Difference between revisions of "ISFDB talk:Proposed Design Changes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New fields: first printing date) |
m (fmt) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == New fields: first printing date == | ||
From a discussion [[User_talk:Roglo#The_Years_of_Rice_and_Salt|here]]: ''Hopefully, Some day we will be able to enter the first printing date and printing # into ISFDB. At that point the 0000-00-00 for the printing date will become less onerous as the display code will be able to sort by the first printing date and printing # if the printing date is not available.'' Both 'first printing' and 'this printing' dates should be available. --[[User:Roglo|Roglo]] 11:40, 29 Jan 2008 (CST) | From a discussion [[User_talk:Roglo#The_Years_of_Rice_and_Salt|here]]: ''Hopefully, Some day we will be able to enter the first printing date and printing # into ISFDB. At that point the 0000-00-00 for the printing date will become less onerous as the display code will be able to sort by the first printing date and printing # if the printing date is not available.'' Both 'first printing' and 'this printing' dates should be available. --[[User:Roglo|Roglo]] 11:40, 29 Jan 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 29 January 2008
New fields: first printing date
From a discussion here: Hopefully, Some day we will be able to enter the first printing date and printing # into ISFDB. At that point the 0000-00-00 for the printing date will become less onerous as the display code will be able to sort by the first printing date and printing # if the printing date is not available. Both 'first printing' and 'this printing' dates should be available. --Roglo 11:40, 29 Jan 2008 (CST)