User talk:AlHazred

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, AlHazred, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ahasuerus 06:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

The Necronomicon

I have approved your changes to Price's The Necronomicon and have a couple of questions if you happen to be working off a physical copy of the book:

  • Could you please confirm that the title of Price's introduction is "The Figure in the Flying Carpet" and that it starts on page vii? (We support both roman and arabic numerals, by the way.)
  • Is "Demons of Cthulhu", which appears on page 62, credited to Robert Silverberg or to "Charles D. Hammer", his pseudonym?
  • Similarly, is "The Mantle of Graag" (p. 11) attributed to Frederik Pohl, Henry Dockweiller and Robert A. W. Lowndes or to "Paul Dennis Lavond", their collective pseudonym?
  • Are the page numbers listed by Locus for the currently unnumbered Lin Carter micro-stories correct?

Thanks! Ahasuerus 06:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

I do, in fact, own a physical copy of this book -- I started picking up the Call of Cthulhu Fiction line from Chaosium with #1 and have almost all of them. I am adding them to my Book Collector software, and plan to submit changes to ISFDB as time permits.
  • Price's introduction is, in fact, named "The Figure in the Flying Carpet." It is in the typical Price style of combination Introduction/Literary History/Homage. The headers of the pages it's on, however, do say "Introduction." Similarly, all of the stories are started with a short bibliographical intro.
  • "Demons of Cthulhu" is attributed to Silverberg. Price mentions the pseudonym in his intro.
  • "The Mantle of Graag" is attributed to Pohl, Dockweiller, and Lowndes. Price mentions the pseudonym in his intro.
  • The page numbers for the microstories appear to be correct.
Stories are listed as starting with the page containing Price's intro. --AlHazred 06:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, that helps! I have removed the title record attributed to "Charles D. Hammer" and added the one for Silverberg. (It's a common issue with reprints.) I also added a note about the slight discrepancy in the way the introduction is listed.
Now, re: the proposed removal of the micro-stories, the question is whether we want to enter "The Dee Translation" as a single novella title or as multiple short story titles (or perhaps both). All of these micro-stories originally appeared in various magazines and we will eventually want to create publication entries for them and enter their contents. Once that is done, it will be useful to show that these stories were later reprinted in an anthology, something that we will not be able to do if we enter just the novella record. Would you agree? And again, thanks for your contributions!
P.S. I may have to drop off for the night since I am on the East Coast this week and it's 2am here. There may be other moderators popping up over the next few hours, but if no one else chimes in, I will pick it up in the morning. Ahasuerus 06:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
I think it's a good idea. However, the stories in these anthologies come from a bewildering variety of minor fan-made magazines spanning decades -- putting them all in the database is the chore of a lifetime. Verifying them will be difficult if not impossible -- I doubt some of the magazines still exist in more than a handful of physical copies.--AlHazred 07:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Primary verification can be indeed problematic when more obscure fanzines are involved. However, we do accept secondary verifications from reliable source, although primary verifications are, of course, preferred.
In this case, some of the micro-stories have appeared in other reprint anthologies, e.g. "The Doom of Yakthoob" appeared in 4 publications that we list.
Also, you wanted to remove Steffan B. Aletti 's "The Castle in the Window" from this publication. Does Locus list it in error? Or is it, perhaps, attributed to another version of the author's name? Thanks! Ahasuerus 23:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm... That was in error. Aletti's "The Castle in the Window" is in there. It starts on page 73 -- the first page is a short intro to the piece by Price, and then the story itself spans seven more pages. I blame a current bout of insomnia.
I should also mention I own two copies of the Necronomicon anthology -- one from 1996 and the later 2002 edition. I do not own the edition currently being sold on the Chaosium.com website. I will have to sit down with them later today and compare them to find the discrepancies. --AlHazred 18:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for checking! Based on your explanation, I have rejected the Title removal submission and added a few missing page numbers. We are getting there :-) Ahasuerus 03:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Bad Ronald

Was this published as by John Holbrook Vance or Jack Vance? You put it under the title record for John Holbrook Vance and the OCLC record gives Jack Vance credit as the author. Also what is the currency you placed in the price field? If US dollars you should place "$" before the figure. Thanks. Mhhutchins 00:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. My apologies.--AlHazred 15:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Last Man on Earth

Have your submission to add Wayne Barlowe as the artist for [this] on hold. If the image is correct, there is a signature on the bottom right [that I can't quite make out] but it looks nothing like the one Barlowe was using in 1982. His "Celtic Rune" sig. was a box with three initials inside at the time. See [here]. Is there another cover or a secondary source? I see the 1985 printing credits Barlowe and AbeBooks has one of those that states Barlowe as the artist, but without an image. Thanks! --~ Bill, Bluesman 18:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

There is, in fact, another source. I never knew it was Barlowe until I saw that exact piece in one of his art book collections (will get the exact one, and page number, when I get home). It's credited to him elsewhere, as well; for instance, this anime wallpapers site.
Super! Now that site has a gorgeous pic and the signature is plainly visible. Thanks for checking, will approve the submission. --~ Bill, Bluesman 01:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street

I'm holding a submission that wants to change the note on this record to indicate that it's a teleplay, and not a story adaptation of the teleplay. I'm not sure (not having any of the books to check), but I believe this is the story and not the teleplay. We have a record of the teleplay which was published in Twilight Zone magazine. Do you have a copy of any of the books in which the first record was published? Mhhutchins 04:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm also now concerned that I accepted the changes you made in Walking Distance and The Fever. All three of these stories appeared in the book Stories from the Twilight Zone which has been verified. Someone has changed the note fields of the title records of every story in the book indicating they're teleplays. Somehow this doesn't seem right. Thanks. Mhhutchins 04:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
I made those changes to make the different entries for the Stories from the Twilight Zone publication match -- I saw that some of them had the teleplay data while others did not. The stories are all, in fact adaptations of teleplays; the teleplay data for most of them is in the notes to the stories (the ending of each is the concluding narration by Mr. Serling); one of the stories has the note that the teleplay was "scheduled" for airing on a particular date, but this differs from the notation in that story, and I guess the teleplay aired earlier than expected. I thought that the Notes showed the proper way to do that, but I guess there's supposed to be a different way to do it? --AlHazred 18:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes. I would suggest "Story adaptation of a teleplay originally broadcast on [date]." This makes it clear that the record is for the story and not the teleplay, which may have been published later, and making it an entirely new work. Thanks. Mhhutchins
I've made the changes in the notes to the stories. Mhhutchins 19:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! --AlHazred 01:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Title date changes

Afraid I've been asleep at the switch. You entered the contents for [this] and are now changing the dates for the individual stories. Please stop!! The vast majority of the stories have been previously published and changing the dates for the entries in the above publication doesn't really do anything as they still need to be merged with the existing record[s]. To do this in one step all you have to do is click on each author's name from the contents of the pub record and then from the bibliography page that comes up, click on "Check for Duplicate Titles". The story, if it has been published before, will show up with the new record adding all those contents will have created. Click on "Merge Selected Records". You will see the dates of the original record and the one you added [all of which will have 1987-00-00]. The earlier story will already have the button 'selected' so just click "Complete Merge". Then go back to the contents of the pub and select the next author and repeat. The ones you submitted already [and I approved without thinking about it properly] will still have to be merged. Doing as above eliminates one step. Some of the stories are original to this publication, but will still need to have the dates changed to 1984-04-00 as that's when the first edition was published. The contents should also be imported to the other two editions. My apologies, should have caught this earlier. --~ Bill, Bluesman 04:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

I've started from the bottom of the contents and have done a few to lighten the load... 100 is a lot! --~ Bill, Bluesman 04:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
(Needless to say) I did not know that! That's an awesome feature, and I will start over from the top!--AlHazred 15:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://isfdb.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:AlHazred&oldid=215763"