Difference between revisions of "R&S Example page"
DESiegel60 (talk | contribs) (→On Hold: Open but Inactive Discussions: descriptions) |
(link) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NotFinal|Date=18 August 2009}} | {{NotFinal|Date=18 August 2009}} | ||
− | Add new discussions to [[#Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn|Pending]] See instructions in that section. | + | See [[Rules and standards discussions]] |
+ | |||
+ | __NOTOC__ | ||
+ | Add new discussions to [[#Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn|Pending]] at the bottom of the page. See instructions in that section. | ||
==Current: Active Discussions== | ==Current: Active Discussions== | ||
− | This section is for up to three active discussions. Include <nowiki>'''Seeking Closure'''</nowiki> if | + | This section is for up to three active discussions. Include <nowiki>'''Seeking Closure'''</nowiki> if someone has suggested that the discussion be closed and is asking for agreement or objections. Include <nowiki>'''Poll'''</nowiki> if a poll is in progress. |
* [[R&S Example page/Date formats including Day of the Month|Date formats including Day of the Month]] Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized. | * [[R&S Example page/Date formats including Day of the Month|Date formats including Day of the Month]] Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized. | ||
− | * [[R&S Example page/Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines|Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines ]] Should | + | * [[R&S Example page/Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines|Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines ]] Should these works be included? Should the ROA be changed? |
* [[R&S Example page/Gurps Infinite Worlds|Gurps Infinite Worlds]] Should this and related works be IN or OUT? | * [[R&S Example page/Gurps Infinite Worlds|Gurps Infinite Worlds]] Should this and related works be IN or OUT? | ||
− | == | + | ==Action Pending: Completed discussions waiting for Help/Policy updates== |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | * [[R&S Example page/ISSNs suggested on verified magazine records?|ISSNs suggested on verified magazine records?]] Do ISSNs belong in magazine issue db records? | |
− | + | * [[R&S Example page/Editors and "scientific editors"|Editors and "scientific editors"]] When is an editor not an editor? What level of credit makes a co-editor in our records, and what level should be for notes only? | |
+ | * [[R&S Example page/Italics in a title?|Italics in a title?]] Should we use HTML in title fields? | ||
− | + | ==Recent: Discussions closed but not yet Archived== | |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | * [[R&S Example page/OCLC as a verification source|OCLC as a verification source]] Add OCLC to the list of secondary verification sources? | ||
+ | * [[R&S Example page/Request to delete Graham Greene|Request to delete Graham Greene]] Should the works of {{A|Graham Greene}} be deleted? | ||
+ | * [[R&S Example page/Initials normalization|Initials normalization]] Should we standardize on Initial, Period, space, no matter what was in the pub? | ||
− | == | + | ==On Hold: Open but Inactive Discussions == |
+ | Topics where no consensus has been reached, to be re-opened later: | ||
− | * [[R&S Example page/ | + | * [[R&S Example page/Ebook inclusion standards|Ebook inclusion standards]] What makes an ebook, as opposed to a webzine, IN? |
− | * [[R&S Example page/ | + | * [[R&S Example page/Serials in Chapterbooks|Serials in Chapterbooks]] Is this example a good model to follow? |
− | * [[R&S Example page/ | + | * [[R&S Example page/Spaces in Author names|Spaces in Author names]] Is "DeWitt" vs. "De Witt" worth a variant, or should we normalize such names, or only some such names? |
+ | * [[R&S Example page/Use canonical artist name for uploaded images?|Use canonical artist name for uploaded images?]] Should we use canonical names in wiki credits, or names "as stated"? | ||
==Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn == | ==Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn == | ||
This section is for discussions that have been put forward but not yet become active. They will wait for a slot in [[#Current: Active Discussions|Current]]. | This section is for discussions that have been put forward but not yet become active. They will wait for a slot in [[#Current: Active Discussions|Current]]. | ||
− | To add a new discussion, add "<code>'''<nowiki>[[R&S Example page/<Discussion Title>|<Discussion Title>]]</nowiki>'''</code>" to the list below. Add a | + | To add a new discussion, add "<code>'''<nowiki>[[R&S Example page/<Discussion Title>|<Discussion Title>]]</nowiki>'''</code>" to the list below. Add a short description of the issue. Save the page. Follow the link to create the new subpage and describe the issue on that page. |
− | * [[R&S Example page/Verification cycle|Verification cycle]] | + | * [[R&S Example page/Verification cycle|Verification cycle]] Should notes on secondary sources be deleted on primary verification? Should they be added later? |
− | * [[R&S Example page/Magazine Editors|Magazine Editors]] | + | * [[R&S Example page/Magazine Editors|Magazine Editors]] Executive editors and other "editors": which should be co-editors in magazine issue db records? |
Latest revision as of 12:45, 6 January 2011
This page is a work in progress, and has not yet obtained a solid consensus. It was first created (or significantly revised) on {{{date}}}. Do not take the information on this page as firmly established ISFDB policy or guidelines. Feel free to discuss any issues with the content on this page on its talk page. If in doubt, before accepting the guidelines on this page, feel free to discuss the matter elsewhere, perhaps on the Community Portal.
This notice will be removed when the page obtains a reasonable consensus on its contents. |
---|
See Rules and standards discussions
Add new discussions to Pending at the bottom of the page. See instructions in that section.
Current: Active Discussions
This section is for up to three active discussions. Include '''Seeking Closure''' if someone has suggested that the discussion be closed and is asking for agreement or objections. Include '''Poll''' if a poll is in progress.
- Date formats including Day of the Month Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized.
- Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines Should these works be included? Should the ROA be changed?
- Gurps Infinite Worlds Should this and related works be IN or OUT?
Action Pending: Completed discussions waiting for Help/Policy updates
- ISSNs suggested on verified magazine records? Do ISSNs belong in magazine issue db records?
- Editors and "scientific editors" When is an editor not an editor? What level of credit makes a co-editor in our records, and what level should be for notes only?
- Italics in a title? Should we use HTML in title fields?
Recent: Discussions closed but not yet Archived
- OCLC as a verification source Add OCLC to the list of secondary verification sources?
- Request to delete Graham Greene Should the works of Graham Greene be deleted?
- Initials normalization Should we standardize on Initial, Period, space, no matter what was in the pub?
On Hold: Open but Inactive Discussions
Topics where no consensus has been reached, to be re-opened later:
- Ebook inclusion standards What makes an ebook, as opposed to a webzine, IN?
- Serials in Chapterbooks Is this example a good model to follow?
- Spaces in Author names Is "DeWitt" vs. "De Witt" worth a variant, or should we normalize such names, or only some such names?
- Use canonical artist name for uploaded images? Should we use canonical names in wiki credits, or names "as stated"?
Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn
This section is for discussions that have been put forward but not yet become active. They will wait for a slot in Current.
To add a new discussion, add "[[R&S Example page/<Discussion Title>|<Discussion Title>]]
" to the list below. Add a short description of the issue. Save the page. Follow the link to create the new subpage and describe the issue on that page.
- Verification cycle Should notes on secondary sources be deleted on primary verification? Should they be added later?
- Magazine Editors Executive editors and other "editors": which should be co-editors in magazine issue db records?