Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

  • ...02324|name=The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction}}'', 2nd edition, eds. John Clute and Peter Nicholls, New York, St. Martin's Griffin, 1993, ISBN 0-312-09618- ...edia.com/ ''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction''], 3rd edition, eds. John Clute, David Langford, Peter Nicholls, Graham Sleight, et. al., October 2011
    987 bytes (139 words) - 16:17, 13 January 2019
  • {{T|189435|name=Encyclopedia of Fantasy}}, eds. John Clute and John Grant, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1997, ISBN 0-312-14594-2, 1
    2 KB (361 words) - 10:28, 8 September 2022

Page text matches

  • ...02324|name=The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction}}'', 2nd edition, eds. John Clute and Peter Nicholls, New York, St. Martin's Griffin, 1993, ISBN 0-312-09618- ...edia.com/ ''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction''], 3rd edition, eds. John Clute, David Langford, Peter Nicholls, Graham Sleight, et. al., October 2011
    987 bytes (139 words) - 16:17, 13 January 2019
  • |[[Reference:Clute/Nicholls|Clute/Nicholls]] |[[Reference:Clute/Grant|Clute/Grant]]
    10 KB (1,334 words) - 18:48, 27 October 2016
  • :::One possible solution is to do what Clute/Nicholls et al do for books that had earlier magazine appearances. They giv
    2 KB (328 words) - 11:29, 19 December 2006
  • {{T|189435|name=Encyclopedia of Fantasy}}, eds. John Clute and John Grant, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1997, ISBN 0-312-14594-2, 1
    2 KB (361 words) - 10:28, 8 September 2022
  • ...iography; it says: "(pseud) See CROSBY, H.C." Looking up Anson McDonald in Clute/Nicholls show: "-> Robert A. Heinlein" [[User:Alvonruff|Alvonruff]] 15:31, ...ck to the real biblio page for "single person pseudonyms" the way Tuck and Clute/Nicholls do. However, there is some value to being able to take a look at "
    6 KB (1,141 words) - 18:52, 26 December 2006
  • ...tasy''' (1997, St. Martin's Press, xvi+1049pp, ISBN 0-312-15897-1) by John Clute and John Grant. Both of these encyclopedias follow the same format: they gi ...cover the genre through 1968. The look and feel is very different than the Clute & Nichols & Grant encyclopedias. Biographies are more in-depth, publication
    13 KB (1,999 words) - 22:21, 7 December 2010
  • .../www.scifi-az.com/sfaz-04.htm Web site-cum-store], Amazon.com, {{OCLC}}, {{Clute/Nicholls}}, {{Locus}} and {{Reginald3}}. Changed the canonical name from "M *{{a|Edward_Abbey}} - internal consistency done; reconciled with Clute/Nicholls; publication data retrieved from OCLC/Fiction; linked to articles
    34 KB (4,285 words) - 00:52, 5 December 2006
  • ...gi?THSHDWFHVN1978 here] where the "(revised 1991 UK)" obviously comes from Clute/Nicholls and totally misses the probable 1978 "restored" they don't mention
    6 KB (1,089 words) - 14:10, 29 January 2008
  • ...liographic data, please do not check "Correct". For example, the Nicholls/Clute Encyclopedia, while very reliable, does not generally give publisher or pri
    10 KB (1,773 words) - 03:49, 14 April 2008
  • * ''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction'', 2nd edition, eds. John Clute and Peter Nicholls, New York, St. Martin's Griffin, 1993, ISBN 0312096186, * ''Encyclopedia of Fantasy'', eds. John Clute and John Grant, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1997, ISBN 0312145942, 1049
    29 KB (4,201 words) - 21:58, 13 September 2022
  • ...rs of intense daily abuse, my copy of The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (Clute & Nicholls) has finally taken major damage in the form of a tear down the s
    10 KB (1,546 words) - 14:02, 16 April 2006
  • # {{a|John_Clute}} [[Author:John Clute|ISFDB Wiki]]
    18 KB (2,641 words) - 17:53, 7 August 2009
  • ...ook publication. Most encyclopedias try to provide both data elements (see Clute/Nicholls). I suspect that this issue will be discussed some more when we ta ...all records that are applicable. Use paper bibliographies (Bleiler, Tuck, Clute, Reginald, ect) for older editions, Web bibliographies (Locus, Contento, Oz
    168 KB (27,880 words) - 17:18, 17 December 2015
  • == Clute/Nicholls Verification Revisited == ...which confuses matters a bit. I wanted to ask if our policy is still that Clute/Nicholls is reserved for the paper (or CD/ROM if anyone can still play that
    231 KB (38,975 words) - 12:44, 29 June 2022
  • ::::The Frenkel attribution comes from Clute/Nicholls (p. 453 of the first hardcover edition). As I recall, I meant to a ...ogies with 3+ stories whose editor is known but not credited. For example, Clute/Nicholls and OCLC agree that [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?34316
    76 KB (13,019 words) - 21:00, 12 November 2008
  • :::::Tell that to your fellow Brits who edit the SFE III. (I guess Clute would be an American as well since he was born in Canada.) [[User:Mhhutchi == Clute/Nicholls Verification ==
    191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
  • ...same theme, published in one large volume". That's the definition used by Clute/Nicholls' ''Encyclopedia of Science Fiction'': "omnibus is a book that asse
    37 KB (6,425 words) - 17:22, 17 December 2015
  • ...tasy author (no entries in the respective encyclopedias by Nicholls and/or Clute), shouldn't his work be deleted? ...n. In this case (yes, I own a copy of the CD-rom), the text is credited to Clute and Nicholls, so they should be the authors (read editors). By the way, the
    267 KB (43,901 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
  • ...ources are completely worthless. If, someday, such catalogs [Tuck/Reginald/Clute] are accessible through cyberspace, then one could actually see the 'record
    180 KB (29,287 words) - 15:38, 23 March 2017
  • 1966 Clute John Clute 9
    170 KB (17,905 words) - 14:25, 10 July 2011
  • .... His sources are Contento for Boardman and informal information from John Clute and others for Aldiss. I would probably but a note on the story and in the
    206 KB (35,390 words) - 17:20, 17 December 2015
  • ...ly entered book publications vs. magazine publications. If you open one of Clute's Encyclopedias, (i.e. ''of Science Fiction'' or ''of Fantasy''), you'll se
    621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015
  • ...book form and the texts that have not appeared in book form, which is what Clute/Nicholls and other encyclopedias do. At the time, we didn't want to create
    478 KB (79,808 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
  • ...] and [http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?863882 here by Ron Goulart]. Clute and Nicholls imply they're different versions, although I'm not so sure as
    573 KB (97,958 words) - 17:23, 17 December 2015