Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The gutter code was used by Doubleday, both for their trade and book club printings, from mid-1958 to mid-1987. C Please note that "gutter code" is an informal name used by book collectors. Doubleday and the [[Publisher:Science Fiction Book Club|Science Fiction Book Club]] (15 KB (2,477 words) - 19:08, 9 November 2015
- ...sher.cgi?8 Doubleday]<br />[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?172 Doubleday (UK)]<br />[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/publisher.cgi?1127 Heyne]<br />[ht ...ress&unfiltered=1&qid=1502897074&sort=date-desc-rank Delacorte Press]<br />Doubleday [https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_nr_n_25?fst=as%3Aoff&rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_30%129 KB (17,998 words) - 13:03, 10 March 2018
- ...ime when I was in the club (from the mid-70s to around 1990.) The "Nelson Doubleday" imprint was also used for omnibus editions or other first "as thus" editio ...tions which had no (or misleading) ISBN/publisher information, I find the "Doubleday/SFBC" convention to be useful, but I don't think we have a hard and fast ru124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
- ...leday and its book clubs. I've noticed that " / BCE" has been used for non-Doubleday book club printings, but as long as the editor makes it clear why they beli212 KB (35,169 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
- ::The LCCN is unhelpful; it relates to the 1982 Doubleday hardcover.<br>There are no house ads in the book, so no clues from date cod109 KB (17,868 words) - 13:24, 8 September 2022
- ...on dustjacket flaps. So, most undated and gutter-coded books published by Doubleday for its trade or book club divisions between 1958 and 1987 can be given a r191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
- ...ay "Doubleday Science Fiction" on the jacket though the title page states "Doubleday." ...s publishers. All the omnibuses I have seen, pre Guild/America, are Nelson Doubleday regardless of who had the original copyright. Don't know if that would affe573 KB (97,958 words) - 17:23, 17 December 2015
- ...l form, even if it matches the actual title page of the publication (e.g. "Doubleday & Company, Inc."), we will use the canonical name regardless. The problem i227 KB (36,842 words) - 17:29, 17 December 2015
- ...hat is published. OCLC has records that tout Tor, Guild America and Nelson Doubleday, often it is a matter of who input the data. In any case, I personally unha ...ch is exactly how the book credits the work. Another example without: the Doubleday edition of [http://www.worldcat.org/title/mockingbird/oclc/5555669 Mockingb478 KB (79,808 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- ..."hardcover" instead of "hc" nor if the enter "SFBC-Doubleday" instead of "Doubleday / SFBC". In all such cases we gently correct new editors, and expect them t621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015
- || Nelson Doubleday / SFBC351 KB (49,680 words) - 15:51, 15 February 2022