Search results

• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive07
  ...be potentially destructive. Of course, we will need to implement Pseudonym deletion first. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 00:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC) ...rticular discussion. This would be a little like Wikipedia does with their deletion discussions, splitting each to a separate sub page. I can set up the protot
  208 KB (35,083 words) - 17:26, 17 December 2015
• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive09
  ...time to research them. Most of the other novels are obvious candidates for deletion. The longer works are there because they were added by ISFDB robots. The sh :::::: Careful deletion is fine by me. We'll need to do {{A|G. K. Chesterton}} and {{A|Robert Louis
  267 KB (43,901 words) - 17:27, 17 December 2015
• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive06
  ::::It looks like the "least bad solution" is to decide that the addition/deletion of punctuation merits a separate variant title, but differences in the type ...''We''' don't do webzines. If some'''one''' will deal with them, let them. Deletion is a major pain here, and should be reserved for RPGs, Comics, etc. Deletin
  621 KB (105,414 words) - 17:25, 17 December 2015
• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive02
  [[User:Lorenzr|Lorenzr]] just submitted a deletion of a {{t|27617|Star Trek calendar}}. Any comments? I think it should prob
  124 KB (21,154 words) - 17:19, 17 December 2015
• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive11
  .... If you feel comfortable doing so, I would invite you to suggest some for deletion. Adding books is important to our efforts; but deleting books that don't be
  191 KB (31,181 words) - 17:28, 17 December 2015
• Rules and standards discussions/Archive/Archive16
  ...prohibited, I'll stop doing this. If it is not, what is our policy on the deletion of allowed data that an editor does not like? If editors should not be del
  376 KB (62,546 words) - 20:32, 27 June 2019

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)