Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creative Commons License"

From ISFDB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Version== This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose eithe...)
 
(→‎TAMU: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Version==
 
==Version==
 
This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license ".
 
This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license ".
 +
 +
== TAMU ==
 +
 +
The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "isfdb.tamu.edu/wiki". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:21, 30 July 2009

Version

This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license ".

TAMU

The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "isfdb.tamu.edu/wiki". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -DES Talk 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)