Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ::If not, I'm inclined to go say we should go ahead and start the beta, and rely on the moderators to notify each other i :::I think that rather than go off and do a huge project, that I'll do one kind of change at a time: autho5 KB (939 words) - 15:07, 19 December 2006
- * Lot's of data fixes. Lot's more to go. ...on versions, I found and fixed a data error. Lot's of fixes here, lot's to go.3 KB (477 words) - 01:20, 14 April 2008
- ...he Title, Author, and PubDate fields plus additional notes for what should go on a publication page. ...cle under the appropriate categories. The general convention is that these go at the bottom of an article.4 KB (620 words) - 00:49, 27 September 2008
- ...of him definitely becomes a more obvious choice. I have a feeling I should go back now and just list the last two and forget Guccione. Bova is listed as ...ved, and want to get a better feel before starting any of them. Think I'll go back and re-do the first four or five editor credits with notes as you sugg3 KB (561 words) - 10:44, 20 August 2009
- ...le mysql system with some test data and that's more trouble than I want to go to right now. However, I did notice that if you change the author_emails va Here's an rcsdiff of what I did before stopping --- if you decide to go this route you presumably need to grep for the remaining references to used5 KB (708 words) - 08:22, 14 April 2007
- ...ing from publications to Wiki pages, but this functionality is expected to go away in the future. Publication tags are not to be confused with title tags4 KB (421 words) - 12:28, 3 May 2019
- ...ay want to run a data scan looking for these occurrencies so that we could go back and fix them. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 13:04, 27 Dec 2006 (CST)3 KB (443 words) - 07:44, 9 January 2007
- ...ly fond of auto-rejecting submissions if it means that the editor needs to go back and re-enter a magazine worth of data. That way lies frustration and q3 KB (493 words) - 07:57, 9 January 2007
- ...all "pb" and "tp" forrmat with "sc" for ''all non-English records'' in one go Advantages: None. Go back to the beginning and read again.11 KB (1,853 words) - 22:01, 9 July 2018
- ::::Infinite Worlds should go I think. It has a nice fictional crosstime setup but is not related to any ...ere are many sourcebooks for <u>subsets</u> of the D&D Universe. But if we go for "the fiction must have come before the sourcebook", we're on less slipp6 KB (1,012 words) - 10:41, 20 August 2009
- :There are those of us who would like to see the directory go away, but there are others who who like to see it live on. Since I'm trying3 KB (581 words) - 19:30, 23 March 2007
- ::::P.S. After entering the review as by Pohl alone, I was able to go back to the Pub and add Kornbluth as a co-author, so there is a workaround.3 KB (508 words) - 12:57, 1 January 2007
- :::::::: I think all the long works can go, except maybe {{P|SNSFRLTTBD1950|A Sense of Reality}} and {{T|185510|Ninete ...y a prolific non-genre author and ask a helpful but not very bright bot to go grab more of his stuff" :-( Eventually, we'll blow away 90%+ of the current7 KB (1,213 words) - 11:02, 20 August 2009
- ...]] · [[Genre Stories on the Web / F-L#Go|Go]] · [[Genre Stories on the Web / F-L#Gr|18 KB (3,319 words) - 04:51, 12 November 2018
- ...ors? (Sorry, mag guys, didn't want to give you a headache about having to go back and change all of those hundreds of issues!) I'm open to hearing argum4 KB (665 words) - 11:05, 20 August 2009
- ...ield to a separate field; I think a serial number or catalog number should go in as it is on the book, without a leading "#". Other than I agree with yo5 KB (869 words) - 22:17, 6 January 2007
- ...hing the handful (6) I've got from 1952, 1953, & 1960. My plan is then to go back through it all, forward this time, checking (& verifying anything that ...h data that's a prediction about the future), but when I wrap that up I'll go back to Analog 1966 and work my way forward from there. My box of Analogs f10 KB (1,533 words) - 18:25, 31 May 2022
- ...s are best displayed first. I think it's the expected behavior, so I would go with the Rule of Least Surprise. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 14:20, 19 Jan6 KB (938 words) - 05:17, 21 January 2007
- # Go to advanced search in the database. # Go to advanced search in the database.28 KB (4,143 words) - 18:46, 23 January 2016
- ...s the nomination should use their judgement based on the comments, and can go against the consensus if they have a strong enough reason. They must give6 KB (952 words) - 12:49, 9 February 2018