Search results

...t on page 7. Your opinions desired. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 11:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC) ...Stratford then. Thanks for the tip. Thanks Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 14:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Please see [[User talk:Dragoondelight#DeWitt vs. De Witt]] for context. Harry ([[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]]) makes an argument that in many particular cases we don't actually know w

...uld be made. 2¢ and not worth much. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 19:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC) ...ility)to these DB author summaries. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 13:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

...t on page 7. Your opinions desired. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 11:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC) ...Stratford then. Thanks for the tip. Thanks Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 14:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

...ems to be basically what is needed. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 12:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC) ...hand and it matches #3 my example. Thanks, Harry. --[[User:Dragoondelight|Dragoondelight]] 21:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Please see [[User talk:Dragoondelight#Encounter in Space]] and [[User talk:Dragoondelight#The Devouring Fire]] for context. much of what follows will be quoted from Harry ([[User:Dragoondelight]]) has attempted to enter records on some books that are not standard Mass-

...F and Fantasy Covers of X" that credited the original publication. I think DragoonDelight did some of those, and we have INTERIORART variants of COVERART records. Th ::::I agree, there should always be a variant relationship. Dragoondelight once did a great job on pubs like [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?2633

...her user's talk page with [[Template:Inactive user]]. For example, [[User:Dragoondelight]] was last active on 2010-12-01. On 2012-11-03, or 23 months later, Mhhutch

...ication (again see the "Chronicles of Amber" set, volume 1 was verified by Dragoondelight, volume 2 not. Obviously I'm in favor of treating these as individual publi