Difference between revisions of "R&S Example page"
DESiegel60 (talk | contribs) (→Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn: description) |
m (→Current: Active Discussions: Sp) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Current: Active Discussions== | ==Current: Active Discussions== | ||
| − | This section is for up to three active discussions. Include <nowiki>'''Seeking Closure'''</nowiki> if | + | This section is for up to three active discussions. Include <nowiki>'''Seeking Closure'''</nowiki> if someone has suggested that the discussion be closed and is asking for agreement or objections. Include <nowiki>'''Poll'''</nowiki> if a poll is in progress. |
* [[R&S Example page/Date formats including Day of the Month|Date formats including Day of the Month]] Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized. | * [[R&S Example page/Date formats including Day of the Month|Date formats including Day of the Month]] Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized. | ||
| − | * [[R&S Example page/Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines|Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines ]] Should | + | * [[R&S Example page/Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines|Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines ]] Should these works be included? Should the ROA be changed? |
* [[R&S Example page/Gurps Infinite Worlds|Gurps Infinite Worlds]] Should this and related works be IN or OUT? | * [[R&S Example page/Gurps Infinite Worlds|Gurps Infinite Worlds]] Should this and related works be IN or OUT? | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 20 August 2009
| This page is a work in progress, and has not yet obtained a solid consensus. It was first created (or significantly revised) on {{{date}}}. Do not take the information on this page as firmly established ISFDB policy or guidelines. Feel free to discuss any issues with the content on this page on its talk page. If in doubt, before accepting the guidelines on this page, feel free to discuss the matter elsewhere, perhaps on the Community Portal.
This notice will be removed when the page obtains a reasonable consensus on its contents. |
|---|
Add new discussions to Pending See instructions in that section.
Current: Active Discussions
This section is for up to three active discussions. Include '''Seeking Closure''' if someone has suggested that the discussion be closed and is asking for agreement or objections. Include '''Poll''' if a poll is in progress.
- Date formats including Day of the Month Whether and how date formats for magazine issue titles that include a day as well as a month and year should be standardized.
- Inclusion of Non-genre works reviewed by Genre Magazines Should these works be included? Should the ROA be changed?
- Gurps Infinite Worlds Should this and related works be IN or OUT?
On Hold: Open but Inactive Discussions
This section is for discussions that have been suspended without closure, but may (and probably will) be reopened later in an effort to achieve closure.
- Ebook inclusion standards What makes an ebook, as opposed to a webzine, IN?
- Serials in Chapterbooks Is this example a good model to follow?
- Spaces in Author names Is "DeWitt" vs. "De Witt" worth a variant, or should we normalize such names, or only some such names?
- Use canonical artist name for uploaded images? Should we use canonical names in wiki credits, or names "as stated"?
Action needed: Discussions Closed but not Implemented
This section is for discussions where closure/agreement has been reached, but the help needs to be updated or other implementation is needed.
- ISSNs suggested on verified magazine records? Do ISSNs belong in magizine issue db records?
- Editors and "scientific editors" When is an editor not an editor? What level of credit makes a co-editor in our recors, and what level should be for notes only?
- Italics in a title? Should we use HTML in title fields?
Recent: Discussions closed but not yet Archieved
- OCLC as a verification source Add OCLC to the list of secondary verification sopurces?
- Request to delete Graham Greene Shoule the works of Graham Greene be deleted?
- Initials normalization Should we standardize on Inital, Period, space, no matter what was in the pub?
Pending: Discussions Waiting for a Turn
This section is for discussions that have been put forward but not yet become active. They will wait for a slot in Current.
To add a new discussion, add "[[R&S Example page/<Discussion Title>|<Discussion Title>]]" to the list below. Add a 1-3 sentance description of the issue. Save the page. Follow the link to create the new subpage, and enter the inital statement of the issue on that page.
- Verification cycle Should notes on secondary sources be deleted on primary verification? Should they be added later?
- Magazine Editors Executive editors and other "editors": which should be co-editors in magazine issue db records?