Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creative Commons License"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Some answers) |
DESiegel60 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | :Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. [[User:Ahasuerus|Ahasuerus]] 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I figured. Hardly Urgent, just came on this and noticed. The differences between 2.0, and 3.0 only matter to lawyers anyway, i think. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
== TAMU == | == TAMU == | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 30 July 2009
Version
This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license".
- Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
TAMU
The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "isfdb.tamu.edu/wiki". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -DES Talk 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, just a leftover from a bygone era :) Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)