Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bookthing"

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 78: Line 78:
 
Your submission to add a new record for this title is very similar to one that's already in the database ([http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?335544 here]). The differences: an additional "x" pages in the page count field, the publisher as "Warner Vision", and a different cover image. The publication date, ISBN, and price are the same leading me to think they're the same edition. In cases like this, it's better to just update the current record, especially when it has not been primary verified, and the data is from a secondary source. I'll keep your submission on hold and wait for your response. If you agree that these are probably the same printing, I'll delete the older record, accept your submission and then let you update it. One more thing: you did not give the source for your data in the submission, so I can only assume you're working from an actual copy of the book. If so, you should add a message in the "Note to the Moderator" field to this effect. This keeps the moderator from having to do additional research in order to confirm the data. If you're working from a secondary source, not the actual book, you should ''always'' note your source in the record's "Note" field. (Notice the difference between the two fields.) Thanks. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 20:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 
Your submission to add a new record for this title is very similar to one that's already in the database ([http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?335544 here]). The differences: an additional "x" pages in the page count field, the publisher as "Warner Vision", and a different cover image. The publication date, ISBN, and price are the same leading me to think they're the same edition. In cases like this, it's better to just update the current record, especially when it has not been primary verified, and the data is from a secondary source. I'll keep your submission on hold and wait for your response. If you agree that these are probably the same printing, I'll delete the older record, accept your submission and then let you update it. One more thing: you did not give the source for your data in the submission, so I can only assume you're working from an actual copy of the book. If so, you should add a message in the "Note to the Moderator" field to this effect. This keeps the moderator from having to do additional research in order to confirm the data. If you're working from a secondary source, not the actual book, you should ''always'' note your source in the record's "Note" field. (Notice the difference between the two fields.) Thanks. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 20:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  
I believe that these are the same printing and the older record should be deleted.  I am working from an actual copy of the book.
+
:I believe that these are the same printing and the older record should be deleted.  I am working from an actual copy of the book. {{unsigned|Bookthing}}
 +
 
 +
::I have accepted the submission and deleted the old record. Here is [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?397409 the new record]. According to the [http://www.worldcat.org/title/brimstone/oclc/59877837 OCLC record] the publisher is Warner Vision, and there are ten roman numbered pages. If this is true of your copy please update the record. Also remember to do a primary verification of the record, and to sign any wiki comment with four tildes. (See the welcome section above to learn how to do both.) Thanks. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 03:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:08, 8 September 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Bookthing, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!Kraang 02:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Year's Best SF 16

Hi! Your submission would make Year's Best SF a sub series of Year's Best SF 16[1]. What you need to do is click "Edit Title Data" and in series paste in Year's Best SF and 16 in series number. This will add the title to the series. Thanks for editing and welcome to the ISFDB!Kraang 03:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I added the image you uploaded. This is a two step process, upload then submit the image link. Just right click the uploaded image go to properties and copy the URL and submit. This will then link the image. Thanks!Kraang 03:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Lambshead's Cabinet

Should the introduction to this anthology be an essay or should it remain as a short story? Also please consider removing the note giving the source as Amazon and do a primary verification of the record. (Here's a link to the help page for verifying data.) Mhhutchins 03:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

The Simple Art of Murder

I see that you have submitted the 1988 edition of Raymond Chandler's The Simple Art of Murder (1950). Is there any speculative fiction in this book? As far as I can tell, the stories are mysteries and the book also contains Chandler's eponymous essay. The Collection title is in the database because it was reviewed by Algis Budrys in 1977, but I don't think we want to include the stories unless they have SF elements. Thanks for editing! Ahasuerus 04:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Every Shallow Cut

The submission adding this new pub to the database was accepted, but I made some changes and additions. The price field should show the currency, so I added "$" before the price. I also changed the date to the one given in the Amazon.com listing, which also provided a cover image, and the cover artist credit. If you have a copy of this book, please do a primary verification (you can remove the "Data from Amazon" note as well.) Thanks. Mhhutchins 18:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Sourcing data and/or verifying the record

When adding a new publication record to the database, or updating an existing one, it is important that you do one of two things:

  1. If you have the book in hand, leave a message in the "Note to Moderator" field that you're working from a primary source, and after the submission is accepted go back to the record and do a primary verification. (There's a link in the Welcome section above for a page that gives instructions on how to do a primary verification.)
  2. If you do not have a copy of the book, and you are working from a reliable secondary source for your data, you must record the source for your information in the "Note" field (not the "Note to Moderator" field),

Thanks. Mhhutchins 20:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Currency

Please give the currency symbol when entering a number in the price field. Thanks. Mhhutchins 18:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Kurland's The Infernal Devices & Others

I've accepted the submission to add this record but made the following changes based on the OCLC record, and to make it comply with ISFDB standards:

  1. The title was changed from The Infernal Device and Others to The Infernal Device & Others which is the title according to the OCLC record from the book's title page. (We don't use the dustjacket or cover title.)
  2. Publisher was changed from "St. Martins" to "St. Martin's Minotaur". (In most cases, we use the publisher's name as given on the title page, with occasional changes to conform to the publisher's canonical name.)
  3. Page count was changed from "516" to "viii+516". (We include the roman-numbered pages in the total page count.)

I also added a link to the cover image on Amazon, and then merged the contents' title records with those that were already in the database. I also placed all of the title records in a new series. Thanks for contributing. Mhhutchins 17:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Herbert's Destination: Void

I'm holding a submission to add a new printing of the Berkley edition to this title. You see that we already have a record for the December 1978 printing with a different ISBN and lower price. So I'm assuming your printing is a later printing, even though it gives the date of the first Berkley edition. Look again at the copyright page and see if there is any indication that it's a later printing, either a statement, e.g. "Second Printing", or a number line, e.g. "9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2". Thanks for looking. Mhhutchins 20:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

This is a later printing. Unfortunately, I cannot consult the copyright page to determine the exact printing number and date because the book is unavailable at the moment. I do have a scan of the cover which clearly shows the different ISBN and price. If you choose to approve the submission I can upload the cover afterwards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bookthing (talkcontribs) .
The cover's not the problem. As I said, we already have a record with that date, so you'll have to get the correct date. Otherwise, if I accept the submission, I'll have to zero out the date to give it an unknown publication date. If you don't have the book at hand, you should always give the source for your data in the Note field. If the information is only from a scan of the image, you have to let us know that. It is important to realize that we want data from the book's interior: the title page and the copyright page. But getting information from a cover scan is OK, as long as your record that in the submissions Note field (not the Note to Moderator field).
One more thing, please end out your posts on the wiki with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically signs and dates the message. Thanks for contributing. Mhhutchins 00:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Submission approved and the record is here. Please update it to note the source for your data. Mhhutchins 00:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Pournelle's A Step Farther Out

Same situation as above with the submission to add a new printing of this title. We already have a record for the August 1980 edition with a different ISBN and lower price. Please recheck your copy to see if it's a later printing. Mhhutchins 20:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

This is a similar case to the Herbert. This is a later printing. Unfortunately, I cannot consult the copyright page to determine the exact printing number and date because the book is unavailable at the moment. I do have a scan of the cover which clearly shows the different ISBN and price. If you choose to approve the submission I can upload the cover afterwards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bookthing (talkcontribs) .
Same response as above. I'm going to approve the submissions, but blank out the dates. You should go back to each of these records and add a note about the source for your data. Thanks. Mhhutchins 00:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Submission approved, and the record is here, awaiting your update to note the source. Mhhutchins 00:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

John Coulthart

I accepted two submissions adding cover art credit for this artist. Please update the records to indicate your source for the data. If you have the books, do a primary verification and remove the data from the note field giving the secondary source. Mhhutchins 00:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Image uploads

You will now have to link the files that you uploaded to the appropriate publication records. But, please keep in mind, the standards as outlined in the instructions for uploading images. They can not be more than 600 pixels at their longest side, and be no more than 150K in size. Three of the four images you uploaded exceeded these limits, and you should have got a warning that they were oversized. If you need instructions on how to link the images to the records, just ask here. Mhhutchins 01:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Citing secondary sources

Hi. I've been processing your "Stanislaw Fernandes" credit additions. If you don't have the books and are making the determination from some other source (for example, the artist's website or a citation on the publisher's website), you should record that source in the publication's notes while you're in there adding the artist's name. Otherwise, someone with the pub will come along, find no explicit credit in/on the pub, and will be forced to figure out whether to keep that credit or not. The same goes for publication dates and anything else. Not only "should" the source be documented anyway, but you'll save a lot of head-scratching. Thanks. --MartyD 12:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Preston & Child's Brimstone

Your submission to add a new record for this title is very similar to one that's already in the database (here). The differences: an additional "x" pages in the page count field, the publisher as "Warner Vision", and a different cover image. The publication date, ISBN, and price are the same leading me to think they're the same edition. In cases like this, it's better to just update the current record, especially when it has not been primary verified, and the data is from a secondary source. I'll keep your submission on hold and wait for your response. If you agree that these are probably the same printing, I'll delete the older record, accept your submission and then let you update it. One more thing: you did not give the source for your data in the submission, so I can only assume you're working from an actual copy of the book. If so, you should add a message in the "Note to the Moderator" field to this effect. This keeps the moderator from having to do additional research in order to confirm the data. If you're working from a secondary source, not the actual book, you should always note your source in the record's "Note" field. (Notice the difference between the two fields.) Thanks. Mhhutchins 20:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I believe that these are the same printing and the older record should be deleted. I am working from an actual copy of the book. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bookthing (talkcontribs) .
I have accepted the submission and deleted the old record. Here is the new record. According to the OCLC record the publisher is Warner Vision, and there are ten roman numbered pages. If this is true of your copy please update the record. Also remember to do a primary verification of the record, and to sign any wiki comment with four tildes. (See the welcome section above to learn how to do both.) Thanks. Mhhutchins 03:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)