Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- * [[Fanzine:Mainstream|Mainstream]]14 KB (1,676 words) - 18:23, 25 March 2017
- ...nes. However, because they are also erotica, and indeed fetish erotica, no mainstream magazine is at all likely to publish them. My submissions for several of hi60 KB (10,247 words) - 11:01, 20 August 2009
- ...hing which often came close to vanity publishing) took off and a number of mainstream SF writers used them when they couldn't find a traditional publisher. The d ...y" or some other considerations, e.g. "Has this author been published by a mainstream publisher?", to the list of eligibility criteria, but there were so many di478 KB (79,808 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- ...indicate that the database would include speculative fiction published by mainstream and other non-SF publishers. When the Project Scope Policy was first define172 KB (28,464 words) - 13:26, 14 November 2019
- ...nes. However, because they are also erotica, and indeed fetish erotica, no mainstream magazine is at all likely to publish them. My submissions for several of hi208 KB (35,083 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
- ...were 1/4-professional at best and for the most part outside of the genre's mainstream. Now, however, just one randomly selected [http://subterraneanpress.com/ind ...by an author that is known primarily for his spec-fic, and this is a rare mainstream or genre other than spec-fic story, there is no easy way to "slip" it into621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015