Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creative Commons License"
DESiegel60 (talk | contribs) (→Copyright: new section) |
DESiegel60 (talk | contribs) m (→Copyright) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Copyright == | == Copyright == | ||
− | Since you can't release something under a Creative Commons license, there should probably be a copyright notice on this page, crediting Al with the general compilation copyright, and the various contributors with individual copyrights on their contributions. Again, this isn't urgent. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 20:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | + | Since you can't release something under a Creative Commons license unless you hold the copyright, there should probably be a copyright notice on this page, crediting Al with the general compilation copyright, and the various contributors with individual copyrights on their contributions. Again, this isn't urgent. -[[User:DESiegel60|DES]] <sup>[[User talk:DESiegel60|Talk]]</sup> 20:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:42, 30 July 2009
Version
This page doesn't specify the version of Creative Commons Attribution license that we are providing, although it links to CC page for version 2.0. I suggest that we chose either "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0" or "Creative Commons Attribution, version 2.0", and add something like "The ISFDB may chose, in future, to re-license under a later version of the Creative Commons Attribution license".
- Sounds reasonable, but we probably need to ask Al. Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
TAMU
The page currently states that it covers pages in the domain "isfdb.tamu.edu/wiki". I think this is obsolete and should be removed. Am I missing something? -DES Talk 20:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, just a leftover from a bygone era :) Ahasuerus 20:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Copyright
Since you can't release something under a Creative Commons license unless you hold the copyright, there should probably be a copyright notice on this page, crediting Al with the general compilation copyright, and the various contributors with individual copyrights on their contributions. Again, this isn't urgent. -DES Talk 20:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)