Difference between revisions of "ISFDB talk:Data Entropy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Does anyone read this anyway?) |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Generally positive news, but the lack of updates on the price category makes me wonder if that's of use. Some good Publisher regularization recently makes me think we need another measure, but that can't be as absolute as the other measures - we don't want "one publisher to rule them all", we just want to reach the right level of accurately recording imprint and publishers without over-duplication. Other suggestions for (definable) measures are welcome though. [[User:BLongley|BLongley]] 21:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC) | Generally positive news, but the lack of updates on the price category makes me wonder if that's of use. Some good Publisher regularization recently makes me think we need another measure, but that can't be as absolute as the other measures - we don't want "one publisher to rule them all", we just want to reach the right level of accurately recording imprint and publishers without over-duplication. Other suggestions for (definable) measures are welcome though. [[User:BLongley|BLongley]] 21:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Yep! [[User:Hall3730|rbh (Bob)]] 01:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:37, 10 July 2008
Generally positive news, but the lack of updates on the price category makes me wonder if that's of use. Some good Publisher regularization recently makes me think we need another measure, but that can't be as absolute as the other measures - we don't want "one publisher to rule them all", we just want to reach the right level of accurately recording imprint and publishers without over-duplication. Other suggestions for (definable) measures are welcome though. BLongley 21:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yep! rbh (Bob) 01:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)