Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- * Edit Author Data - [[Help:Screen:AuthorData]] - Used to update background information about an author such a * Make This Author a Pseudonym - [[Help:Screen:MakeAlternateName]]6 KB (910 words) - 20:02, 9 September 2022
- ...37 Multiple verifications '''OPEN''' How about allowing multiple people to verify a publication? That would increase confidence in the verifications, allow ...undo a primary verification. A thought that comes to mind is the existing verify.cgi could show multiple rows for each of the primary verification instances5 KB (871 words) - 14:29, 23 March 2007
- ...e publication; in the edit screen for the publication; and in the moderate screen for the publication. While the structure of the Wiki page is not specified, ...What you know gets documented on the wiki page, if it differs. See [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] for more detailed information about what to enter.10 KB (1,773 words) - 03:49, 14 April 2008
- <li>verify.py 1.3 | Debug/Moderator: Pub's note not shown in post-approval screen35 KB (4,818 words) - 17:52, 18 May 2012
- * 10002 FIXED some time prior to 11/22/2206: The "Publication Listing" screen displays alternate titles separated by caret signs ("^") instead of "vt [.. ...under his last name only). I pulled the Publication up in the new editing screen and deleted "Martin" (which happened to be the second Author in the list) f36 KB (5,466 words) - 19:27, 22 November 2006
- |URLs not linked correctly in the post-approval screen |Link to view pub after verify41 KB (5,830 words) - 08:04, 15 March 2011
- | On Verify screen, show who took each Primary slot *edit/verify.py 1.679 KB (10,892 words) - 02:03, 1 January 2014
- ...t. '''OPEN''' If the edit has already beeb approved (or rejected) when the screen is displayed (or refreshed) including a warning flag of some sort. -[[User: ...by the edit. I suggest that either on the various edit screens, or on the screen that displays the submisison xml, or perhaps on a new confirmation dialog,110 KB (17,630 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2020
- ...entering "Y" in the title id field for MakeVariant on X, then the approval screen claims you are making Y a variant of X. If you approve it it goes through ...(make ''Test Story 2'' the VT). The XML blob looks good and the approval screen header is correct but the displayed data is backwards which also explains w49 KB (7,728 words) - 11:07, 3 February 2008
- ...ur users. However, I see that we don't have this spelled out in the [[Help:Screen:NewPub|Help pages]]: ...ion that is in the pub being verified by Primary, and also that it's ok to Verify an Anthology that has only one Publication for the Title Record, and none o206 KB (35,390 words) - 17:20, 17 December 2015
- ...nInfo:WhatToInclude]], which is transcluded in [[ISFDB:Policy]] and [[Help:Screen:NewPub#Content_Information]], was originally written based on the assumptio ...d_in_a_book here] and especially [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#Page here] state that153 KB (25,708 words) - 03:05, 14 May 2020
- ...know this up front? Especially when the author's bibliography is long and screen real estate is at a premium? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 21:56, 1 May 2006 :::#The screen will be split into two halves.168 KB (27,880 words) - 17:18, 17 December 2015
- ...is present I generally regard it as the primary format, and that is what I verify. A list of formats is going to require constant update, and in any case IMO ...but basically it's uncontrollable and should be addressed in Help - "don't verify against OCLC/Worldcat without crediting the records involved". I don't beli208 KB (35,083 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- I suggest that we add a rule to [[Help:How to verify data]] that the note ''must'' contain information about non-primary-verifie ...ing ISFDB would come across it. It can than be referenced in [[Help:How to verify data]]. I would also quibble with some of the wording. Non-trivial & detail225 KB (36,311 words) - 12:24, 12 April 2021
- ...ly want to record the fact that the column was published as per the [[Help:Screen:NewPub|Help Pages]]: ...d saw a load of titles that I could put a "correct name" on: not enough to verify them, but it might put some of them back into a position where a verifier w124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
- ...ed' with a new date, but rather the list price is simply changed. What you verify today, can (and will) be verifiably different at a later date. (That later ...r entering the page number. See [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#EntryType the entry type help section] for more details.'''227 KB (36,842 words) - 17:29, 17 December 2015
- ...title" or "headlined" concept for classifying stories. It's very easy to verify if a story title appears on the title page and does not seem to create wide ...at was a parent title of the existing omnibus/anthology records but then a screen refresh reminded me that the variant/child titles vanished from the bibliog76 KB (13,019 words) - 21:00, 12 November 2008
- ...of being the primary verifier for a pub that has data in it which I cannot verify -- primarily the month of publication or the cover artist. In these cases I ...n though it may look like we don't always do it -- what's displayed on the screen and what's filed in the database is not always the same :-) [[User:Ahasueru267 KB (43,901 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
- * edit/verify.py 1.7 | Search box overlaps main area at some screen resolutions179 KB (24,447 words) - 20:39, 1 January 2015
- ...ffort that puts a burden on many people as we would need to both enter and verify data with a lot more attention to detail than we have needed for story titl [[Help:Screen:NewPub]] makes no mention of non-Latin/Unicode (i.e. Japanese, Cyrillic, et212 KB (35,169 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015