User talk:Martinbainbridge

Revision as of 23:54, 26 April 2017 by Ldb001 (talk | contribs) (→‎Science Wonder Quarterly, Fall 1929: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Hello, Martinbainbridge, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mhhutchins 02:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Science Wonder Quarterly, Winter 1930

I have to reject the submission to change the date of this issue from 1930-01-00 to 1929-12-15. Because this is dated on the cover as a 1930 issue, we have to retain that as the date of the issue. Because of the vagaries of magazine publishing it's almost impossible to determine the actual publication date of magazine issues. That's why we depend solely on the date given on the cover. This becomes a problem when the dating is seasonal. But we can't change the date of "Winter 1930" to December 1929 without conflicting with the established standards of the ISFDB and other databases. For example, the January issue of almost every magazine in the field appears on the newsstand and in subscribers' mailboxes sometime in late November, sometimes even earlier. Regardless, the ISFDB record gives the date as January.

About your note concerning the removal of the source for the non-verified records. Yes, feel free to remove any source data when you can do a primary verification of the record and can confirm that the data is actually stated in the publication. If the data is from a secondary source, but remains unstated in the publication, you should retain the source in the note field. Thanks for contributing. You'll find many helpful links in the Welcome section above. Mhhutchins 02:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Serialization of complete novels

When novels are published complete in one issue of a magazine, it is still considered a serialization, and should be typed as SERIAL in ISFDB records. Thanks. Mhhutchins 02:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Science Wonder Quarterly, Fall 1929

Hi, I added a little more detail to the title record for this pub, including the credited forms of the authors' names and more detail for the reader letters. Ldb001 03:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)