Search results

...y with the consensus gained on the ISFDB Wiki on the resolution of various bibliographic debates. * '''Bibliographic experience'''. A moderator should know the basics of bibliography. This i

::Having just read Ahasuerus's comments about serial display on the [[Bibliographic Rules]] page, I tend to agree that serial display within Long Works is not

...graphic sources should certainly be recorded here; this will be useful for bibliographic researchers and, more importantly for the ISFDB, is information a moderator Bibliographic comments for {{p|JCKOEG1952}}.

...roject then from the ISFDB publication record click on the ''Bibliographic Comments'' link. This will take you to a Publication: article in the wiki. Edit the

*'''Bibliographic Comments''' :* When the title is displayed in a non-specific bibliographic section (for instance, a collection that appears in the ''Series'' section

...raphic Comments: Publication:THMSNCHNTD2000" with another option "Artistic Comments: Publication:THMSNCHNTD2000". The COVERART titles are frankly polluting our ::::I see your point, but I fear that people would misunderstand "artistic comments" to mean reviews & discussions, and even if we found a better name, bepole

* Added full linewrap for bibliographic data on the summary page, so awards don't spill off the right margin. * Initial comments indicated a desire to show award nominations as well as award wins on the a

...rcing page protections on many wiki pages and moderation on blog comments. Bibliographic data tends to be far more objective than encyclopedia articles, but detaile ...ents section of this blog, and set the comment policy to moderated. So any comments made here won't show up instantaniously. Additionally, I cleaned the porn o

:Well, www.sigla.ru is already present in the list of [[Sources of Bibliographic Information]] and it searches 1,600 online catalogs simultaneously, includi ==Bibliographic Category Definitions==

===Bibliographic Support Features=== ...tated in the publication rather than adding "(pub title)" manually and the bibliographic displays would be more informational. Related to this would be to have a l

...ning. I've been thinking about the verification issue, and verification of bibliographic data falls into two distinct camps: objective and subjective. Objective dat ==Bibliographic Category Definitions==

...to keep in mind is that we are following an old (and arguably unfortunate) bibliographic convention that demands that we use the date of the first '''book''' public ...agazines Américains" is stunning! I don't read much French though, so some comments on whether they have bibliographically useful material or just great presen

...ontent is constantly changing and expanding, books are rarely removed from bibliographic sections. ...the idea was based on the [https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ MARC-21 bibliographic format], which is used by most major libraries. The standard includes a [ht

...lso capitalized except for'''... Wording it this way closes that loophole. Comments? [[User:Syzygy|Syzygy]] 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Comments? [[User:Syzygy|Syzygy]] 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

...meaning of Primary Verification to reflect that, and add another entry in "Bibliographic References" for "Primary, INCLUDING all Artwork checks". However there shou ...tor Nomination?|"lapidary" and "laconic"]]. Might be worth rereading those comments. Might not be worthwhile. That BLongley bloke talks too much at times. Happ

...(if I'm understanding him correctly): that interstitial editorial material/comments/responses are neither recorded as content, nor are they credited; that the ...publication" date of the e-ARC. Except for the dates of some of the reader comments you wouldn't know when this became available for sale. And the submission g

::::We have author photos, and scans of miscellaneous bibliographic data (copyright pages, etc.) as well. ...d be in the notes or not included at all. Please stop reading more into my comments than is there. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</fon

::: Other comments: it doesn't have to be the Comic Book database, that was just my first thou ...t where the original meaning of the post has disappeared. As for your last comments, Dana, the problem is that for any particular issue there may be only 4 or

Do I correctly understand from the comments of Mhhutchins above that if John Benson changed his site to make a "downloa ...sider text that has been posted to the web as being "unpublished". Frankly comments like the above tempt me to find and delete all our vanity publications. How

:::::::::::::: Well, all of the comments following Annie's proposal (which is, by the way, in perfect consensus with : Reading through all the comments, there's something that I still don't understand; why would a novel that ha

:I agree with most but not all of the comments in the discussion above. Specifically I think that: ...nd with a tweak to the code we can also decode/display the storylen on the bibliographic display. The publication length in pages is already displayed. --[[User:Mar

...about how to handle prologues and epilogues. If you have any thoughts or comments that you'd like to add, please check it out. [[User:Mhhutchins|Mhhutchins]] ...age numbers may help in that matter. I don't believe I have seen any other bibliographic data elsewhere that attempts to document the unpaginated pages.--[[User:Swf

...nadian market. ARCs are, to me, interesting collectible items, but have no bibliographic value as separate "editions". The only reason I'd question this approach is ...al discussion on this issue. To simplify things, i am copying here several comments originally posted on [[User talk:Kpulliam]]. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>

::And yes, we need a free text field for Author level bibliographic notes, e.g. "Not to be confused with the other 3 David Alexanders". Unfortu ...have a separate field in the MARC21 standard for [http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd110.html "Corporate Names"]. We have a somewhat similar issue with (a) ma

...ile our data entry standards haven't. It's not an uncommon scenario in the bibliographic field: we have repeatedly changed our data entry standards and the software :::::::There is a point of no return on all of this. Are we a bibliographic website or just another Index??? Once a decision is made to just STANDARDIZ

...ough the chaff for wheat is possible but not friendly. Especially when the comments are vague and I end up going back through the XML to see what was really ch ...ources_of_Bibliographic_Information#Individual_Library_catalogs Sources of Bibliographic Information] no longer functions and has been superseded. I've noted it as

:::::::I believe I have seen other similar comments. Whether it is the quantity difference or something else, you would have to ...y with the consensus gained on the ISFDB Wiki on the resolution of various bibliographic debates.' --[[User:Willem H.|Willem]] 16:23, 9 November 2019 (EST)

...In addition, even if they can't be verified, they let us capture whatever bibliographic data we have about the title's appearance. ...audience" codes that Darrah mentioned earlier are [http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd008b.html as follows]:

...note system and link into the current wiki as is done for author bios and bibliographic notes. I realize that means more clicking to see the note or some way to in :::Yes, please ask. But if you read my comments again, you'll see "''if we're positive that LeFanu was the editor, and we d

...rs' pages for the author, etc -- enter the one with the most comprehensive bibliographic and biographical data. If the author is deceased and has no official or aut **Biographic and bibliographic pages from online encyclopedias