User talk:Bernarrd

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Bernarrd, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- JLaTondre (talk) 10:04, 27 May 2023 (EDT)

The Forgotten Door

Hi, and welcome. I have a question about this submission. I suspect it duplicates this record, although that record may simply be for a later edition. Does your copy have any sort of 9-digit or 10-digit number on it anywhere? Thanks, and thank you for contributing. --MartyD (talk) 08:49, 11 June 2023 (EDT)

Hi MartyD, No my copy does not have a 10 digit number on it. As is mentioned in the note for the other entry, The early editions did not have an ISBN number on them. The 10 digit ISBN did not come into use until about 1970. And I doubt that all publishers used them even at that time. The book does have a Libarary of Congress Catalog Card No. 65-10170. This edition is earlier than that edition shown, and may be a First Edition. I have collected Alexander Key's books for around 30 years and I have seen a lot of them. The problem with Westminster Press is that they did not bother to mark their First Editions, or their early reprints, in any way for many years. To determine if your book is in truth a First Edition is a little bit of a guessing game. You have to be a bit of a detective and look for clues. The ads inside the book and especially on the dust jacket are helpful in determining when the book was published. You will also notice that the dust jacket image I posted is a little different from the one on the current entry. The current image is from a later copy. I have in my collection a 13th and a 14th printing of the book and they are both in a similar jacket to the one currently listed on the site. I also have a copy from around 1967 which is more like the copy I listed, and has a similar jacket except for the ads on the jacket and the price. The ca. 1967 jacket has a price of $4.25, and ads for "Tunnel Through Time" (1966) and "The Runaway Robot" (1965) by Lester del Rey and "Secret of the Marauder Satellite" (1967) by Ted White. I have collected books for over forty years, mainly Fantasy titles and Childrens books. I have found that many publishers did not go to much trouble in marking the editions of their children's books, even when they clearly marked their adult titles. I guess they either thought they were not important, or not collectible. This makes the collecting of Children's books much more of a challange. I also noticed that I have an unbalanced double quote in my note field in front of "Rivets" and also "this publisher did not marked First Edition" should read "this publisher did not mark First Editions" in the note field. I have "The Westminster Press" in the publisher field and apparently the site uses just "Westminster Press". And finally I have given a date of 1965-02-04 which is the date that the copyright was registered. This came from the Catalog of Copyright entries. I find that many publishers register the copyright on or near the expected release date. At one time I had access to Publishers Weekly and used it for release dates, but I no longer have access. Bernarrd (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2023 (EDT)

Ok, thanks. I accepted it and tweaked the other entry a little. One thing I changed: It looks like we have settled on "Westminster Press" as that publisher's name, so I removed "The". Here it is. --MartyD (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2023 (EDT)

linking you uploaded covers

I rejected this submission attempting to link your uploaded cover. You were linking the wiki page rather than the actual image. Right click the image on the wiki page and select 'copy image link', that's the URL you enter in the publication record. I fixed this one for you. John Scifibones

I guess that is why I am getting broken images when I post an edit. I have 4 or 5 pending edits that have the same problem. I guess there is no way for me to edit my pending edits? Bernarrd (talk) 14:38, 15 June 2023 (EDT)
Unfortunately not. I can't edit them either. Let them be approved as they are, then correct the links when you review them. John Scifibones 14:47, 15 June 2023 (EDT)