View source

From ISFDB

You do not have permission to do that, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups user, Write.
You can view and copy the source of this page:
<!-- The __NEWSECTIONLINK__ tag is used to force a link for adding new sections to the top of this page. Please do not delete it.--> 
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
<!-- End "Magic Word" section -->
{{Isfdb-general-header}}
{{Isfdb-moderator-noticeboard-archives}}
{{moderator-availability}}

== ISBN wrong ==

Record 672711 (http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?672711) Le fantôme de Canterville et autres contes shiows the ISBN to be 978-2-253-02346-3.
However NooSFere and World Cat has this ISBN for L'enfant tombé des étoiles. (along with Goodreads & Amazon.fr)
For Le Fantome de Canterville : et autres contes, World Cat shows the ISBN to be 2253048089 9782253048084 for the 1988, 1997 edition  but no cover pics.
NooSFere shows editions for 1982, 1988, 1989 & 1991 for LIVRE DE POCHE Jeunesse. No 1986 edition
ISBN : 2-253-02346-9  for 1982, ISBN : 2-010-13984-4  for 1988, 1989, 1991. All have the same basic cover that is shown in the ISFDB page.
This file was verified by Linguist back in 2018 and I don't want to step on toes. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 17:41, 1 May 2022 (EDT)

== Bruno Elletori / Elettori ==

Does anyone know if [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?25855 Bruno Elletori] is the same person as [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?62081 Bruno Elettori] ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 03:09, 2 May 2022 (EDT)

:Bruno Elettori is on Instagram.  He has artwork posted there matching these Bruno "Elletori" credits:
:* [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?830593 Prisoner of the Planets]
:* [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1102548 Soma]
:* [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1328461 Days of Atonement]
:* [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1328463 Facets]
:and one that is similar but not identical (a face in the eye instead of a skull):
:* [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?138254 Blue World and Other Stories]
:--[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 10:22, 2 May 2022 (EDT)
:: If Elettori (one L) depicts [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?830593 Prisoner of the Planets] on his website where the credit on the book has it as two L's - does that mean the the two records on ISFDB for the artist should be merged - or some kind of varianting done ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:04, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
:::Yes.  I think we should make the two-L, one-T misspelled one a pseudonym of the one-L, two-T correctly spelled one.  For your case, we would make a variant.  You can verify the printed credit is (mis)spelled with two Ls and one T, and we have definitive-enough evidence it's by the person who spells his name with one L and two Ts.  We can research the others and either variant (if actually misspelled, or if we cannot tell) or correct.  For example, I found ''Days of Atonement'' full scan on archive.org, and it shows "Front cover illustration by Bruno Elettori".  So I'll go correct that one. Would you like to do the pseudonym and varianting, or would you rather I did? --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 18:14, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
:::p.s. I can see for ''Days of Atonement'' that Locus1 has the name misspelled, and it uses the same spelling for ''Facets''.  That might be the source for misspelled credits in ISFDB. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 18:17, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
:::: The entry for the artist will need sorting as well as the publications listed under each. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 11:41, 8 May 2022 (EDT)
::::: Yes.  I will take care of it. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 07:24, 9 May 2022 (EDT)
:::::: This is done.  I was able to find a good source of "Elettori" (vs. Grafton's misspelled "Elletori") for all but ''Beastmaker'' and ''Beaststalker'' (for neither of which was I able to find actual artwork, either).  Given the bountiful supply of documented misspellings, I decided it's safe enough to start with an assumption that the same is true for those two.  I sent Elettori a message on Instagram, but he has not responded. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 09:53, 10 May 2022 (EDT)
(Unindent) Found images of Beastmaker at [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1929421.Beastmaker Goodreads] and Beaststalker also at [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4313794-beaststalker Goodreads] --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 07:19, 15 May 2022 (EDT)

== Wrong Riot ==

Mavmaramis upped a cover for Riot '71 to the Wiki, but it clearly says WALKER on the cover; the real Hodder cover is here; https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Riot-71-Ludovic-Peters-Hodder-Stoughton/19674196786/bd. Editor rarely responds on his board, so I'm letting everyone know. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:44, 2 May 2022 (EDT)
: I was only provided with a photo of the front flap of the dustwrapper by Joachim Boaz which had the Edgar Blakeney credit. He did not state he had a different hardback copy and pointed me to his Ruminations blog for a scan and I did not notice it was a different publisher. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 05:56, 6 May 2022 (EDT)

:: Thanks for responding. I assume you'll upload correct cover using my link, and maybe create a record for the Walker edition, too, using your cover. Also, since you saw the front flap and British HC's usually have a price there, was the price obscured, not there, or did you forget to enter it? --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:05, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
::: As stated I was only send an image of the front flap and nothing else. There was no price printed on it as far as I remember. I have no bibliographic details for the Walker edition nor did Joachim Boaz provide me with any so no I won't be uploading anything - don't shoot me I was merely assisting JB as he's not a registered user here (nor do I suspect he wants to be) and merely uses me to make edits. If you wish to upload the cover you linked then you are free to do so. I cannot create a record for a book I do not own and know nothing about other than the cover artist. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 16:16, 6 May 2022 (EDT)

:::: OK, I'll upload it. Your friend J.B. has a 2014 review of a 1979 Michael Bishop novel entered on ISFDB, so I'll see if I can find a photo of him to add to his record. Thanks for doing as much as you could. Also, if anyone else reads this and wants to enter any other editions they may own, while checking all this out I saw a paperback cover of Riot '71 with an angry white dude manhandling a black lady, so unlike the almost artistic HC covers the PB cover just went straight for the sensationalism. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:48, 6 May 2022 (EDT)

==Aldiss / Helliconia Winter==

I am editing / PVing Aldiss's [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?16826 Helliconia Winter]. The only PV is inactive, so this is to advise that I will add sourced notes, remove "Helliconia (map)", import the existing "Helliconia Winter (map)" (because the maps for Helliconia Summer and Winter are slightly different) and replace "Both Reginald and Clute have the Cape edition as the first" with "Reginald has the Cape edition as the first" in accordance with my post 'Clute/Nicholls and "First Edition"' on the Moderators' Noticeboard dated 3 April 2022 [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 19:13, 5 May 2022 (EDT)

== Uploading issues ==

I've tried to upload some new images but some of them don't seem to appear - 2 of them did do so after some time (even after refreshing / closing and re-opening the website). The third goives me "Error creating thumbnail: /var/www/html/wiki//bin/ulimit4.sh: line 4: /usr/local/bin/convert: No such file or directory" despite it being within the size limits. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:01, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
:The old wiki software the ISFDB uses has a bug in that when you upload a replacement image, it doesn't tell your browser a new version is present and so your browser continues to use its cached version (if the image has already been viewed). You need to force the new image to be displayed (Ctl + F5 on most browsers). Any other user viewing the image will see the new one. As for the convert issue, that can occur even on those images below the size limit. It can be ignored in those cases. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 17:26, 6 May 2022 (EDT)

== Mel O. ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1704977; 3 different PV's, all active; question is whether this is supposed to be Mel Odom (artist). --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:32, 9 May 2022 (EDT)

:Yes it is, corrected now. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 13:05, 9 May 2022 (EDT)

== Duplicate Publication Record: Adams / So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish ==

I was about to PV the Pan pb 2nd printing of Adams / So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish when I realised it appears to have duplicates: [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?30978 Record 1] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?301939 Record 2]. Note that the publication date of 1985-05-00 for Record 2 looks incorrect because it is a 2nd printing so the date should be "date unknown". I cannot see a tool for merging publication records, so could a moderator please advise how I go about sorting this out? Do I just delete one of the publication records? I am reluctant to do this because it will result in a loss of information about the PVs. Only 1 of the 4 PVs (Linguist) is active. I have left a note on his talk page pointing him at this topic. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 17:44, 9 May 2022 (EDT)

:The covers are different, and both are editor-provided scans. The capitalization in the blurb at the bottom is different, and the second record has a Pan logo in the top left, while the first record does not.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 09:05, 10 May 2022 (EDT)

::Although the cover scan associated with Record 1 is editor provided, I do not believe it has come from a pb edition.  Compare it with the scan associated with the [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?230741 Book Club edition]. From the imperfections on the dust jacket, they are clearly the same. So one of these pub records has re-used the scan from the other. I strongly suspect the Book Club has the correct scan. The hc eds (Pan trade and Book Club) have the cover with no Pan logo to top left. The early Pan pb's have the cover with the Pan logo to top left. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 19:01, 10 May 2022 (EDT)

::: Likely by sheer coincidence I entered the OL ID for the first (?) printing recently, so if a mod would like to accept that edit then that book can be looked at. Hologram covers, FTW. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:17, 10 May 2022 (EDT)

:::: Hello, and sorry I only saw the notification to-day. Indeed, both "2nd printings" are identical, Record 1 having the wrong cover. It would have to be deleted, of course, but I don't know whether there is a way to preserve the PVs. I'll ping Ahasuerus about it, he should know if it's possible. [[User:Linguist|Linguist]] 11:02, 21 May 2022 (EDT).

::::: Unfortunately, Ahasuerus says it's not possible. So I'll suppress one and change the date of the other to “unknown". Cheers, [[User:Linguist|Linguist]] 04:34, 22 May 2022 (EDT).

:::::: Linguist: all looks good now. I have also PVd the kept record. Thanks for cleaning this up. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 06:41, 22 May 2022 (EDT)

== To merge or not to merge? ==

Same title, same publisher - merge [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/edit/find_title_dups.cgi?977655 these] or not? Suggestions? Thanks! [[User:MagicUnk|MagicUnk]] 14:31, 11 May 2022 (EDT)

: This is why adding a note to excerpts (if possible) is valuable. A simple statement 'Excerpt consists of first two chapters' for example. [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User:GlennMcG Glenn] is a PV for two of the three. He can tell you if [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2865425 this one] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?3012858 this one] are identical. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 18:15, 11 May 2022 (EDT)

:: They're the same... about 3 pages worth. --[[User:GlennMcG|Glenn]] 19:03, 26 May 2022 (EDT)

== Author L Chan ==

We have two summary bibliography pages [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?327423 L Chan] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?229287 L. Chan] for this author. Under our rules 'L Chan (no period) is the correct canonical name. Many of the entries under 'L. Chan' should have been credited 'L Chan' initially. I propose to change any title where I can see that it was recorded as 'L Chan' in the publication. Question, where our only source is secondary, should I change those or leave and make 'L. Chan' an alternate name. Obviously, the author only uses 'L Chan', but we show what is actually in the publication. Opinions? [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 10:43, 13 May 2022 (EDT)
:For any of those entered as "L. Chan", if there's a PV, ask them to verify how it's entered in the book. For those without a PV, we can simply variant them to "L Chan" and make "L. Chan" an alternate name to "L Chan". ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 13:24, 13 May 2022 (EDT)
::For the secondary-only cases, it can be helpful to look for scans -- Amazon Look Inside, archive.org, Google Books, etc.  I think if the scan contradicts the secondary source, it's better to correct and include a note about the discrepancy and source of the information used to override the official/blessed secondary.  If no scan is available, then I agree we're stuck with keeping the secondary's credit and making a variant.  Because we know for sure that some publications used "L.", we cannot assume a mistake on the part of the secondary source.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 08:43, 14 May 2022 (EDT)

== Araminta Station ==

There is a note onm [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2690909 this] record that states "First version, do NOT merge with the second version." but I cannot find the alleged second version listed or depicted anywhere. The note may be there to warn but doesn't actually help in pointing you to the other cover so you can visually see the differences. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 15:14, 14 May 2022 (EDT)
:[[User:Dirk P Broer|Dirk P Broer]] added the note per the Edit History so you can try asking him. It is possible that at one time there was a miscredit in the database or a wrong cover image displaying on one of the editions that made it look like two separate covers. If so, it could have been corrected and the note is now superfluous. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 15:11, 16 May 2022 (EDT)

== Wiki Covers ==

http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Image:THNCHNTDNN1975.jpg; So someone uploaded cover with a huge crease running all the way through it, I found one that was uncreased, some other person reverted it back to the creased cover, and this had the fortunate side effect of me finding a better cover than the one I uploaded previously, which is not only uncreased but slightly bigger in dimension yet smaller in size than the creased cover, plus it doesn't have black mark over price like my previous cover. however, am I supposed to do something else now? I ask because it still has the name of the original uploader as the scanner. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:44, 16 May 2022 (EDT)

:The image you uploaded was vastly inferior to the original (smaller, less bright, less sharp, price unreadable), so naturally it had to be reverted. The new one is still less sharp than the original. You could have contacted the (active) primary verifier of course. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 10:41, 16 May 2022 (EDT)

:: It may not be 100% as sharp as the original, but it also doesn't have a huge fault line running through the entire cover. Does anyone else have an answer to my question above? I'm guessing the "edit" at the top could be used to insert my name in place of the original uploader, but I hesitate to do that since obviously some people are very touchy about anyone improving their work. It's surprising how many terrible book covers/author photos were uploaded to the Wiki over the years when certainly in most cases better ones were easily found online; in the future I'll try to remember if I'm going to upload a better image to only do so for images uploaded by people who aren't here anymore so as not to upset anyone. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:08, 16 May 2022 (EDT)
:::Yes, if you replace a cover on the wiki, you should edit the page and change the uploader name to you. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 14:27, 16 May 2022 (EDT)

== Strange Horizons ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/note_search_results.cgi?OPERATOR=contains&NOTE_VALUE=at+strangehorizons.com; I was checking the 6 August 2001 review of The Best of Cemetery Dance and the ISFDB link doesn't work, but online Google search found the issue; note search above gave same problem when I clicked the first link, so possibly all of these links don't work. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:54, 17 May 2022 (EDT)

== Peter Sís ==

The artist [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?2889 Peter Sis] should have an acute accent over the "i" in his last name. Would a moderator change it? --[[User:Rosab618|Rosab618]] 04:15, 18 May 2022 (EDT)

== Rob C. ==

http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Rob_Crausaz; I'm uploading a better cover of his PV to A Glass of Stars; hasn't been around since 10/2018 and so should probably get a "no longer active" message. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:48, 18 May 2022 (EDT)

== Duplicate Publication Record: Adams / Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency ==

The Pan pb 4th printing of Adams / Dirk Gently's ''Holistic Detective Agency'' has duplicate pub records: [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?10224 Record A] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?412396 Record B]. I propose to delete Record B but it has two PVs, neither of whom are active, hence this post. I have edited / PVd Record A and transferred across all the additional notes from Record B so that no information will be lost. May I please proceed with the delete?  [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 16:31, 20 May 2022 (EDT)
:No objection, seems OK to me. [[User:Linguist|Linguist]] 07:40, 22 May 2022 (EDT).

== Luisa Preißler ==

Greeting!  I have no idea on how to do this but--- Could Author Record # 321880  be merged with Author Record # 232592 isnce they are the same person.

Author Record # 232592  also has Luisa Preissler & Luisa J. Preissler attached and this would join all 4 versions of her name together and hopefully also put all of the book titles together as a group. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 09:04, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

: Done, see [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?232592 here]. It's actually quite easy to do. First you make the variant author a pseudonym of the canonical ("Make/Remove Alternate Name" under editing tools), then you variant the titles under the pseudonym to the canonical author. --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 10:19, 24 May 2022 (EDT)

== Dennys ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5326614; On a roll of adding prices to Canadian publisher's books; this one had a price that looked funny, so I checked and it was 95, not 96, but has active PV's so I cancelled it. If anyone wants to fix this very minor thing the Google link is at the bottom. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:11, 25 May 2022 (EDT)

:Is there a reason that you are mentioning this here instead of reaching out to the verifiers, both of whom are active?  I'm sure either of them would be happy to check the price, though you'll have to use the email system to contact [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]].  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 10:53, 25 May 2022 (EDT)

:: Well, besides the fact that I've made it clear recently that I'm not re-doing rejected edits anymore and cancelling my edits that turn out to have active PV so as to avoid the waiting for a response/PV complaining about my fixing of incorrect info, which I believe you thought might be a good idea, both of the PV for this book had particularly less-than-positive responses when I've contacted them to let them know I added or fixed something in their edits, as you can easily see if you go on their boards; Mr. W especially still stands as probably the rudest response I've ever gotten, which is really saying something. You and others are always going on about etiquette and such but when I do the "right thing" often I'm met with hostility for daring to correct something, regardless of the fact that usually it's justifiable, so maybe you should let other PV know how they're supposed to respond. This is a very minor fix, so if nobody wants to change it it hardly matters. --[[User:Username|Username]] 11:30, 25 May 2022 (EDT)

== Satanic Panic ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1317298; After nearly 2 weeks my extensive edits for these books were accepted, but 1 that removed something was rejected with no comment but "Why?" and the same mod removed something himself from the original edition; I can barely remember the convoluted importing and fixing I did for these, so someone look these over if you can spare the time and make sure everything's where it's supposed to be. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:27, 25 May 2022 (EDT)

== Rejected Why? ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5318733; Can someone un-reject this? The old pic's already on Wikipedia, he's turned to the side, and it's very small; the one I entered isn't on Wikipedia, he's facing forward, and it's quite a bit bigger. Also this, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5318770, which was rejected even though there's no PV. Also this, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5318771, which wouldn't have been rejected if the previous edit had been approved, because that's clearly where the date came from. Also this, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5319524, because previous editor entered #6 incorrectly as both series # and ID. Also this, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5319526, because that's what previous editor's note and WorldCat (ID already on book's record) say. The same mod rejected all of these; he also rejected my replacement of E. Nesbit's Tales of Terror cover with the full wraparound cover (featuring art continued on the back) but I'm going to let that one go because there was an actual PV for that one. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:12, 26 May 2022 (EDT)

: I have asked Biomassbob to respond here. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:53, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

::Username doesn't bother to complain to me because I'm unlikely to buy his arguments.  For example, the photo he chose is poor, slightly out of focus, and the existing photo is better.  Most of his suggested changes had no explanation of why the existing information was bad, and I rejected them with the question "Why?".  He apparently doesn't think he can possibly be wrong, he doesn't want to notify PVs when he makes changes.  I liked the cover for Tales of Terror, but he really needs to contact the PV.  Another of his favorite tricks is to remove an entry in a pub, then in his next submission, replace it with something he likes better.  It would really make things easier for monitors if he would just edit the entry instead of tossing it out before we can know why he wants to remove it.  He's a difficult editor to review, obnoxious and arrogant, but he works hard and I'll keep reviewing his submissions.  But he should learn to submit reasons for his suggested changes. [[User:Biomassbob|Bob]] 19:50, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

::: Dude, you haven't even approved any edits by me for months; I actually thought you'd given up moderating here because you were barely around for a long time and your attitude when you did work on my edits last year suggested you were doing so under protest or something, rejecting many of them because of some silly reason like "no movie-related info in the notes", which was a common excuse, apparently not noticing the countless other movie-related notes entered by other editors. If you think my Abe photo was poor then you must really think the already-on-Wikipedia, tiny, dark, profile picture currently there is horrible, right? I'm going to find a really great one now just to make you happy. As for PV, there are many things I assume they should know like looking at existing notes or clicking external ID's to verify my edits without me having to spell everything out like I'm working with slow adults, but apparently I give them too much credit. I have explained many of my edits where necessary when the info was something not apparent. As for being wrong, please see the many messages I've left on the boards where I chastise and insult myself as an idiot for making silly mistakes; like the recent Stephen King "Weeds" situation. I already explained that I'm letting the Tales of Terror rejection go because it actually has a PV (unlike your rejection of my importing of something into Dark Energies, which has no PV but only secondary verifications, which don't require contacting the person who did those, as you should know being a PV and all) and I don't feel like waiting for an often really long time for a response just to add a better cover, especially since a lot of the PV left years ago but whoever's in charge of tagging them as "no longer active" never did that. As for the "tricks" you mentioned, I don't even know what to say about that because I have no idea what you're talking about; removing wrong info and importing correct info is a very common thing that I've done many times because that's what you're supposed to do. Your abusive "obnoxious and arrogant" comment would bother me if I cared what you thought about me, which I don't, and recalling from the dim mists of time your attitude when you were a regular moderator and worked on many of my edits long ago, all I can say is: pot, meet kettle. The one thing I agree with you about is that I work hard, since in the slightly less than a year-and-a-half I've edited here I've made more than 25,000 edits, and encouraged others to do many more, all the while putting up with all the constant complaining and insults from others who "work" here while getting almost nothing in the way of feedback about anything I write on the boards. But I shouldn't be surprised about any of this because from reading recent and not-so-recent writings on the boards it's clear many editors have stopped editing here because they couldn't get along with other editors/moderators; as I mentioned somewhere recently, the fact I'm still doing this at all should be cause for gratitude. I think that's about it, so now that I'm going to replace the Abe picture and not bothering with the Tales of Terror cover, see what you can do to approve those other edits you wrongly rejected, or let someone else approve them if you don't want to. --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:42, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

== The  Other Glass Teat ==

I found an advert in the back of [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?269390 The Glass Teat] refering to this book with blub, size (210 x 140mm) and giving the ISBN as 0 86130 005 X. No evidence this publication from Savoy ever appeared - it doesn't appear on Savoy's website listing of publications - nor does the ISBN appear to exist so should it not be listed as "unpublished" under Savoy's publisher page ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 11:43, 27 May 2022 (EDT)

== Shape of Fear ==

http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Image:THSHPFFR1971.jpg; I uploaded a better image to this book but didn't get the usual "do you want to replace", apparently because back in 2009 Bluesman entered a too-big image or something, so can a mod get my image, http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Image:THSHPFFRDJ1971.jpg, to show up in the book's record? --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:26, 27 May 2022 (EDT)
:The original image was at the "wrong" location. I edited the pub to add the new image and deleted the original. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 18:59, 31 May 2022 (EDT)

:: [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/images/7/72/FRNSNDKKHS1953.jpg]; uploaded this, and again old one was not replaced because it's a different URL. --[[User:Username|Username]] 14:51, 2 June 2022 (EDT)

::: Same for this one, edited the pub to point to the new image, then deleted the original. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 15:28, 2 June 2022 (EDT)

:::: http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Image:THMNWHFRDL1942.jpg; It's not replacing the old image because it has an extra "L" in the URL. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:48, 12 June 2022 (EDT)

== Once Again ==

Unnecessary rejections: 1) http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5327115; New image has different URL with "SSL" which is, according to mods, the preferred Amazon image address now, but also new image doesn't have the "copyrighted material" bugs at top and bottom, which I replace whenever I see them if I find a cover without them. Un-reject this edit. 2) http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5327678; New image replaces old image with "P" in the URL which, according to mods, should be replaced. Un-reject this edit, too. I'm really getting tired of my edits being rejected incorrectly, especially these very minor image replacements, and having to waste time writing these stupid notes in order to get them un-rejected when that time could be used to actually make more edits. Somebody inform this particular mod that there's a reason to replace old images besides the fact that they "look better". EDIT: Same mod rejected another replacement of a cover with "P" in the URL, saying the new cover looked worse than the old one, but I'm going to let that one go because new cover I got from OL has a proper URL but also has some slight cover differences so I'm just going to make another edit from Amazon where the cover with proper URL looks exactly like the old cover. Most alarmingly, however, is this rejection, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5326695, where mod left a long note about stuff including the page count change, when there's an Archive link in the edit which leads to a copy of the book where it's obvious that the much higher page count I entered is the correct one. Un-reject this edit, too. On the plus side, while checking into all this I noticed at the very top of the copyright page the name of the illustrator for Wells' book, so that's been added in another edit; every dark cloud has a silver lining. I don't know what's going on here but let's try not to let this keep happening. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:05, 2 June 2022 (EDT)

== Please add Goodreads Choice Awards "Science & Technology" category ==

I can't imagine this is going to get much use (especially as they seem to have dropped this category for their most recent iteration), but could we have [https://www.goodreads.com/choiceawards/best-science-technology-books-2018 this category] added so that [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2601713 this nominated title] can be added to it?  I think this is a moderator or bureaucrat task?

Thanks. [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 16:41, 8 June 2022 (EDT)

: Any moderator should be able to add a new category to an award type. Only new award types require bureaucrat intervention. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 17:27, 8 June 2022 (EDT)

:: [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/award_category.cgi?1039+1 Done]. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 18:03, 8 June 2022 (EDT)
::: Thanks! [[User:ErsatzCulture|ErsatzCulture]] 18:04, 8 June 2022 (EDT)

== Chavey ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?325318; After constant complaining about adding info about cover images to this guy's PV books at the bottom of a long list I've added a couple recently, but just noticed there's a warning about the length of it being way too long and some browsers possibly not being able to handle displaying it properly. So someone should contact him and advise him on how to break it up or whatever's needed since he rarely checks it. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:35, 9 June 2022 (EDT)

: Our Wiki software is quite old, which is why it displays a warning about the 32K limit, which is not an issue with modern browsers. Al is currently working on upgrading the Wiki software. Once he is done, the warning will disappear. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:56, 10 June 2022 (EDT)

== Ruleless Stonecreek? ==

Do the rules for editing PVs only apply to me or do they also apply to Stonecreek? Data was changed and added by him without contacting me. I've been warned for breaking the rules like this, but apparently Stonecreek has fool's liberty, [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5336952 look here].--[[User:Wolfram.winkler|Wolfram.winkler]] 09:57, 12 June 2022 (EDT)

: Did you read the note: "Adding missing relevant data: date, content, pub. series, sources, links & notes"? All of these were missing - as usual - from the stub record you provided. Christian [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] 11:39, 12 June 2022 (EDT)
::Is there no one who can give me a reasonable answer?--[[User:Wolfram.winkler|Wolfram.winkler]] 16:52, 13 June 2022 (EDT)
:::Apparently there is no one who has the courage to comment here. That's sad. --[[User:Wolfram.winkler|Wolfram.winkler]] 13:28, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

::::: Stonecreek's self-approver privileges were [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Community_Portal#Falcons_of_Narabedla revoked on 2022-06-14] -- see the link for details. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 16:30, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

:::: I can't comment on your question, but I thought you'd like to know that Stonecreek entered another Hobbit Presse book by Mr. Sullivan, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?901899, in case you own that and can also PV. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:44, 17 June 2022 (EDT)
:::::Interesting information, but I can't see any connection to my question/complaint.
:::::I'll rephrase it: Do the rules regarding editing PV's data apply to all users?
:::::@ Username: I can't see how this information can help to clarify my question. Please explain that to me.
:::::BTW the next rule violation from Stonecreek [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5340329 here] (Google translator).--[[User:Wolfram.winkler|Wolfram.winkler]] 11:35, 21 June 2022 (EDT)
::::::Well, the missing answers confirm my assumption that there is a two-class society here. I'll give you one piece of advice along the way: stop Stonecreek.(Google).--[[User:Wolfram.winkler|Wolfram.winkler]] 12:45, 4 July 2022 (EDT)

== How to enter ==

Very shortly I will be having a box set of four books by different authors (published by Puffin) delivered. My question is how I enter this - would it be OMNIBUS ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 15:20, 15 June 2022 (EDT)
: Yep. And I would also add each of the books individually (so 5 publications) because these box sets tend to get separated... [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 15:33, 15 June 2022 (EDT)
:: Thank you Annie. The four books contained within the box set are already on ISFB anyway (it's an early 1970s set) but I'll still add them as content. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 10:34, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

== Paul Jacquays vs Paul Jaquays  ==

Author Record # 9645 Paul Jacquays is in reality Author Record # 8705 Paul Jaquays.
I think the name Jacquays was most likely misspelled when entered. 
The art for one of the books under Jacquays, Star of Cursrah, can be found on the artist's Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Jennell.Jaquays.Artist/photos/1583624091905697.  Paul Jaquays now goes as Jennell Jaquays. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 10:15, 16 June 2022 (EDT)

== Mick Van Houten ==

In email correspondance with this artist in relation to some cover art identities he has informed me that (quoted verbaim) "‘Mike' was a consequence due to 3rd party ignorance, thankfully corrected later, although often I’d still see ‘Van' instead of the correct ‘van'." Would a moderator edit his canonical and legal name to show the correct 'van' please ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 10:37, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

: Thanks for looking into this. Since we don't create alternate names based on capitalization, I have changed "Van" to "van" in all three versions of the name and added notes. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 16:43, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

:: No worries and thanks. I'd initially contacted him in regards to [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?483015 Jane Gaskell's The Serpent] and he sent me a lengthy reply explaining the error(s). --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 18:53, 17 June 2022 (EDT)

== Andrew Robinson / Andrew J. Robinson ==

The listing for [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?81177 Andrew Robinson] includes [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?2111035 this interview] which should be this [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?7967 Andrew J. Robinson]. I have no idea whether any other items listed under the former belong to the later. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 07:53, 19 June 2022 (EDT)
:Fixed. Interviews should always uses the canonical name of the author so I updated the record. They look like two different people. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:13, 19 June 2022 (EDT)

: I'm the one who recently added the photo to Andrew J. Robinson's page from Clive Barker's Hellraiser (1987); however, he's more famous for playing the Scorpio killer in Dirty Harry (1971). I also just now added Andrew Robinson cover credits to the 2 other Windrusher books because he did all of them. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:46, 19 June 2022 (EDT)

== Fantasyworld ==

Can one of you do something with this, http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Username#Fantasyworld? I think I entered info properly as can be seen in the edit history, but the Michael Trevillion cover credit ended up being on his author page but not actually added to Fantasyworld, then mod deleted something, then the Trevillion author image which I also added showed up on his page where it hadn't been when I checked a few minutes earlier. I wrote to explain this and mod deleted the Fantasyworld author credit so now it doesn't show up anywhere. Someone restore my info as I entered it. Thanks. --[[User:Username|Username]] 19:53, 19 June 2022 (EDT)

== Frontispiece ==

I could swear I've seen other editors add "fp" when adding a frontispiece; I've done it rarely but still have done it several times. A moderator asked about this on my page, so if it's not OK to add that then how to go about searching ISFDB for all "fp" and getting rid of them? --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:42, 26 June 2022 (EDT)

: Help section [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:NewPub#Regular_Titles Regular Titles] subsection Page, bullet point <i>Special designations</i> clearly identifies the allowable abbreviations. The fact that some other record may contain the same error is not justification for ignoring our standards. As always, you are free to propose a change in [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Rules_and_standards_discussions Rules and Standards]. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 13:12, 26 June 2022 (EDT)

:: I asked if there's a way to search for all page fields with "fp" so I can see how many I've done, if others have really done it, too, and to delete them all if that's not a proper page entry; someone with that knowledge hasn't responded yet, assuming anyone will. Also, it's "Rules", not "Rusles"; I'll correct that for you. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:23, 26 June 2022 (EDT)

== Artie Conliffe ==

In refeerence to this [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?1320383 map]. It is signed "Arthur Conliffe" so should not not be his true name and "Artie" a variant ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 16:21, 26 June 2022 (EDT)

== Romanian Names ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=filipa&type=Name; 2 Titus. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:39, 27 June 2022 (EDT)

== Keeping Up With the Joneses ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/se.cgi?arg=james+jones&type=Name; James Jones' 1 British cover art credit should probably be with the 2 British cover art credits under James Jones (artist), and the American Shadows artist is likely a whole different person. --[[User:Username|Username]] 09:58, 27 June 2022 (EDT)

== Joe D. Ripper ==

I added Joe DeVito cover credit to the 1988 anthology Ripper! using www.jdevito.com Bibliography page. 2 PV, 1 active and only responding by e-mail, which I'm not using. EDIT: Oddly, the Ripper credit doesn't appear in the extensive cover list but only in a card list further down the page; doing a quick check of the other credited covers, it seems the Ripper credit was the only one missing on ISFDB, except for this late one, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?69942, which I just made an edit for to add the credit. EDIT: Many more DeVito cover credits/merges/variants done, pending approval. He also seems to have done the covers for a few of those men's adventure series (American Nightmare, Steele, etc.) but it's not clear if he did all the covers in each series so I didn't touch those. --[[User:Username|Username]] 08:36, 30 June 2022 (EDT)

== Machen Dupe ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?37144; I replaced cover for 1 edition and noticed now that there's another which seems the same, but there's different info in each, in case anyone thinks info should be combined in 1 record and the other deleted. --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:49, 30 June 2022 (EDT)

== Christian Vs Chris McGrath ==

I have been working on artist Christian (Chris) McGrath on my Pinterest account and have been finding a number of titles where his has not been attributed as the cover artist and have been updating those. A number of titles have a preview where you can see that the artist is named as Chris McGrath and in those cases I have been using that name. Under Christian McGrath there are a number of titles where it list the book, then again with the addition "with Chris McGrath"

There are two titles (one by me, one not) that are listed under Chris McGrath but not Christian McGrath. How do I get those titles listed under Christian McGrath with the addition "with Chris McGrath" as well as the others I have submitted?

They all should be listed under Christian McGrath with that note the artist is named as Chris McGrath. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 09:57, 2 July 2022 (EDT)

:We are using Christian McGrath as the canonical name and Chris McGrath as an alternate name.  So if you have something credited to "Chris" McGrath, you should record it that way, then once that record is in place, make it a variant of the same title but credited to "Christian" McGrath.  Where your record is used, it will say "by Christian McGrath (as by Chris McGrath)".  On the Christian McGrath bibliography page, you will see the title listed with either "[only as by Chris McGrath]" if that is the only reference or "[as by Chris McGrath]" if publications are using the canonical record or any other variant.
:For each of the two titles you cite, go to the title's page and choose "Make This Title A Variant" in the Editing Tools menu at the left.  In the dialog that comes up, scroll down to the bottom half (there are two forms on the page -- use the second one), and change "Chris McGrath" to "Christian McGrath" and submit.  After that is approved, you will see the title on the Christian McGrath page, with the "only as by Chris McGrath" annotation.  If there were already a record credited to Christian McGrath, you would use the top half / first form to link the Chris McGrath-credited title to the existing Christian McGrath-credited one.  If you make a new one and one already exists, that's ok, too.  The two records credited to Christian McGrath can be merged without losing any of the Chris McGrath links.  --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 16:40, 3 July 2022 (EDT)

== RIP FP ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?27947; http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Frederick_Patten. Change in status needed. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:33, 6 July 2022 (EDT)

== Primus ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubs_not_in_series.cgi?27215; I found Archive copy and fixed the Scientists book by adding Donald I. Fine to the publisher among other things, am going to ask PV of other book to do the same, but that last book is obviously not the same publisher, so mods can decide how to differ it; what language is that, anyway? --[[User:Username|Username]] 15:11, 7 July 2022 (EDT)

== The Mists of Avalon ==

Hello mods. I have been sent details of a copy of this book - the Alfred A. Knopf edition - however it has the number 05925 printed in a white box on the rear of the dustwrapper, it has no gutter code on page 875 (or on any of the 10 adjacent pages), neither does it have 1/83 on the rear flap of the dustwrapper. Since it is a lot cheaper than the Michael Joseph UK or the "proper" Knopf (non Book Club edition) I've gone ahead and ordered it. I'm going to make a big assumption that it is infact a Book Club edition but one that has not yet been recorded on ISFDB. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:17, 8 July 2022 (EDT)

== Gollancz / Victor Gollancz ==

Ok so I've noticed some discrepancies in regards to some publications from this publisher.
Eg. [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?185497 The Instrumentality of Mankind] is noted as "Victor Gollancz" yet [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?185417 The Rediscovery of Man] is "Gollancz". Title pages for both have "Victor Gollancz Ltd". Gollancz editions of [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?22461 The Collected Stories of Philip K. Dick] all have publisher as Gollancz and again titles pages have Victor Gollancz. Can someone explain why they are all just "Gollancz" and not "Victor Gollancz" ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 06:07, 10 July 2022 (EDT)

== Author Photo Links ==

Per this discussion, http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:JLaTondre#Non-ISFDB_Author_Photo_Links, a warning when someone adds a non-ISFDB friendly author image might be warranted. I fixed a few but only because I chanced across the cleanup report's mention that there were several dozen that were unacceptable links. --[[User:Username|Username]] 12:41, 10 July 2022 (EDT)

: Thanks for the heads-up. Let me see what the software is currently configured to do. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:25, 11 July 2022 (EDT)

:: After reviewing the linked discussion, I think I see what's going on. The software as it currently exists does warn you if you try to add an image hosted by a site that we don't have permission to link to, e.g. see [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?3357146 this 2017 submission] -- note the yellow warning. What the software doesn't do is notify the reviewing moderator that the '''current''' -- and about to be replaced -- image URL is not allowed.

:: If you think about it, this is how yellow warning work for all fields. None of them notify you about issues with the about-to-be-replaced data. I suppose we could change the software to do it, but it would have to be done across the board. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:00, 11 July 2022 (EDT)

== Wrong cover image uploaded ==

Uploaded and replaced cover scan for [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?449406 this]. Not the same edition. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 12:00, 11 July 2022 (EDT)

== Moderator view of certain submissions tweaked ==

"Moderator review" pages have been enhanced to display links to "Public View" and "Raw XML" views of unapprovable submissions. This applies to rejected submissions, previously approved submissions, and submissions created or held by other moderators. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 17:29, 11 July 2022 (EDT)

== "Next Submission" behavior modified ==

The behavior of the "Next Submission" button on submission review and post-approval pages has been modified. It now skips submissions created by self-approvers. You can still see and access them via the "New Submissions" page. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:18, 12 July 2022 (EDT)

: P.S. [[User:JLaTondre]] has suggested that it may be useful to color-code submissions created by self-approvers the way we color-code submissions created by other moderators. What would be a good color to use? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:24, 12 July 2022 (EDT)
::What colors are currently being used? I know there's green for new editors, yellow for moderator entries, and blue for the entries of the person viewing the page. Maybe cyan? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:55, 18 July 2022 (EDT)

::: That's right. Submissions created by other moderator use <span style="color:#FFFF00">"#FFFF00"</span>, your own submissions appear as <span style="color:#3333FF">"#3333FF"</span> and new editors' submissions are <span style="color:#00FF33">"#00FF33"</span>. I assume "cyan" would be the same as "aqua" or <span style="color:#00FFFF">"#00FFFF"</span>. I have no preference since I am colorblind. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 16:21, 18 July 2022 (EDT)

::::Yes, that would be the same as cyan. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 19:29, 18 July 2022 (EDT)

::::: Hearing no objection, I have made the change. Moderators may need to do a full reload of the "New Submissions" page (Control-F5 in most browsers) in order to see the new color. In addition, an explanation of all used colors is now displayed at the bottom of the page. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 12:54, 22 July 2022 (EDT)

== Some Summer Lands ==

There is a listing for Jane Gaskell's [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?31084 Some Summer Lands]. Note states "Library Edition" but using the ISBN provides absolutely zero results from [https://isbnsearch.org/ ISBN search] or any other book dealing websites. It doesn't appear as if Macdonald ever published it in hardback - no library copies seem to exist. Is this a ghost (unpublished) publication ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:55, 12 July 2022 (EDT)

: This ISBN has been verified against [http://www.locusmag.com/index/0start.htm Locus1], which does [http://www.locusmag.com/index/b185.htm#A2501.5 list it] as a:
:* Reprint (Hodder & Stoughton 1977) fantasy novel, conclusion of the “Atlan” series. Library edition.
: The 1984-1998 Locus Index was compiled based on the monthly "Books Received" column in ''Locus Magazine''. I suppose it's possible that this ISBN was listed by the publisher in a standard "review package" sent to industry reviewers, but was never distributed to libraries for whatever reason. Given this uncertainty, I think the best we can do is document what we know about this ISBN, i.e. where our data comes from and the fact that no online catalog lists the ISBN as of 2022, in the Note field. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 15:16, 12 July 2022 (EDT)

:: It may well appear in Locus as you pointed out but [https://isbnsearch.org/ ISBN search] tells me "Sorry, we could not find any information for this book" when using the ISBN 0-356-12118-6. No libraries have a copy (at least none that I could find), OCLC/WorldCat and other bibliographic sites don't find it. If it did exist surely there would be more evidence than a printed note in Locus ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 00:46, 13 July 2022 (EDT)

::: Well, if the totality of the available evidence -- including the fact that https://www.addall.com/advanced/ finds no traces of this ISBN -- suggests that it was never distributed to libraries, we can change the publication date to 8888-00-00 and add a note explaining our sources. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 09:04, 13 July 2022 (EDT)

:::: That seems to be a very reasonable course of action to take. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:33, 14 July 2022 (EDT)

== Tripods Trilogy Macmillan / Collier editions ==

I have been sent photographic evidence of Roger Hane's signiature (very readadable) for The White Mountains and City of Gold and Lead. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:09, 13 July 2022 (EDT)

== UNHOLD button tweaked ==

The behavior of the UNHOLD button has been modified. Instead of displaying a "dead end" Web page, it now re-displays the submission review page.

I also considered making the same change to the behavior of the HOLD button, but I am not sure that it has the same workflow. Suggestions? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 08:36, 16 July 2022 (EDT)

== Jack Sullivan and Penguin ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?275516; 3 active PV, I just added OL ID for the Archive copy and a note mentioning the Brit price on the front flap (US price not seen but likely bad framing because there's a photo online that clearly says $29.95 at the top), but info on bottom left is obscured; what does it say? If it's the month that could be entered. --[[User:Username|Username]] 13:01, 17 July 2022 (EDT)
: Checked my copy. Number bottom left on front flap is: 07288086. Make of that what you will. Price definatley $29.95 printed at top but my copy is price clipped bottom right (presumably UK price). --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 15:20, 19 July 2022 (EDT)

== Publication to delete ==

I had entered [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?907014 Land of Always-Night] by Kenneth Robeson and noticed [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?457947 this] copy which seems to be the same pub entered under Lester Dent, rather than varianted. I'm happy to moderate and stand behind my own submissions, but would rather a moderator cleaned this one up. Thanks. ../[[User:Holmesd|Doug H]] 22:32, 18 July 2022 (EDT)

== A tricky one ==

[http://www.philsp.com/homeville/sfi/k01645.htm#A1 The FictionMag lists] {{t|2815409|The Bards}} as having two authors: "Álvaro de Sousa" and "Holstein Ferreira". This turns out to be incorrect. The actual author is [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?238927 "Álvaro de Sousa Holstein Ferreira"]. Now, since I don't know whether or not the name is misprinted in the publication itself, or is a typo in the FictionMags entry, I cannot just update the author of {{t|2815409|The Bards}} to Álvaro de Sousa Holstein Ferreira. One option could be to variant both "Alvaro de Sousa" and "Holstein Ferreira" to the canonical name - would be awkward though. Any suggestions on how to deal with this situation instead? See also submissions [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5363434 here] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?5363437 here]. Thanks! [[User:MagicUnk|MagicUnk]] 12:02, 19 July 2022 (EDT)

:How do we "know" the attribution is incorrect and the poem was written Álvaro de Sousa Holstein Ferreira rather than two (other) people? Given that our credit relies exclusively on a secondary source and it's rather difficult to properly represent this particular type of mistaken attribution, I would be inclined to change the title to have the single Álvaro de Sousa Holstein Ferreira credit and record in the notes that secondary source FictionMags credits this as the work of two separate authors but secondary (and hopefully more authoritative) source XYZ credits it to just the one person; thus it seems likely the FictionMags dual credit is the result of a transcription error.  With no primary verification, it's clear this has not been determined from the publication itself.  Note that going any sort of variant/alternate name route mapping this poem to Álvaro de Sousa Holstein or Álvaro de Sousa Holstein Ferreira is relying on the same "knowledge" that this poem is in fact the work of one person, not two.  So to do that, we still need a source. --[[User:MartyD|MartyD]] 12:01, 21 July 2022 (EDT)
::A Couple of observations: Miller/Contento also has the credit for this poem as by two separate authors.  My understanding is that FictionMags is built off of Miller/Contento and other indexes.  Strangely, Locus1 (another index related to FictionMags) skips issue 7 of ''SPWAO Showcase''.  However, they do list de Sousa and Ferreira as separate authors in their record for ''[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?430000 Frontier Crossings]''.  We have it as a single credit, which I believe to be correct.  I can see how someone would consider the credit in FC to be two authors.  The names are in all caps and the column where the essay occurs is narrow enough so that "Álvaro de Sousa" appears on one line with "Holstein Ferreira" on the next.  The credit for the essay in ''[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?630439 Worldcon 75 Souvenir Book]'' is clearly a single name.  I expect we are talking about a single person and that it is entirely possible that there is an error FictionMags for ''SPWAO Showcase'' is similar to that in Locus1 for ''Frontier Crossings''.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 18:24, 21 July 2022 (EDT)

::: https://www.scribd.com/document/28902577/Nebulosa-1; author is mentioned several times using 1 name. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:48, 21 July 2022 (EDT)

:::: Thanks for the advice - I've updated the publication accordingly. Regards, [[User:MagicUnk|MagicUnk]] 12:13, 26 July 2022 (EDT)

== Carole Nelson Douglas / Probe ==

I am editing / PVing [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?26769 Probe] and am posting this note because I am changing the Format field on a pub that only has an inactive PV. This book is definitely a small tp: 20 x 13 cm. Note that Locus1 incorrectly lists this as a pb which is probably the source of the error in the ISFDb pub record. [[User:Teallach|Teallach]] 15:31, 20 July 2022 (EDT)

== Re-Adding Author Info ==

http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?348714; I fixed first guy's name to how it is in the book, but now all info on his old name's page is gone. Here's the cached page, [http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5ZlMGHLxZKcJ:www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi%3F106949+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us]. --[[User:Username|Username]] 23:07, 22 July 2022 (EDT)
:There are two problems here.  First, and most importantly, this edit should not have been made.  The edit removed the comma between the author's name and the suffix "IV".  This is incorrect regardless of how it appears in the book.  Please see [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/view_submission.cgi?876733 this template] under "Ranks, suffixes, prefixes" where it indicates that suffixes are regularized to include the comma no matter how they are printed in the book.  
:The second problem is the "deletion" of the additional author data.  When an author is updated in a title and publication record, this does not result as an edit to the existing author.  Rather, the old author (in this case "W. E. Butterworth, IV") is removed from the record and a new author (William E. Butterworth IV) is created.  In this instance, the author record for "W. E. Butterworth, IV" only occurred on the records where it was removed by the edit, it left that author record (with all of the other data) without any publications or titles, and thus it was deleted.   Had this been an appropriate edit, it would have been better to update the author record to remove the comma, which would have preserved the additional date.
:Since this edit should not have been done, I would recommend that you update the author data to re-add the comma.  The additional data (legal name and notes) will also have to be re-added and can be done at the same time.  I suspect the wiki notes (Additional Biographical Data) which are still present will re-link by themselves after the the author name is corrected and matches the wiki again.  However, I've never added an author where the wiki notes preexist, so it will be an interesting experiment.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 18:33, 24 July 2022 (EDT)

:: I made a couple of edits, first re-adding legal name and note about being the son of..., then an edit adding comma to author's name twice in the book's record. --[[User:Username|Username]] 20:36, 24 July 2022 (EDT)
:::That won't work.  Your first edit will add the author information back.  You second edit will will create a new author and since the author you updated with the first edit will have no titles or publications associated with it, it will again be deleted.   If they are approved in the opposite order of how they are submitted, I believe the edit to the author record would require a hard reject as the author record edited would no longer exist.  I guess my recommendation wasn't clear.  All the changes, to the author name, legal name and notes should all be done with a single edit to the author record.  That will get everything back to the way it was.  I assume an author name can be edited by an editor (i.e. non-moderator).  Please let me know if the field is locked for you.  --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 24 July 2022 (EDT)

:::: Yes, it's locked. I can only change the name by going into the book's record; author's record, no. --[[User:Username|Username]] 21:48, 24 July 2022 (EDT)
:::::OK, I accepted your author edit, rejected the title/pub update, and updated the name on the author record to include the comma.  I guess the moral here is that if an author has a single title publication, you'll need to ask a moderator to update the name field if that is required.  Thanks. --Ron ~ [[User:Rtrace|Rtrace]]<sup>[[User talk:Rtrace|Talk]]</sup> 22:29, 24 July 2022 (EDT)

:::::: Ron, I renamed the Wiki Bio page to match the new canonical name. While the wiki page correctly links back to the new author summary page, the author summary does not show the bio page. What am I missing? [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 10:16, 25 July 2022 (EDT)

:::::::The use of wiki pages to document author information has been deprecated. They were used from before there was a notes fields on the author record. Links to old one are maintained, but new links are no longer created. The data is supposed to be migrated into the database and the pages deleted. As there is nothing on this wiki page that is not already on the author record, I will delete it. Thanks. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 11:05, 25 July 2022 (EDT)

== weblink no more ==

The webpage conglomeration.info  on Kevin Ward, Authur record 9505 is up for sale. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 21:07, 23 July 2022 (EDT)

: Unfortunately, the Wayback Machine doesn't have a copy of http://www.conglomeration.info/2013/03/announcing-the-conglomeration-2013-featured-artist-kevin-ward.html on file, so I had to delete the link :-( [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 11:48, 25 July 2022 (EDT)

==La grande anthologie de la science-fiction==
Hi
I have been around this beautiful site before
and today I am looking for info about
Publication Series: La grande anthologie de la science-fiction
at http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pubseries.cgi?1898+2

My question is :  why are there several entries for some of the books.
For example, the 2-253-00060-4 is listed 7 times.

Thank you.
Roger <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Bilboquet|Bilboquet]] ([[User talk:Bilboquet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bilboquet|contribs]]) .</small> 00:00, 27 July 2022 (EDT)
:We include entries for every printing of every eligible book. In this case, there are several printings of the titles, so there are several entries. I hope that helps. Also, please remember to sign your comments using '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'''. Welcome to the site! ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:14, 27 July 2022 (EDT)

== To add or not to add that is the question. ==

Hello Mods. I'd like opinions regarding [https://artofsoulburn.gumroad.com/l/ClEHi Megastructres] as to whether it does or does not qualify for inclusion on this site. It's a Kickstarter funded book that has been published in two states - a regular edition and a premium edition with faux carbon fibre boards and chrome foil emblam. I have purchased the premium edition and await it's delivery from the USA. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 04:45, 30 July 2022 (EDT)
: Unless you can find an art piece tied to some fiction, it will be out IMO. Non-fiction (of any type) and art are only eligible when there is a connection to eligible fiction (unless the author is above threshold) or (for art) when it is a cover for eligible book. I suspect we may need to wait for you to get the book and see if there is links to fiction in some/all explanations and that may change things. But from what I am seeing, it is out of scope. Nice book though :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 16:15, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
:: If that's the case can you explain why [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?825393 this] publication is included ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 12:29, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
::: Ask the moderator who approved it. I don’t think it is eligible either unless the images are connected to eligible fiction titles or bssooks. But then we do have a scope creep in some areas (especially around art). If other moderators agree that if is in scope, feel free to add it. For me it is out of scope. But it is a collective project.  :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 13:11, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:::: I was the one who added and approved that one; according to the linked review it has connections to eligible fiction: it seems there are also art pieces of sf magazines included (or was that a wrong understanding?). Christian [[User:Stonecreek|Stonecreek]] 13:21, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:I'd consider ''Megastructures'' to be eligible given that it is speculating about near future possibilities. That bumps it into science fiction. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 12:52, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:: But it is not fiction - look at our ROA. Which category would it be eligible under? [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 13:07, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:::It's nonfiction speculating about possible future stuff, some of which would (currently) be clearly science fiction. It's not speculative fiction stories, but nonfiction about speculative fiction. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]]</small> 15:59, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:::: I own a copy of [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?825393 Soviet Space Graphics] and as noted all the interior illustrations are covers of Russian magazines. Website for the publication os [https://www.phaidon.com/store/design/soviet-space-graphics-9781838660536/ here] - the 'About this Book' has "This otherworldly collection of Soviet space-race graphics takes readers on a cosmic adventure through Cold War-era Russia" and "Presenting more than 250 illustrations - depicting daring discoveries, scientific innovations, futuristic visions, and extraterrestrial encounters". So according to Annie's interpretation  none of the images depict any "connection to eligible fiction" or are "cover[s] for eligible book[s]" they are merely visions of a potential future - ones that may or may not happen (i.e. "speculation") and if this a database SPECULATIVE fiction surely art depicting speculative future technoolgies, structures, whathaveyou ought to be included. I'm going to enter the publication anyway when it eventually turns up and see what happens. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 16:52, 2 August 2022 (EDT)

== Merge Authors??? ==

Since David Cherry #78701 is the same person as David A. Cherry #21265, shouldn't someone merge the records of 78701 with 21265???  [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 16:06, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
: Nope. We record authors names as they are used (with some regularization as per the rules). In this case some of the books have the initial "A", some don't. So we keep two separate records and we mark one of them as a pseudonym/alternate name for the other. This is already done here. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 16:10, 1 August 2022 (EDT)
:: I guess I was expecting to see the books under David Cherry also listed under David A. Cherry with "(as by David Cherry)" as I have seen else where. [[User:Aardvark7|aardvark7]] 15:05, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
:::The records under {{A|David Cherry}} need to be varianted to {{A|David A. Cherry}}. It doesn't happen automatically. If someone enters a new credit under an alternate name, the variant needs to be manually created. If the submitter & moderator are not paying attention, then they are left dangling. We have a [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/edit/cleanup_report.cgi?10 cleanup report] to find them. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 18:20, 2 August 2022 (EDT)
::::So I see that the all of the [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?73261 Dave Langford reviews] I added need to have a variant created.  Is there way to create them more than one at a time? [[User:Taweiss|Tom]] 11:16, 7 August 2022 (EDT)
::::: No, you have to create them one at a time. [[User:Scifibones|<b>John</b> <small>Scifibones</small>]] 11:28, 7 August 2022 (EDT)
::::::Any chance we could get the variant link in the header like the edit link.  Scrolling over and over to find the variant link in the editing tools makes the whole process more challenging. [[User:Taweiss|Tom]] 17:54, 7 August 2022 (EDT)

== The Purple Pirate ==

Does anyone know a reason as to why [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?274785 this] publication has not been included in [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?23865 this] series given it's published by Zebra Books/Kensington Publishing Corp. and has "Volume 4" prominently on the cover ? --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 14:39, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
: Because it appears to be the same book as #6 in the other series. Titles can only be in one series and if you put it in the "Tros of Samothrace (Three separate volumes)" series, it cannot be in the main series as well. In cases like that, the original series usually take precedence to later reprints... but there are exceptions.
: If there are two books with the same title, they need unmerging. If it is indeed the same book, we choose one of the series and you can use the MultiS template to note that there is a second series and add its name... [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 15:10, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
:: Is that something you can do. Copies of those Zebra editions are not cheap - someone on Ebay is selling them (with Queen Cleopatra) for £35 but the postage is a whopping £65. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 15:32, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
::: Notes added [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?21215 here] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?23865 here]. That's the best we can do. Let me know if I can assist further and feel free to edit if you want to add details. [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 16:23, 4 August 2022 (EDT)
:::: Fabulous. Thanks. Does make it clearer. --[[User:Mavmaramis|Mavmaramis]] 16:19, 5 August 2022 (EDT)

== LCCN Help ==

http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/User_talk:Username#Please_revert_edit_for_Kingsbane; Recently I noticed a Playboy Paperbacks book I was working on had an LCCN on the copyright page so I entered it, and then saw it wasn't on the LOC site; I own a few horror anthologies from the publisher and saw that none of the LCCN on their copyright pages were on ISFDB, and none were on the LOC site, so I entered those, too. I also searched Archive.org for books by the publisher and entered some missing LCCN from those, too. There was 1 PV, but since they entered LCCN as a note I thought I would move it to its proper field since many editors over the years have entered info in the wrong places and I try to fix them when I notice them, but this PV obviously doesn't agree and apparently didn't make a mistake but actually wanted it in the notes. I had a chat with a mod recently who mentioned that he remembered from years ago that the LOC site treated paperbacks as unimportant compared to hardcovers and never entered many of them on their site, just storing them away in boxes, but that doesn't change the fact that they were given an official # in the books themselves, and just because they don't show up on the site now doesn't mean they won't in the future if and when they decide to enter them; I highly doubt after I'm finally gone from here that anyone else is going to go back and check to see if they were ever entered on the site and enter the #'s themselves. So the question is, was mod (MagicUnk) right to approve my edit, and, if not, what about the others I entered? I'll remove the # from this particular one, anyway, since I was asked to. --[[User:Username|Username]] 18:45, 5 August 2022 (EDT)
:Please see [[Help:How to create a link to a US Library of Congress (Loc) record]]. If the LCCN is not in the catalog, it should be listed in the notes & not as an external id. --&nbsp;[[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 08:35, 6 August 2022 (EDT)

:: I've gone back and fixed my edits where I added LCCN to ID, moving them to notes; while doing so I found these, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?629621, http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?274049, the first of which made the same mistake I did and the second of which called it the "LCCN website" instead of LOC, a mistake I made in all my edits which I fixed at the same time I was fixing the ID, so if anyone wants to follow up on those two, there they are. --[[User:Username|Username]] 10:17, 6 August 2022 (EDT)
Templates used on this page:
Template:A (semi-protected)
Template:Isfdb-general-header
Template:Isfdb-moderator-noticeboard-archives (protected)
Template:Linkcolor (protected)
Template:Moderator-availability
Template:T (protected)
Return to ISFDB:Moderator noticeboard.
Retrieved from "http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/ISFDB:Moderator_noticeboard"
View source

From ISFDB

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Toolbox
