Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...the tags are supported in the metadata section. You should refer to [[Help:Screen:NewPub]] for more detailed information on data entry. The bold text in the Refer to [[Help:Screen:NewPub#General_contents]] for detailed data-entry help:5 KB (715 words) - 18:52, 13 February 2014
- * [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] -- detailed help on the various publication-level fields and how * [[Help:Screen:EditTitle]] -- detailed help on the various title-level fields and how they4 KB (589 words) - 10:21, 27 June 2019
- <li>newpub.py 1.8 | Debug/Moderator: Pub's note not shown in post-approval screen35 KB (4,818 words) - 17:52, 18 May 2012
- |Improve link to pub from Edit Pub approval screen |Link series from the Edit Series approval screen23 KB (3,326 words) - 01:14, 14 December 2012
- |URLs not linked correctly in the post-approval screen ....cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/isfdb/isfdb2/edit/newpub.py?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 edit/newpub.py 1.3]41 KB (5,830 words) - 08:04, 15 March 2011
- * edit/newpub.py 1.30 * edit/newpub.py 1.3188 KB (12,011 words) - 22:48, 10 January 2016
- ...om [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:PublicationSeries Help:Screen:PublicationSeries].11 KB (1,727 words) - 14:09, 28 June 2020
- ...for more details. Follow the ISFDB standard insofar as possible.''" [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] does not seem to mention dates with day numbers. The last substan ...ule above into the templates that build [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] and [[Help:Screen:NewPub]], thus making this the standard rule for Genre as well as non-genre22 KB (3,758 words) - 10:35, 20 August 2009
- * edit/newpub.py 1.49 * edit/newpub.py 1.5078 KB (10,513 words) - 22:39, 3 January 2017
- *edit/newpub.py 1.18 | On Verify screen, show who took each Primary slot79 KB (10,892 words) - 02:03, 1 January 2014
- | Make variant approval screen mangles Unicode characters *edit/newpub.py 1.1721 KB (2,856 words) - 22:13, 3 January 2013
- ...may need adding to the ROA for clarity, it is already documented in [[Help:Screen:NewPub#Reviews|Help New Pub]] which states "Non-sf works should be entered20 KB (3,241 words) - 14:07, 6 January 2011
- | Add a "Next Submission" link to the post-approval screen | Add a "Next Submission" link to the post-approval screen - Pub update bug fix60 KB (8,522 words) - 19:14, 4 January 2020
- :::This situation was handled by documenting the help screen for new publications. [[User:Alvonruff|Alvonruff]] 12:39, 16 Dec 2006 (CST) .... The Work had a pre-existing Wikipedia URL, which I didn't touch, yet the screen reported that there was no URL in the old version and there ''was'' a URL i59 KB (9,023 words) - 18:26, 26 December 2006
- * edit/newpub.py 1.23 * edit/newpub.py 1.24179 KB (24,447 words) - 20:39, 1 January 2015
- ...t. '''OPEN''' If the edit has already beeb approved (or rejected) when the screen is displayed (or refreshed) including a warning flag of some sort. -[[User: ...by the edit. I suggest that either on the various edit screens, or on the screen that displays the submisison xml, or perhaps on a new confirmation dialog,110 KB (17,630 words) - 20:24, 3 January 2020
- ...ur users. However, I see that we don't have this spelled out in the [[Help:Screen:NewPub|Help pages]]: ...information that is stated in ISFDB matches their publication. The [[Help:Screen:Verify|verification help]] seems to support this. The other thing is if som206 KB (35,390 words) - 17:20, 17 December 2015
- ...nInfo:WhatToInclude]], which is transcluded in [[ISFDB:Policy]] and [[Help:Screen:NewPub#Content_Information]], was originally written based on the assumptio ...d_in_a_book here] and especially [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#Page here] state that153 KB (25,708 words) - 03:05, 14 May 2020
- ...ly want to record the fact that the column was published as per the [[Help:Screen:NewPub|Help Pages]]: :Our [[Help:Screen:NewPub|Help pages]] follow the current Hugo guidelines, which state that a124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
- ...know this up front? Especially when the author's bibliography is long and screen real estate is at a premium? [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 21:56, 1 May 2006 :::#The screen will be split into two halves.168 KB (27,880 words) - 17:18, 17 December 2015
- ...ng and dating rules used for the titles of the works illustrated". [[Help:Screen:AddVariant|Those rules]] state that we should use the earliest date of the ...ok exactly as it is given on the publication's title page" to match [[Help:Screen:NewPub]]. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 09:49, 13 May 2021 (EDT)231 KB (38,975 words) - 12:44, 29 June 2022
- [[Help:Screen:NewPub]] makes no mention of non-Latin/Unicode (i.e. Japanese, Cyrillic, et ...unnumbered pages), a section of [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#Content_Information this help page] was brought to my attention: '212 KB (35,169 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
- ...the overall column is credited. [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#Reviews this help] specifically asks for both an ESSAY title for th ...as reviews or discussions). These kinds of resources are mentioned [[Help:Screen:EditTitle#Web_Page|here]] - but apparently not included as links right now191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
- ...n though it may look like we don't always do it -- what's displayed on the screen and what's filed in the database is not always the same :-) [[User:Ahasueru ...re general discussion on how to deal with non-English currency. The [[Help:Screen:NewPub#Publication Information|help text]] (under '''Price''') has a good s267 KB (43,901 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
- ...series with separate buttons for each issue, but it still takes up only a screen and a half. [[User:Chavey|Chavey]] 03:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC) ...oved. Currently, only West German Deutschmarks are mentioned in the [[Help:Screen:NewPub#Price|help]]. East German Marks should also be mentioned because the246 KB (40,297 words) - 20:05, 26 September 2017
- ...all moderators to agree on one policy, whichever it is, and have the help screen changed if necessary. --[[User:Vasha77|Vasha]] 08:56, 24 January 2018 (EST) ...undant (although a first-time user might not scroll down when their laptop screen puts Contents below the fold). So--is there a rule on what can and can't go376 KB (62,546 words) - 20:32, 27 June 2019
- ...for more details. Follow the ISFDB standard insofar as possible.''" [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] does not seem to mention dates with day numbers. The last substan ...ule above into the templates that build [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] and [[Help:Screen:NewPub]], thus making this the standard rule for Genre as well as non-genre208 KB (35,083 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- ...r entering the page number. See [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#EntryType the entry type help section] for more details.''' As per [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditTitle Help]:227 KB (36,842 words) - 17:29, 17 December 2015
- :[[Help:Screen:EditPub]] says: ...tional VT information that is now displayed for Serials in the Publication screen is quite valuable, e.g. here is how Garrett/M. Janifer's "Occasion for Disa478 KB (79,808 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- ...d the URL into the publication's [http://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:EditPub#Web_Page Web Page] multifield.</font> ...tp://www.isfdb.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Screen:NewPub#Publication_Type help screen] only mentions boxed sets, not books sold together as a set, and the [http:225 KB (36,311 words) - 12:24, 12 April 2021
- ...bout partial magazine entries anywhere in [[Help:Screen:NewPub]] or [[Help:Screen:EditPub]]. [[ISFDB:Policy#Rules of Acquisition|RoA]] #1 clearly makes SF co ...serial publication should probably be a novel. The length rules in [[Help:Screen:EditPub]] are not worded as "guidelines" but as clear-cut hard and fast "de621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015
- ...elf (allegedly): if they're different, then they're both variations of the Screen-Play (which we don't have). As per [[Help:Screen:NewPub]]:573 KB (97,958 words) - 17:23, 17 December 2015