Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[Rules and standards discussions]]46 bytes (5 words) - 07:52, 16 April 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Rules and standards discussions/Archive]]54 bytes (6 words) - 07:58, 16 April 2007
- #REDIRECT [[Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive01]]64 bytes (7 words) - 07:57, 16 April 2007
Page text matches
- * [[Sources of Bibliographic Information]] - Links to non-ISFDB resources for bibliographic data. ...ussions|Rules and Standards Discussions]] ([[Rules_and_standards_changelog|Rules changelog]])3 KB (344 words) - 23:32, 23 May 2021
- ...ue to be stored without hyphens, but are displayed with hyphens within the bibliographic, editing, and search tools. * Tor paperbacks are special cased, as they ignore the rules for 0-812 isbns.700 bytes (102 words) - 14:35, 26 December 2006
- ==Rules and standards changes== For a changelog of ISFDB data entry rules and standards, see the [[Rules and standards changelog]] page.4 KB (561 words) - 11:36, 21 July 2018
- ...cataloging and cleanup projects within ISFDB. (For archived projects see [[Bibliographic Projects in Progress/Archive|here]]). ...ndividual magazine publications, but can also be used to keep track of the bibliographic verification work that has been done on those magazines.5 KB (724 words) - 00:18, 14 December 2021
- ...just read Ahasuerus's comments about serial display on the [[Bibliographic Rules]] page, I tend to agree that serial display within Long Works is not that u2 KB (328 words) - 11:29, 19 December 2006
- ...[http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?Janet%20J.%20Asimov Janet J. Asimov] bibliographic pages (other than [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ae.cgi?Janet%20J.%20Asimov ...onym of Pohl and Merril. Now both the real and the pseduonym bibliographic rules have to apply to the same bibliography.6 KB (1,141 words) - 18:52, 26 December 2006
- ...<br/>'''Note:''' Threads in this archive originally appeared on the [[Talk:Rules and standards discussions|talk page]], which was then being used in basical :Well, www.sigla.ru is already present in the list of [[Sources of Bibliographic Information]] and it searches 1,600 online catalogs simultaneously, includi37 KB (6,425 words) - 17:22, 17 December 2015
- There seems to be a conflict between the documented [[ISFDB:Policy#Rules of Acquisition|ROA]] and our current practice. To be specific, in what case ...d in a column you are entering, discuss the situation on the Bibliographic Rules page to decide what can be eliminated." I also recommend that the ''onerou20 KB (3,241 words) - 14:07, 6 January 2011
- There was a [[Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive11#Clute/Nicholls Verification |sh ...ontent is constantly changing and expanding, books are rarely removed from bibliographic sections.231 KB (38,975 words) - 12:44, 29 June 2022
- ...nd currency correctly, even if its format doesn't stick to someone's local rules. [[User:Hitspacebar|Hitspacebar]] 19:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC) ...maybe even better, a drop down box. Then you wouldn't need a lot of these rules (and could display the values based on the user's locale information). [[Us180 KB (29,287 words) - 15:38, 23 March 2017
- :I'd use the same rules we do for RPGs which is if they are speculative fiction or closely related ...to keep in mind is that we are following an old (and arguably unfortunate) bibliographic convention that demands that we use the date of the first '''book''' public124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
- ...iscussion, everyone agreed that this is our practice. Obviously, these two rules are contradictory: do we include or exclude a non-speculative work by a non ...re not related to speculative fiction ..." Maybe this whole section of the Rules of Acquisition needs to be rewritten to discuss fiction and nonfiction sepa153 KB (25,708 words) - 03:05, 14 May 2020
- {{Isfdb-rules-and-standards-archives}} <div style="padding-left: 1ex; font-size: larger; color: #641">Rules and standards changelog</div>125 KB (20,374 words) - 12:29, 28 September 2022
- I realize the English capitalization rules leave a lot to be desired, but I'll try to ask a simple, focused question a ...m capitalized. At least for me anyway. Not that we follow the most logical rules all the time though :) [[User:Anniemod|Annie]] 18:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC172 KB (28,464 words) - 13:26, 14 November 2019
- ...h we standardized Ace, Tor has got messy: and I don't want to expand these rules to Omnibuses in general. What is the particular objection to Omnibus? (Actu ...s one of the most objective we have, and it is based on the relevant award rules to boot. I see no good reason to change or blur it. If a work is shorter th76 KB (13,019 words) - 21:00, 12 November 2008
- ...'ve settled on as a means for accurate and practical data entry within the rules as they stand. Until someone points out to me why it shouldn't be so, it's ...ase under the current inclusion policy. At that point, the issue becomes a rules and standards one. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] 20:43, 14 October 2012 (U191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
- ...g <nowiki><cite></nowiki>, but it might nevertheless be better to keep the rules more simple, especially when considering the amount of already existing rec : I agree that expanding our hosting rules beyond cover scans may raise various technical (disk space) and legal (copy246 KB (40,297 words) - 20:05, 26 September 2017
- ...ning. I've been thinking about the verification issue, and verification of bibliographic data falls into two distinct camps: objective and subjective. Objective dat ...Fields%3APubType&diff=0&oldid=10261 updated the help] to reflect the above rules. [[User:Mike Christie|Mike Christie]] 05:28, 1 Dec 2006 (CST)168 KB (27,880 words) - 17:18, 17 December 2015
- :::: Suppose we were to change the data entry rules and update all of our "Steven H. Silver" titles to use "Steven H Silver". T :As long as there is no consensus, one should stick to the rules, as it seems there is no basis for just another self-defined rule. [[User:S376 KB (62,546 words) - 20:32, 27 June 2019
- ...pear to be already capitalized. I bring this up to ensure we don't go all rules happy and generalize that all prepositions should be uncapitalized. - Thank ...ndeed, as [[User:JohnMarks|JohnMarks]] pointed out, by the letter of these rules all the PG ebooks should be OUT, as none have ISBNs, and none are part of a208 KB (35,083 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015