Difference between revisions of "User talk:FlaSheridn"

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Bridging the Galaxies by Niven: record here _correctly_ paginates the contents)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
:It appears that our data comes from [http://www.locusmag.com/index/t502.htm#A26273 the Locus Index], which is not infallible. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 16:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 
:It appears that our data comes from [http://www.locusmag.com/index/t502.htm#A26273 the Locus Index], which is not infallible. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 16:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
  
:: The record here ''correctly'' paginates the contents; it’s the table of contents in the book that’s wrong.
+
:: The record here ''correctly'' paginates the contents; it’s the table of contents in the book that’s wrong. [[User:FlaSheridn|FlaSheridn]] 16:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
[[User:FlaSheridn|FlaSheridn]] 16:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
+
 
 +
:::Sorry, I misread the note.  Your submission has been accepted. Thanks. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 22:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:12, 29 April 2011

Welcome!

Hello, FlaSheridn, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mhhutchins 16:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Bridging the Galaxies by Niven

I'm holding your submission which adds a note to this pub that the record incorrectly paginates the contents. It's better to actually make the corrections to the record and then do a primary verification (if you have the book) so that we know the source of the data. The note itself doesn't correct anything, it only points out the error. That sort of contribution should be made on the community pages of this wiki, not in the database record itself. You can respond here on your user talk page, or make another submission correcting the mistaken pagination. Thanks for contributing. Mhhutchins 16:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

It appears that our data comes from the Locus Index, which is not infallible. Mhhutchins 16:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
The record here correctly paginates the contents; it’s the table of contents in the book that’s wrong. FlaSheridn 16:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I misread the note. Your submission has been accepted. Thanks. Mhhutchins 22:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)