Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...painful to look at Recent Changes or the watchlist and see many dozens of anonymous Feature:900## listings scrolling by. I like the idea of separate discussion297 bytes (45 words) - 01:24, 20 December 2006
- Authors: Anonymous ...'t the error message tell me to enter "Anonymous"? Or, better yet, insert "Anonymous" when there is no Author specified in the form? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]59 KB (9,023 words) - 18:26, 26 December 2006
- ...ps://sourceforge.net/projects/isfdb/ SourceForge]. Anyone can do it, even "anonymous".16 KB (2,597 words) - 10:03, 11 September 2022
- ...is to enter the anthology as by "uncredited" (as opposed to the obsolete "anonymous" which is currently used in ''Five Fates'') and then set up a variant title ...omorrow'' look ok to me though I'd agree that "uncredited" is better than "Anonymous." ''Three for Tomorrow'' needs lots of notes... --[[User:Marc Kupper|Marc K76 KB (13,019 words) - 21:00, 12 November 2008
- |Error text advises to use Anonymous instead of "uncredited"41 KB (5,830 words) - 08:04, 15 March 2011
- | Exclude Anonymous from the Variant Title-Pseudonym Mismatches cleanup script | Ignore unknown, Anonymous, various, uncredited, The Readers, The Editors in the Prolific Authors with179 KB (24,447 words) - 20:39, 1 January 2015
- || an anonymous hand || an anonymous hand351 KB (49,680 words) - 15:51, 15 February 2022
- ...list though with that one the distinction is that the publication states "anonymous."124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
- ...painful to look at Recent Changes or the watchlist and see many dozens of anonymous Feature:900## listings scrolling by. I like the idea of separate discussion110 KB (17,630 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2020
- ==Uncredited vs. Anonymous vs. N/A plus Reviews== ...ymous or uncredited works. If a work is credited to "Anonymous", then put "Anonymous" in the author field. The same applies for any obviously similar pseudonym,573 KB (97,958 words) - 17:23, 17 December 2015
- ...s... still, if we can figure out what to do in these cases ('uncredited'? 'anonymous'? 'unknown'? 'dunno'?) and make searching for magazines a little easier (as ...cgi?uncredited uncredited], [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?anonymous anonymous], [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?unknown unknown] shouldn't be allowa621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015
- ...the content difference is the only way to tell the difference between two anonymous translations. The use of variant as a link to the source is a substitute fo153 KB (25,708 words) - 03:05, 14 May 2020
- ...ant to us, Goodreads recommends giving the author of traditional tales as "Anonymous.") Sometimes such stories have no credit, sometimes the credit is something172 KB (28,464 words) - 13:26, 14 November 2019
- .../index.php/Template:TitleFields:Author a section of the help page] (under "Anonymous or uncredited works") concerning author credit for letter columns that up u191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
- ...hout source that is not evident from the copy. How should one identify the anonymous content? Do we sign any of these notations to allow traceback? Do the exist225 KB (36,311 words) - 12:24, 12 April 2021
- ...ng [[Rules_and_standards_discussions#Books_by_.22unknown.22|unknown versus anonymous]] authors. The solution also introduces complexity that might no be unde206 KB (35,390 words) - 17:20, 17 December 2015
- ...help, I have made a changed to [[Template:TitleFields:Author]]. Under the "Anonymous or uncredited works" section, the last two lines were:227 KB (36,842 words) - 17:29, 17 December 2015