User talk:RolHje

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Important!

This editor is no longer actively participating and is unlikely to respond to messages left here.

If this user is the sole verifier of a publication record, please:

  • post only notices on the user's talk page concerning the addition of images and notes
  • post inquiries regarding any other changes to the verified record at the Moderator noticeboard

Otherwise, please post notices and inquiries only on the talk pages of the other primary verifiers.


Welcome!

Hello, RolHje, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mhhutchins|talk 21:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Cover image file limits

This file exceeds the ISFDB standard of the image being no more than 600 pixels tall. I will resize it and then link it to the publication record. (I had to reject your submission to link because you linked the URL of the wiki page, and not the URL of the image file itself.) Please keep this in mind for future uploads. Thanks for contributing. Mhhutchins|talk 21:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

6 Great Short Novels

Accepted your submission to add [this] printing and made a couple of small changes. Since the printing history in the notes gives the date, I changed that for the record to match. The big advantage of being able to clone records, especially for anthologies/collections is that the contents are already there [no later work to enter/merge]. But while the editing window is open, you can change any of the fields in the main record to match the publication/printing you are entering. Secondly, I changed the OCLC record number. The one from the 1954 printing is specific to that printing [unlike the Library of Congress number which can be on every edition of every printing even though it refers only to a particular edition]. In checking OCLC they do have a record specific to a 1956 edition so I substituted that number. If there wasn't then it can just be deleted. As for the way you recorded the printing sequence, it was fine. There are no rules for entering such, but it's always a good idea to enter all the dates the book gives as that can help to place an earlier printing that otherwise may not be dated. If you have questions, ask away! Welcome aboard. --~ Bill, Bluesman 22:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

God of Tarot

Hello, your proposed submission is very likely this already existing one (as you noticed) a reccuring problem with some british titles of this period is that are entered under a wide variety of publishers (Grafton/Granada/Panther). As it's not PVed, we better play on the safe side, please take the PV1 spot and change the publisher and we'll wait for even,tual "real" Panther printing. Hauck 14:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Same thing for Vision of Tarot. I've rejected both submisssions. Hauck 14:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Split Infinity

Hello, I've approved your submission but deleted "Panther Science Fiction" as a publication series. It's more likely an imprint than a publication series in our sense (yours was the first time this series was proposed). Hauck 16:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Blue Adept

Sorry to bother you, but in this case (multiple printings and data from a reliable secondary source), you should create a new publication dated 1986 (4th printing). In the future we hope to add a "Printing Rank" field that may help in such cases. Hauck 17:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Ogre, Ogre

In this case you've got a second 1984 printing, you'll need to create a new record for it (the existing one is the first 1984 printing). Hauck 17:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Look to Windward

I'm holding your submission to clone Banks' Look to Windward. The reason I'm holding it is that it looks like the publication that will be created is nearly identical to this one with the exception of the price and the ISBN. I found the ISBN for the record you are adding on Amazon UK and it looks like perhaps your publication is a mass market paperback (pb) instead of a trade paperback (tp). I'll also note that Amazon has the date as May 3, 2001. The date from Locus1 mentioned in the note is for the other ISBN and I suspect your copy was published earlier than the August date. Let me know if those sound appropriate and I'll approve your submission. Thanks. --Ron ~ RtraceTalk 17:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Selecciones Illustradas, Avda del Generalissimo, 325 Barcelona (9)

Hello, I've approved a few submissions with the above artist as illustrator. IMHO, the last part of its name is its adress (likely a spanish outfit). Can you check? Note also that you created a publication series here that lacks #1. Can you confirm that you intended to create a publication series (a set of book sharing the same presentation, like Ace Double) and not a title series (a series of texts set in the same universe like Burrough's Barsoom). Thanks. Hauck 15:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

The part after the first comma is indeed an address. The Mars, 1-5, (1 being John Carter och Marsfurstinnan, miss by me) has the appearance of a publication series, but there seem to be only 5 books in the series, according to the Swedish national bibliography - http://http://libris.kb.se/, and is certainly a title series. Being a newbie I did/do not know how to indicate this. Mars 1 etc. is printed on the spine of the books.How do I amend?
First of all, It's best to keep the discussion in one page (usually the first used), I've displaced your answer here. I've made the necessary changes to the artist name (it was already present in the db) and included #1. The fact that this particular subset is (or not) a publication series is your call. IMHO a simple numering is not enough, see for example this french publication series that is made of "sub-publication" series (as on this cover). I'll let you decide. Hauck 16:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Rhiannons Svärd

Please add the correct binding to this verified record. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 04:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The binding is also missing from this record and this one. Also, in the page count field, what is meant by the "+2"? Mhhutchins|talk 07:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I see you've corrected the last two, but the first one (Rhiannons Svärd) is still missing the pub binding/format. Mhhutchins|talk 19:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Bokmakarna Bohman & Dahlström

Can you determine if the artist of this cover is a single collective, or individual artists? Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 06:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

No. Bokmakarna is today a company in publishing with 0 employees.

A Fall of Moondust

Hello, I've approved your submission for this pub but changed date to "1964-04-00" as per your notes ("Second Dell printing - April, 1963"). As you state that you own the book, please think about setting you up as its primary verifier (idem for the other ACC titles). Hauck 10:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

How do I do that?
Go the publication page here, then click on the Verify This Pub link and in the column "Verified" for the first line ("Primary"), then valid (note that the process is not moderated). This will indicate to other contributors that you have permanent access to a physical copy of the book so they may ask question to you or inform you that they changed something in it or had found (e.g. a cover artist) additional data for this publication. Other owners of the same book will eventually take the other PrimaryX spots. Hauck 17:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Library of Congress record numbers

The Library of Congress Control Number (previously Catalog Number) should be entered in the Note field using this format: "LCCN: 12-34567" (for the 20th century) or "LCCN: 2001123456" (for the 21st century). Of course, this will change based on the record numbers.

I have changed the data you added to this record from "Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-13388" to "LCCN:58-13388". I also linked it to the record on the Library of Congress website. That is optional but if you want to do it, here are the instructions. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 21:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The Planiverse: Computer Contact with a Two-Dimensional World

Hello, what is the source of the 1984 date for your submission? The data you gave indicate a second printing (the number line) of a title first published in 1984, but not its precise year.Hauck 13:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

There are no other date indications than the lines
First printed in Great Britain 19984 by Pan Books Ltd,

and (c) A. K. Dewdney 1983 There is also an ISBN 0 330 28333 2 hardcover for which https://www.book-info.com/isbn/0-330-28333-2.htm

So your book should be dated "0000-00-00" awaiting additional data (e.g. a listing in Locus). I've made the changes. Hauck 16:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Flöda min gråt sa polisen

Hello, the introduction (or so I suppose it's one) in this book (Introduktion) should be disambiguated. I've done this for you. Please note that it's useless to add a NOVEL content, it will be automatically added, it must now be deleted. Hauck 16:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Translated works

If you're adding publication records for new titles of translated works, you should follow-up by varianting its title record to that of the original title. I've done that for you for several titles including this one and several works by Edgar Rice Burroughs, translated into Swedish. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 18:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

When do I do that. After the submission is accepted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RolHje (talk • contribs) .
Yes. The title must be in the database before it can be varianted. The title is added to the database in the submission which creates a publication record. That submission, of course, has to be moderated and accepted. Mhhutchins|talk 20:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Godmaker

There was already a record for the [fourth] printing, but it mistakenly had a Canadian price [my mistake, actually]. Rejected the clone but you can verify the existing record. --~ Bill, Bluesman 17:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Dosadi Experiment

There is already a [record] for the '78 edition in the db. Also the submission for Soul Catcher has it as a NEW pub instead of an additional one, which will create a whole new title record. Was there not one similar you could clone? --~ Bill, Bluesman 18:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Towers of Midnight

Hello, I've approved your submission for this pub but I've deleted the PubSeries and Pubseries# info (you're were probably thinking of the Series and Series# that are at title level here) and deleted credit to Russo (we only credit the artist and not the designer who may be cited in the notes as you did). Hauck 09:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Pattern Recognition

Re this publication record: I changed the publisher name to "Penguin Books" (the ISFDB designation for the UK publisher). A question: what is the "+1" in the Page Count field? Unusual counts as this should be explained in the record's Note field. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 17:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Destination Infinity

Despite the date for the introduction Tuck, Reginald, Clute all have the year as 1958. Forgetting those for a moment, the catalog # is the real clincher: in 1956 the highest catalog # was T-155, highest in 1957 was T-208. #T-285 appeared in late 1958. Cheers! --~ Bill, Bluesman 21:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Rhiannons Svärd

Hello, can you add the binding/format to this verified (by you) publication? Thanks. Hauck 06:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

W. H. Allen

I've approved two of your edits that had the publisher listed as "W.H.Allen". In both cases I've updated the publisher name to reflect how we have it listed in the database, i.e. "W. H. Allen". Per this help page (second bullet), we use the canonical name of the publisher even when small variations exist between that and how the name appears in the book. Thanks. --Ron ~ RtraceTalk 22:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A Storm of Swords: Steel and Snow

This publication record of A Storm of Swords: Steel and Snow appears to be the first printing of the title. The notes in your proposed edit state that you have the "Third edition by printing line". I think you mean that you have the third printing of the edition. Your edit would have effectively replaced the first printing with the third. I'm going to reject your edit for that reason. Instead of editing the first printing, what you want to do is use the "Clone This Pub" tool which will create a new copy of the record which you can then adjust to create the third printing. I'm not sure that you should use a 2001 date, though. Assuming that your copy has a copyright page identical to the one in the look inside copy of the fist printing on Amazon UK (except for the printing line), I think that the 2001 date refers to the first printing of the split paperback edition (the record you were attempting to change). The 2000 date refers to the hardcover full novel. We already have a record for the second printing which is dated April 2002, though no source is given for the date. There is also a record for a printing dated April 2002, but with no mention of printing number. I would guess that the actual date of your printing was issued somewhere between those two. Since we can't determine an actual date, you should enter your copy with a date of "0000-00-00" indicating that we don't know an actual date. You'll also want to move your verification to the new record. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. --Ron ~ RtraceTalk 11:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

A Storm of Swords: Part 2: Blood and Gold

I've approved your submission for a third printing but changed the date back to "0000-00-00" because we already have a second printing dated 2002-04 here. The line "This paperback edition 2001" usually concerns only the first printing for british books. I've also deleted the bit about Amazon's # (as it's now pved). Hauck 12:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Secondary Sources

When primary verifying a publication, please remove any secondary source credits (unless it is for information that is not actually present in the book). If the information is in the book, the primary verification is the only source needed. If there is information that is not in the publication, but comes from another source, than the secondary credit should state specifically what information is coming from that source. Hopefully that is clear. If not, let us know. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Binding for Kapplöpning till månen

Hi. This came through with an "unknown" binding. I assume since you have the book you can tell what the binding is. :-) Thanks, --MartyD 00:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Endymion Omnibus

The ISBN given in this record has a bad checksum. Perhaps you omitted the "978" from the number? Mhhutchins|talk 18:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

The Confusion

If you have this book, wouldn't the data come from the book itself? If some data is not stated (such as the publication date), then should you provide secondary sources for that data in a primary verified record. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 18:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Same situation with this record. Mhhutchins|talk 22:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Also with The Confusion, I didn't ask you to remove the publication date. If the day of publication is from Amazon, it's OK to give that in the ISFDB record as long as you note the source. Mhhutchins|talk 22:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Earth Abides

What is meant by the quotation marks in the note field of this record? If you're noting direct statements from a publication, the data itself should be quotation marks. Mhhutchins|talk 00:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

The quotation marks are used on the copyright page to indicate that it is the same as above. The spaces between them are apparently deleted by isfdb. What should I do? Substitute the quotation marks with corresponding words, which is not what i is on the copyright page?

RolHje 11:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

I've never seen a copyright page that uses ditto marks, so I don't know how that could be displayed in an ISFDB record. I can only suggest that you replace them with words. Mhhutchins|talk 02:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


Done RolHje 13:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Shadowland

Submission adding this record was accepted, but I changed the publisher to "Berkley Books" (the ISFDB designation for this publisher).

Also, you used the wrong function to add a publication for a title which already exists in the database. Instead of using the "Add New Novel" function, you should have gone to the title record and used the "Add Publication to This Title" function. Now there are two records for this title: the one I linked above and the one that was created when you used the wrong entry method. They will have to be merged. Please do that when you get a chance. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 00:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

You didn't have to delete the publication record. Just merging the two titles would have added the original publication to the list of other publications of this record. Here are the instructions on how to merge titles. Also, here is a list of links to help pages for the most common tasks on the database. Thanks for contributing. Mhhutchins|talk 16:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Shadowland varianting

Hello, I had to reject your submission. I hope I didn't miss something, but this seemed to be the same title. If that's so, the titles have to be merged to show all publications for that title. Thanks, Stonecreek 09:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

In case you're confused that your new submission also was rejected: I corrected an earlier submission from you which did the same thing for another title. But as it seems you like to stay, it seems better if you know how things are handled: to merge titles it usually is best to go to the author's summary page and use the Check for Duplicate Titles button. The further steps should be self-explanatory. I hope that helps. Stonecreek 12:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Day of publication

It is within the ISDFB standards for an editor to use a secondary source for the day of publication when the book only contains the year of publication. Feel free to use Amazon for those dates and give them as the source in the Note field of the publication record. (Although I don't suggest using it for books published before 2000.)

I accepted your submission to remove the day of publication from this record, but it lessens the value of the record by not providing the full date which Amazon gives as March 1, 2006. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 17:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Worldwar: In the Balance

You didn't provide the source for the data given in this record. I assume you forgot to do a verification of it at the time of the record's creation. Even though you noted that you had the book in hand, it's better to check the box provided which will save you from doing a primary verification after the submission has been moderated. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 17:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Otherland

Re this publication record: It's not likely that the capitalization of the title is authorial. Can you confirm that the word is capitalized throughout the body of the novel? If it's a design choice, you should change it to standard case. Also, you should explain the numbering given in the Page Count field by adding a note to the Note field. You also failed to give the pub binding. And can you confirm that the publication series is actually stated as "Pocket"? Could that just be a designation for its size or format? Mhhutchins|talk 22:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Still waiting for a response to this message. Mhhutchins|talk 23:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

I have changed the capitalization.

In the note filed there is an explanation that the last page is not numbered.

I have also changed the Pub series to B. Wahlströms Pocket, which seems to be the one used. RolHje 08:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

"461+1" means that there are 461 numbered pages followed by another page which is numbered "1". When the last page isn't numbered, you should enter the full page count including the number, thus "462", and then record that in the Note field. I'll change the page count. Mhhutchins|talk 20:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

vi

Please provide the pub binding/format to this verified publication. Mhhutchins|talk 02:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Sagan om trojkan / Snigeln på sluttningen

The author credit of this publication record ("Strugatskij") doesn't match the author credit of the title record ("Strugackij"). The author credit of the content titles ("Strugackij") also does not match the author credit of the publication record ("Strugatskij"). Before making a submission to correct the record, please confirm in a response to this message how the authors are credited on the publication's title page (not the front cover or dust jacket). Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 07:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, the introduction by Lundwall should be typed as ESSAY and the title should be disambiguated by adding the title of the publication parenthetically. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 07:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

The title page of my copy has Arkadij & Boris Strugatskij

The variant Strugackij is used 83 times, and Strugatskij is used 101 times, in Libris.kb.se, so there seems to be ambiguity on the transkription. In my opinion the title record should be changed, to represent the verifiable copy. RolHje 08:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

We enter credits based the actual publication, regardless of whether it's the most popular form of the name. (That's why the pseudonym and variant functions were created.) I will make the corrections based on the title page credit. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 17:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Another concern: you've entered the price as "SEK 49.00" while the softcover release of the same work is in the database as "kr44.00". What is the standard entry for Swedish currency? Mhhutchins|talk 17:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Also, you didn't disambiguate the title of the introduction. I've done it for you. Mhhutchins|talk 17:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

In Sweden the price is usually given as e.g. 5,50 kr (the comma is used as decimal separator), i.e. the kronor abbreviation is after the value. Th standard designation for Swedish Kronor is SEK. Thanks for the help. RolHje 18:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

If both are used, which one is the true standard? Or to be specific, which should be the single usage on the ISFDB? It needs to be added to this help page. Thanks. Mhhutchins|talk 18:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


I propose that the international standard ISO 4217 Currency Codes (http://www.xe.com/iso4217.php) be used, especially since both Denmark and Norway also use kr, thus needing separation. RolHje 09:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

We can't use those standards because we use symbols for many currencies, not codes. We're not going to replace "$" with "USD", "£" with "GPB", and "€" with "EUR". Perhaps this discussion should be moved to the Rules_and_standards_discussions page. Mhhutchins|talk 20:06, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Science Fiction & Fantastica

Hi! Your verified publication Flöda min gråt sa polisen has the identical publication series title as a german publication series Science Fiction & Fantastica. We could distinguish this two series, if you add for example swedish in brackets behind the pub series title from the Publisher Bernce. Thanks! Rudam 09:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Galactic North

Hi, I've imported content for your verified copy of Galactic North. That is including the afterword of the author that starts on the numbered page 338 (like with the other records for this title).--Dirk P Broer 21:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Foundation and Empire

Hi, I've imported content for your verified copy of Foundation and Empire.--Dirk P Broer 10:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

The Man Who Ate the World

Hi, I've imported content for your verified copy of The Man Who Ate the World.--Dirk P Broer 14:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Catseye

I've added the source of the Cover Artist to Catseye. --AndyjMo 22:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Publisher changes

Hello, I've put both your submissions on hold. You intended to change the publisher first from "Bernce" to "Bernce (Swedish)" then from "Bernce" to "Bernces". As per this page that I can absolutely not understand, perhaps is the second submission the correct one. Can you confirm? Thanks. Hauck 19:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Without reply, I rejected the first and approved the second. Hauck 08:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Foundation's Edge

I have uploaded a cover scan for Isaac Asimov's Foundation's Edge. I also included the Afterword as content from page 432 and added the author's name per your reference in the notes. Doug H 15:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Vilken vanvettig värld

I added a cover scan to Vilken vanvettig värld. MOHearn 17:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Invasion från djupen

I credited the cover of Invasion från djupen to Paul Lehr with a note on the Dell cover it reprints. MOHearn 16:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The War of the Flowers

Added Printing History, source of cover artist and new Cover Art to The War of the Flowers. --AndyjMo 11:30, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

Kapplöpning till månen

Hi, I've found the cover artist for Kapplöpning till månen. It is Ed Valigursky.--Dirk P Broer 17:00, 29 August 2017 (EDT)

By the way, Kapplöpning till månen is the only title in the Rymd-böckerna series that is coded as hardcover (hc), the rest is paperback (pb).--Dirk P Broer 20:09, 29 August 2017 (EDT)

Seveneves

I changed a few things in this verified pub. Added a note about this being the international edition, changed the publication date to 2015-05-19, changed the publisher to "William Morrow / HarperCollins", removed the "Data from Amazon UK as of 2015-06-21." note and added some other notes. --Willem 16:39, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

A Spell for Chameleon

Image artist found for this pub. --Zapp 16:22, 4 October 2017 (EDT)

Uppror!

I credited the cover of Uppror! to Frank Kelly Freas, linking it to the original done for Pandora's Planet. MOHearn 10:25, 17 October 2017 (EDT)

Jaktrymdskepp X12

HI

Just a note that I submitted a patch to change "Jaktrymdskepp X12" from a publisher series to a series since all the books are by the same author and the stories all focus on the same spaceship and crew. See the Swedish Wikipedia article on the series.

Cheers, Lokal_Profil 17:21, 16 August 2021 (EDT)

"Science fiction i dag..." etc

Hi. Just wanted to check if this book and its two companions in the same series have internal art? Wondering since I'm trying to match them to Libris records and these hint at both Lundwall being the artist (possibly of both cover and interior art and also the translator together with Jonas Norén.

Was also wondering if you mind double checking the year for the fourth book (Asimov to Sheckley) since all other sources I find say the first edition was published in 1974.

I haven't found a listing of the content titles of any of these books anywhere so if you have them close by.../Lokal_Profil 15:18, 30 December 2021 (EST)

Internal art by various artist in 1-3

Copyright (C) 1973 ... Gummesons Boktryckeri AB, Falköping 1964

Gotisk skräckromantik från Horace Walpole til H. P. Lovecraft submission question

Hi. I have a question about your Gotisk skräckromantik från Horace Walpole til H. P. Lovecraft submission, which I have on hold. The ISBN, 91718980070, is not valid -- it is 11 digits instead of 10, and the final "0" checksum does not match the first part of the number. The WorldCat entry for this has the ISBN as 9171980075. Can you confirm the number that is presented in/on your book? If the book has an ISBN that is not valid, we would move the as-stated, incorrect number to the publication notes and substitute the valid number from the secondary source as the official ISBN. But if it is just a data entry typo, then we will just correct it in place. Thanks. --MartyD 13:34, 31 December 2021 (EST)

p.s. If you will be active again, edit this page and remove the 

{{Inactive user}}

at the top to get rid of that big yellow message. --MartyD 13:34, 31 December 2021 (EST)

Since I was looking at the other three books in the series I came across this post. Per that the isbn should be 91-7198-007-5, but it hints at there being an incorrect isbn in circulation. /Lokal_Profil 14:42, 31 December 2021 (EST)
Goodreads has 9171980070 (invalid but right number of digits) so it seems likely that the submission is a combination of that and a typo. /Lokal_Profil 14:53, 31 December 2021 (EST)

The ISBN printed in the book, inside and back of the book, is 91-71898-0070

I apologize for the delay. I accepted the submission and moved that ISBN into the notes. I added the valid ISBN from OCLC/WorldCat. See here. Thanks! --MartyD 14:11, 5 February 2022 (EST)

Stenens visdom submission

Hi again. I also have some questions about your Stenens visdom submission, which I have on hold:

  1. It appears to me that the four stories collected in that book are all short fiction (shorter than NOVEL length). Is that true? If so, we would make this an ANTHOLOGY instead of an OMNIBUS (which I can take care of).
  2. It would be useful to create title records for those four stories. Do you have the actual Swedish titles (including proper Swedish-style capitalization)? I would set them up if you tell me what they are.
  3. We usually "normalize" all-capital-letters presentation to standard capitalization. In standard Swedish, would that be "Stenens visdom" or something else?

There is no need for you to change anything -- I will take care of it -- I just need to know what to use. Thanks! --MartyD 13:52, 31 December 2021 (EST)

1. There are four short stories on the same subject, like chapters in a book. 2. STENBOKEN Originalets titel: The Stone Book MORMORSPOJKEN Originalets titel: Granny Reardun GENVÄGEN Originalets titel: The Aimer gate STORA PAXARDAGEN Originalets titel: Tom Fobble's Day 3. Yes, but the Title on cover and title page an in the descriptve texts is all capitals STENENS VISDOM

Retrieved from "https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:RolHje&oldid=624837"