Search results

...umeric value between 1 and 99. For poll-based award types, it's the work's position in a poll and should be between 1 and 70. For non-poll-based award types, i ** 84 : Withdrawn - Official Publication in a Previous Year

...s because it's simpler to associate the two works. I don't know what the "official" stance is, but it may be somewhere in the Help section. Back to the Bradbu ...That's quite a bit to ask and I doubt that most casual users will be in a position to do so in Smith's case, let alone Silverberg's case. I wouldn't be surpri

...tand why we have to reinvent the wheel and to create our own codes. As the official standard was seemingly rejected, it looks like the local usage (or even a p ...self-published and fan-published SF out there that we are simply not in a position to process. There are over 440,000 ISBNs on our development server alone th

::::: If a non-moderator can contribute, I often find myself in the position of being the primary verifier for a pub that has data in it which I cannot ...50" and "DM 10,50" are both quite clear to me, but I don't want to be in a position of having to figure out that a submission using "XY 10.50" should be correc

* Web Page - If the author has an official Web site, enter it here. The full URL should be listed, including "http://" ...bibliographic and biographical data. If the author is deceased and has no official or authorized sites then alternate web sites with significant bibliographic

* Is appending "(I)" to a name the official standard for disambiguating an author name? Can someone cite where this is ...6. Finally, there is "Editorial page editors" with a note stating that the position was "titled Editor-in-Chief or Editor until retirement of Merz but never ha

...nd/or unless we form alliances with other sites, we will probably be in no position to do this area justice. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 18:59, 16 Jul 2007 (C ...hes stick to less than 100 records: which is why proposing that we make it official that we leave art alone is definitely arguable. We're doing a lot of things

...r this field to reflect practice, and, if so, what should the standard for position of the suffix be (at the end, or after the surname)? I included the III ex ...(I used it when I was in the banking field, you can skip the bit about the position) that we can use instead of creating another custom one. The major drawback

...alphabet or the transliterated form, so I propose that we adopt it as the official standard. One possible alternative would be to add a new field for "transli ...y years, if it turns out that the newer author has risen to a more popular position, it would be fairly simple to reverse the two. (In 1984, I thought it was s

...asily find their books in the database. You appear to be advocating for a position that does not take into account whether the books have an ISBN (and only as ...5004] instead of using scenarios that in no way reflect the other person's position. -- [[User:JLaTondre|JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 11

:::::::::::::Sorry for nitpicking English, a notification is an official communication. I'm willing to go with the log is a passive communication of ::The official [[:Template:PublicationFields:Date]] has been updated with the proposed tex

..._markets#An_example|example for the German market]] on the wiki page: the "official" formats there are only partly size-based. The question by editors that wil :: Adding the just mentioned "official" definition as a new rule especially for the German market is no solution a

...similar names, and they find KJ Kabza's name with a link to this author's official page. This would save the site the trouble of constantly creating pseudony : I had been on the record with a similar position as Christian as well - trying to bend the rules causes more problems than i

::::::Good catch! I don't think I have ever seen an ARC counted as an official first printing, but the publishing world is nothing if not weird :) [[User: ...." I could see one reason for stating ARCs are not allowed is support the position that ARCs should not be sold/redistributed as the neither the publisher nor

...into the database. Why not just add a note to the record for the final and official version of the work that it was previously available (in a somewhat differe ::: Few things in this world are perfect -- and I am generally not in a position to judge since my collection of British magazines is limited to older diges

...eems like we may need hidden anchors in the series list to allow people to position sub-series. This is getting messy – the existing mechanism is defined in ...is that for hyphenated values there must be a hyphen in the second to last position (just before the checksum) which will solve the phone # issue as it's rare

...tiple field, so we can list as many sites as we need to, although we favor official/authorized sites, especially for living persons, since they have to be more ...al draft of a book predating publication for a year or many years since 1) official copies of the script in its final form would have received some distributio

...ctive primary verifiers if someone notifies only me because I hold the PV1 position. I do a physical examination of the publication, either make the change or ...There doesn't seem to have been different currencies in the GDR, only the official naming has changed over time. As said elsewhere, we shouldn't try to repres

...lp our users to find obscure SF books. Some UK based small presses have an official US distributor and providing that distributor's contact data (often a PO bo ...side and Arabic for the other have been suggested, but as usual never made official. [[User:BLongley|BLongley]] 22:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)