Talk:Creative Commons License

Jump to navigation Jump to search


This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license".

Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
I figured. Hardly Urgent, just came on this and noticed. The differences between 2.0, and 3.0 only matter to lawyers anyway, i think. -DES Talk 20:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Done. Better late than never :-) Ahasuerus 13:29, 18 August 2021 (EDT)


The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -DES Talk 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Yup, just a leftover from a bygone era :) Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Gone. -DES Talk 20:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


Since you can't release something under a Creative Commons license unless you hold the copyright, there should probably be a copyright notice on this page, crediting Al with the general compilation copyright, and the various contributors with individual copyrights on their contributions. Again, this isn't urgent. -DES Talk 20:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


To be super clear it might be worth adding an entry along the lines of "For images see each individual image page for the applicable license" under the Works not covered section. /Lokal_Profil 03:47, 18 August 2021 (EDT)

Done -- thanks for pointing this out! Ahasuerus 13:33, 18 August 2021 (EDT)