User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 02:05, 3 November 2016 diff hist +17 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:55, 3 November 2016 diff hist +9 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:49, 3 November 2016 diff hist +4 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:41, 3 November 2016 diff hist +5 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:35, 3 November 2016 diff hist +76 m Rules and standards discussions
- 01:17, 3 November 2016 diff hist +1 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:13, 3 November 2016 diff hist +1 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 01:10, 3 November 2016 diff hist +62 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 00:54, 3 November 2016 diff hist +20 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 00:47, 3 November 2016 diff hist +7 m Rules and standards discussions Indentation, syntax
- 00:41, 3 November 2016 diff hist +15 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 23:15, 2 November 2016 diff hist +23 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 23:07, 2 November 2016 diff hist +23 m Rules and standards discussions Invisible comments to editors (<!-- -->) appear only while editing the page.
- 22:32, 2 November 2016 diff hist +2 m Rules and standards discussions →Essay in non-genre book
- 22:30, 2 November 2016 diff hist +1 m Rules and standards discussions →Essay in non-genre book
- 22:24, 2 November 2016 diff hist +8 m Rules and standards discussions Typo, syntax/clarity, punctuation
- 22:03, 2 November 2016 diff hist +25 m Rules and standards discussions Typos, easy to find signature
- 21:33, 2 November 2016 diff hist +1 Rules and standards discussions →Tami Hoag
- 21:31, 2 November 2016 diff hist +1 m Rules and standards discussions →Pseudonym direction
- 21:30, 2 November 2016 diff hist 0 m Rules and standards discussions Typo
- 21:26, 2 November 2016 diff hist +7 m Rules and standards discussions Punctuation, indentation
- 21:19, 2 November 2016 diff hist +9 m Rules and standards discussions Typo
- 21:06, 2 November 2016 diff hist +8 m Rules and standards discussions Superscripting made for odd linebreaking; Typos fixed
- 19:23, 2 November 2016 diff hist +3 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE "best practices?"
- 19:05, 2 November 2016 diff hist +2 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 00:33, 2 November 2016 diff hist +1,722 Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 22:36, 1 November 2016 diff hist +113 Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 22:20, 1 November 2016 diff hist +1,329 Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 19:41, 1 November 2016 diff hist -1 m User talk:JLaTondre →Cover arttist found
- 19:38, 1 November 2016 diff hist 0 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 19:29, 1 November 2016 diff hist +96 User talk:JLaTondre →Oops!: new section
- 19:11, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 19:06, 1 November 2016 diff hist +5 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 19:00, 1 November 2016 diff hist +1 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 17:50, 1 November 2016 diff hist +61 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 17:48, 1 November 2016 diff hist +1,195 Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 09:58, 1 November 2016 diff hist +60 m Rules and standards discussions →How is this justified without flagrantly disregarding our own guidelines?
- 09:54, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2,709 Rules and standards discussions →How is this justified without flagrantly disregarding our own guidelines?
- 08:27, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2 m Rules and standards discussions →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 08:18, 1 November 2016 diff hist +3 User talk:Chrisgherr Undo revision 446858 by Hauck (Talk)
- 07:36, 1 November 2016 diff hist +14 N User:Chrisgherr New page: Hi ... it's I!
- 07:32, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2,047 Rules and standards discussions →Disappointed!: new section
- 07:14, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2 User talk:Hauck/Archive16 →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 07:08, 1 November 2016 diff hist +3 m User talk:Hauck/Archive16 →Why must we IGNORE best practices?
- 07:06, 1 November 2016 diff hist +1,993 m User talk:Chrisgherr →Disappointed!: new section
- 06:53, 1 November 2016 diff hist +2,030 User talk:Hauck/Archive16 →Disappointed!: new section
- 19:33, 31 October 2016 diff hist +217 N File:STNDNGSTRS2012.jpg {{CID1 |Title=Astounding Stories of Super-Science, January 1930 |Edition=Project Gutenberg 2012 ebook |Pub=STNDNGSTRS2012 |Publisher=Project Gutenberg |Artist=H. W. Wessolowski |Source=Scanned by User:Chrisgherr}} current
- 17:25, 31 October 2016 diff hist +28 User talk:Chrisgherr →Your submission to unmerge ...
- 17:10, 31 October 2016 diff hist +24 User talk:Chrisgherr →Your submission to unmerge ...
- 17:08, 31 October 2016 diff hist +236 User talk:Chrisgherr →Your submission to unmerge ...
