Search results

<Note>Angus &amp; Robertson publishers have been an imprint of HarperCollins since 1989.</Note> <Webpage><nowiki>http://www.harpercollins.com.au/</nowiki></Webpage>

<Subject>Angus &amp; Robertson / HarperCollins (Australia)</Subject>

| [http://www.isfdb.org/harpercollins.html Harpercollins]||

...e="text-align: left;" | One of the biggest genre publishers; an imprint of HarperCollins. Harper Voyager Impulse is digital-first. | style="text-align: left;" | A subsidiary of HarperCollins, publishing mostly romance.

...tp://www.harpercollins.com/imprints/index.aspx?imprintid=518005 '''Eos''', HarperCollins' SF/F imprint]

...electronic catalogues treat the latter as a superset of the former. Where HarperCollins did not even exist when the publication was published. This is the same wit So for instance you might wind up with a 1973 HarperCollins edition that has been imported.

..., I see that 22 libraries have it cataloged as by "Eos" and 148 as by "Eos/HarperCollins" even though all of them are working off the same OCLC-provided guidelines. ...But we should have enough data here soon to record Eos as the imprint and HarperCollins the publisher. In fact, I see you mentioned Eos was the ''imprint'' when yo

...ground of this conversation. Some (Pengiun/Ace, Penguin/ROC, Penguin/DAW, HarperCollins, Macmillan (but they only use mobipocket)) publishers are issuing a differe