Talk:Creative Commons License

Version

This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license".

Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I figured. Hardly Urgent, just came on this and noticed. The differences between 2.0, and 3.0 only matter to lawyers anyway, i think. -DES ^Talk 20:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

TAMU

The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "isfdb.tamu.edu/wiki". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -DES ^Talk 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Yup, just a leftover from a bygone era :) Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright

Since you can't release something under a Creative Commons license, there should probably be a copyright notice on this page, crediting Al with the general compilation copyright, and the various contributors with individual copyrights on their contributions. Again, this isn't urgent. -DES ^Talk 20:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)