Difference between revisions of "User talk:JosHil"

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
I thank you for your contributions, and I am sorry that this one may be deleted. I do hope you will make many more contributions to the ISFDB. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 08:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 
I thank you for your contributions, and I am sorry that this one may be deleted. I do hope you will make many more contributions to the ISFDB. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 08:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Making it "NONGENRE" might be more appropriate, as it was reviewed in a Spec-Fic magazine. I wouldn't encourage more editions of such though - we seem to have the first printing (to justify title date), and the edition that was most likely reviewed. I'd say that's plenty. (I am not adding the first British publication for instance.) [[User:BLongley|BLongley]] 17:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:55, 7 September 2009

Welcome!

Hello, JosHil, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ahasuerus 04:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Salvation in Death

I accepted the submission for a new publication of this title, but had to change the binding from "softcover" to "pb", which is the standard entry for mass-market sized paperbacks. (Larger paperbacks are entered as "tp".) Does the paperback give a month of publication? If so you can update the pub while adding the cover image that you just uploaded. Thanks. MHHutchins 04:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

For more specifics on entering pubs, here's the link to the help page. MHHutchins 04:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
The link you added to the record was to the Wiki page, and not the image itself. Go to the page, click on the image, and its URL will appear in your browser's address bar. Copy this URL and place it in the record's image field. MHHutchins 04:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I see that you chose the smaller of the two files that you uploaded. Perhaps the larger one would be better, because the system automatically thumbnails it for the publication record page, but allows a user to click on it to see a larger version. Also, if you have any questions, or responses, you can do so on this Wiki page which is your personal talk page. See the link in the Welcome about Wiki editing help. Thanks. MHHutchins 04:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Image:DOTDJAJPBF.gif

I see that you uploaded Image:DOTDJAJPBF.gif, a cover for Day of the Dead by J. A. Jance. However, it does not appear that you supplied any of the standard Image License Tags for this image, nor have you yet linked the iamge to the publication record. (See Help:How to upload images to the ISFDB wiki for more information.)

However, in this cane, you need not bother, because Day of the Dead is a mystery with no speculative fiction aspects, and I plan to delete it from the database entirely in the near future.

If you know of any reason why we ought not to delete Day of the Dead from the database, please do mention it here.

I thank you for your contributions, and I am sorry that this one may be deleted. I do hope you will make many more contributions to the ISFDB. -DES Talk 08:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Making it "NONGENRE" might be more appropriate, as it was reviewed in a Spec-Fic magazine. I wouldn't encourage more editions of such though - we seem to have the first printing (to justify title date), and the edition that was most likely reviewed. I'd say that's plenty. (I am not adding the first British publication for instance.) BLongley 17:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)