Author:Anonymous

From ISFDB
Revision as of 18:52, 3 January 2011 by Uzume (talk | contribs) (AuthorHeader)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is an ISFDB Bibliographic Comments page for the author (or artist or editor) Anonymous. This page may be used for bibliographic comments or extended notes about the author, or discussion on how to the author's works are to be recorded . The link above leads to the ISFDB summary record for Anonymous. Please use Bio:Anonymous for a biographical sketch of this person. To discuss what should go on this page, use the talk page. For more on this and other header templates, see Header templates.

Is not Anonymous largely the same as unknown? Should this be used only in cases when there's an explicit "Anonymous" in the contents/title, or what? --JVjr 15:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Help:Screen:EditPub#Author says (in part): "If a work is credited to "Anonymous", then put "Anonymous" in the author field. The same applies for any obviously similar pseudonym, such as "Noname". If the work is not credited at all, use "uncredited", with a lower case "u"." So I think that the answer is yes, but the uncredited name should be used where no name at all appears in the publication. It is only when working from secondary sources, when no author is credited but I can't be sure whether there is a credit in the publication or not, that I use unknown. -DES Talk 16:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
There is a bug in the Publication Editor code which currently tells users that "Every publication must have an author. If you have intentionally left the author field blank, use "Anonymous" to indicate unknown authorship." This behavior has been documented as BUG 2833255 and will be changed in the next patch. Ahasuerus 16:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)