates in the ISFDB should be entered in the format YYYY-MM-DD. If any of those are unknown you can enter zeros, but the each element must ...o include zeros for the missing pieces. If a date's format is not YYYY-MM-DD, the value in the submission gets thrown away. So you need to use:

...abandoned in the mid-2010s and we decided to keep the more precise YYYY-MM-DD date when its source is properly documented in Notes. It's similar to the w ...ss there's a good reason, and if so, that reason (and the original yyyy-mm-dd value) should be documented in the title/pub note? [[User:ErsatzCulture|Ers

...y'', but please note that we enter the year/date of publication in YYYY-MM-DD format. YYYY-MM will confuse our software, which isn't terribly bright :) P

...the process brings up a dialogue "Date must be in YYYY, YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD format, 0000-00-00 means "Unknown",.....etc". I've not seen this before and

...rs a 4 digit date, then they'll get a warning that it should be in YYYY-MM-DD format, and it will add "-00-00" automatically. But this does sound like a

...ub record along the lines of 'website inspection shows pub date of yyyy-mm-dd but otherwise unchanged' or something to that effect? [[User:MagicUnk|Magic